Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Rosemary Ainslie COP>17 Circuit / A First Application on a Hot Water Cylinder  (Read 319558 times)

Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Happy - glad you approve and hopefully you'll see the need for patience.  It's something I lack - but since these last trials I suspect that I'm being really tested.  Clearly need to apply myself here.

Hope - A mathematician - John Bell - I think he was Irish - was able to prove mathematically that the underlying condition of our physical realities needed to be really, really ordered - else all would be manifest chaos.  The actual conclusion reads 'The statistical predictions of quantum theories ... cannot be upheld by local hidden variables'.  I have no understanding of the equations.  But I do understand this concept.  Effectively he saw, as do all our physicists, the need for absolute symmetry on a particle level - else there would be none of that order that is evident in our predominantly ordered universe.  So.  I'm with you on the 'sphere'.  Perhaps the foundation of all matter rests on this shape. 

Regards,
Rosemary
Edited the quote

Pirate88179

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 8366
Just like the color black is all the colors mixed together, I believe the sphere is every known shape possible mixed together.  That is what you end up with.

Bill

Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Hi Bill.  Nice to see you around.  And I like your thinking.  I notice that you invariably relate to some kind of analogous association which is excellent to promote concepts.  You did the same with the 'perpetual motion' thing. 

Personally I find it an enormous struggle to express what I see in the mind's eye.  I suspect this is why my concepts still remain that obscure.  But language is difficult.  Far better to illustrate.  It's more eloquent.  LOL.

Kindest as ever,
R

exnihiloest

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 715
Hi

I'm interested in third party replications.
Did someone duplicate the Rosemary Ainslie Circuit and confirm a COP>1?

Sorry for posting again the same question but flooded replies from Rosemary Ainslie prevented a good readability of this thread. I'm interested only in independent replications or attempts from experimenters here, not in matter from the author about his own work.

Thank you for your understanding.


twinbeard

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 130
Rosemary,

Where can I find a parts list and schematic?  I will build one, and report results.

Cheers,
Scott


Hi

I'm interested in third party replications.
Did someone duplicate the Rosemary Ainslie Circuit and confirm a COP>1?

Sorry for posting again the same question but flooded replies from Rosemary Ainslie prevented a good readability of this thread. I'm interested only in independent replications or attempts from experimenters here, not in matter from the author about his own work.

Thank you for your understanding.

Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Hi

I'm interested in third party replications.
Did someone duplicate the Rosemary Ainslie Circuit and confirm a COP>1?

Sorry for posting again the same question but flooded replies from Rosemary Ainslie prevented a good readability of this thread. I'm interested only in independent replications or attempts from experimenters here, not in matter from the author about his own work.

Thank you for your understanding.
I'm afraid I not only DO NOT understand but would ask you WHY you are imposing your demand on this thread?  If you wish to engage with replicators please feel free to start an alternate thread.  The sole purpose of this thread is to articulate the thesis and to record the tests on the proposed application.

I see your undertaking there Twinbeard.  Please feel free - but please note that this thread is absolutely NOT for replications.  My time is fully occupied as it is and this thread is meant as a dedicated record of the application ONLY - as well as the thesis in support of it. 

And may I add, exnihiloest - that this comment 'Sorry for posting again the same question but flooded replies from Rosemary Ainslie prevented a good readability of this thread'is flirting with good manners.  If you find my answers unreadable - then I suggest you read elsewhere.  That is always and option open to you.  Meanwhile MAY I REMIND YOU.  You asked for evidence of duplication.  Here's the results of that duplication.  AGAIN. 

http://www.scribd.com/doc/26240411/PROVING-OVER-UNITY-THE-HARD-WORK-OF-MANY-DEDICATED-OPEN-SOURCE-MEMBERS

I am very aware of your posts and the trollish nature of them.  You parade a scepticism that is inappropriate to the intentions of this forum.  I would prefer it that you don't post on this thread. 

Rosemary

twinbeard

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 130

I see your undertaking there Twinbeard.  Please feel free - but please note that this thread is absolutely NOT for replications.  My time is fully occupied as it is and this thread is meant as a dedicated record of the application ONLY - as well as the thesis in support of it. 

Surely.  I was planning on reporting findings on my own host anyway;)
Also, pardon my often tangental comments... I occasionally get lost in a train of thought that is somewhat related and feel a need to share with other borderline autistic minds who may be reading.  I absolutely do not mean to distract anyone!

I am very aware of your posts and the trollish nature of them.  You parade a scepticism that is inappropriate to the intentions of this forum.  I would prefer it that you don't post on this thread. 

Oh.  One of those.  I was unaware.  Thanks for the headsup.

Cheers,
Twinbeard

Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Surely.  I was planning on reporting findings on my own host anyway;)
Also, pardon my often tangental comments... I occasionally get lost in a train of thought that is somewhat related and feel a need to share with other borderline autistic minds who may be reading.  I absolutely do not mean to distract anyone!

