Language: 
To browser these website, it's necessary to store cookies on your computer.
The cookies contain no personal information, they are required for program control.
  the storage of cookies while browsing this website, on Login and Register.

GDPR and DSGVO law

Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding.
Amazon Warehouse Deals ! Now even more Deep Discounts ! Check out these great prices on slightly used or just opened once only items.I always buy my gadgets via these great Warehouse deals ! Highly recommended ! Many thanks for supporting OverUnity.com this way.

User Menu

Plug Heater

Powerbox

Smartbox

3D Solar

3D Solar Panels

DC2DC converter

Micro JouleThief

FireMatch

FireMatch

CCKnife

CCKnife

CCTool

CCTool

Magpi Magazine

Magpi Magazine Free Rasberry Pi Magazine

Battery Recondition

Battery Recondition

Arduino

Ultracaps

YT Subscribe

Gravity Machines

Tesla-Ebook

Magnet Secrets

Lindemann Video

Navigation

Products

Products

WaterMotor kit

Statistics

  • *Total Members: 83398
  • *Latest: Fixr

  • *Total Posts: 509950
  • *Total Topics: 15197
  • *Online Today: 44
  • *Most Online: 103
(December 19, 2006, 11:27:19 PM)
  • *Users: 2
  • *Guests: 10
  • *Total: 12

Author Topic: Bash Rosemary Ainslie  (Read 31421 times)

Offline Mk1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2069
Re: Bash Rosemary Ainslie
« Reply #75 on: August 29, 2010, 07:21:28 PM »
@all

I have to say i am quite sad about all the bashing , war is upon us the order has been ready all Army's , i for one will always resist stupidity , we are here to change things not to destroy others , No single person can change the world , we can only change our self one by one and hope others get to do the same , re evaluate the way you conduct your self's .

If someone get you on your bad side , pay him a compliment and wait 48 h , depolarize the defective unit 48h should be enough to retune him , if not then ignore them , people like to fight , but can't do it alone ...

This world is shity because we let it .

I wish you all great success    .

 

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Bash Rosemary Ainslie
« Reply #75 on: August 29, 2010, 07:21:28 PM »

Offline fuzzytomcat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 676
    • Open Source Research and Development
Re: Bash Rosemary Ainslie
« Reply #76 on: September 05, 2010, 02:42:02 PM »
Hi members and guests,

Here is another example of misrepresentation of the facts that any "THIRD" grader could do a search http://www.energeticforum.com/search.php at Energetic Forum and find the facts for themselves .....

http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=9442.msg255578#msg255578

Quote
Re: Rosemary Ainslie COP>17 Circuit / A First Application on a Hot Water Cylinder
« Reply #536 on: Today at 12:57:21 PM »

Guys - just for the record.

Aaron has now officially locked all my threads and buried them on a subforum.  Meanwhile he displays the mosfet heating circuit thread on the front page of every forum.  That thread denies that I was the author of the circuit and it further denies benefit in the circuit.  Effectively the propagandising related to this technology is still rife.

I seriously doubt that EF.com can be accused of 'advancing' ou technologies while these evident propagandising tools are required.

Regards,
Rosemary
http://www.scribd.com/doc/33937867/IF-I-WAS-A-TROLL


The Energetic Forum threads of course through the "NATURAL" progression of any forum member adding a topic or thread has made the COP 17 subjects slip to pages 20 through 25 and beyond, so technically I guess the members at Energetic Forum has buried the threads through lack of interest or better subjects not the Energetic Forum administration.

What has happened was the relocation to the "FRONT" or "PAGE 1" of the Renewable Energy threads for easy access into the "INDUCTIVE RESISTOR"  http://www.energeticforum.com/inductive-resistor/ sub forum where the Mosfet Heater Circuit http://www.energeticforum.com/inductive-resistor/5359-mosfet-heating-circuits.html has been always located.

In addition the unfinished controversial "Magnetic Field Model" thread which was also relocated into the same sub forum, as it has possibly some unproven relationship with the unseen Quantum October 2002 article device or data with a COP>17 that was claimed by the authors.

This allegation appears to be another attempt by Rosemary Ainslie to discredit the work and technology of many others that are slowly working on the yet to be proven 100% by anyone on the planet a COP>17.



