Language: 
To browser these website, it's necessary to store cookies on your computer.
The cookies contain no personal information, they are required for program control.
  the storage of cookies while browsing this website, on Login and Register.

GDPR and DSGVO law

Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding.
Amazon Warehouse Deals ! Now even more Deep Discounts ! Check out these great prices on slightly used or just opened once only items.I always buy my gadgets via these great Warehouse deals ! Highly recommended ! Many thanks for supporting OverUnity.com this way.

User Menu

Tesla Paper

Free Energy Book

Get paid

Donations

Please Donate for the Forum.
Many thanks.
Regards, Stefan.(Admin)

A-Ads

Powerbox

Smartbox

3D Solar

3D Solar Panels

DC2DC converter

Micro JouleThief

FireMatch

FireMatch

CCKnife

CCKnife

CCTool

CCTool

Magpi Magazine

Magpi Magazine Free Rasberry Pi Magazine

Battery Recondition

Battery Recondition

Arduino

Ultracaps

YT Subscribe

Gravity Machines

Tesla-Ebook

Magnet Secrets

Lindemann Video

Navigation

Products

Products

WaterMotor kit

Statistics


  • *Total Posts: 521885
  • *Total Topics: 15550
  • *Online Today: 44
  • *Most Online: 103
(December 19, 2006, 11:27:19 PM)
  • *Users: 2
  • *Guests: 14
  • *Total: 16

Recent Posts

Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10
41
I have watched with amusement this thread and others that relate to it.  The inverse of resistance is conductance usually given the symbol G.  Thus 1/R1 = G1, a conductance.  And 1/R2 = G2, also a conductance.  Have them both in parallel and their conductances add, G = G1 + G2 = 1/R1 + 1/R2.  The equation R = 1/R1 + 1/R2 is dimensionally incorrect.

Added note.  Using conductance G as though it were a resistance value in a power calculation will give an incorrect answer.

Smudge






Lets pull the Tit on the Cow, Smudge, why and what's the right answer? You're going to say Skin Effect? Cancels Conduction? Cant wait to hear your explanation here!

1/RT = 1/R1 + 1/R2 = 1/70 + 1/70 = 1/0.02857142857142857142857142857143 = 35.00 and power is V2 / R = P = 25V2 / 35.00 = 17.85714 Watts

Best wishes, stay safe and well in these Dire Times,
   Chris Sykes

P.S: I have watched your NMR thread with amusement and others that relate to it.
42
mechanic / Re: Ultrasonic / mechanical cavitation used to transmute matter
« Last post by ChileanOne on September 23, 2020, 10:36:57 PM »
Before start with the mockery and the name calling, please at least have the courtesy of reading the papers, where all the technologies and the laboratories that performed the analysis on the solid obtained from mercury are listed extensively, and also all elements known or found to be part of the experimental setup and instruments were discarded as potential results of transmutation. The first and last papers are freely available online, the other Can be retrieved using a very known page, but I got a copy by asking for it to the researchers through ResearchGate.


 The video is just a quick demonstrative exercise, nothing more, nothing less, and you are “cherry picking” it for making a mockery of this serious and interesting research.


There is also a recent exposition of the whole line of Research that was presented in a small event held in Asissi, Italy by GianLuca Cherubini, where he discusses the whole line of research since it’s origins to the more current results. It’s in Italian but it can be watched with auto subtitles.


https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=G2IL4vvhjfk

43
mechanic / Re: Ultrasonic / mechanical cavitation used to transmute matter
« Last post by stivep on September 23, 2020, 10:11:28 PM »
RESPONSE#2



Equipment needed to  provide  full proof of experiment  made by Fabio Carzone
1. EDXRF picture #1
link1.  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CQ3gPFfgDp8

link2. https://youtu.be/k2PJVIkyW5Y   
all of the equipment shown here  can be applied to  measurement of  radiation, especially  Neutron and Gamma.
link3.  https://youtu.be/GdlkeI0bXy4?t=211
Video presents ORTEC  Detective EX ( many of them)
the new one cost around $93 000
And software  Gammavision32 ~$4000
However there are  inexpensive devices giving you similar results for ~1000 dollars
Video starts not from the beginning - you can rewind it


 
Wesley
44
mechanic / Re: Ultrasonic / mechanical cavitation used to transmute matter
« Last post by ramset on September 23, 2020, 08:31:18 PM »
Wesley Thank you for commenting and Hunter mention [My Mom went to school there for short time till life changed plans and geography] :)
Will be a few days till things get sorted,
respectfully Chet

45
What are the humans who say they are developing something new from an old technology that was researched decades ago?⛔

⛲ ⛳ ⛴ ⛵ ⛶ ⛷ ⛸ ⛹ ⛺ ⛻ ⛼ ⛽ ⛾ ⛿ ✀ ✁ ✂ ✃ ✄ ✅ ✆ ✇ ✈ ✉ ✊ ✋ ✌ ✍

⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡
⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡
⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡
⚡⚡⚡⚡
⚡⚡⚡
⚡⚡
46
mechanic / Re: Ultrasonic / mechanical cavitation used to transmute matter
« Last post by stivep on September 23, 2020, 07:03:33 PM »
RESPONSE#1


read this first and than go here to the video:
https://overunity.com/18632/ultrasonic-mechanical-cavitation-used-to-transmute-matter/msg550943/#msg550943