Oh.  One of those.  I was unaware.  Thanks for the headsup.

Cheers,
Twinbeard
Hi Twinbeard.  I'm absolutely not qualified to state what this gentleman's intentions are.  I just find a rather 'dire' theme to his posts that I personally find to be somewhat counterproductive.  But feel free to engage with him. 

And if you do those tests - then let us know how they pan out.  I'd be really interested.  And I've been reading your posts elsewhere.  You've got some considerable experimental talents there which I'd be inclined to respect.    Just develop the tests on a different thread is all I ask.  This is definitely, rather selfishly, intended for record of our own experiments and development of the concepts in the thesis.

Kindest regards,
Rosie 

 ;D

Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Hi all.  Just a few snap shots of the lab and the switch.  The switch is still being modified.  It's a faithfull replication on Glen's design but, for some reason, is not giving us a reasonably stable waveform.  Modifications being made.  They'll be posted in due course together with any changes.

Kindest regards,
Rosemary

Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Sorry.  Just a few more that I somehow missed. 

Seems like when I re-size I also lose some of the clarity.  Still lots to sort out here guys.  General apologies for repeats and what have you.  I'm not very good at this.

Kindest regards.
Rosemary

Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Rosemary,

Where can I find a parts list and schematic?  I will build one, and report results.

Cheers,
Scott

Scott?  I wondered if we'd get closer to an identity here.  Nice to put a name to an avatar - so to speak.  Hi again.

If you download the attached link - it's got everything that opens and shuts on the circuit.  Delighted to hear you're up for this Twinbeard.  Very nice indeed - the more so as I'm really blown away by your general experimental talents.  Feel free to open a thread.  I think there are many who may want to follow it.  I know in the early stages there were a few takers.  But I saw it dominating my own interests here and rather discouraged it.  But I suspect you'll get a good following.

Kindest regards
Rosie
http://www.scribd.com/doc/26240411/PROVING-OVER-UNITY-THE-HARD-WORK-OF-MANY-DEDICATED-OPEN-SOURCE-MEMBERS

I think you may need to sign up to Scribd to get their download facilities.  Not sure.

GREAT STUFF SCOTT.   ;D

TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13958
http://www.scribd.com/doc/26240411/PROVING-OVER-UNITY-THE-HARD-WORK-OF-MANY-DEDICATED-OPEN-SOURCE-MEMBERS


Well, I see that that preprint bears the page heading of the IEEE Journal of Transactions of Industrial Electronics.

Congratulations on getting your paper published, Rosemary.
The last I heard it had been summarily rejected by the journal. Twice.

WilbyInebriated

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3141
http://www.scribd.com/doc/26240411/PROVING-OVER-UNITY-THE-HARD-WORK-OF-MANY-DEDICATED-OPEN-SOURCE-MEMBERS


Well, I see that that preprint bears the page heading of the IEEE Journal of Transactions of Industrial Electronics.

Congratulations on getting your paper published, Rosemary.
The last I heard it had been summarily rejected by the journal. Twice.
tk, i'm glad you're back here. you left some contradictions of yours that i would like to talk to you about. you ran off crying when your hack was shown to be a hack and when your transistor 'prediction' kinda turned out the opposite as you predicted. hopefully you can be a little more grownup about it this time...

TinselKoala

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13958
tk, i'm glad you're back here. you left some contradictions of yours that i would like to talk to you about. you ran off crying when your hack was shown to be a hack and when your transistor 'prediction' kinda turned out the opposite as you predicted. hopefully you can be a little more grownup about it this time...

And meanwhile everything I "hacked" has been confirmed over and over by the various "teams" like Glen, Ashtweth, Aaron, Harvey, and others. And I note major .... er..... differences.... or maybe not .... in the design shown above from what I did. What transistor is being used in the circuit above?

May I remind you that I boiled water with the Ainslie circuit something like two years ago....

But why spoil things by criticising me... surely you share Rosemary's joy at being published in a major peer-reviewed professional journal.

WilbyInebriated

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3141
And meanwhile everything I "hacked" has been confirmed over and over by the various "teams" like Glen, Ashtweth, Aaron, Harvey, and others. And I note major .... er..... differences.... or maybe not .... in the design shown above from what I did. What transistor is being used in the circuit above?

May I remind you that I boiled water with the Ainslie circuit something like two years ago....

But why spoil things by criticising me... surely you share Rosemary's joy at being published in a major peer-reviewed professional journal.
at least you finally admit yours was a hack instead of clinging to that 'replication' claim... ::)

may i remind you that you only started on this back in june of 2009...

of course i do, don't you? thank goodness i don't have to share your shame... you claiming changing transistors would make no difference. lol, that one still makes me giggle. and i see you are still avoiding those contradictions of yours. business as usual, tk style. it's good to know some things never change.