Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: a new kind of visible radiant energy?  (Read 304054 times)

sm0ky2

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3948
Re: a new kind of visible radiant energy?
« Reply #30 on: August 23, 2010, 05:02:37 PM »
If we assume that magnetic radiation is a function of the change in energy levels of an electron, forced into a vectored elliptical orbit around the nucleus...

That would mean that the frequency of the radiation is (in close estimate) equal to the orbital frequency of the electron.
Which, if my calculations are correct for Iron(Fe)
would place this right around 281 Gigahertz.
   give or take variations in magnetic field intensity (mass dependent?)

thats somewhere between microwave and visible light.

the electric-charge vortex is a different effect than the radiation, more of the cause really... i dont know what effects this radiation might have on the human body, or objects placed into it.

i need to do some more research before i continue to experiment with this. I had a whole slue of tests lined up last night, to include numerous types of materials, lasers, electro-static discharge, temperature monitoring a suspended container of water in the field.

but what ended up happening, was i stared at it for a while, stuck my finger in it,. held various objects in the field and watched it stretch and flow towards them.
began a series of charged particle tests, then got spooked by the stuff. i didnt want it radiating around me, not knowing what it was.... so i took it down for now, until i learn more.

At this point my focus of study is going to be in the 281Ghz range
This is theorized off the Bohr atomic model, to be the frequency of a magnetic field, radiating from a magnetized iron atom.
Using a technique similar to the emision of lazer-light frequencies,
the "magnetron" uses the frequency of a ceramic-ferrite material to produce radiation in the microwave frequency range.

The Lambright Radiation, if it is indeed from the oscillations in the magnetic field itself, would be actually considered "microwaves", but approaching the edge of the scale to far-infrared light.
something we call "milimeter waves" (EHF), noted because of their wavelength. Interference patterns within the field could easily explain frequency-peaks exceeding the low end of the infrared scale, which would correlate with the type of visual effect we are observing. (magnetic diffraction?)

If this is the case, then this radiation would be relatively harmless to us. (may cause cancer in small laboratory animals) virtualy identicle to what we use for long-range microwave communications.
except that this is completely incoherent, being that its an interference pattern.


but , like i said im not entirely sure on this yet. so i'll need to learn more before i continue experimenting with it.




sm0ky2

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3948
Re: a new kind of visible radiant energy?
« Reply #31 on: August 23, 2010, 05:53:27 PM »
there'd be a real simple test for this....

If you can get your hands on a PV-cell with low-iron glass
these are generally more expensive, but are known for their ability to pick up on, not only visible light, but also IR light as well.
these are called "high-efficiency cells", or full-spectrum cells
(even though they are only partial spectrum, because our ability to manufacture products makes it difficult to assemble a cell that captures the UV specrum)

or remove the cell from a calculator and swap the glass from an IR transmitter (rectualanger I-C chip), should be able to come up with two that are close to the same size. just swap the glass it should work fine.

If IR-radiation can be recieved from this device, it would prove this as a viable solid-state power source. Because, by definition, the PMH will sustain its magnetic current indefinately.


david lambright

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 211
Re: a new kind of visible radiant energy?
« Reply #32 on: August 23, 2010, 07:49:15 PM »
hi everyone...i made another aluminum tube/oxide core ring but this time i put a coil of copper wire inside the tube before filling it with oxide...i drilled 2 small holes in the tube for the wires to come through ...after i energized it with a coil around the outside of the tube, i checked for voltage from the inner coil...it seems there is a small constant output....my meter is not very sensitive, but it looks like a very tiny constant flow of energy...this device is a fairly crude proto-type......the wave form that radiates from these devices is the same type that Tesla was seeing,the same that alex from EF saw...both of them saw this after high voltage, current etc.  Tesla noted gravitational effects in some of his tests....Brown also described gravitational effects....Leedskalnins generator is a PMH that is able to spin that visible distortion wave into a vortex, but without the high voltage that others have used.....i do not think the high voltage is necessary to get the gravitational effects that they describe.....david

Low-Q

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2847
Re: a new kind of visible radiant energy?
« Reply #33 on: August 23, 2010, 08:23:19 PM »
I am very keen to see what these findings has to do with free energy. Is it a static field, or can it be harnessed to run something?
Interesting thread btw :)

Vidar

sm0ky2

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3948
Re: a new kind of visible radiant energy?
« Reply #34 on: August 24, 2010, 05:40:47 AM »

there's an electric charge'flow through the center and back around the outside. the direction of magnetism determines wether it flows top to bottom, or bottom to top.

the way mine was set-up, a positively charged particle is sucked down into the center, like a toilet-bowl, swirling around.
then pushed back up around the outside. (see picture 1)

the radiation and this vortex are clearly two seperate effects.

it makes sense to me that a stationary coil would pick up a small degree of this action, but i think there are better ways to harness this.

the best logical solution, that agrees with the mathematics
is the propegation of the magnetic moment.
this generally only applies to "radioactive elements", but it appears in the case of a magnetic current loop, the ferromagnetic material becomes "radioactive".

