Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: **UN-CENSORED" Rosemary Ainslie COP>17 Circuit ??  (Read 66771 times)

fuzzytomcat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 676
    • Open Source Research and Development
Re: **UN-CENSORED" Rosemary Ainslie COP>17 Circuit ??
« Reply #75 on: October 28, 2010, 11:00:53 AM »
Tell me where you got this photograph?  Is it yours?  And if so - what is it's relevance to the ainslie tests?  To me it looks like the oscillation of the waveform across the shunt taken on a typical
resonating test.  And unless I'm wildly mistaken that looks like a FLUKE?  HOW DID THIS GET INTO
YOUR PHOTOBUCKET?  is the question.

You know fully ..... this was from Aarons Negative Dominate Wave Form Circuit testing and evaluation, when I went to his home 800 miles away to verify his results with my experimental device and took some preliminary tests with the Tektronix TDS 3054C he had in his possession using my custom made proto type 10 Ohm inductor.


Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: **UN-CENSORED" Rosemary Ainslie COP>17 Circuit ??
« Reply #76 on: October 28, 2010, 11:01:59 AM »
Now.  Let me state all this again.  I CANNOT UNZIP THOSE FILES.  IT IS NOT WITHIN MY CAPABILITY.   IT SHOULD NOT BE REQUIRED.  THE PRIME DATA AND THE WAVEFORMS SHOULD HAVE BEEN LEFT  AS THEY WERE 0N THE FORUM.  THEY ARE NO LONGER AVAIALABLE.  OUR READING PUBLIC AND I WOULD PREFER TO SEE THEM WHERE THEY BELONG.  NOT IN SOME IRRELEVANT LITTLE FILE IN GLEN'S NAME WHICH CANNOT BE EASILY ACCESSED. 

And don't give me those complex excuses. Just put the data back for open source to see what gives.  Anything less and it's obviously being done with the sole intention of making that data inaccessible to me, in the first instance and to our reading public in the second instance.

I will then take the trouble to go through all those post where Glen specifically refused to allow anyone to post those waveforms on the forum.  I can't myself do this.  But I can get someone to do it for me.  In other words it would be relatively EASY for all that information to be posted for permanent record.  So this nonsense about zipped files and God knows what other excuse Harvey is bringing to the table - is spurious nonsense.  The only thing preventing the reading public from seeing the actual data and the actual facts of those tests is Glen's preference to keep you, and us - IN THE DARK.

That smacks of AGENDA and AGENDA and AGENDA.  There is NOTHING in that which can be mistakenly construed as acting in the best interests of Open Source.  Any pretense by either of them that this is a residual or any concern is therefore evidentially a whole lot of rubbish.  More hand waving.

Rosemary

EDITED

Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: **UN-CENSORED" Rosemary Ainslie COP>17 Circuit ??
« Reply #77 on: October 28, 2010, 11:15:32 AM »
You know fully ..... this was from Aarons Negative Dominate Wave Form Circuit testing and evaluation, when I went to his home 800 miles away to verify his results with my experimental device and took some preliminary tests with the Tektronix TDS 3054C he had in his possession using my custom made proto type 10 Ohm inductor.

NO  I DO NOT KNOW THAT.  I KNOW NOTHING WHERE YOU ARE CONCERNED.  I FIRST NEED TO WADE THROUGH YOUR LIES AND YOUR FACILE EXCUSES.

Please advise everyone here why it is that you DO NOT wish to have the test record easily accessed.  Can you explain this?  Can you dig deep - even if it's yet more lies.  Just tell me whether this forum would be able to support that data?  Or would the quantity of information exceed Harti's bandwidth - and God knows what other nonsense you use for an excuse.  LOL As I remember it you simply REFUSED to post the original data here.  I now know why.  You'd NEVER have been able to delete it.  And you have the bald faced temerity to accuse me of DELETIONS?  WHAT A JOKE.

fuzzytomcat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 676
    • Open Source Research and Development
Re: **UN-CENSORED" Rosemary Ainslie COP>17 Circuit ??
« Reply #78 on: October 28, 2010, 11:25:19 AM »
Now.  Let me state all this again. I CANNOT UNZIP THOSE FILES.  IT IS NOT WITHIN MY CAPABILITY.   IT SHOULD NOT BE REQUIRED.  THE PRIME DATA AND THE WAVEFORMS SHOULD HAVE BEEN LEFT  AS THEY WERE 0N THE FORUM.  THEY ARE NO LONGER AVAIALABLE.  OUR READING PUBLIC AND I WOULD PREFER TO SEE THEM WHERE THEY BELONG.  NOT IN SOME IRRELEVANT LITTLE FILE IN GLEN'S NAME WHICH CANNOT BE EASILY ACCESSED. 

