Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Generator by Gerard Morin  (Read 148145 times)

tinman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5365
Re: Generator by Gerard Morin
« Reply #180 on: April 25, 2016, 03:25:11 PM »
Yes, I did. Where is the extended self looping?

Indeed ;)

Teslatic may not know the difference between surface charge and deep charge in a battery :D

Remove the circuit,and run the two lights straight from the two batteries hooked in parallel.
I bet the battery voltage dose the exact same thing--drains the surface charge of,then settles on a voltage that remains quite steady for some time driving those lights.


Brad

Meta

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 218
Re: Generator by Gerard Morin
« Reply #181 on: April 25, 2016, 07:16:39 PM »
"And the "measurers" will scream....we cant measure it so it cant be real!!!!"
There are no DEMONSTRATIONS to show that it is real, only videos.

See? Here we have a measurer, already, screaming.

Well Sir, theres coming, a time when your instruments will not measure what is going on.
What will you scream then?

memoryman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 758
Re: Generator by Gerard Morin
« Reply #182 on: April 25, 2016, 07:32:28 PM »
There was no screaming. You can get medical help for your hallucinations.
If you can't measure it or even observe it, how can you know that it exists (outside your imagination)?

Meta

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 218
Re: Generator by Gerard Morin
« Reply #183 on: April 26, 2016, 07:17:21 PM »
There was no screaming. You can get medical help for your hallucinations.
If you can't measure it or even observe it, how can you know that it exists (outside your imagination)?

 Albert Einstein > Quotes >

  “Imagination is more important than knowledge. For knowledge is limited to all we now know and understand, while imagination embraces the entire world, and all there ever will be to know and understand.”

Now, memoryman, use your memory and re.member what I told you previously about the 2 sided universe. I said DNA is dual, the I Ching is dual, the Mayan Calendar is dual, your brain is dual and reality, the Mind, has a daul partner, the Actuality: Matter, and the seen has an unseen half. Many overunity machines are dual halves of each other. I told you 3 + 4th dimensions need a dual 5th, 6th, 7th and 8th. You didnt pay attention. You are an expert in Matter and Physics measurements using your one sense, rationality and logic and I am expert in Metaphysics using my Intuition or Imagination. Actually I use both rationality and intuition but you say

"If you can't measure it or even observe it, how can you know that it exists (outside your imagination)?"

I know by all that Ive studied about 2...and I used my imagination to image the universe...thats how. Since you only use 1/2 of your brain, never considering imagination or intuition, I would say you are a half-wit. I suggest you argue with Einstein.

By the way, Einstein was a half-wit also. He said matter twists, warps and spindles space, when it is space, the superior force that twists, warps and spindles matter.

memoryman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 758
Re: Generator by Gerard Morin
« Reply #184 on: April 26, 2016, 07:47:39 PM »
Regardless of all that, can you DEMONSTRATE even ONE OU device?

Meta

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 218
Re: Generator by Gerard Morin
« Reply #185 on: April 27, 2016, 01:13:57 AM »
Regardless of all that, can you DEMONSTRATE even ONE OU device?

Define OU. I assume you are speaking about over unity.

Ive seen thousands of circuits, hundreds of perpetual motion machines, dozens of self running mechanisms and many, many claims with spurious evidence behnd it. I know that for something to be proof, fact or truth it must be attached to the only two absolutes that I know of, detailed elsewhere and nothing can be attached to them so all we know, speak and consider to be laws are relative, arbitrary, speculative opinion backed by will and weapon...but Ive never seen a over unity device, circuit or scheme that ran for a time.

marathonman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 860
Re: Generator by Gerard Morin
« Reply #186 on: April 27, 2016, 04:00:16 AM »
I hate to comet on something i haven't followed but..... Meta you are very correct Einstein was a half-wit Paid by JP Morgan as was Heaviside  and Lorenz to hide free energy proof. even changed school books...... look it up. FACT.