look at picture 2 and 3, when the magnetic moment occurs at TDC, where its magnitude is the strongest, it sends vectored field of the north polarity in one direction.
1/2 a cycle later, it occurs at BDC, and sends the south field in the other direction.
Now, while this occurs locally relative to the atom,
to us, observing the entire mass simultaneously,... we observe the "wave" of magnetic moments occuring one, after another after another, in both directions. north and south. just like ED said. the apparent motion of the wave is caused by the delay in the material as the original magnetic current propegated through it to start the PMH loop. This locked the atoms in synch with one another, offset only by a fraction of the initial propegation delay

This is of course, only an "apparent wave". Its not actually flowing through the material. which solves my first problem.
       - the relativistic one
i think the second problem can explained by the input energy,
but it only works out if we assume the ideal superconductor.
the electrons have to be elevated into a higher energy state to set them in an oscilating eliptical orbit.

we observe this magnetic current in perpetual motion.
so, does that mean that the magnetic current, turns the metal into a "magnetic superconductor"?
or is it simply that magnetic current doesn't incurr resistance in the same way that electricity does? ( i may have decided on the 2nd choice as i type this)

but here,s my best visual representation to describe what im talking about here... notice that the propegation of the "imaginary wave" is in the same direction during both halves of the cycle.
but on the lower half, the direction of the magnetic force is negative, little mind boggling..


 




david lambright

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 211
Re: a new kind of visible radiant energy?
« Reply #35 on: August 24, 2010, 06:09:01 AM »
smokey! ......mere words cannot convey my thanks....and i must say you are right, these devices must be tested to be "safe" as far as what energies are are being radiated....please be careful when replicating any of these devices....smokey, this radiance is something pretty interesting, i will think you will agree...did you get my PM that i sent?....if you have a working replication of my device, and you have "felt" the anomalies with quartz or metals, i want you to try something that will blow your mind, not literally of course, but you must keep an open mind, and you have.....but i think you will find this almost unbelievable!.......david

sm0ky2

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3948
Re: a new kind of visible radiant energy?
« Reply #36 on: August 24, 2010, 07:17:15 AM »
@ Dave

This whole thing has been amazing to me. i have to admit it was a bit spooky at first. but i think ive wrapped my head around this enough times, that i dont need to go buy a geiger counter just yet..

im fairly certain this is on the tail end of the red spectrum, so its relatively safe. but there are a couple concerns.. i'll draw a picture of the waves, to show what i mean.

i dont have any good quartz,
what little bit i had collected over the years was turned into quartz powder when i was experimenting with quartz-doped
oscillatory semiconductors. (long story)

if i need to i can find some more.
What is this other amazing thing?
      have you done anything with aluminum?

sm0ky2

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3948
Re: a new kind of visible radiant energy?
« Reply #37 on: August 24, 2010, 07:56:43 AM »
here, i didnt feel like drawing one. so this will have to do.
this is actually from a quantum light experiment, but the images look identicle, so here you go

an estimated assesment of frequencies involved here
your main three are going to be 281, 562, and 140 Ghz
that last one is potentially harmful at high power levels,
like standing in front of the transmitter antenae
but it shouldn't be dangerous from anything we're going to get off a 6 - 12 v battery.

i still have to cut the pipe segments, i may go about that differently, by just cutting a slit down one side of the whole pipe.
then cut it into chunks.
pry them open a bit.
instead of trying to cut the pipe into a bunch of 1/2 segments.

my small one concetrates the effect nicely. i fabricated it by hand out of a high-permeability sheet metal, with tin-snips and pliers.

i have it completely dissasembled. still debating wether or not to conduct these experiments inside an old microwave housing or something, to try and isolate it to some degree.

i also worry about interference.  technically the FCC has no jurisdiction over non-moving permanent magnets, but something like this may cause the rule-book on that matter to be reassesed.
what i worry about is it going to interfere with anything nearby..
like somebodies remote controlled device, or the neighbors pacemaker... is it going to cause abnormalities in my childrends DNA replication, resulting in cancer 30 yrs from now?

i dont have these answers completely. and this is like a little man on my shoulder telling me not to play with this stuff.

then i have this other guy, whos sitting there like " thats so KEWL! how can you NOT want to play with it?"

im still on the fence on this one, but im leaning towards
 "relatively safe to proceed with caution"

i mean, i could wear a lead suit, and have all kinds of instruments monitoring my surroundings and do this with a 10-ft pole.
but then again, walking across the street in broad daylight could prove more lethal...

my free spirit tells me to go for it, but the little voice that has kept me alive for this long, says theres just something wrong here...








sm0ky2

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3948
Re: a new kind of visible radiant energy?
« Reply #38 on: August 24, 2010, 08:10:52 AM »
Not to sound too stupid, But I would like to replicate this, but have seen no plan or detailed description to enable me to do that.

Is such information available?  If on another site, please list a link and I'll run over there.

I'm VERY eager to see what interactions there are via basic electrical interactions, as in, what levels "Overload" these intrinsic ones...