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xQ-_T1nWqP0

In regards to opinion of  Dr Roy I must say that mentioned video from above 
is done in the  environment  similar to 19 century   alchemy lab.
- there is lack of analysis  by means of 
-EDXRF   
-Electron microscope
- chromatography
-  HPGE  with Ortec/ Canberra software to  assign energies into  its byproducts  if Beta, Gamma/ Alpha is active after  transmutation.
 Ironically  truthful and shockingly obvious is the fact that all of these Italian chemists,  nuclear scientists, engineers
didn't have access  to the listed by me  equipment in their Italian Universities
and I have all of it in my lab..also  the  place the  examination was provided  looks like church  room, or
old Harvard storage room and not like  fully prepared  experimental facility.,
The weight  measured  was  using  scale that was tragically inaccurate.   I can buy similar one  in supply store for American elementary school.

Note: yes I don't have chromatography  analyses at present time  but that is like go around the corner to the  Hunter College and ask
a professor for help.

Wesley
47
Some have played with this [sooo many topics over the years]
I will search a bit...just a note : Cavitation Topic is under construction.hopefully some insight from LENR [Dr.Jones "Physics Prof" here at forum] community will help guide best path forward?and provide access to sample testing  .....??

also Sad to see Otto above....a very good man !!
I agree many good things need a closer look ..
with Gratitude
Chet K
Thanks!, I think that all these technologies are related, and expressions of the same underlying phenomena. What saddens me is that the obtuse disbelief stopped this from being put to good use. Doing this kind of things on a DYI basis is complex, out of reach for most people, and thus those who had the intention but were stopped to develop this at industrial level never had the chance to make it available for everyone.

Let me know when the Cavitation Topic is ready to start taking part.
Thanks!
48
mechanic / Re: Ultrasonic / mechanical cavitation used to transmute matter
« Last post by stivep on September 23, 2020, 06:44:29 PM »
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s42452-019-1391-6
if ultrasound creates  transmutation  of matter than what happened to energy released from that transmutation?
______________________
additional materialhttps://www.worldscientific.com/doi/abs/10.1142/S0217979217501685
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xQ-_T1nWqP0
https://iscmns.org/2018/11/jcmnsv27/




Opinion of my friend
Dr Roy.
Theoretically,
I guess the generic answer would be :
that if and when all the mass, binding forces, and other mass-energy components of the interaction
were added up, mass-energy would be conserved.
-, mass-energy conservation is, at best, a local 'law' that breaks down when you consider
that the volume of the Universe changes over time - a Universal mass-energy conservation
law would require a steady state Universe, which is not where you or I am living in.
Piezonuclear Decay or Piezonuclear Fusion is a very dubious theory, as far as I am aware, it remains unproven.
One of the authors that you cited,   Wesley, - Fabio Cardone (along with his colleague Alberto Carpinteri)
have caused the resignation of Italian politicians, when they had planned to elevate them to positions
of importance (after all the dust settled, no one was elevated anywhere,
and they went back to their school and continued their unproven research).
Piezonuclear decay reads like Cold Fusion, with an Italian accent.
The claims that his laboratory findings
"could appear as a confirmation of the DST theoretical hypothesis" seems rather absurd, since
DST is also a rather abstract unproven theory, based upon a non-Einstein variant of General Relativity
that would suggest that some frames of reference are better than others, which sounds like it trashes
General Relativity as most physicists understand it.
It sounds as though Fabio is 'cherry picking' his data, since he mentions
in his article that his results are very sensitive to location and orientation of his experiment
- my guess is that he has a LOT of data points that fail to show any Piezonuclear decay,
so he just 'doesn't waste his time on those results'.
I don't know him, but I guess that he is some crackpot that got tenure in a department of
Chemistry and fell down a rabbit hole. People publish all manner of nonsense
these days just to keep the journals full of stuff.

Wesley's opinion:
I must agree with Dr Roy.
Wesley
49
Magnegas, Aquafuel, Bingofuel systems / Re: Ron Cole shows great MagneGas production setup
« Last post by ramset on September 23, 2020, 06:24:02 PM »
Some have played with this [sooo many topics over the years]
I will search a bit...just a note : Cavitation Topic is under construction.hopefully some insight from LENR [Dr.Jones "Physics Prof" here at forum] community will help guide best path forward?and provide access to sample testing  .....??

also Sad to see Otto above....a very good man !!
I agree many good things need a closer look ..
with Gratitude
Chet K

50
General Builders discussion / Re: RANT CAFFE ASYLUM
« Last post by picowatt on September 23, 2020, 04:49:00 PM »
Partzman,

A comment to his video #9 suggested he feed two zero to 5 VDC "in phase" 50% duty cycle square waves into the two scope channels for a simulated 25 watts during the square wave on times.

If the scope math is correct, that should read an average of 12.5 watts (25 watts for 50% of the time).  One of the square waves is then phase shifted 180 degrees and the scope should then read close to zero watts.

I think the above is an excellent suggestion as well.

PW
Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10

OneLink