Offline Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: Bash Rosemary Ainslie
« Reply #77 on: September 05, 2010, 02:59:39 PM »
It's confusing.  But I think what is now being alleged is that when a member gets banned it's likely that their threads will 'fall off the front page' so to speak.  When one bans the member responsible for those threads then that may, perhaps, be seen as a natural consequence.

What is not so readily understandable and certainly not natural - is to take the trouble to 'lock those threads' in the interests of closure.  I am not sure that this is a typical consequence of banning.  Threads survive.  Their originators may not.

What is also not readily understandable is the need to display a Mosfet Heating Circuit on page one of every thread reference on OU.com - when the Mosfet heating Circuit has EVERYTHING to do with the locked threads and while the perpetrators of that Mosfet Heating Circuit DENY any association with those same locked threads.

But either way - the fact is that there is absolutely NO interest in the Mosfet heating Circuit and it's only because of it's privileged and happy positioning on page 1 that it is able to survive any attention at all.  Conversely the locked threads sustained a growth in readership and interest that exceeded all previous threads on EF.com and it's been relegated to the dump yard. 

It is my considered opinion that EF.com have lost any rights to claim to support OU technology for open source and I suspect that the circuit technology that I attempted to progress is deliberately being quashed.  It is also my opinion that there is a programme intended to diminish the technology associated with the locked thread and that it is that programme that the adminstrators of EF.com are following.



Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Bash Rosemary Ainslie
« Reply #77 on: September 05, 2010, 02:59:39 PM »
Sponsored links:




Offline fuzzytomcat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 676
    • Open Source Research and Development
Re: Bash Rosemary Ainslie
« Reply #78 on: September 05, 2010, 03:15:48 PM »
It's confusing.  But I think what is now being alleged is that when a member gets banned it's likely that their threads will 'fall off the front page' so to speak.  When one bans the member responsible for those threads then that may, perhaps, be seen as a natural consequence.

What is not so readily understandable and certainly not natural - is to take the trouble to 'lock those threads' in the interests of closure.  I am not sure that this is a typical consequence of banning.  Threads survive.  Their originators may not.

What is also not readily understandable is the need to display a Mosfet Heating Circuit on page one of every thread reference on OU.com - when the Mosfet heating Circuit has EVERYTHING to do with the locked threads and while the perpetrators of that Mosfet Heating Circuit DENY any association with those same locked threads.

But either way - the fact is that there is absolutely NO interest in the Mosfet heating Circuit and it's only because of it's privileged and happy positioning on page 1 that it is able to survive any attention at all.  Conversely the locked threads sustained a growth in readership and interest that exceeded all previous threads on EF.com and it's been relegated to the dump yard. 

It is my considered opinion that EF.com have lost any rights to claim to support OU technology for open source and I suspect that the circuit technology that I attempted to progress is deliberately being quashed.  It is also my opinion that there is a programme intended to diminish the technology associated with the locked thread and that it is that programme that the adminstrators of EF.com are following.

So silly .....

At Energetic Forum as anyone knows that is a member that one can .....

A MEMBER CAN EDIT OR DELETE A POST IN A THREAD AT ANY TIME FOREVER OR YEARS UNLESS THE THREAD IS LOCKED FOR ARCHIVAL PURPOSES
( such a request was made by Rosemary Ainslie to lock the first thread http://www.energeticforum.com/81742-post3434.html )

At Over Unity Forum as anyone knows that is a member that one can .....

A MEMBER HAS ONLY HOURS TO EDIT OR DELETE A POST IN A THREAD AFTER THAT TIME IT CANNOT BE CHANGED EVER BUT ONLY BY THE ADMINISTRATION

Offline Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: Bash Rosemary Ainslie
« Reply #79 on: September 05, 2010, 03:24:05 PM »
Glen are you OUT OF YOUR MIND?  I cannot get into energetic forum at all - let alone delete or modify or change any part of anything posted there.

The only time I can even see the thread is when I log in under an assumed identity and that certainly does not allow me to post.

I am never quite sure if you are madly deluded or if you're simply incapable of telling the truth.  Possibly both.  But let me remind you.  The readers here are of a higher caliber than those at EF.com and they see through your lies more readily.  If you think that you can still regain any kind of respect or plausibility then stick to EF.com.  It's better suited to your type.  They actively encourage the outright theft of ideas.  You are over qualified for membership there.