Our Universe is a perpetual Motion Machine that will keep spinning when we are long gone so for a scientist to say it is not should be beheaded in public. FACT.

Sorry for imposing.

memoryman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 758
Re: Generator by Gerard Morin
« Reply #187 on: April 27, 2016, 05:15:57 AM »
"Our Universe is a perpetual Motion Machine that will keep spinning when we are long gone" but not perpetually.
Einstein was brilliant, but not perfect.
Since you claim to know that the proof of free energy was hidden, if you know about that proof, it is no longer hidden, so you can show it.

TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13958
Re: Generator by Gerard Morin
« Reply #188 on: April 28, 2016, 05:52:11 AM »
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vHYHeDN0078


Well? 71 Amps? Discuss...   

Meta

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 218
Re: Generator by Gerard Morin
« Reply #189 on: April 28, 2016, 11:12:49 AM »
How can anything be discussed when you are describing the set up while you're creating maximum noise at full power. We heard nothing.

Meta

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 218
Re: Generator by Gerard Morin
« Reply #190 on: May 01, 2016, 10:42:31 PM »
Here's a new test you can chew on, if you love to measure things......

Gerard Motor PROOF of RF.mp4

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3jXJdA4Y7CU


We might get a variety of answers.....


"The test is too simple"
"The measurer is too simple"
"He's using the wrong equipment" (Please describe the right equipment and your own tests)
"Its setup wrong" (Please describe the right setup and your own tests)
"The RF wand is not calibrated properly" (Describe how you would know that)

Meta

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 218
Re: Generator by Gerard Morin
« Reply #191 on: May 01, 2016, 11:20:53 PM »
TK,

How can anything be discussed when you are describing the set up while you're creating maximum noise at full power. We heard nothing.

memoryman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 758
Re: Generator by Gerard Morin
« Reply #192 on: May 01, 2016, 11:25:09 PM »
There is no 'we' in "We heard nothing." just you.

citfta

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1050
Re: Generator by Gerard Morin
« Reply #193 on: May 02, 2016, 02:59:36 AM »
Here's a new test you can chew on, if you love to measure things......

Gerard Motor PROOF of RF.mp4

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3jXJdA4Y7CU


We might get a variety of answers.....


"The test is too simple"
"The measurer is too simple"
"He's using the wrong equipment" (Please describe the right equipment and your own tests)
"Its setup wrong" (Please describe the right setup and your own tests)
"The RF wand is not calibrated properly" (Describe how you would know that)

And what were we supposed to learn from that little video?  It has been known for over 100 years you can create RF by using a spark gap.  That is how the earliest radio transmitters worked.  Yawn.  Time to go back to sleep and wait for some real information.  By the way he didn't actually measure anything.  He just showed there was some RF on the wire and foil.

gyulasun

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4117
Re: Generator by Gerard Morin
« Reply #194 on: May 02, 2016, 11:43:25 AM »
How can anything be discussed when you are describing the set up while you're creating maximum noise at full power. We heard nothing.

The problem is not what you are hearing in a noisy background but what you can see...  Just watch from video time 6:10 to 6:20 ( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vHYHeDN0078 )  when he (rollindough) sets the range switch on the clamp-on meter from  AC voltage to AC Amper. 
When you wish to measure current with a clamp-on meter, one of the wires carrying the current should be placed into the jaws of the clamps, right?  See this picture I took from the video it shows the moment when he switches back from AC Amper to AC voltage after he read the 71.2 Amper:
you can clearly see there was no any wire between the clamps, the 71.2 Amper on the display was a bogus value. A clamp-on meter is designed to measure current in a wire  which is placed into the clamps by opening and closing the clamps.
By the way, which wire was supposed to carry the 71 Amper?  Any of his (rather thin) wires shown in his setup would have gone into smoke if current that high had indeed been a reality in that part of the circuit.

Gyula