Author Topic: Help with Ed Leedskalnin Riddle , any idea . (Read 346770 times)

david lambright · « **Reply #180 on:** November 27, 2010, 10:41:22 PM »

scotty, i get the feeling that you do not believe that Eds device generated this same wave-form that my devices make....you have a good replication of Eds device, which IS a circular PMH...have you ever charged it like a PMH?...my next device is going to be a copy of Eds wheel but using iron oxide in place of his V shaped segments....the oxide allows more of the magnets to be thrown off....do you believe that magnetic current is visible?...i also get the impression that you do not think that what my devices do, has any thing to do with Eds work....and that the visible distortion is all that my devices do . ..you know a PMH works, in your video with the neon bulb, does the power supply need to be hooked up, to get that effect?....in my expirements, all the effects my devices produce, do so with out any power hooked to it...david

david lambright · « **Reply #181 on:** November 27, 2010, 11:18:08 PM »

so anyway, i get the impression that you do not think that what i have found is related to Eds work, and that the visual distortion is all my devices do, if that....and that it is not useful and i should find something with more usefullness ?...when Volta saw that first tiny spark, so tiny almost not visible, of what use was it?....a PMH only radiates this visible wave when it is energized...dont you think that is significant?....that it does this perpetually with only an initial charge...and that it will do the same thing using oxide instead of iron....do you know that Eds generator IS a circular 24 segment PMH?....anyway that is the impression i get, if i am wrong, sorry...david

ElectricGoose · « **Reply #182 on:** November 27, 2010, 11:25:20 PM »

Quote from: david lambright on November 27, 2010, 10:41:22 PM

and that the visible distortion is all that my devices do . ..you know a PMH works, in your video with the neon bulb, does the power supply need to be hooked up, to get that effect?....in my expirements, all the effects my devices produce, do so with out any power hooked to it...david

Lambright, you seem like a nice guy but you have been bumbling on this topic here and at Energetic Forum for a good part of a year with thousands of posts. I'm not sure you have much to 'boast' about as regards what 'your' device can or cannot do. Right now it cannot do a damn useful thing and you continue to play and post useless videos which don't really show the viewer anything.
Having said this, I KNOW that the Leedskalnin wheel/pmh produces these effects, therefore dont think I am refuting what you have to say. Where you are failing big time is in your scientific methodology. You run around like a little kid, freezing water, doing this and doing that, posting videos and trying to convince people....THIS IS NOT SCIENTIFIC METHOD! For a start....forget trying to convince the audience of anything....are you a believer? If the answer is yes, then start building your 'evidence locker' and decide where you want to take this technology. If you want to attain funding or come out with a useful product you will not achieve this by roping in half interested forum people meanwhile acting like a child yourself who has Attention Deficit Disorder because he can't stay focussed on one track.

Until then all you have is a mystical novelty that isn't doing you or humanity any good.

E-Goose

nuevo_vidente · « **Reply #183 on:** December 14, 2010, 06:40:15 PM »

Gents, just visited Coral Castle and I plan to join you guys in the search for answers on Leedskalnin's technique. Me and my friend shot some hi-def video and some interesting stills, but some of the key elements of Coral Castle seem to lacking in the conversation. One is the "turnstyle" located near the front entrance. This large piece of Coral is mounted on some sort of ball bearing as far as they can tell but there are magnetic readings which come from the rock itself, meaning that there are magnets buried within the Coral to achieve this effect. I noticed this all over the place, a limestone filler being smoothed over some of the places in the coral. Ed made the claim that he did this to some of the material so that you may place camera's, but I think he drilled into the Coral blocks and magnetised the entire thing with his pmh. I will post some pictures to back this up, and you can all tell me what you think, so that we can stimulate a bit more discussion.

nuevo_vidente · « **Reply #184 on:** December 17, 2010, 11:06:08 PM »

Notice this cavity he carved out

nuevo_vidente · « **Reply #185 on:** December 17, 2010, 11:06:58 PM »

And this one

Mk1 · « **Reply #186 on:** December 17, 2010, 11:10:41 PM »

@nuevo_vidente

Welcome to my tread , nice pictures feel free to elaborate .

