AN OPEN LETTER TO STEFAN

Dear Stefan.

I have been hospitalised for nearly a week.  I come back to find my thread has been FLAMED - again - by Glen and all of it OFF TOPIC and this effort has been advanced by Glen and Harvey who CLAIM that I maligned them.  WHERE?  Glen CLAIMS that I have deleted 8 of his posts.  WHERE??

When you invited me to post here you assured me that I would have moderator status as - without it - I will inevitably be 'attacked' by that 'gang' of unprincipled opportunists - and then I will be banned.  You have breached that agreement and withdrawn that moderator status and have invited GLEN AND HARVEY to start a thread in opposition to my own - which is working against this technology and is dedicated to wrecking my hard work on the thesis and on the applications.

I assure you that there are a large number of readers of my thread.  I know this as it entices an off forum discussion which is getting ever wider.  Why have you taken this stance against me?  Are you under an obligation to give them this license to prevent my advancing either the thesis or the application itself?  Am I becoming too effective?  Are you in league with them?  Certainly their need to silence me is now CLAMOROUS.  What exactly is your commitment to open source if you can allow this.

Please do not pretend that I can continue with any kind of work here if they are given the right as you have now given them - to destroy this thread and my hard work in advancing it.

The flaming that has now occurred co-incided with my efforts at discussing certain aspects of the thesis.  I am entirely satisfied that Harvey and Glen need to SILENCE ME.  Surely the evidence speaks for itself.  Why should they be so anxious to rake up an irrelevant HISTORY - when all I am trying to do is advance a really easy technology?  And for God's sake - LOOK AT THEIR WORK.  Look at EF.COM AND even what they've written on OU.COM.  There is ABSOLUTELY NO interest in taking this further.  If I am not allowed to report on this then it will be KILLED.  IS THAT WHAT YOU ALSO REQUIRE?  It certainly is NOT what I understood your commitment to be when you opened this thread for me.

And what exactly do you mean when you say that you are going to DELETE these threads?  Are you now going to delete this hard work.  Have you even read what you're planning to delete?

Regards,
Rosemary

And Stefan.  Ashtweth hints in that broad inarticulate way that he does that he's aware of the identity of Doozy2.  Tell us all, PLEASE how he was given this knowledge?

Regards,
Rosemary

The gig is LONG up Rose, dont distract people any more and leave us get on with the work we are doing.
i am sure you will be banned if you dont take this hint.

Ashtweth Palise
Panacea founder

WHAT GIG?  WHAT ARE YOU HINTING HERE ASHTWETH?  IF YOU HAVE SOMETHING TO SAY - THEN SAY IT.

And I am entirely satisfied that you would LOVE to have me banned.  God knows how hard you all worked on this at EF.COM.  And it seems that you've perfected the recipe.  All you do is wait for the moment - FLAME the threads - not even articulate sensible posts - then then sit back like a pack of carion and pick the bones clean.

History will speak very loudly here Ashtweth - that I promise you.  And I have every reason to believe that you will regret this extraordinary attack you head against us poor inventors.  Especially those of us who are female.  LOL

R

What really puzzles me is that you see this imperative requirement to divorce these results from my efforts or thesis.  I wonder if it is because you've INVESTED in Steorne's work and would rather prefer to advance that.  Like you've got a right to rewrite history as per Ashtweth's preference.  And this because you understand so much about physics.  Or is it because it's easier to hit at old women than it is to band together as 'men' as you seem to see it.  In truth, MEN don't behave as you do.  MEN are actually honourable and don't spend their time trying to gag women.  MEN are prepared to acknowledge that women can make as strong a contribution to science as men - because they can also think - and create - and analyse.  And MEN would not, as a rule, have difficulty in acknowledging talent - be it among men or women.

You have all gone to some considerable trouble to try and paint me stupid.  Feel free.  Those MEN out there who matter are not so inclined to share your opinion.  And the THREE of you are absolutely NOT representative of MEN.  MEN absolutely DO NOT BASH OLD WOMEN for doing nothing more nor less than standing up for the truth.

