Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Rosemary Ainslie COP>17 Circuit / A First Application on a Hot Water Cylinder  (Read 317918 times)

Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
So.  Maybe time is localised, never variable and potentially greater than light speed


Sorry to quote myself but I've just re-read this.  It's wrong.  Time is not variable when it's localised.  Which possibly means that it's variable depending on locality.  Anyway.  Something like that.

CORRECTION.  I can't modify the post so am doing it here.

Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Guys, Am delighted to introduce you to our new team member.  A LeCroy wave jet 324 - 200 MHz 4 channel Oscilloscope.

I'll take some more pictures when I get this to Campus tomorrow.   Apologies for those multiple attempts at down loading this.  Even now the picture is not clear.  For some reason the transfer of this from my documents to photobucket and the photos are resized and lose their high definition.  I'll check with the agent - what gives here.  It's more than a little irritating. 

Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
The loan was kindly made available to us by David Davie of Coast to Coast Cape.  Here's a little about their company

Coast to Coast was established in 1994 in KwaZulu Natal, and ten years later
in the Cape Provinces.

We are test equipment specialists in the following:

Fluke Digital Multimeters, Clamp Meters, Electrical Testers, and Insulation Testers. Fluke Earth Ground Testers, Installation Testers, and Portable Appliance Testers. Fluke digital Thermometers, and Thermal Imagers. Fluke ScopeMeter Test Tools, Fluke Power Quality Tools, Fluke Field calibrators, and Intrinsic Safe Test Tools and Fluke Accessories.

We also specialise in Megger Insulation Tests, Megger Insulation Continuity Testers and Earth Ground Resistance testers. Megger Power quality Tools, Megger Time domain reflectometrers, Cable Trace and Voltage detectors. Megger Low resistance testers and Megger Loop testers. Megger Multimeters, socket testers, voltage detectors and Clampmeters.


Representing many world leading T&M Manufactures like Fluke, Megger, JDSU, Amprobe, Midtronics, BK Precision, Fluke Networks, Ametek, to name a few, and we pride ourselves of supplying the complete commitment of Sales, Support, Service and SANAS Calibration, from coast to coast.
With many years of experience, we are able to advise on the best solution for your measurement applications and requirements.



Many thanks indeed for organising this David.  Deeply grateful and an enormous help to us all in this project.

Kindest regards,
Rosemary
 

Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Hi Loner.  Thanks for the tip.  We've actually got a whole lot of scopes to use but this has the advantage of having 4 channels.  But we'll compare - and I'll keep your tips in mind.

Kindest regards,
Rosemary

nievesoliveras

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1996
@rosemary

I know you will like this link:

http://www.richieburnett.co.uk/indheat.html

Jesus

TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13958
Whatever, Rosemary.

But if it were me, or if I were a co-author on that paper, I wouldn't be so proud of something that's been rejected, what, 5 times now by the same sets of journals. That's got to be telling you something.

And as far as teeth go... well, time will tell which one of us is right, and about what.

Congratulations on your 200 MHz LeCroy. I can't recall if that model does integration as part of its math package or not. I know both of my LeCroy scopes do, but they are 1 GHz bandwidth, a little higher up the food chain than your borrowed scope. The on-board integration over time, to give a direct reading of the energy flow (as I illustrated long ago) is the correct way to use the capabilities of these fine instruments. Downloading data to a spreadsheet and analyzing it there is very error-prone and the results depend strongly on assumptions and choices made by the user.

But what happened to your favorite Fluke ScopeMeter? The Fluke-o-Scope has one feature that is actually almost necessary to test your circuit: the channel grounds are isolated and can be at different reference voltages. This is one reason that the Fluke ScopeMeters gave you the results you got, early on.

This is not the case for the LeCroy. All channels have the same ground reference on these scopes.

Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Hi TK.  I'm not proud of the fact that the paper has been rejected.  The process is that a paper is submitted - the editor then forwards it to reviewers - experts - who comb through it for obvious errors and if and when it passes a review process the editor then considers publishing.  The rule is the more radical the experiment the more newsworthy and the more inclined are the editors to publish. 

