Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: a new kind of visible radiant energy?  (Read 306124 times)

sm0ky2

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3948
Re: a new kind of visible radiant energy?
« Reply #240 on: September 01, 2010, 04:47:20 AM »
second one for Cletus.  I was blown away by these symmetries.

it would have worked out better if that artist had triangulated the squares instead of the circles.
thats why the two rings drawn are not the same.
its actually a lot more symetrical than that drawing.


sm0ky2

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3948
Re: a new kind of visible radiant energy?
« Reply #241 on: September 01, 2010, 04:51:46 AM »
Flower of life, anyone?

http://peggymarie010.files.wordpress.com/2010/03/flower-of-life.gif
Which reminds me of some work K0W0O0N0 is doing...
This is the first in a long series of videos he has posted with various tests of this design... see any parallels?
Cheers,
Twinbeard

Do you know who invented this coil?? this "starship" coil?

Marco Rodin,  now cletus tells me i get to call you a NIMROD!

Clanzer does a much better job at demonstrating it

http://www.overunity.org.uk/showthread.php?t=510

see. NOW i understand..
Cletus saw this, the first time he looked at what were were doing..
he TOLD us this..




Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: a new kind of visible radiant energy?
« Reply #242 on: September 01, 2010, 04:52:53 AM »
it would have worked out better if that artist had triangulated the squares instead of the circles.
thats why the two rings drawn are not the same.
its actually a lot more symetrical than that drawing.

Hi Sm0ky.  I'm sure you're right.  I was trying to find pi in that arrangement.  Failed miserably but I'm reasonably satisfied that the next circle will double and the next.  I've been told NOT.  But I'm not sure.

Regards
Rosie

twinbeard

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 130
Re: a new kind of visible radiant energy?
« Reply #243 on: September 01, 2010, 04:58:46 AM »
Hi Rosemary,

Hi again Twinbeard.  I've seen that first design rendered by a muslim artist in the most perfect 'botanic'? anyway - plant like structures with flowers.  It's mind bending.  Really wonderful. 

Guys - the secret is in geometry.  I'm SO sure of that.  Wish I knew more.

Kindest regards,
Rosemary

That is an ancient symbol from many cultures and religions found all across the planet... Abydos, Egypt at the Temple of Osiris, Hindu Temples, Aztec, Inca, the Forbidden City in China... could go on for some time.  It is considered by some to be a "sacred geometry."  It shows up as a resonance pattern as well:  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GCUg4Kx_CjY

You mentioned that you key on symmetries... I key on pattern recognition;)  If I see a pattern somewhere, particularly in nature, and see the same pattern elsewhere, under a completely different context, I know there is an underlying connection there somewhere.  The fun part is ferreting out exactly what that connection is. 

Spiral galaxies, hurricanes, the pattern I saw in the ferrofluid when exposed to a torsional B field;
atoms and solar systems;
DNA, Leedskalnin's double helix representation of how "individual magnets" move, and the filamentary double helix patterns of aetheric flux paths between galaxies and clusters of galaxies currently called "dark matter" or "dark energy"...
these are all examples of fractal pattern iterations.  I saw identical patterns with your diagrams of variants of Davids incredible permutation of Leedskalnins PMH and this ancient symbol held in high regard by almost every great civilization.  Lets find the connection:)

Cheers,
Twinbeard

twinbeard

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 130
Re: a new kind of visible radiant energy?
« Reply #244 on: September 01, 2010, 05:24:22 AM »
Do you know who invented this coil?? this "starship" coil?

Marco Rodin,  now cletus tells me i get to call you a NIMROD!

Clanzer does a much better job at demonstrating it

http://www.overunity.org.uk/showthread.php?t=510

see. NOW i understand..
Cletus saw this, the first time he looked at what were were doing..
he TOLD us this..

You guys can worship Rodin and call me names all you want... none for me, thanks.  Sticks and stones... all that.  Don't be a douchenozzle.  See?  I can call names too.  It does neither of us any good.  Also, I do not want to take anything away from Cletus... I'm sure he has valuable things to contribute, and some unique insight, but honestly, one needs to be able to express oneself in language that others can understand to get a point across.  Verbiage, syntax, and sensible structure make a difference in when trying to communicate ideas to others. 

If you have built one, you would realize that the B field in Rodins coil is planar, while the starship is cylindrical.  They have different properties, and a guy going by the handle hhoforvolts came up with the starship.  I use a variant in my FlowerPower device that I designed, and call the Leedskalnin Starship... 24 points, bifilar non progressive wind.  Totally not based on Rodins math... I use it because it a) concentrates the B field in the center while b) allowing the exterior parts of the wind to act as an antenna for the E field, which is just about right for my purposes.  In fact, in the links you referenced, post 7 and 8, Clanzer is building my variant.  Don't believe me?  Check the datestamps on my video posts vs. his, or the datestamps of my posts on EF.  I posted a scan of my winding jig there some time ago. 

All you are doing with your name calling and self indulgant ego stroking mental masturbation is alienating intelligent people of real scientific accomplishment who are making real contributions.

Constructive debate?  I'm up for it.  Worthless trolling?  Love your hair, hope you win... NEXT!!!!