And don't give me those complex excuses. Just put the data back for open source to see what gives.  Anything less and it's obviously being done with the sole intention of making that data inaccessible to me, in the first instance and to our reading public in the second instance.

I will then take the trouble to go through all those post where Glen specifically refused to allow anyone to post those waveforms on the forum.  I can't myself do this.  But I can get someone to do it for me.  In other words it would be relatively EASY for all that information to be posted for permanent record.  So this nonsense about zipped files and God knows what other excuse Harvey is bringing to the table - is spurious nonsense.  The only thing preventing the reading public from seeing the actual data and the actual facts of those tests is Glen's preference to keep you, and us - IN THE DARK.

That smacks of AGENDA and AGENDA and AGENDA.  There is NOTHING in that which can be mistakenly construed as acting in the best interests of Open Source.  Any pretense by either of them that this is a residual or any concern is therefore evidentially a whole lot of rubbish.  More hand waving.

Rosemary

EDITED

So sad .... take some electronic and some computer classes .... your rich .... maid and all .... feed your dogs fresh cooked veal everyday, get a education like us working folks.

I have no stomach for your unreasonable demands and allegations on my test results and how I document them especially from you ...... how about that COP>17 proof of claim of yours ??

Go back to your pathetic thread and talk about your magnets ..... I really want to see how you use them in your first hot water application .....

Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: **UN-CENSORED" Rosemary Ainslie COP>17 Circuit ??
« Reply #79 on: October 28, 2010, 11:40:18 AM »
WELL.  It seems that we are finally getting to the meat of the issue.  Pure unadulterated spite - and that's enough for you and Harvey to justify this hiding of the truth.  You'd rather indulge your malice than allow the liberal distribution of data to the public.  You'd go to such EXTRAORDINARY lengths to keep the public in the dark?  And yet you pretend to be concerned about Open Source.  Glen you may not like me.  And for that matter I may not like you.  But it's irrelevant.  The need for Clean Green and all attendant concerns is far greater than your personal feelings or even mine.  This is information that should be broadcast as far and wide as possible.  Not hidden in a dying thread on EF.com with a dusty dialogue muttering about it's possible imprecisions.  It is the stuff of really great hopes and that's what's lacking.  If this were more widely known - who knows how much more confidently would others work on this and similar - or even develop their own more extensively?  The lasersabers, or Pirate - Goto - Berdini - EVERYONE?  You're effectively trying to silence this technology and it's implications and the thesis that required these results.  That's not well done Glen.  Not well done at all.

And for the record - just to remind everyone how hopelessly I fell into a project that you'd designed many months back.  When I asked you to post the information here on OU.com - you explained that you could not do so because you did not have the bandwidth?  or Harti did not have the bandwidth.  Since I could hardly understand either excuse I let it ride.  I was wrong.  I should have moved heaven and earth to get the data here.  Because on Harti's forum - you WOULD NOT HAVE BEEN ABLE TO DELETE.   

And how dare you imply that I'm rich.  I am NOT rich.  What a LIE.

Rosemary

fuzzytomcat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 676
    • Open Source Research and Development
Re: **UN-CENSORED" Rosemary Ainslie COP>17 Circuit ??
« Reply #80 on: October 28, 2010, 11:53:35 AM »
WELL.  It seems that we are finally getting to the meat of the issue.  Pure unadulterated spite - and that's enough for you and Harvey to justify this hiding of the truth.  You'd rather indulge your malice than allow the liberal distribution of data to the public.  You'd go to such EXTRAORDINARY lengths to keep the public in the dark?  And yet you pretend to be concerned about Open Source.  Glen you may not like me.  And for that matter I may not like you.  But it's irrelevant.  The need for Clean Green and all attendant concerns is far greater than your personal feelings or even mine.  This is information that should be broadcast as far and wide as possible.  Not hidden in a dying thread on EF.com with a dusty dialogue muttering about it's possible imprecisions.  It is the stuff of really great hopes and that's what's lacking.  If this were more widely known - who knows how much more confidently would others work on this and similar - or even develop their own more extensively?  The lasersabers, or Pirate - Goto - Berdini - EVERYONE?  You're effectively trying to silence this technology and it's implications and the thesis that required these results.  That's not well done Glen.  Not well done at all.