LET ME PUT THIS MORE PLAINLY.  I HAVE BEEN BANNED.  IT IS IMPOSSIBLE FOR ME TO LOG IN UNDER THE NAME WITSEND OR AETHEREVARISING OR ROSEMARY AINSLIE OR ANY VARIATION THEREOF.  NO AMOUNT OF INSINUATION ON YOUR PART WILL SATISFY ANY ONE HERE THAT IT IS THEREFORE POSSIBLE FOR ME TO GET BACK INTO MY POSTS TO CHANGE THEM - MODIFY THEM OR ADD TO THEM.  YOU ARE EITHER UTTERLY DELUDED OR YOU ARE INCAPABLE OF TELLING THE TRUTH IF YOU THINK THAT THIS NEW VERSION OF REALITY WILL WASH WITH ANYONE AT ALL

And for perfect clarity let me add - the new identity does not allow me to post.  I actually think that admin are aware of this assumed identity as I'm also not able to trace all the links that are posted.  So sick. 

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Bash Rosemary Ainslie
« Reply #79 on: September 05, 2010, 03:24:05 PM »
Sponsored links:




Offline fuzzytomcat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 676
    • Open Source Research and Development
Re: Bash Rosemary Ainslie
« Reply #80 on: September 05, 2010, 03:36:31 PM »
Glen are you OUT OF YOUR MIND.  I cannot get into energetic forum at all - let alone delete or modify or change any part of anything posted there.

The only time I can even see the thread is when I log in under an assumed identity and that certainly does not allow me to post.

I am never quite sure if you are madly deluded or if you're simply incapable of telling the truth.  Possibly both.  But let me remind you.  The readers here are of a higher caliber than those at EF.com and they see through your lies more readily.  If you think that you can still regain any kind of respect or plausibility then stick to EF.com.  It's better suited to your type.  They actively encourage the outright theft of ideas.  You are over qualified for membership there.

So very silly ..... shall I hang some scissors on the threads door so some guests and members can use them to place holes in their nickers so they can see ??

A assumed name to try and by pass a member banning ..... such things are not looked on favorably on persons trying to bypass the system in place.

Offline Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: Bash Rosemary Ainslie
« Reply #81 on: September 05, 2010, 03:46:07 PM »
Not only are you a vulgarian of rather limited verbal skills but your spelling is laughably inadequate.  By nickers - I guess you mean 'knickers'.  The two words have entirely different roots.  And the analogy in any event is - at best is juvenile - if not infantile.  But may I impose on you to address the point if you can bend your mind to concentrate for that long.  You CLAIMED that I could get into my threads notwithstanding being banned.  I recommend that you get EF.com admin to acknowledge this before I, for one, will be able to believe you.

I will meanwhile email your post to admin and ask them if this, indeed, is a facility that they allow banned members.  It will be interesting.

And while I'm at it I'll also forward them this last post of yours lest they suspect, for one moment, that they're dealing with a sensible adult when they entertain your own membership.


Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Bash Rosemary Ainslie
« Reply #81 on: September 05, 2010, 03:46:07 PM »
Sponsored links:




Offline fuzzytomcat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 676
    • Open Source Research and Development
Re: Bash Rosemary Ainslie
« Reply #82 on: September 05, 2010, 03:58:46 PM »
Not only are you a vulgarian of rather limited verbal skills but your spelling is laughably inadequate.  By nickers - I guess you mean 'knickers'.  The two words have entirely different roots.  And the analogy in any event is - at best is juvenile - if not infantile.  But may I impose on you to address the point if you can bend your mind to concentrate for that long.  You CLAIMED that I could get into my threads notwithstanding being banned.  I recommend that you get EF.com admin to acknowledge this before I, for one, will be able to believe you.

I will meanwhile email your post to admin and ask them if this, indeed, is a facility that they allow banned members.  It will be interesting.

And while I'm at it I'll also forward them this last post of yours lest they suspect, for one moment, that they're dealing with a sensible adult when they entertain your own membership.

Oh .... I see now only your 1,800 posts are worth editing or deleting ..... not any other forum member that posted in the thread(s), their contributions are nothing now to you if removed ??