What we have achieved is the rejection of the paper prior to review on every single submission.  And our papers show experimental evidence that one can trash the unity barrier with ease.  It's very obviously newsworthy.  In fact, if this were ever published it would dominate scientific attention everywhere.  It would certainly be newsworthy.  Just not that popular.  This because it would also require the systematic deletion of most of the text in ALL of their text books and would deny the 'foundation of their faith' - so to speak.  There is a simple truth.  Science can be wrong on small issues and history can adjust their perspectives - as needed.  But it CANNOT be wrong on big issues.  And the unity barrier is definitely a BIG ISSUE.

Another BIG ISSUE is Dark matter.  The real reason that they're all hoping to find a particle to account for this apparent abundance of energy - is that if they don't - then they're nailed on some critical arguments related to relativity.  And Dark Energy has finally managed to leak past their editorial desks and into public awareness.  That took 80 years or thereby - for God's sake - just to make it to mainstream.  Our public are still not aware of the significance of it.  And there are still those dinosaurs who also STILL deny all that evidence.  And if you want to know what keeps all this back?  Why they need to MUFFLE the truth?  I'll tell you.  It points to that same need to re-think and re-write an awful lot of archaic assumption.  I suppose one could be indulgent and say that it's all very understandable as livelihoods and God knows what else is on the line.  But it says NOTHING about the integrity of science if scientific reality needs to be sacrificed to pragmatic concerns.

Science is based on experimental evidence.  If they refuse to look at the evidence then science is not about experimental evidence any more.  It's about 'creed' and 'belief' and 'philosphies' and 'religion' and 'opinion' and 'popular sentiment' and 'majority view points' and all kinds of corrosive disgusting things that I had always been assured would NEVER taint the purity of science.  So.  While I'm sorry we've not been 'reviewed' I'm not sorry that we're disassociated from today's sad state of science by 'opinion'.  It's certainly NOT science.

The good news is that this attitude is entirely exempt from some rare and special academies.  And I'm intensely proud to be associated with such.

Regards,
Rosemary
http://www.scribd.com/doc/38315399/MORE-INCONVENIENT-TRUTHS

Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
@rosemary

I know you will like this link:

http://www.richieburnett.co.uk/indheat.html

Jesus

Hi Jesus.  Nice to hear from you.  I tried that link but those colour combinations defeat my bad eyesight.  I'll try it again later today when the light is better.  But thank you. 

Kindest regards,
Rosie

Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Hi guys.  I've been browsing through the threads here again - and am struck by the amount of interest and time that all spend in shaping ever more complex coils.  The results appear to be haphazard - not always as expected - but the exploration is fascinating.  Especially the work that's advanced by Mark - Mk1 - I think is his internet name.  I'll look for the link.  Here it is.

http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=8878.0

Fascinating work - geometry in the 'round' so to speak.  It is almost as if there is some deep seated geometric shape that everyone is trying to find - that will provide the 'answer' the 'holy grail' to that elusive 'energy from nothing'.  Compelling shapes and compelling questions.  It's like one's tongue searching for an elusive flavour of something that's somehow there - but also somehow 'lost'. 

I have a recurring dream - one of those archetypal numbers that are strong enough not to be able to dismiss - even if it's significance is only in its symbolism.  I'm standing in a circle with a group of us around a monolith.  And there's a kind of holy communion between us.  It's telepathic and it's an emotional link that escalates - or grows in crescendo - or just gets stronger and stronger - until it's almost overwhelming.  Probably something close to bliss.  But at it's conclusion - this is the point - I then realise that we've LOST this knowledge.  It's an unbearably sad realisation.  And, somehow, I think that this realisation is also possibly true.  I wonder if, just perhaps, we - 'once upon a time' had a kind of telepathic sense that has been erroded out of our gene pool - or been superceded by way too much 'language'.  Our insects - bees, ants, birds - all seem to have a knowledge of geometry - certainly enough to construct what they need to construct - and they communicate very well without language.  Geometry is a kind of logic - and, whether insects access this knowledge on a subliminal or instinctive level - or whether they are conscious of the value of their work  - we'll never know.  I've seen female weaver birds destroy their partner's nests until he finally comes up with a 'safe' build.  To me that seems that there's an active critical faculty at play.  Just don't know the answer.  But I'm reasonably sure that we're all looking for that 'geometry'.  And I suspect, that when we find it - it'll be much more 'readable' and more logical - than anything we've suspected.

