Tinsel you’re a clever guy, you are the man who could help them, (the people who cant get it to work that is) and yet they scorn an harass you instead of asking for your help. It’s really disgusting the lengths some will go to protect a huge organisation.

Tinsel
Just got back from a road trip and noticed this

If there is anything we can do to help .

Just ask.

would be a privilege to assist you.
Chet

TK:

This is terrible! There is no way she is going to sue you because she would have to come to the jurisdiction in which the alleged "violation" took place.  This means she would have to come back to the US where the U.S. Marshalls probably have some paperwork for her as well as a place to stay for a number of years.  (I am not an attorney nor do I give legal advice and nothing I type here, or anywhere, is to be construed as legal advice of any kind)

If preventing fraud is not fair use then, I suppose I don't know what is.  There are a lot of us that will help you in any way we can.  If contacting Youtube would help, let me know.

Bill

The one video of less than one minute length has been taken down. For six months, I lose the ability to upload videos longer than 15 minutes, I lose the ability to dispute content claims, I lose the ability to use custom thumbnails, to make my videos private or unlisted, and some others.

Yup, "Guilty Till Proven Innocent". 
"All a tyranny needs to prosper is for good men to say nothing."

Incidentally, this is one of the reasons why I don't have a YouTube account.

I mourn with you, the extortion of your private details ...now Google, NSA and the USgov has it, too. They might sell it to other corporations later. ...and the Moroccans can rob your lab now 

TK,

As you know, I have been going against Naima Feagin and Dijon Roos for a few months now.

I have stopped reporting this here because of kickback I got from Ramset and Tinman.
Despite trying to show FTW in a negative light with REAL reports from replicators, it was me
that got the run around and threats.


Anyhoo,

I was unsuccessful at persuading the Canadian lady to cease funding them (to the tune of $120,000),
but was 100% successful at stopping them from using crowdfunding websites.

They are MOSTLY uanaware of my involvement (possibly since I am an IT guy).


I have various (lots of) evidences saved on my hard drive,
including the infamous interview with Sterling.

If there is anything you need, please reach out.

I am willing to be used as any sort of reference you may need against this.

Pete

Pete [PIH123]
Please don't rewrite history or your intent here !
Your anonymous 3rd degree public interrogation /abuse of member Gotoluc by his full name   in a  dedicated thread using  his name  [since removed] was exactly what got you poked in the chest , your ignorant assumptions and innuendos regarding Luc in this matter were appalling to say the least.

and now you paint once again with the broad brush of ignorance and arrogance involving members here [myself now and Brad [Tinman] in some  fantasy of yours regarding these people and what exactly ??

what are you alleging NOW regarding myself.. Brad [TinMan] and these people ??

If you are going to start make-believe court cases here and taking public depositions from members regarding their involvement in these Scams by Proxy or ignorance [calling Luc and others here a Coward ??] , and you yourself are completely ignorant of what even transpired ...??

the PM function works just fine here ,a ten second PM to Luc would have sufficed .

Now you try to Paint a Turd with a Golden Brush  and in doing so are attaching {YET AGAIN} persons here  "by name" to this 
 QEG ..nonsense.

??
your willingness to make all manner of public assumptions and innuendos here about OU.com  members and their involvement in
This  QEG Fiasco  ... on a complete whim ....is most disturbing to say the least !

Your half measured anonymous attempts to save some Lady from the wolves would probably have been better served by putting on your Big Boy Boots and playing hardball with these fleecing Moroccan's .

but first you should get your facts straight Bud !!

 
Chet K

The problem with YouTube is
they, themselves, pretend to be a "copyright" authority.
once posted on youtube, a video is considered to be copyrighted by the terms of service agreement.
So, to even copy one youtube video and repost it on youtube, is a violation of their copyright protection rules.

Now, since YouTube does not actually file a piece of paper with each video, to the U.S.P.T.O.
None of this holds up in the court of law.

It does, however, hold up within their system, and if you value access and usage of your YouTube Account,
you should refrain from violating their imaginary copyright rules, within their server.

If you cannot refrain from doing so, I would recommend creating a secondary YouTube account, from which to post questionable material. That way if something "happens", you don't lose access to your primary account.

In most cases, using a second account within a server, is "malicious", or "deviant", but in this case, the owners of the server
brought this situation to themselves, by failure to investigate copyright claims, and siding with the complainant, ad verum.

S
o, when it comes to YouTube, I personally have no quarrels with anyone owning several YT accts, to accomplish their goals.