Well, we know its an inverse pulse motor generator, I've narrowed down the stator core to these specifications give or take.


Starting with the stator core the innermost layer will be made of N.I.B. magnets (Neodymium, Iron, Boron) this is where the engine begins and finishes its conductivity process.

The second layer is comprised of electronically charged Teflon, I would assume that 400kv of electricity or greater would be enough to sufficiently charge it. This will act as an electrical amp to the outermost layers.

The third layer is common Iron/Ferrite, I'm particularly interested in the isotope Fe-56 due to its stability & magnetic conductivity, this will be my first candidate for the prototype.

The outermost layer is copper to protect the inner layers of the stator, and thanks to its known electrical conductivity.


Now I know quite a few of you consider this machine a lost cause, but stick with me a little longer here.


Omni-polarized rotors allow for frictionless orbit around the stator, at the same time repelling from the other rotors in magnetic equilibrium. This allows for a rotor to exert force upon another roller, and with enough energy will continue until a state of perpetual motion, over-unity and eventually propulsion.

Once the initial charge of energy has started the rotors, moving in excess of 200 RPM it can continue to maintain the speed its at if voltage controlled, if not, it will continue to accelerate.

If the Russian studies are accurate, it generates zero point electricity until it reaches 550 RPM where it begins to manipulate the quantum magnetic field of space and lifts itself, making some fun flight capabilities.

I had thought that voltage controlled actuators could be placed around the final rotary segment if not but to only accelerate the engine in the counter-clockwise direction. reduction of RPM is complicated due to de-synchronization of the rotors this could have fatal/costly consequences if not built properly.

a simple braking system is not viable due to rotary malfunction, although one possibility involves angled pulse actuators facing the opposite direction of momentum, these would be intended to draw energy from the magnetic zero-point in the center of the engine and pulse against the momentum of the rotors to reduce RPM for more stable control.

Now again, back to the Russians, if studies are right then a copper coiled spike in the center of the central stator would harness the zero point energy into what I believe would be direct current (DC) energy. You would only require a machine to convert the input of electricity to your regions standard.

Also, the S.E.G. is a perfect example of Einsteins' equation of E=Mc2, this is because the amount of zero point energy obtained is equivalent to the rotary mass multiplied by the circumference of the engine, squared.

The only issue I see in active development and use of the S.E.G. is the cost of materials.

Please give me your input, I'm here to collaborate.


*edit* as a side note, if it operates without friction and continues to draw energy, that would violate the laws of thermodynamics, and change the face of "science" as we know it.

< snip <

Also, the S.E.G. is a perfect example of Einsteins' equation of E=Mc2, this is because the amount of zero point energy obtained is equivalent to the rotary mass multiplied by the circumference of the engine, squared.
<snip <

Sounds interesting but you lost me on this.  However when I got to the E=MC2 part you have stated I've got to ask if you are saying C=circumference or what.  E=MC2 was Energy = mass x speed of light squared so I don't see how this applies to what you are talking about.  I think many believe that formula is no longer correct anyway but just don't see how it fits in with what you are describing.   
    Are you talking about Searl's concepts here?