And for the record - just to remind everyone how hopelessly I fell into a project that you'd designed many months back.  When I asked you to post the information here on OU.com - you explained that you could not do so because you did not have the bandwidth?  or Harti did not have the bandwidth.  Since I could hardly understand either excuse I let it ride.  I was wrong.  I should have moved heaven and earth to get the data here.  Because on Harti's forum - you WOULD NOT HAVE BEEN ABLE TO DELETE.   

And how dare you imply that I'm rich.  I am NOT rich.  What a LIE.

Rosemary

http://cid-6b7817c40bb20460.office.live.com/browse.aspx/.Public/Mosfet%20Heater
http://www.energeticforum.com/inductive-resistor/5359-mosfet-heating-circuits.html


http://www.scribd.com/doc/23455916/Open-Source-Evaluation-of-Power-Transients-Generated-to-Improve-Performance-Coefficient-of-Resistive-Heating-Systems

WilbyInebriated

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3141
Re: **UN-CENSORED" Rosemary Ainslie COP>17 Circuit ??
« Reply #81 on: October 28, 2010, 12:53:38 PM »
With Regards to ZIP files.

Skydrive has a 50MB upload limit for any single file. Some of my spreadsheets of the tests exceeded this limit and therefore needed to be compressed to allow upload.
then don't use skydrive... put the data in a sql database (this avoids your upload limit problem @skydrive) and whip up a simple script to select the necessary data... it's a simple 'high school' solution. ;)

ZIP technology is an industry standard that has been around since the early days of DOS and it is expected that this is well understood by all persons qualified to evaluate these analyses. However, if there are any who are having problems with unzipping these files and would like assistance in doing so feel free to PM me and I will step you through the extremely simple high school steps of doing so.
or you could PM glen and step him through the extremely simple high school steps of properly sizing an image... ::)

Additionally, the high resolution data (100,000 samples per 10 divisions) will not fit in Excel versions prior to 2007. Therefore, I took the time to create an Access Program for those with older versions of Microsoft Office that allows them to peer into this data at high resolution with zoom charts and see the many instances of high amplitude pulses that are simply missing in the much lower resolution data of 10,000 samples per screen.
this is not an issue when using a sql database instead of some proprietary microcrap software (excel).

All of this has been available 100% of the time with absolutely no reservations from the time of publicizing the results. Any attempts to infer otherwise should be considered subterfuge and an attempt to besmirch Glen's good name and therefore should be summarily dismissed as the rhetoric it is.

Furthermore, Glens tests and all of the data associated with Glens tests remain his property. He has graciously shared those tests and their results with the world to benefit us all in any way it can. I wish I could say the same for the South African tests. ALL of the test data from the listed testing agencies is missing, withheld, or never even happened. Therefore, it is incumbent upon the South African group to at the very least match Glen's tests and public display of data if they wish to continue boasting "OPEN SOURCE".
what about this harv? why just test13? why not all of them?
I ..... Glen Lettenmaier, am withdrawing any use of my complete Test number "Thirteen" (13) data and image files for further usage, evaluation or publication, other than what has already been seen and posted at Energetic Forum, Panacea Bocaf and my "copyrighted" Scribd publication.

Sincerely,
Glen A Lettenmaier (aka FuzzyTomCat)

Otherwise the Entire OPEN SOURCE community has no choice but conclude they are protecting their Intellectual Property and the all of the claims otherwise are nothing but a ruse for publicity.

Harvey
denied. logical fallacy, false dilemma.

truthbeknown

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 98
Re: **UN-CENSORED" Rosemary Ainslie COP>17 Circuit ??
« Reply #82 on: October 28, 2010, 07:04:57 PM »

I guess Loner missed this comment but she will read and post here just as day follows night.
And who cares that you don't like me Rosemary because nobody ever asked you to. And really, reviving a thread is what you do everyday with your COP>17 thread. If nobody comments on it then you have to say some Blah Blah to keep it on the front page just as you have done on every forum you have posted in.  So really, what some people would like to see are pictures and videos of the work you say is being conducted "on campus." So you say you can't post the parts list and so on because of "thieves" so how about some pics and videos? We have to wonder why?
I'm sure the collaborators could shed some light on things but so could you with some effort. You are so good at deleting posts that don't suit you and editing even your own posts its pretty hard to understand your agenda. I hope this thread can truly show all the truths about your whatever device.

 ???
J.