Rosemary

Howdy reading members and guests,

Another quote from Rosemary "in her own words" ......


http://www.energeticforum.com/61506-post942.html   July 20,2009    Post #942

witsend 

hi Joit. Love the comments. What scares me is not the academics - because at least they sincerely believe in their science - with good reason. Its the detractors on other forums that are worrying. The lengths they go to to discredit the person and the claim - both.

Have you ever looked through the OU.Com thread on this? It beggars belief. Malice hardly describes it. And the amount of money that is spent on displaying tests and parading brand new state of the art equipment that is never effectively used. Weeks go by without a single test result - just promises of this. Yet we are constantly advised that the claim is wrong. Has it ever occurred to anyone that - to this day - no single power measurement has been made on the circuitry? No test has been run to duration of a battery capacity. Brand new state of the art equipment is constantly on display but never are its full functions referenced. Small irrelevant points become critical evidence of a lack of proof and are championed with an unabashed repetitiveness that is boringly persistent but brutally destructive. But no actual proof is offered.

What is frightening is that anyone who questions a result is actually verbally menaced. One post we've got on record is of Ramset's answer to a challenging observation by one of their contributors. He actually wrote to the effect that 'owlsley needs to kiwl the kitty'. TK is on record as openly saying that I am a mendacious prevaricator. Apparently all aspects of our test are some sort of public con, apparently aimed at I don't know what? Surely my stated intention not to capitalise on the device must bring my motives to question. Clearly, if I am perpetuating a con - then it's not for purposes of defrauding the public. Why would I go to such lengths to expose a small little effect, possibly the smallest of any OU claim ever offered up for consideration? What is it that deserves their heavy handed attempts at wit or sarcasm, done with the orchestrated approval of other 'so called' scientists sharing that thread. TK only needs to make a post for immediate endorsement by other contributors who also then mock my apparent lack of sanity, judgement, intelligence, schooling, beliefs, ideas, lack of expertise - name it's all there. All for public consumption. All unchallenged. And all such detractors always out of reach, always carefully hiding behind their assumed identities. They flirt with their rights to freedom of expression that under normal circumstances, and under ordinary civil law would be actionable. And all this, clearly with Stephan's endorsement. Never do they give us their names. Never do they disclose their identities. Never are we in a position to find out their actual motives.

To compound my concerns is the fact that the entire forum was promoted by Stephan, with, one would assume, the intention of promoting the study of free energy. I can no longer access OU.Com. Was he responsible for my not gaining access? And if so, at whose asking and why? Public - to everyone but me? Then too it seems that my emails are being read. How does that happen? Are my phone calls also being monitored?

It's all very puzzling. All I want is an answer to the question posed in my paper - ideally from academics who can validate the result or not and comment accordingly. If they won't hear me then maybe they'll listen to you guys? It's quite important really. But its only a small question. In the light of the attack, however, I'm realising how significant it is. Certainly it seems to be sufficiently significant for them to do everything in their power to destroy my reputation and my work - both. Why is it that important? I can only propose it's because we're near the truth and this, for some reason, needs to be discredited. And again. Why?

And all this, clearly with Stephan's endorsement. Never do they give us their names. Never do they disclose their identities. Never are we in a position to find out their actual motives.


To compound my concerns is the fact that the entire forum was promoted by Stephan, with, one would assume, the intention of promoting the study of free energy. I can no longer access OU.Com. Was he responsible for my not gaining access? And if so, at whose asking and why? Public - to everyone but me? Then too it seems that my emails are being read. How does that happen? Are my phone calls also being monitored?


**********************************************************************************************


I'll let Stefan handle the last past flaming posts starting at Post #803 from Rosemary about her recent banning and moderator status here at Over Unity Forum and her unfounded unproved allagations again against everyone in the world but her.  The truth hurts ......


Regards,
Glen


.

I have been hospitalised for nearly a week.

glad you are back. hope you are feeling better.

Glen,

Rose was able post earlier today. Are you saying she has now been put on "read only" status?

.99