Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: a new kind of visible radiant energy?  (Read 304097 times)

Hope

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 701
Re: a new kind of visible radiant energy?
« Reply #75 on: August 27, 2010, 09:22:27 AM »
Had to beat back the world awhile today but am still at it, the base  doesn't seem important at just making the effect (it may in magnetic amplification though) only the shape and magnetic lock.   Will get pictures posted a.s.a.p.  Hello All, from the American San Juan Islands.  Today was perfect weather and we got alot done outside and my friends Lambrite Device is ready to be put together tomorrow if all goes normal.   Thank you All     next (besides studying the effect)  We will also see about making a tube device also         )))

sm0ky2

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3948
Re: a new kind of visible radiant energy?
« Reply #76 on: August 27, 2010, 09:32:18 AM »
@ Jermutin

yes, yes, and i dont know - refer to Daves videos

the first thing i noticed was a piece of hair getting sucked off of a metel i was moving through the field.
i thought maybe just some static effect.

but when i moved onto the static-charge tests, the styrofoam niblet performed nicely. it went around twice, much faster through the center, and slowly around the outside back up to the center again. then it got stuck to the bottom inside the center, on one of the "tubes".

the test model i was using was an inconsistently-shaped contraption bent out of sheet-metal.
the metal alloy is designed to contain a good portion of the flux path, its used for EMF/RF shielding in high-power electronics.

the exact size, i guess will depend on what we do with this thing.
the larger it gets the more intense the radiation.
the small it gets, the more concentrated it is.

so i guess it could have differing potential.

i havent found a way to really interact with this radiation stuff yet.
it seems to "slowly attract" to almost anything.
theres a few man-made inorganic substances which it seems to ignore...  i need to do the light tests, i have some precision lasers i can mount them to pass through the field at various angles and distances.

and of course some coil arrangements can't be overlooked.
this is definately ground breaking stuff dave is onto here.




sparks

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2528
Re: a new kind of visible radiant energy?
« Reply #77 on: August 27, 2010, 11:38:37 AM »
   Radiant energy or radiant matter?  Matter which has mass bends light. If matter can absorb thermal photons why cant matter absorb lower frequency photons.  This matter then caused to emit the stored photons in a vastly shorter amount of time then it took to absorb them.  The energy appearing to come from thin air when it was actually stored in thin air.

ramset

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8073
Re: a new kind of visible radiant energy?
« Reply #78 on: August 27, 2010, 02:36:47 PM »
Sparks
Qoute:
The energy appearing to come from thin air when it was actually stored in thin air.

---------------
I like the way that sounds!

 little fuel cells![every where]

Chet

sm0ky2

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3948
Re: a new kind of visible radiant energy?
« Reply #79 on: August 27, 2010, 10:56:07 PM »
There may actually be a relationship there.

sort of the fundamental engineering of matter itself.
the stars create matter by resonating a local region at a specific frequency, based on its constituents and their conditions.

this frequency determines the type of material that is produced by the fission.
i think what we are doing here, is tapping into this frequency and causing it to resonate within the material.

i just found this today
http://adsabs.harvard.edu/full/1990Ap%26SS.168..293B

these equations are the same that i used a few pages back, just in a different form, when i was trying to determine the frequency of this radiation.
"Magnetic frequency of iron" if you will.

According to Harvard, this is the same frequency the sun was resonating at, the moment these atoms were formed.
its amazing to think we might actually be tapping into this frequency.



cletushowell

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 571
Re: a new kind of visible radiant energy?
« Reply #80 on: August 28, 2010, 12:15:40 AM »
Having a bad day as always when you want to learn how to contain
controll and reverse thr radiation
ill be here playing stupid trying to
recreate all the things you guys know
off the top your head like how to activate a strobe light
to build the plasma to oscilate the 369
and some how the activation is the hot spot on
morays light bulbs but you all know I dont know how to wire the strobe
bulb or change its pulse to make my electronic
distributor for my wireless ac unlimited energy
so i just keep fucking throwing shit
till i fucking figure it out you radiation controll is water i tried to post it yesterday but the whole thing was wiped by goverment
im not retyping it here it took to long for nothing
ch@helpuflip.com

cletushowell

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 571
Re: a new kind of visible radiant energy?
« Reply #81 on: August 28, 2010, 12:27:15 AM »
When you want to find the frequency of the two stars
all energy comes from
the 144,000 go search decibel
then you see a guy that built a system
simular to haarp on a rotating
bearing he tuned all the frequencies
and found two left thise two are the dog wistle and the
144,000 tje dog wistle is the green star you only see on the west coast when it crosses the ocean at just the moment the sun sets called green flash the other star is the red star is so far you can see it
that start frequency is everything
but either due to goverment or
just stupidity they cancled his testing
because it did not intefere with the telegraph lines
but its actualy the reason the telegraph worked
but no one will get that ill see if i can find the link 
 

cletushowell

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 571
Re: a new kind of visible radiant energy?
« Reply #82 on: August 28, 2010, 12:43:09 AM »
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karl_Guthe_Jansky
heres the guy
this is not his orginal device
this is a cover up his fibdibg was not the milky way
either

cletushowell

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 571
Re: a new kind of visible radiant energy?
« Reply #83 on: August 28, 2010, 12:56:19 AM »
http://www.nrao.edu/whatisra/hist_jansky.shtml
i find it interesting
he was in a depression and were in a depression
and now finishing the work he started
they killed why did they kill a fucking frequency
so they can charge us for energy thats why

nievesoliveras

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1996
Re: a new kind of visible radiant energy?
« Reply #84 on: August 28, 2010, 02:19:01 AM »
Thank you @lambright!