Cheers,
Twinbeard

cletushowell

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 571
Re: a new kind of visible radiant energy?
« Reply #245 on: September 01, 2010, 05:40:33 AM »
Rose i sent you a priivate message
nimrod was never once degraded by God he not only has power over hell
a place God cannot go but he gets a axis exactly parralle
to heaven a exact oposite he said to be a mighty hunter
and deceives even 1/3 the angles the path is straight and narrow
you see mathew 7:14 few will find it
7/3 2.3333 I gave you the answer
marco has power and a lot of it
dont wory devil went down to georgia
for you
there a long way till me and him go to war
and God said there would be war but its also the prince
job to declare peace a war does not mean millions die
be fruitfull and populate the earth
but bible is full of war grandpa did a lot of work with geneva
treaties and theres only a few not playing by the rules

cletushowell

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 571
Re: a new kind of visible radiant energy?
« Reply #246 on: September 01, 2010, 05:54:42 AM »
Ill corect you again and defend marko
have you seen marco wire a coil
have you seen marco with a coil
marko did not build a coil
marco built eithe a optic crystal or a optic crystal with a plasma
similar to the magnifyer glass with
the neon thru it but the numbers represent cuts on the crystal
you cannot land on the sun and drink ice tea with wires he specificaly tells you that the coil was put out by the goverment and when he found out he was a little upset but glad that people were listenening
its like my flyiny triangle i fixed the polarity
on i couldnt build it but the goverment did
and landed it in my hometown on
aug 22 but i was not there in fresno i was at my shop in bakersfield
what we can do is limited to our help
marco has a lot of help now and technology is moving extremly fast between me and him if you knoticed everything
has picked up in science im about 3 months its no longer stuck
like it has been since tesla died and
were not yet in goverment but i will be
God said Im to be the leader of the west
read the bush scrolls you will see

sm0ky2

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3948
Re: a new kind of visible radiant energy?
« Reply #247 on: September 01, 2010, 06:12:41 AM »
here you go rose


that was actually helpful, i see something i overlooked before..



cletushowell

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 571
Re: a new kind of visible radiant energy?
« Reply #248 on: September 01, 2010, 06:28:20 AM »
Smoky you got the pattern its just complicated because the second ring is off
a bit im going to Give the answer to rose
then rose can correct the rings
Or you can try spin the outside ring
till the circles line up 34543
sorry I dont have the programs you do
this should start your pattern of either a bit bigger or a little bit off
this is seperating your prontons and electrons and building your next ring


cletushowell

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 571
Re: a new kind of visible radiant energy?
« Reply #249 on: September 01, 2010, 06:36:50 AM »
Remember i said the pyrramids
intersect you see when you spin it
32123
then imaginge the 123 the other way
bout the 3 is the base 2 is past center
1 is the peak

Then reverse 321 again
its pefectly symetrical over the 1
something rodin could not do
 

sm0ky2

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3948
Re: a new kind of visible radiant energy?
« Reply #250 on: September 01, 2010, 06:45:56 AM »
i noticed that when i was triangulating it,
its not drawn with enough precision.
its "off" a bit..



what i noticed is... their phase
they are 180-degrees apart.

meaning when one fluxuates "north", the one on either side adjacent to it is fluxing "south".

This sheds a lot of insight on a point someone made earlier, as "what happens when they're odd numbers"
(sparks? maybe?)

we would have to deduce this to prime-odd numbers, each non-prime odd number would have the same frequency response.

2/3 , 2/5, 2/7, 2/11 ect. and you will see the phase differentials between the tubes.





david lambright

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 211
Re: a new kind of visible radiant energy?
« Reply #251 on: September 01, 2010, 06:53:14 AM »
hi twinbeard...thanks for posting!...you are familiar with Mandelbrot i understand....his sets are a description of a flat plane vortex? ...Fibonacci's spiral and the Mandelbrot sets should go together...i believe that the way that all plants grow follows a magnetic pattern...the same pattern like you talked about...the helix...when this radiation is made to vortex it gets very strong....can you tell me more of Mandelbrot and Julia?...thanks....david

cletushowell

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 571
Re: a new kind of visible radiant energy?
« Reply #252 on: September 01, 2010, 07:05:55 AM »
Dam spark i thought this was going be top secrete i guess
it not no more you just hit the string too
move your two dots to the middle black and white
now you have your
--++
++++ triangles
the twelve triangles of 12,000
just cross your dots with a x three of them
so much for science its busted 

sm0ky2

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3948
Re: a new kind of visible radiant energy?
« Reply #253 on: September 01, 2010, 07:10:25 AM »
Now,.  as we discussed earlier,

the induction originates at the point where the tubes meet.

This means that BOTH sides of the tube, are pulsing north AND south, simultaneously.
one from itself, and one from the tube next to it.
i dont know how to explain that so it makes sense...
its like a "DC" magnetic pulse current at ~ 281 Ghz

if you want to know the polarity theres a point between the "gap"
just on the inside of the metal
you can suspend a magnetized piece of needle on a string and it will act as a compass.


cletushowell

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 571
Re: a new kind of visible radiant energy?
« Reply #254 on: September 01, 2010, 07:19:02 AM »
You get exact cuts of the pipes when you line the third ring up with the second you see they are not ezactly equal but are
they alternate ill be in court dealing with my stuoid earth
battery arrest tomaroe then ill post the correct key
you have it already but you need to line the rings up
smoky but you have string theory now
well the points ill fill you in on the lines
tomaroe send me your email
so i can fill you in