Mark

nuevo_vidente · « **Reply #187 on:** December 17, 2010, 11:16:00 PM »

While I see the primary concern of this thread is to solve his generators mystery, I think that misses some of the more fundamental discoveries he made, such as how to magnetize the coral itself, which might transfer to most matter if done right. While the original rock gate was the most impressive example of this, the method he used to mount it must have been imperfect, or the ley line/magnetic field must have migrated from the original location, which would have explained it's collapse. But the turnstyle, and the sun chair still seem to be mounted and rotatable. You can still get readings from whatever he embedded in the coral to achieve this effect. If you think of the radio waves generated by his device as some sort of transmitter of magnetic field, then with the proper magnetic material embedded inside the coral, he could potentially "levitate" it, couldn't he? I might be way off on this, but there were many instances of limestone filler being used on the coral rocks to cover up whatever he had done to drill inside. If anyone is still paying attention to this, I would be eager to hear your responses.

Mk1 · « **Reply #188 on:** December 17, 2010, 11:32:08 PM »

@nuevo_vidente

Yes some thing like that , but in simple terms if the analogy fits , my explanation is .

Like noise reduction systems that record the noise and and send it back phase reverse to cancel the sound . You need to do the same with gravity waves ...

But how ever think the wheel is obviously the rotor , but the stator is u shaped .

The schematics is hidden in most high ranking masonic lodge . People are starting to make motors the only problem is the size of the u core compared to the wheel.

Mark

slapper · « **Reply #189 on:** December 18, 2010, 06:36:22 AM »

Mk1 ? uhm. What is that inside the interwoven triangle

Mk1 · « **Reply #190 on:** December 18, 2010, 06:59:39 AM »

Quote from: slapper on December 18, 2010, 06:36:22 AM

Mk1 ? uhm. What is that inside the interwoven triangle

Sorry , the triangle represents the wheel ... the u-shaped is the stator .

We know the the PMH hold the charge or spin ...

Inside the triangle is the nasa space shuttle .

just kidding

Its a primitive tool , most likely , well i don't know the word check the second picture . But it is also a pendulum ...

Mark

TEKTRON · « **Reply #191 on:** December 22, 2010, 12:30:26 PM »

Quote from: Mk1 on July 29, 2010, 10:24:19 AM

@all

Gravity theory shows at as 2 waves hitting the same point at the same time .

Look at the picture the heavy chain on top is moving to the beat of the wheel

It is following the arm , there is also a iron bar perpendicular to the wheel.

Both of those are iron , under stress from the wheel , both are linked to chains (chains conduct magnetism like a copper wire electricity ).

And finally both are 90 degrees apart physically and in operation .

I bet that on the rock you need one chain on top and one on the side .

There is also some indication of the use of electricity more on that soon...

Hint the bottles ( glass contains electricity ) caps , magnetic quench , spark gap...

Mark

A variable capacitor? Just add water.

david lambright · « **Reply #192 on:** January 23, 2011, 10:39:23 PM »

Physics Model
Hey Van, what i meant was square the numbers by squaring one hundred times any other number ends in a nine before it goes back to one. Try this with both numbers, .7129 and .6105195. That point is the infinite point. Super conductivity and super fluidity show us that the infinite exists. Any number that you do this with with either come up ones and zeros, or nines. Pi shows us the infinite by squaring the numbers .7129 all the way back near zero you will get 98. That is the point of incidence. Square the next one, .61059195 and you will get the same thing, .99998. then it goes to one??Every other number squared to the end becomes.99999 one. EVERY ONE BUT THOSE 2....try it...pull up your windows calculator and see for your self ....see how they are a line of either 99999s or 0000000s Notice how the ones and zeros co-relate to the shape of inside a sphere. The inside of the sphere is equal to one. draw a circle....imagine 99999s with their tails sticking through with a 0 on the outside ...with a value of 1....a FULL sphere ..EVERY WHERE BUT 2 POINTS....do the calculations again .... But yet, every quarter is equal to one. now multiply .1 times .314 We know about super fluidity, super conductivity etc. This proves infinity. expansion at a ratio of one to four Leedskalin's numbers show us the angle of the infinite ray. Think about it like this, you are standing on a bubble and the floor is zero degrees and infinite. At eye level is the next boundary level. An infinite point is an infinite line, inside of a sphere is equal to a point mathematically. Pi times radius squared. Now you realize that it is a reflection of the infinite. No matter what number you put in a computer calculator etc. and square it a hundred times only two numbers end in 98 before they go to one, this proves the infinite ray mathematically. Infinite ray is unidirectional, infinite line is bidirectional. Infinite line can become infinite disc, infinite bi-directionality gives us spin which gives us attraction and repulsion which is magnetism and gravity. Why is pi only infinite at one point? Because it is a perfect mathematically correct reflection of the infinite. Phase shift problems with parabolic mirrors, the reflected ray from a parabolic mirror does not phase shift again. The main ray upon reflection shifts. This proves reflection. The Electron Phase Shift some of this theory applies also.....i need to post this but my next posts will be Leedskalnins method .....and the experimental proof that is irrefutable......pull up your windows calculator in the mean time and see......david

