hi everyone...jesus, your device might come today!.....jetijs, yours wii be there soon...guys, when you get the device, dont expect it to shoot green sparks, lol....just look at it, i have found if there more people looking at the device, the ones who see it right off can help by their description of what they see....hold it up, turn it slowly, do not try too hard, kindof let yuor eyes relax....the words people are using to describe this....looks like heat, a bubble or film, and like a lens...take your time, it will manifest...also my newest device!!...i made the ferro fluid core device using a clear vinyl tube, about 2" diameter.... the tube is 1/4" vinyl, coupled with a short piece of just larger tube....i filled the tube with ferro fluid, not very easy, wear gloves, it was messy but worth it....i could not get all the air out, i left a 1mm bubble in it...i do not think is affects the orbital path....20 or 30 wraps of copper wire and energized first one way, then flip the battery and do it again.....very quick, so that the wires do not get hot.....this device really does the lens thing good...is is just as smokey2 said, you gotta see it for yourself.....david

Hi All,

Some of what you are describing sounds like what Pier Luigi Ighina was working on.

http://www.svpvril.com/ighina/magatom.html

"...
When observing an atom under an atomic microscope, he defined 4 fundamental laws:


1) The light atoms, when they excite the observed atoms, give part of their motion to the latter.

2) The observed atoms absorb part of the motion of the light atoms to speed up theirs.

3) In order to excite an atom, you need it to get in touch with an atom of higher motion; the atom with the highest motion will attract the one with the lowest motion.

4) The higher the atoms motion, the more luminous it will be and vice-versa.
..."

I'm wondering if #3 is what is causing the Aluminum to attract? If you could excite the Aluminum atoms to a higher motion then it would be more likely to attract those with a lower motion? The glimmer effect could be part #4 when exciting the surrounding atoms to a higher motion.

I could be all wrong in the thinking of this but the implications of the Lambright effect are amazing.

@David:  I sent you a PM

@All:  Here's a video of my replication of the Baker's Device, YouTube - Baker's device 

I used the nylon fibers found inside a CAT 5 cable.  All I need to do now is to add a mirror to the nylon string to reflect the laser light, then seal it up so there are no air currents to affect the experiments.  I also need 4 ring magnets so the combined forces of the earth's magnetic field and those of the doughnut magnets almost cancel each other out so it will rotate quite freely and be the most sensitive.  This setup detected a magnet from 4 feet away without the nulling magnets in place.  It didn't take very long to assemble this apparatus and it was easy to build.

GB

@David:  I sent you a PM

@All:  Here's a video of my replication of the Baker's Device, YouTube - Baker's device 

I used the nylon fibers found inside a CAT 5 cable.  All I need to do now is to add a mirror to the nylon string to reflect the laser light, then seal it up so there are no air currents to affect the experiments.  I also need 4 ring magnets to null out gravity so it will be the most sensitve.  This setup detected a magnet from 4 feet away without the nulling magnets in place.  It didn't take very long to assemble this apparatus and it was easy to build.

GB

Well done GB.  It'll be nice to see measurements of Dave's rig when you get it.  Really well done. 

kindest regards,
Rosemary

@rosemary
you dontderstand everything is different ech time i see it its like they cut peices from my side so im not ignoring you but did not have your response to answer your question im now frustrated but ill do it anyways.
your question
What I really wanted to do was to list some of the questions that I understood are still outstanding.  Here goes - to the best of my knowledge we do not know why the electron is precisely 1836 times smaller than a proton - yet has the identical but opposite charge?

the answer= 1836 =1+8=9 3 6 teslas 369 rev 18 there not exact smae there 1 off the 8


 Why the electron does not nosedive to the proton is still out there.?
answer the proton and neutron cannot colide due to the 1 added to the system once this is done polarity is always seperated 3691888 after the 1 everything is always positive or double energy its ciclin back thru the 8 the 369 cirlcles back thru the 369


  Partially explained as it's having a 'like' charge to some of the proposed quarks - which again is based on theoretical suppositions.  Nothing wrong with theory.  Just very difficult to prove.  Then there's the outstanding question related to the forces themselves.  No-one knows how they work - only that they do.  And right now the structure of the universe is somewhat topical as they've been obliged to propose an overriding universal expansion to override the 'attraction' of the gravitational force. ?
Gravity is expanding the plasma earths sea of glass is expanding as gravit increases the green house gas the water is suspended longer as the sea turns to salt crystals the green house energy is then vibrated between the plasma and the earth this is the end result the sea crystals hold all the water in space.
 This analysis is based on measurements related to the red shift - but there are gross inherent contradictions that relate to empirical evidence - especially as this relates to the collision of galaxies.  But over and above all of this is the fact that neither classical and quantum gravity explain the mystery related to our galaxial masses that really should unravel and yet they don't.  This question is NOT answered by universal expansion.?
you dont see the loops its not expanding or contracting its apearse to be based on the time and energy you evaluate it at the earth is constantly sending rocks to space why the grand canyon
does not build it own giant dam where did the dirt go the rocks I know it hard for you to get
but its the same result as coral castle but when the energy level is increased to a point the rocks build so much energy the shoot to space dislodge with energy when enough sediment is loose the rocks has more energy the the resistance it goes this happens at nigh due to temperature of air coller then the rocks and energy.