So sad and not a single reference posting or post number from four forums I post in to substantiate any allegations .... just statements no proof of "IN MY WORDS"

Offline Ted Ewert

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 48
Re: Bash Rosemary Ainslie
« Reply #83 on: September 05, 2010, 04:09:10 PM »
I don't really understand the blind defense of EF displayed by Glen here. He is well aware of the questionable characters and shady dealings going on at the site, but chooses to ignore all that and instead go after Rosemary for some reason.
He is well aware that Aaron has pulled this same crap with other experimenters. He has read personal accounts by people who have had the same thing done to them as was done to Rosemary. He is also aware of the deceitful agenda openly admitted to by the vaunted "PHD" at that site.
Yet he continues to doggedly grasp at straws to try and discredit Rosemary. The complete lack of substance in his arguments is pathetically obvious, yet he won't give up. Why? What can he possibly gain from this besides the demise of his credibility?
If Glen wants to expose dishonesty and double dealing, EF administration would provide a target rich environment. Going after active experimenters with nebulous and flimsy charges is just stupid IMO.

Ted

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Bash Rosemary Ainslie
« Reply #83 on: September 05, 2010, 04:09:10 PM »
3D Solar Panels

Offline Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: Bash Rosemary Ainslie
« Reply #84 on: September 05, 2010, 04:23:00 PM »
The following a faithful copy of the text that I've just sent to Admin at EF.com

Dear Admin

Glen has claimed that notwithstanding being banned, EF.com will allow me the right to amend my posts and I demand that right. This is unequivocally claimed in his denial that I cannot get into the forum in my own name or any derivatives of my previous user names.

Posted today at OU.COM
A MEMBER CAN EDIT OR DELETE A POST IN A THREAD AT ANY TIME FOREVER OR YEARS UNLESS THE THREAD IS LOCKED FOR ARCHIVAL PURPOSES

He has also posted the following which I am simply adding to remind you how your members advertise themselves.

Posted today at OU.COM
So very silly ..... shall I hang some scissors on the threads door so some guests and members can use them to place holes in their nickers so they can see ??

Here I think he's telling us that he can get members and guests to view the threads should they require it.  I'd be interested to know exactly how he uses those scissors and what relevance this has to my knickers?

Regards,

Rosemary

Offline Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: Bash Rosemary Ainslie
« Reply #85 on: September 05, 2010, 04:26:30 PM »
I don't really understand the blind defense of EF displayed by Glen here. He is well aware of the questionable characters and shady dealings going on at the site, but chooses to ignore all that and instead go after Rosemary for some reason.
He is well aware that Aaron has pulled this same crap with other experimenters. He has read personal accounts by people who have had the same thing done to them as was done to Rosemary. He is also aware of the deceitful agenda openly admitted to by the vaunted "PHD" at that site.
Yet he continues to doggedly grasp at straws to try and discredit Rosemary. The complete lack of substance in his arguments is pathetically obvious, yet he won't give up. Why? What can he possibly gain from this besides the demise of his credibility?
If Glen wants to expose dishonesty and double dealing, EF administration would provide a target rich environment. Going after active experimenters with nebulous and flimsy charges is just stupid IMO.

Ted

THANKS for speaking up Ted.  I think the public would be well served to be warned about the duplicities at EF.com.  I will get around to a full disclosure but am still to find out what's legally permissable regarding the exposure of emails and the rest.  It's going to get nasty.  But we've already got a thread lined up.

Kindest regards,
Rosie

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: Bash Rosemary Ainslie
« Reply #85 on: September 05, 2010, 04:26:30 PM »
3D Solar Panels

Offline fuzzytomcat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 676
    • Open Source Research and Development
Re: Bash Rosemary Ainslie
« Reply #86 on: September 05, 2010, 04:31:30 PM »
The following a faithful copy of the text that I've just sent to Admin at EF.com

Dear Admin

Glen has claimed that notwithstanding being banned, EF.com will allow me the right to amend my posts and I demand that right. This is unequivocally claimed in his denial that I cannot get into the forum in my own name or any derivatives of my previous user names.

Posted today at OU.COM
A MEMBER CAN EDIT OR DELETE A POST IN A THREAD AT ANY TIME FOREVER OR YEARS UNLESS THE THREAD IS LOCKED FOR ARCHIVAL PURPOSES

He has also posted the following which I am simply adding to remind you how your members advertise themselves.