david lambright · « **Reply #193 on:** January 24, 2011, 07:37:18 AM »

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bu6L2M2gpu4&feature=related this video shows the 4 components of a di-pole magnetic field..... the one main and 3 reflections.....the reflection of the beam puts it out of phase with the main beam this is what permanent magnetism is.....the reflected beam does not shift....the mechanics of it are this;...infinite ray is reflected.no phase shift....reflected ray is split and shifts....this produces the attractive and repulsive force....a laser uses these principles ...this infinite beam or ray, i will show, makes all of the forces... Eienstien equation, E-mc2, shows this form exactly.....this also explains why i felt a pulling/pushing when i used mirrors in my experiments... . http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&cd=6&ved=0CEEQFjAF&url=http%3A%2F%2Fambermd.org%2FQuestions%2Fgibbs.html&ei=O_o8TdvhBI3GsAPUw9HQAw&usg=AFQjCNH7vvOVQbmkwawVNTcp9X4e5WX0Uw&sig2=LF6NA0Dai0dp-IFifBXUMQ in this article, they talk about Gibbs energy and its forward only directionality, AND only when 0>1...but this is a reflected beam so maybe its 9>1 ...like the square root math shows...this is exactly describing the forward only infinite ray i am talking about.......light follows this same pattern...in my experiments, using a laser, i was able to pump the energy to a higher level, increasing the visible flow of energy....the principles are correct.....the math says this is correct... experiments by me and others are saying this is correct....i have seen this energy flowing.....checkout the ferro fluid video again...at 30 sec see how the shape wavers?....this is the same type of distortion seen around devices....if this is nothing, it will fade away ....but it is what i claim and it will continue to grow.....i will post vids when i get some good footage.....david

david lambright · « **Reply #194 on:** January 26, 2011, 04:28:21 PM »

http://sn113w.snt113.mail.live.com/att/GetAttachment.aspx?tnail=0&messageId=6f7418bb-2924-11e0-a10c-002264c154b4&Aux=54|0|8CD8B485920B590||0|0|0|0||&maxwidth=220&maxheight=160&size=Att http://sn113w.snt113.mail.live.com/att/GetAttachment.aspx?tnail=1&messageId=6f7418bb-2924-11e0-a10c-002264c154b4&Aux=54|0|8CD8B485920B590||0|0|0|0||&maxwidth=220&maxheight=160&size=Att these are a couple of overlays to visualize this model

News:

User Menu

Author Topic: Help with Ed Leedskalnin Riddle , any idea . (Read 346770 times)

david lambright

Re: Help with Ed Leedskalnin Riddle , any idea .

david lambright

Re: Help with Ed Leedskalnin Riddle , any idea .

ElectricGoose

Re: Help with Ed Leedskalnin Riddle , any idea .

nuevo_vidente

Re: Help with Ed Leedskalnin Riddle , any idea .

nuevo_vidente

Re: Help with Ed Leedskalnin Riddle , any idea .

nuevo_vidente

Re: Help with Ed Leedskalnin Riddle , any idea .

Mk1

Re: Help with Ed Leedskalnin Riddle , any idea .

nuevo_vidente

Re: Help with Ed Leedskalnin Riddle , any idea .

Mk1

Re: Help with Ed Leedskalnin Riddle , any idea .

slapper

Re: Help with Ed Leedskalnin Riddle , any idea .

Mk1

Re: Help with Ed Leedskalnin Riddle , any idea .

TEKTRON

Re: Help with Ed Leedskalnin Riddle , any idea .

david lambright

Re: Help with Ed Leedskalnin Riddle , any idea .

david lambright

Re: Help with Ed Leedskalnin Riddle , any idea .

david lambright

Re: Help with Ed Leedskalnin Riddle , any idea .