It is only answered by the existence of some force that heretofore has not been factored in to our physics studies.  And it's getting a hard time amongst all academics.  There is still just a fringe group of astrophysicsts who acknowledge the evidence here.  When one considers that this problem has been put out there some 80 years ago, it shows the evident reluctance of mainstream to entertain new questions let alone new answers to those questions.  And finally is the outstanding question related to locality.  The simple fact is that paird particles can adjust their positions simultaneously at faster than light speeds.  This begs the final barrier that superluminal velocity is indeed possible.  This point is seldom referenced by mainstream and - like dark energy - it's only referenced in whispers. dark energy is a joke a new scientific term to get more funding its all the same frequency whether you store it in a battery oil coal natural gas hydrogen a specialy formulated composite of shit that you calcuate converts the energy better its still all the same thing frequency split uvc to uvb tovc to lead all the way to silicon you have the plasma yes I have the formula no I dont have a lab yes they did split lead frequency clear to silicon so theres better solar times 10 your just going to buy there slowest computer first everyone is thats the going green scam unless we bust it first with good will and better intention people then getting rich.
in fact well all get rich because we will all stop paying iran just work together.

Which, again, is why forums such as this rock.  I'm reasonably sure that we all prefer questions to standardised answers.  Clearly - until mainstream will revise those creeds related to thermodynamic laws then - we all definitely have the edge on them.  And more to the point is that we're all prepared to both ask the questions and find the answers.  Maybe not with the same flair and panache and technical rectitudes - but it still puts us streets ahead.  LOL.  We're leaning hard on those paradigms.  Very nice.

 

Regards,
Rosemary

Hello Twinbeard and most welcome to our discussion.  Some very appropriate links.  Many thanks for that.

Hi Rosemary.  Its a pleasure to meet you.  Fabulous work you are doing!

They have actually photographed pictures of atoms - believe it or not.  It looks like nested eggs held in cottonwool - or morning mist.  Extraordinary photograph - but I can't for the life of me remember where I saw it.  Just have the picture of it welded on my mind.

I would love to see it.  Google Images cannot come up with a actual picture of an electron for me, which is what I was intending on referring to... not an entire atom.  If you find such an image, please let me know.  The thought was that the electron it itself comprised of many smaller quark type aetheric particles.

I think Dave or someone with a rig will need to do that thin film of ferrofluid that you recommended.  I must say I'd also like to know the outcome.

I'm just curious what the extent of the B field looks like, given that the flux, by my estimation, should not be able to escape what amounts to a toroidal core, yet the particular geometry of this device may be creating really interesting eddies.

Cheers,
Twinbeard

@Rosemary

   I believe Jeanna over in the joule thief thread posted pictures of an atom.  The surface of which is a series of triangular static lines encasing whirling circles.  Looks like little pyramids encasing spheres. A pyramid is a cool geometric shape it can encompass a circle with the circle meeting the pyramid surface at 5 points.  One in the middle of the base.   And 4 more at pi diistance from the ground to the touch on the four faces.   The pinnacle of the pyramid forms an axis for the encased sphere while the walls  and floor of the pyramid form a 3 dimensional support system for the encased ball of minimal contact.  You can put a sphere inside a square also but the pyramid is more interesting.  Any expansion or contraction of the sphere would be converted to moving the pinnacle of the pyramid up and down.  More or less converting the stress put on the sides of the pyramid into motion at the pinnacle. A little expansion of the sphere creates alot of movement at the pinnacle.
   @ all

     We are down wind of Leo and the two of us are heading towards a supercluster of galaxies beyond what is known as the Great Attractor.  The gravity from this dense cluster of matter is pulling the entire Milkyway there.  Since gravity is pretty quick way faster than the speed of light we can assume that this cluster of galaxies is still there even though slowass light is taking forever to get here.  The young cluster of galaxies we are seeing most probably exist as a super blackhole by now long ago gobbling up the hot matter and cooling it down considerably.  Gravity is an accelerating force.  It accelerates stuff aound here a 32feet per second unless you take the moon into account which slows this acceleration down.  Gravity like movement is a relative thing.  The more mass in a given field the more gravity.  To counter all this mother nature in all her wisdom produced antigravity.  This manifests in like charges being repelled.  There is no positive and negative there is just more or less electricity in a substance. The proton is assigned a positive charge.  Why because it has less mass density.  It is quite large compared to the electron yet it has equal charge effect.  This is because it has less mass density.  If it had the same mass density as an electron it would have the same charge state as an electron and would repel the electron.   A blackhole does not gobble up another blackhole.  We see a blackhole gobbling up the less dense matter surrounding the blackhole at the center of each and every star but blackholes are relavent to blackholes.  Once they have stripped the hot stuff it leaves the core of the star which is at the same mass density as the big black hole.  The two black holes then begin to accelerate away from each other on their way to creating new galaxies somewhere else in time and space.  There has to be antigravity or the big bang has to be repeating itself over and over and over again changing just a little bit every time.  Imploding and exploding so damn fast that all we see is minute changes dictated by whatever force is controlling the whole creator frequency.  Of the two sceanarios I would go with antigravity.  At least on the 7th day when the creator takes a snooze.