Still waiting for the pics and videos.....Even STEFAN wants to see some and posted results...... :o

fuzzytomcat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 676
    • Open Source Research and Development
Re: **UN-CENSORED" Rosemary Ainslie COP>17 Circuit ??
« Reply #83 on: October 28, 2010, 09:51:23 PM »
Tell me where you got this photograph?  Is it yours?  And if so - what is it's relevance to the ainslie tests?  To me it looks like the oscillation of the waveform across the shunt taken on a typical
resonating test.  And unless I'm wildly mistaken that looks like a FLUKE?  HOW DID THIS GET INTO
YOUR PHOTOBUCKET?  is the question.

Well ..... using the common "SEARCH" feature at Energetic Forum where your membership was banned ......

http://www.energeticforum.com/68575-post2766.html   ( September 22, 2009 )
This is where my photograph ( Picture005.jpg ) of a Fluke 123 ScopeMeter used in the Ainslie - Murakami Negitive Dominant Waveform Generator circuit test using the Tektronix TDS 3054C as shown in your COP 17 Heater | Rosemary Ainslie thread ... POST #2766

http://www.energeticforum.com/68576-post2767.html   ( September 22, 2009 )
This is your Post #2767 a response to the prior posting that I did .......
Quote
FUZZY - very well done. Many, many thanks for all that info.


Like others have said you really need to have that condition of yours professionally taken care of .... it can be quite a distraction for us all ......

truthbeknown

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 98
Re: **UN-CENSORED" Rosemary Ainslie COP>17 Circuit ??
« Reply #84 on: October 29, 2010, 01:54:27 AM »
Rosemary Ainslie

    * Moderator
    * Hero Member
    * *****
    * Posts: 1171
    *
          o View Profile
          o Personal Message (Online)

Re: Rosemary Ainslie COP>17 Circuit / A First Application on a Hot Water Cylinder
« Reply #751 on: Today at 01:20:48 AM »

    * Reply with quoteQuote

Quote from: truthbeknown on October 28, 2010, 10:23:36 PM


    So. Where are the results, pics, and videos?


And what exactly are your 'rights' that you can DEMAND results pictures or videos?  The readers here Truthbeknown are very well aware of the fact that we have a project here that is funded by those students who GIVE THEIR TIME to this project.  No-one is paid for their involvement.  It is extracurricular and all are doing their best to fit in the tasks and tests as and when they can.  For my part it is enough that this is on campus that the results will be both recorded and supervised under the guidance of experts.

If and when you devote YOUR life to the promotion of clean green as I am doing here - then I think you will be well qualified to DEMAND a performance to some kind of exacting standard.  But I see a dearth of experimental involvement by yourself and find it rather distasteful that you should demand anything at all of me.  Do you presume to think that I am working as I do - to satisfy your time table or that I am doing all this to gratify your requirements on any issue at all?  I assure you you are mistaken.

Rosemary




This is what she said in answering my question when I posted it in her thread. I figured it best be brought over here before she deletes my posts in her thread....a moderator with a delete finger.

My reply to her on this is that she doesn't know anything about me and what I have promoted for clean green...and I am not obligated to share anything with her about it....BUT...she is the one who keeps posting about things going on "on campus" and not showing the details in either written word or pics or videos. So the readers can decide if its all talk and no show for themselves.

WilbyInebriated

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3141
Re: **UN-CENSORED" Rosemary Ainslie COP>17 Circuit ??
« Reply #85 on: October 29, 2010, 02:23:34 AM »
This is what she said in answering my question when I posted it in her thread. I figured it best be brought over here before she deletes my posts in her thread....a moderator with a delete finger.

My reply to her on this is that she doesn't know anything about me and what I have promoted for clean green...and I am not obligated to share anything with her about it....BUT...she is the one who keeps posting about things going on "on campus" and not showing the details in either written word or pics or videos. So the readers can decide if its all talk and no show for themselves.
so you think they should meekly ask you "how high master?" just because you said jump? ::) get a clue kid, the world does not revolve around you. it will happen when it happens... so chill out, exercise some patience and restraint, and stop behaving like an impatient child. if you're going to sit around on your hands waiting for someone to give you something, at least have the decency to stfu...

truthbeknown

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 98
Re: **UN-CENSORED" Rosemary Ainslie COP>17 Circuit ??
« Reply #86 on: October 29, 2010, 02:32:45 AM »
so you think they should meekly ask you "how high master?" just because you said jump? ::) get a clue kid, the world does not revolve around you. it will happen when it happens... so chill out, exercise some patience and restraint, and stop behaving like an impatient child. if you're going to sit around on your hands waiting for someone to give you something, at least have the decency to stfu...