I am building a variable capacitor with some pieces of aluminum I had around.
The purpose is to test if using a coil and that capacitor (if the capacitor does work) and put it not far from the device and see if I can catch the energy that it is radiating.
Maybe I need to add a diode or two...

Jesus

sm0ky2

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3948
Re: a new kind of visible radiant energy?
« Reply #85 on: August 28, 2010, 05:40:43 AM »
ive been running some calculations on noble gasses

it seems that krypton-chloride would give us the best reactivity with this radiation. im going to see if i can find some, in a neon-tube or something. round, like the letter "O" or whatever.
then build the device to fit the neon

i have this image stuck in my head of that thing from the Iron Man movie....

cletushowell

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 571
Re: a new kind of visible radiant energy?
« Reply #86 on: August 28, 2010, 06:12:49 AM »
I already did that polarity i told you I have every antigravity
polarity email you see Ill send you the suit
i defined thr flying triangle too so it can be pulsed to one from
4 yoi guys are catching up fast check out my
self oscilating overlimt wireless dc
feedback system its tight as shit
keep up the good work email me serious ill give you the polarity for the suit
ch@record7.com

Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: a new kind of visible radiant energy?
« Reply #87 on: August 28, 2010, 07:15:44 AM »
Looks to me it is used either a heavy or lighter gas, or a colder or hotter air. Any of these methods will show a similar effect in air and sometimes hard to spot. The tube can also be very cold or heated by sunlight and the changes the temperature of the air inside it. I cannot see the special about this yet, but maybe science havent discovered these effects yet...
Please correct me if I'm wrong about my explanation of what it is.

Br.

Vidar

Hi Vidar,  I'm actually going through this thread to get up to speed and saw this from you.  Apologies for not answering you before.

I think the 'light' or, as EF.com refer to it 'the Lambright Glimmer' is simply the most extraordinary property of this rig.  In the first instance it is absolutely NOT a schlieren effect - as tested and proven.  I built a version of Dave's rig and did NOT see lights - but I have seen that glimmer off a video on Dave's youtube.  I'll post a link again when I've finished here.  It is readily evident to some people - but apparently not to all.  And there are those, such as Bruce (who was the happy recipient of a prototype) who first did NOT see it and then DID.  Meanwhile his family saw it clearly and 'first off'.  Definitely elusive.  I wonder if we are somehow being 'educated' into a new sensory capacity.  But that's definitely off topic and I digress.  It just reminds me of those people who can detect the early stages of milk turning - and others who simply cannot. A kind of something that is 'genetically' determined - perhaps?  Just don't know. 

Then.  There's the simple fact that any object - regardless of it's magnetic properties or lack of them - simply gets attracted or repelled to various parts of that rig.  And this much I have definitely seen.  It's mind bending.  The actual field on the rig has yet to be defined.  I'm going through some really involved tests to see if I can find this - definitively - but it's a long haul.  If one bears in mind the short duration of applied current - as required to secure the 'lock' then the fact that it should evince any kind of continued magnetic property - is extraordinary.  A small compass in the centre of the rig goes haywire - indicating that there's definitely a polarity or a magnetised condition to the rig.  But nothing actually 'sticks'.  Not even iron filings.  I'm still reasonably certain that the entire rig holds the secret to Leedskalnin's miracles at Coral Castle.  Somehow he used this force to enable his control of stone blocks that weighed up to 30 tons - I believe.  In fact the door to the castle may even weigh more.

But I think Sm0ky may be wise to exercise a little caution in getting this into full functionality (if there is such a word).  This simply because Ed died of cancer - and I would be very wary of what seems like some real energies.  We all know what happened to Madame Curie.  But - having said that - on the level that this is being investigated - then I also think it's relatively harmless.  Certainly I didn't experience any headaches or any harmful effects.  I'm still testing.  But I'm testing around the concepts rather than the concept itself.  I'm entirely engrossed in this subject.

Kindest regards,
Rosemary


Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: a new kind of visible radiant energy?
« Reply #88 on: August 28, 2010, 07:54:47 AM »
If we are seeking physical work done from our devices, using electricity is only one way of doing the job.  We are going to have to design what will look pretty weird to the masses at first. But when they understand it is just using a newly (re) found radiant energy, they will comprehend it no problem.   Our normal electricity theory based test equipment won't be of much use to us, so I look forward to the new tools we will be discovering.

Well said Hope.  I entirely agree.
Kindest regards,
Rosemary

cletushowell

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 571
Re: a new kind of visible radiant energy?
« Reply #89 on: August 28, 2010, 07:58:50 AM »
Seriouusly you guys are getting on my nerves I already gave you the whole code all the math here and on coral castle video the formula
and most important the carvings the
unified feild theory the carvings are the whole key
bit carving a radiated rock is fucking stupid
i finished his book I gavd you all the answers
polorise charge remove
circle the rock
remove to earth polorises it stop remoning charges it
then remove it to earth put frequency below lifts the rock
but remove excess weight by carving it
determine hoe much radiationit stores by the amount of moisture not yo much girls drop the rock by adding more watter
you can never move his castle till you move the capstone