Posted today at OU.COM
So very silly ..... shall I hang some scissors on the threads door so some guests and members can use them to place holes in their nickers so they can see ??

Here I think he's telling us that he can get members and guests to view the threads should they require it.  I'd be interested to know exactly how he uses those scissors and what relevance this has to my knickers?

Regards,

Rosemary

This is really getting silly now .....

I SAID "MEMBER" ..... you are not a "MEMBER" ..... you've been banned ??

Offline Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: Bash Rosemary Ainslie
« Reply #87 on: September 05, 2010, 04:36:30 PM »
@Glen
What part of THIS

Not only are you a vulgarian of rather limited verbal skills but your spelling is laughably inadequate.  By nickers - I guess you mean 'knickers'.  The two words have entirely different roots.  And the analogy in any event is - at best is juvenile - if not infantile.  But may I impose on you to address the point if you can bend your mind to concentrate for that long.  You CLAIMED that I could get into my threads notwithstanding being banned.  I recommend that you get EF.com admin to acknowledge this before I, for one, will be able to believe you.

I will meanwhile email your post to admin and ask them if this, indeed, is a facility that they allow banned members.  It will be interesting.

And while I'm at it I'll also forward them this last post of yours lest they suspect, for one moment, that they're dealing with a sensible adult when they entertain your own membership.


HAS ANYTHING AT ALL TO DO WITH THIS?
Oh .... I see now only your 1,800 posts are worth editing or deleting ..... not any other forum member that posted in the thread(s), their contributions are nothing now to you if removed ??

So sad and not a single reference posting or post number from four forums I post in to substantiate any allegations .... just statements no proof of "IN MY WORDS"


Not only can you not write the simple truth - you are entirely incapable of any kind of sense at all.  There is NO way you can draw these conclusions unless, as ever, you are propagandising.  When you finally learn that trick of stringing a single sentence together then I'll be better able to understand you.

« Last Edit: September 05, 2010, 05:41:38 PM by Rosemary Ainslie »

Offline Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: Bash Rosemary Ainslie
« Reply #88 on: September 05, 2010, 04:49:59 PM »
This is really getting silly now .....

I SAID "MEMBER" ..... you are not a "MEMBER" ..... you've been banned ??

I rest my case.  The man can't open his mouth without garbage spilling out.  And the only way he can wriggle out of this one is to pretend that he did NOT KNOW THAT I WAS BANNED.  Please.  Nothing too low for our Glen.


Offline fuzzytomcat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 676
    • Open Source Research and Development
Re: Bash Rosemary Ainslie
« Reply #89 on: September 05, 2010, 04:55:52 PM »
I don't really understand the blind defense of EF displayed by Glen here.
What did EF do so bad moving threads from pages 20 and beyond to the first or front page in a sub forum always to be on the front page ?
He is well aware of the questionable characters and shady dealings going on at the site, but chooses to ignore all that and instead go after Rosemary for some reason.
 
He is well aware that Aaron has pulled this same crap with other experimenters. He has read personal accounts by people who have had the same thing done to them as was done to Rosemary. He is also aware of the deceitful agenda openly admitted to by the vaunted "PHD" at that site.

If Glen wants to expose dishonesty and double dealing, EF administration would provide a target rich environment. Going after active experimenters with nebulous and flimsy charges is just stupid IMO.

Ted

Yes this is true and have seen some compelling information from the person being banned and not from the other side, but to cast a judgment for me on who's right or wrong with out actually being involved in the dispute without all the facts IMHO would be reckless to cast a opinion on the matter.

Also I have had issues as "YOU" are aware at EF .... but then again .... whom hasn't posted things that may have been over the line ??


Yet he continues to doggedly grasp at straws to try and discredit Rosemary. The complete lack of substance in his arguments is pathetically obvious, yet he won't give up. Why?


Everything I have posted or stated has a reference, correspondence or internet forum post number to defend the allegations against "ME" on this project "I" worked on .... my reputation ....

Were are the "IN MY WORDS" that confirm any and all allegations said against me ..... where ?? in the http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=9442.0 Rosemary Ainslie COP>17 Circuit / A First Application on a Hot Water Cylinder .... where ??

It's really hard to explain away something said in your words ..... unless you can "EDIT" it out ...... so it can't be used against you .....

 

OneLink