Shame on you Wilby....and you eat with those fingers you type with?  I do hope you wash first......I wonder if your mommy will read this?
 :'(
J.

WilbyInebriated

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3141
Re: **UN-CENSORED" Rosemary Ainslie COP>17 Circuit ??
« Reply #87 on: October 29, 2010, 02:43:10 AM »


Shame on you Wilby....and you eat with those fingers you type with?  I do hope you wash first......I wonder if your mommy will read this?
 :'(
J.
shame on me? more like shame on you... ::)

truthbeknown

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 98
Re: **UN-CENSORED" Rosemary Ainslie COP>17 Circuit ??
« Reply #88 on: October 29, 2010, 03:49:00 AM »

Re: Rosemary Ainslie COP>17 Circuit / A First Application on a Hot Water Cylinder
« Reply #753 on: Today at 03:05:48 AM »

    * Reply with quoteQuote

Quote from: truthbeknown on Today at 01:33:21 AM


    Very sad for you......And you don't know anything about me or what I have done to promote clean green and I am not obligated to tell YOU anything about it......but you keep posting about your project with all talk and no show....so thats why it gets brought up...you must have a happy and fulfilling life so enjoy yourself.

    Would you like some cough syrup for your distaste?


ROSEMARYS REPLY:


If the truth is to be known - the only thing that is sad is the quality of your posts.  I'm rather amused to see that you're duplicating them in another thread?  Golly.  Do you feel they need to be preserved?  For prosterity?  LOL  But I'll tell you what.  I could well do without this mediocre effort at trying to interrupt this thread.  Unless you 'up the ante' I will certainly transfer your posts to a more appropriate thread.  It's one thing to be trolled with intelligent contributions.  But this?  Please.  I've got gold fish with more teeth.

And yes - on the whole my life is fulfilling.  Thank you for asking.

Rosemary




From Truthbeknown:

I answered her questions to me as follows:


1. YES
2. YES
3. YES
4. YES

And you are NOT welcome because that was a statement. I said she could use her big delete finger or transfer this to another thread like she says that I didn't care either way...So. she decided she didn't want anyone to read my response to her and DELETED IT! She has moderatorship and censorship all built into one thread.

Carry on.

fuzzytomcat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 676
    • Open Source Research and Development
Re: **UN-CENSORED" Rosemary Ainslie COP>17 Circuit ??
« Reply #89 on: October 29, 2010, 06:36:40 AM »
Hi everyone,

Claimed OU circuit of Rosemary Ainslie ( Over Unity Forum Thread  )
http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=7620.0    ( 189 pages - 2825 Replys )

Reply #2824 on: February 03, 2010
http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=7620.msg226495#msg226495

Quote
Well Rosemary it would have been nice to have the FULL story that during this whole 8 month testing and evaluation exercise of the Quantum "Mosfet Heating Circuit" device that in fact "YOU" presently have in your possession "in storage" withheld from all experimenters .....

1) Working models of the Quantum "Mosfet Heating Circuit" device
2) Components of the Quantum "Mosfet Heating Circuit" device
3) Photographs of the Quantum "Mosfet Heating Circuit" device
4) Documented information from BP
5) Documented information from ABB


And this was nothing but a Chinese Fire Drill for any and all experimenters with only moral support from you, not divulging that you have done this in a attempt of a "independent verification" of any findings on the Quantum article for your thesis "ONLY" nothing else.

This has been nothing but duping the "Open Source" community for help in creating a Academic paper to promote your thesis on your Magnetic Field Model nothing else.


This was a post of mine on February 03, 2010 and I left it alone because of the in your own word's "Quotes" that are available in several Open Source Forums postings that verify Rosemary's comments or claims all outlined in my publicly posted claim above and thought readers would be able to find the quoted words but it appears not, there's to many posts 1000's to sift through ..... I have no pleasure repeating them again, but really need too now.

The word Rosemary uses loosely always concerning the rejected IEEE paper submittal of "WE", is not in my word's and at best misleading, I can speak for myself on my Tests.

Items 1 through 5 will be referenced one at a time to avoid the hundreds of pages and thousands of responses in the thread, many will be from Rosemary Ainslie in a attempt to bury the evidence in pages of nonsense postings hiding the truth from the members and reading guests.