I'm not at all sure that this is on topic - but as it's my thread - I just thought I'd indulge in this observation and comment.

Regards,
Rosemary     

Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Back on topic, I have found a magnet to 'shape' into our pentagonal sphere.  Unfortunately it's ferrite - the only appropriate shape I could get.  But the dimensions are pretty exactly what's needed to shape the first cut.  We're only doing this first piece of what will be 12 pieces - to see if the structure of the magnet is still smooth when we carve it into that five sided diamond.  In a way it's probably as well that it's not neodymium - as I think those rare earth numbers may be too strong to assemble. 

Anyway - it's with the designer.  When the numbers are determined it'll go to another shop and may then be ground or spark erroded - or some combination of both - to see if it's got a consistent structure inside as out - and whether or not to go ahead with all 12 cuts. 

When I find the required shape I'll do the same with a pyramid construct - 6 pieces assembled in a cube with a single pole buried in the centre. 

Regards,
Rosemary

Added.  And I'll be back on campus today so will take photos of the LeCroy in operation - I hope - and also hopefully, will start exploring it's different operating functions.  Can't wait.

Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
And as far as teeth go... well, time will tell which one of us is right, and about what.

AND BTW TK - time has already told us which one of us is right.  Not sure why you think the question is still out there.  The replication of the experiment was all that was needed.  The fact that the replicator wanted to claim this as a discovery - does not negate the value of the replication.  In fact it rather enhances it.  All that we know is that you did not - yourself -  manage a replication.  But I'm not sure if that doesn't speak to a lack of experimental talent rather than a lack of required evidence - with respect. 

Our challenge now is to try and get all this energy to a more usable value.  But the experiment itself - to proof of concept?  That's done and dusted.

Regards,
Rosemary

TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13958
Rosemary, replication -- or rather repetition -- of an error does not "prove" your conjectures at all.

And a result that depends on the kinds of analyses that you have used, to manifest itself at all, is no kind of usable result at all.

You are forgetting some things about my work concerning your reported experiment. For example, I showed how you arrived at your mistaken results by improperly integrating your power waveforms, and I showed how to do it correctly within the oscilloscope's math functions, eliminating the error-prone export of data to spreadsheets.

Once you've got a working model that you are happy with and which you KNOW makes your "excess energy", I would be very happy to arrange for the device to be tested, with yourself present if you like, in the world's most sophisticated civilian-operated calorimeter, which can determine once and for all whether or not it's making more heat output than can be contained in the battery running it.



Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Hi TK.  I'm afraid we rather depended on classical protocols to do our measurements.  And the results are unequivocal but only in terms of those protocols.  If they're wrong - then I think that there's no way anyone can measure anything at all.

 ;D

And thanks for the offer of the calorimeter - but I'll pass.  The heat output is so way in excess of the energy delivered that it's not really required.  But I wish I had your skills on the LeCroy.  Am still struggling.  Fortunately the students are getting up to pace - at light speed. 

Kindest regards,
Rosemary

BTW I took more photographs and somehow managed to delete them.  I'll try again later today. 

Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Guys - good news.  I've actually sourced 6 magnets 1"x1"x1" - and I may have six of them delivered by as early as noon today. 

Here's hoping,

Regards,
Rosemary

Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Guys - I've been to campus.  We're so on track.  The LeCroy is SUPER.  Very fast, nice triggering - easily enables those multiple data downloads.  We can get pictures downloaded - or graphs from the data - name it.  The only thing it doesn't do is make tea.  And so NEAT.

AND ANOTHER THANKS TO DAVID OF COAST TO COAST.  MUCH APPRECIATED.

WE ARE NEARLY THERE GUYS.  I realise that - for those who've been following our experiment - they've also been fraught with delays.  But we now have 4 different oscillators to test each and every resistor.  And, finally, they're all up and running. 

I"ve got some photos to download later today and then, 'tomorrow and tomorrow and tomorrow' - that sort of 'crept along'  in that 'petty pace'  LOL.  Seems like it's finally arriving.  Thank you God.

Regards,
Rosemary