Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: a new kind of visible radiant energy?  (Read 304100 times)

cletushowell

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 571
Re: a new kind of visible radiant energy?
« Reply #150 on: August 29, 2010, 06:53:00 PM »
You cannot measure daves energy
ill tryy to explain why there is a continual
ion flow the feild you see is the rainbow
the only way you can measure is
the amount you can store the amount you
store is based on your battery whatever material your using
basicaly what dave has done is slowed
down the magnetic flow to the frequency
of thing not thought to be magnetic
because the frequency of a solid magnets
is so fast it only attracts magnets at the same frequency
you have one frequency that makes
6 magenta blue red yellow cyan green
those are your six colors
all come from magenta indigo
tge very last one you will magniste
will be water the green the chlorophyl
its your last frequency
so what im saibg is one you build a open
horshoe like dave pipes theres a flow the rainbow
between the edges of the pipe the same
flow of a crack in a car head that attracts powerder
the same crack in the car head is the same
cracks in earth the river the water is attracted
to the river always for several reasons
not just gravity lowest point
the ocean is different it is a salt not a water
completly different in fact complete oposites
if you put salt on a plant you kill it
reversing energy so if you think
of a magnet pumping frequency
your taping the rainbow the
-+ in air no matter how much energy you take from those pipes the refill
from air the auto start a ion flow between them
sending receiving the 369188
in a short loop all on its own your taping that energy
earthquake thats circling the metal
gap pulling or directing frequency
continualy as you test more you
will probly understand more
of this I know its hard but its important you dont put a equation
on it because there is no equation
its pie its loops of infinity and if you determine the
energy please do not stick it on daves device but only
on the plastic or battery your measuring
because its going to confuse everyone
with a equation it cannot equate to

Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: a new kind of visible radiant energy?
« Reply #151 on: August 29, 2010, 07:14:29 PM »
If you have been threatened by mib
send it to me i have no kids im not afraid
of these fuckers and have a lot of shit on
them all and technology they can only dream of
so what im saying is build a fake email
dont put your name and either link me two it
or give it direct I will do my best to decode it
and put it with the rest of others and release it finished
free thats the only way to beat these guys
ch@helpuflip.com

 ;D  Golly Cletus.  I've been rolling.  I must say I'm beginning to rather enjoying your strange postings - albeit that they're not entirely understandable.  Glad to know that you're watching our backs. 

Regards,
Rosemary

Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: a new kind of visible radiant energy?
« Reply #152 on: August 29, 2010, 07:35:19 PM »
Hi everyone,

This is one of three to come.  Hope it works.  I'm not quite sure how to post three consecutively in the same post.  But I'm getting there.

Regards,
Rosemary

cletushowell

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 571
Re: a new kind of visible radiant energy?
« Reply #153 on: August 29, 2010, 07:37:47 PM »
Rosemary
the goverment has and is blocking free
energy every day there are people that develop systems like
bendini like joe cell
like edward the pattent office refused to aknowledge
they threaten everyone if you havent got a visit then you havent built
anything that is a threat to there money supply
lots of people have children and a life important that makes
the goverment shut these technologies
down what im saying is I will
stand up to them I will take as many bullits
as I need to untill this oil ends
the joes cell starts on hydrogen but its not runing on
hydrogen theres no implosion
its running on magnetism the ignition
coil timing is changed to pull the power from the piston to the spark
plug not power across the plug the frequency of the joe coil
is important the pistons are building
energy like a capacitoar actualy all the whole engine is the capacitor
hes discharging it back wards thru the
coil in the order of the pistons
your work on magnetising aluminum
is going to be key to runninh theses new aluminum
motors on his technology probly the reason the switched to aluminum
heads and pistons

Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: a new kind of visible radiant energy?
« Reply #154 on: August 29, 2010, 07:38:25 PM »
SECOND SHOT Close up of the 'saucer' arrangement

Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: a new kind of visible radiant energy?
« Reply #155 on: August 29, 2010, 07:42:03 PM »
Last one.  I'm running out of time here but will try and cover the relevance on this in a following post.

Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: a new kind of visible radiant energy?
« Reply #156 on: August 29, 2010, 08:16:16 PM »
Hi guys, the relevance of that rather eccentric arrangement of magnets was to get a 'design' shape that could test multiple arrangements of magnets - and their effects.  I'ts nowhere near finished.  There's a middle tier that, unfortunately, cracked and it's preventing the three tiers from turning independently.  By which I mean that it's producing a certain amount of friction.  But nor do I see any evidence of any spin at all - which I was hoping for. 

Effectively it's a series of independently 'spinable' cups each with its own bearing - but positioned on a shared axis.  Its the first stage of a series of test apparatus - the next one being a duplicate of this so that we can position two opposing fields in parallel - as required. 

Here's the thinking.  We know that there's an enormous amount of 'empty space' inside your average atom.  I've referenced this widely - and am sure that the most of you know this, but this is the analogy.  If you picture the nucleus of your average hydrogen atom - and make it the size of an apple - in the mind's eye.  Then the electron would be orbiting that nucleus at an about 8 - 12 kilometer radius to that apple.  And the electron, in turn, would be about the size of a split pea.  Between these two structures which are the only KNOWN material in that hydrogen atom - are energy levels - but no-one knows what they comprise because they are apparently without any detectable 'charge'.  The proposal is that these energy levels may be magnetic fields that somehow hold the electron 'locked' in a fixed orbit.  Just a proposal.  It may very well be wrong.  And in any event this, too would depend on the further proposal that the magnetic fields - ALL magnetic fields - comprise a dipolar particle that is undetectable (dark) precisely because it is too small and too fast for even light to detect it. 

That's the 'thinking' behind the construct.  Now.  We all know about the Casimir effect which is the ability of material to 'bond' - on a really small scale.  This 'effect' was predicted by Casimir - a mathematician - and subsequently proven.  In effect there is a property in bonded atoms to also bond with extraneous material - provided only that their proximity is such to allow this.  Take a really small piece of metal and put it next to another really small piece - and they stick like crazy. 

What's proposed here is that this 'bonding' is enabled by really small 'fields' of these dipoles that interact with energy levels but which do not themselves belong to the atom.  They're extraneous.  And they're responsible for the 3 dimensional shapes in all bound amalgams.  In other words - something other than the atom's own 'charge' or valence condition - enables the formation of the crystalline structure in all bound amalgams.  This includes water - but in gases it's confined to molecular bonding.  Anyway - that's the thinking.

But this means that if these fields are responsible for that 'bonding' and if Dave's rig is somehow influencing these tiny little one dimensional fields - then that could be the explanation for the fact that - regardless of the material - anything within it's range of influence also seems to exhibit a marked magnetic type response to the field - regardless as to it's inherent magnetisable properties - or otherwise. 

So.  This apparatus of mine is intended to explore this question.  Right now the outer rim has a n/s,s/n opposing polarities as does the inner rim.  And you can hang any kind of material on a thread and it is very evidently able to influence whatever material you use.  I am going to do a video of this but it will not be until later on next week.

So, while this is NOT in line with Dave's experiments it's still very much on the same page.  I'm just so anxious to see if I can get some answers to the many questions that the Lambright Effect seems to beg.

Regards,
Rosemary

Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: a new kind of visible radiant energy?
« Reply #157 on: August 29, 2010, 08:39:07 PM »
And just something that I urgently need to reference.  This AMAZING little rig of ours was put together by one of the most extraordinary design engineers I've ever had the good fortune to meet.  I'll see if I can show some of the work that he's done - somehow and one day.   Hopefully he may yet come on board as a member.

And Theo - in the unlikely event that you read here, many many thanks for your hard work and for the time and patience in getting this lot together. 



Regards,
Rosemary

Jetijs

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 2
Re: a new kind of visible radiant energy?
« Reply #158 on: August 29, 2010, 09:11:40 PM »
Rosemary,
great test rig you have there. Thank you for sharing, a great idea.
Thaks,
Jetijs

nievesoliveras

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1996
Re: a new kind of visible radiant energy?
« Reply #159 on: August 29, 2010, 10:36:26 PM »

hello
 
this seems to be a brushless dc motor ( like DD and CD motor )
 
here is a pdf :
 
http://www.freescale.com/files/dsp/doc/app_note/AN1961.pdf

Thank you @tagor

I browsed through the document and now I have realized that I chose a very dificult task to accomplish. Or at least it seems to be very hard.