Any information would be appreciated!  (I'm thinking inverse control...)

ok, FIRST you need to understand what the Perpetual Motion Holder is.  Ed Leedskalnin gave this magical wonder to the world.
its basically a metal loop, with a piece that can be open and closed like a switch. Ed used a seperate metal piece, called a "keeper", its like the bar you see across a "U"-magnet
a coil is wound around each end of the loop, opposite the gap.
and wound opposite one another, to form two electromagnets.

when current is sent through the coils, and the "keeper" is in place, a magnetic current will develop through the entire loop, holding the keeper in place. even after the electricity is shut off.

After you understand this simple concept
then go to Dave's YouTube page and watch all his videos.
he shows a few different ways to make the PMH.
its all the same concept, just applied differently.

this new device is modeled after Ed's wheel, found in coral castle

Dave added his own creativity to it, and discovered that it radiates energy.

its a very simple design, and Dave walks you through the building process in YouTube video. plus several other videos of him playing with it. I have to tell you, what you see in the videos doesnt do it justice, you have to see this for yourself. (all words of caution i mentioned above still apply)

This is Scotty demonstrating a PMH holding a 23lb weight,
    with magnetic current.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_uZdEJALdiQ

and this is Dave's chanell
http://www.youtube.com/user/potatoheadist








Low-Q

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2847
Re: a new kind of visible radiant energy?
« Reply #39 on: August 24, 2010, 08:59:08 AM »
A coil should not be able to pick up a constant current flow. This is the biggest problem of transformation of energy. Energy is dynamic potentials. If this potential is almost not dynamic at all, it is hard to harness anything at all.
A moving coil should do a better job in a static field. However, picking up energy will provide a counter force that wants to fight back. It will be interesting to see any result on this.

david lambright

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 211
Re: a new kind of visible radiant energy?
« Reply #40 on: August 24, 2010, 09:41:34 AM »
smokey2!.....OK you got past the spooky part....is your replication able to spin?...if so, take a piece of aluminum and hold it near the spinning device...you should feel a subtle push/pull effect on the metal....any metal really...remember what Ed said, "it likes to flow through metal easier than through air"......OK, so now a little more spooky action at a distance, so to speak...go to my utube channel and find "DO NOT TRY THIS!" video.....hold the metal near the image on the screen.....the energy that these devices emit, can be reproduced as easily as a video! my best results were with a mineral galena, a lead ore.....this really does work and still trips me out every time i do it....i better check and make sure that video is public....it was shot in UV.....interesting....also i have succeeded in making aluminum foil magnetic, enough so to stick to a magnet...jetijs over at EF has done the same thing with pop can thickness aluminum!....and heated the metal to near its MELTING point, way past any Curie point, and still retained its ability to stick to a magnet.....smokey2, thanks again for posting....if you like this, there is more......david....almost forgot, to make the magnetic aluminum, put it inbetween the keeper and the U of a PMH and energize it...keep it there a while 15 to 30 minutes should do and viola, there you have it!......david

Hope

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 701
Re: a new kind of visible radiant energy?
« Reply #41 on: August 24, 2010, 09:48:04 AM »
My friend just came by a couple hours ago and we have (just like yours smokey) slit a pipe and made 48 sections    2inches long   but 1.3/8 inches dia rings  which we to will pry open if testing needs it.    Maybe tomorrow we will have a working model.   Thanks!    and have little fear of this device, Ed Leeds.. didn't die of cancer or grow horns or go blind.  But if you pump it up to HF  then the effect certainly may become a concern to quickly for me.  I also found copper and galvanized conduit clamps i want to make one with as a variance to check for shape and spacing.  We will get some 35mm film shots and scan them, in hope that  you can see this flow of fluid looking energy  (kind reminds me of when I had a magnifying glass and could see heat waves thru the lens while burning something).  Surely this type of shape is repeated many places in nature so we would already know if it is harmful it would seem.  On last thought,  smokey is bright and is correct in his cautions.   My friend and I will keep our models small for now till more is understood of this wavelength.

david lambright

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 211
Re: a new kind of visible radiant energy?
« Reply #42 on: August 24, 2010, 11:43:58 AM »
thank all you replicators for your interest in this subject...as time goes on the results of your builds will show many more important effects...i chose to go open source so that this discovery will not be slowed down...there are modifications i can tell you to " boost" the wave form if any one wants to know, i will post how!....the oxide core devices work like a lens, with no glass or other medium, just air and space!....i hope to post a build on them soon..... david

ramset

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8073
Re: a new kind of visible radiant energy?
« Reply #43 on: August 24, 2010, 03:59:00 PM »
David,
Very cool what you are doing here![Open source]

Have you ever put a piece of Gold close to your rig?

Chet

nievesoliveras

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1996
Re: a new kind of visible radiant energy?
« Reply #44 on: August 24, 2010, 06:51:06 PM »
jesus....OK, so give me a little while and i will send you a device!.....it does not weigh much, so shipping should not be a problem....thanks for your interest...david

@lambright
Hello first!

I would like to know if that offer is still valid.
Or if it was just ...

Jesus