Is there any step by step tutorial on how to run a 3 phase bldc?

Jesus

XS-NRG

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 413
Re: a new kind of visible radiant energy?
« Reply #160 on: August 29, 2010, 10:41:33 PM »
You only think it is hard.

Once you step into the digital controller world, you can make that motor dance with your eyes closed.
It is not hard at all.

cletushowell

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 571
Re: a new kind of visible radiant energy?
« Reply #161 on: August 29, 2010, 11:21:53 PM »
Let go back to the apple
its not a pea in the center its a core
a torus watch this video its the string theory
design but not the structure but its the closest example i can give you
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8ey028iq22A&feature=youtube_gdata_player
to help you understand life itself
without weapons now your testing
daves device you see of very important
to controll the energy you need to conduct two
of those pipes oposite the wheel
with a flat plate
this makes your ++
-+
sorry im lost this thread is all over now
i dont know what the goal is so Im
stuck on trying to tell you the answers to the questions
take rosemarys wheel and put two
one upside down on the other
but your just over complicating daves
design you can get all four cirners if earth from daves
rember the cup ill post the diagram give me a minute



cletushowell

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 571
Re: a new kind of visible radiant energy?
« Reply #162 on: August 30, 2010, 12:12:30 AM »
sorry I got frustrated on the left side I dont hve the graph paper
Im pretty shure its + -+-+ but its negative the last time i did it so maybey its just -
--++
++++
so the 4 + turn to negative but the point the hit the ball is the point of the polarity and being I dont have a the exact graph the ++++
should go ++++
               - --
                ++
                 -  so ya it should be right at the very point - but just off the poi +-+ thats the left

sparks

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2528
Re: a new kind of visible radiant energy?
« Reply #163 on: August 30, 2010, 05:55:16 AM »
@niiev


    You can split just one pulsed signal by inserting capacitors in series with your coils.   You can try it with just 2 one winding connected directly to the line and inserting various capacitors in the other two.  The combination of capacitance and inductance and pulse width can be adjusted so that the coils appear to fire around the circumference of the motor.  You can get it all to ring also.  This is when your motor windings appear as inductors in 3 series resonant circuits.  This is the most efficient design but as you have already noted it is no easy task.

    You can get hold of Bolt who posts in the TPU section quite often.  He builds rotoverters that is basically an electric motor stator creating a rotating magnetic field that whirls around a fixed winding whose currents are then supplied to a load.
« Last Edit: August 30, 2010, 06:30:05 AM by sparks »

sm0ky2

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3948
Re: a new kind of visible radiant energy?
« Reply #164 on: August 30, 2010, 07:12:51 AM »
@ Rose

have you found a way to "polarize" things, different from what Dave showed with the PMH / aluminum?

---------------------------------------------------------

@ Gravity Block
   
What exactly would be gained from knowing that a piece of... say Aluminum, has a ferromagnetic quality of (X)

Or that a piece of Copper has a field of (X - Y)

They are not magnetic. but are attracted to a field, when they should NOT be.. its very strange. but im not sure what measuring this will tell us??

im assuming this is temporary, but i guess time will tell. its only been 3 days and the aluminumn foil is still ferromagnetic. I dont know wether or not dave still has his that he did a while back.
Aluminum foil works very well, Copper sheet works to a lesser degree.
im under the assumption that the material has to be conductive, or more specifically, a metal. though i may experiment with crystals..



i guess what im getting at, Grav..
    What exactly do you hope to determine,
 with the knowledge of the
 precise permeability of a piece of polarized aluminum???
Is there some standard, for causing a mass of alumimum to be attracted to a magnetic field, that perhaps... consumes a given ammount of energy, by which we could use to asses the strength of the magnetic current?
-------------------------------------------------

Theoretically, the strength of the magnetic currents' magnetic field should be::

2.8028 x (10 ^ 14) eV / ng   
give or take impurities in the metal

up to approximately.....
2.33 x (10^15) ng, then we have a "slightly different situation"