Language: 
To browser these website, it's necessary to store cookies on your computer.
The cookies contain no personal information, they are required for program control.
  the storage of cookies while browsing this website, on Login and Register.

GDPR and DSGVO law

Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding.
Amazon Warehouse Deals ! Now even more Deep Discounts ! Check out these great prices on slightly used or just opened once only items.I always buy my gadgets via these great Warehouse deals ! Highly recommended ! Many thanks for supporting OverUnity.com this way.

User Menu

Tesla Paper

Free Energy Book

Get paid

Donations

Please Donate for the Forum.
Many thanks.
Regards, Stefan.(Admin)

A-Ads

Powerbox

Smartbox

3D Solar

3D Solar Panels

DC2DC converter

Micro JouleThief

FireMatch

FireMatch

CCKnife

CCKnife

CCTool

CCTool

Magpi Magazine

Magpi Magazine Free Rasberry Pi Magazine

Battery Recondition

Battery Recondition

Arduino

Ultracaps

YT Subscribe

Gravity Machines

Tesla-Ebook

Magnet Secrets

Lindemann Video

Navigation

Products

Products

WaterMotor kit

Statistics


  • *Total Posts: 897180
  • *Total Topics: 15807
  • *Online Today: 44
  • *Most Online: 103
(December 19, 2006, 11:27:19 PM)
  • *Users: 1
  • *Guests: 11
  • *Total: 12

Author Topic: Rosemary Ainslie COP>17 Circuit / A First Application on a Hot Water Cylinder  (Read 266562 times)

Offline WilbyInebriated

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3143
Rosemary, I just sent an e-mail to prof Gaunt asking him as to whether or not he has confirmed your experimental claim for obtaining more energy out than in. I'm rejecting the idea that electric current isn't due to flow of electrons entirely, in view of the simple experimental facts which definitively prove that it is, and I have no further interest in that part.

Couldn't find Professor Tapsen's e-mail address. Maybe @WilbyInebriated can help. He's good at that.


P.S. My e-mail address is koooyyy@hotmail.com
holy buckets of no comprehension batman!
omni, rosemary already told you that none of them confirmed anything, they didn't even witness the experiment. you can read can't you? go read what she EXPLICITLY said, they stipulated the protocols... ::)

yeah i can help you... can you help yourself? the email is in the link i posted previously. ::)

edit: my bad, i didn't post the other link. funny though, it was about as hard to find as gaunt's...
http://www.eleceng.uct.ac.za/people/jct.php
are you going to ask him if he has confirmed rosemary's experimental claim even though she has already told you he has not?

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy


Offline Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Rosemary, I just sent an e-mail to prof Gaunt asking him as to whether or not he has confirmed your experimental claim for obtaining more energy out than in. I'm rejecting the idea that electric current isn't due to flow of electrons entirely, in view of the simple experimental facts which definitively prove that it is, and I have no further interest in that part.

Couldn't find Professor Tapsen's e-mail address. Maybe @WilbyInebriated can help. He's good at that.


P.S. My e-mail address is koooyyy@hotmail.com

This is a different issue.  If I based my measurements of proof on transients then I would not have sufficient proof.  Our measurements were empirical and the protocols stipulated by experts in the art. The problem was that those same experts would NOT attend a demonstration - lest they were then required to accredit those results. I really don't AGAIN want to detail that protocol.  It's all clearly defined in two papers.  This is EXHAUSTING me Omnibus.  Have pity.

Regards,
Rosemary

In the light of the above - may I impose on you to explain why it is that you're asking Professor Gaunt to confirm whether he's attended a demonstration or not?  And by the way Omnibus - if you signed yourself Omnibus in that email it is unlikely that Professor Gaunt will answer you.

In the first instance I only disclosed his name that you could verify that he was aware of the applied protocols as being sufficient.  And in the second instance I expected a certain amount of circumspection in the manner of your address to him.  It seems that you do indeed have as little restraint and decency as I suspected from the tenor of your posts.

Rosemary


Offline WilbyInebriated

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3143
In the light of the above - may I impose on you to explain why it is that you're asking Professor Gaunt to confirm whether he's attended a demonstration or not?
i can rosemary. it is part of an orchestrated use of logical fallacy, he will do something similar to what he tried to do to mr. kaku. that is to say, attempt to undermine credibility with logical fallacy...

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Sponsored links:




Offline Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
i can rosemary. it is part of an orchestrated use of logical fallacy, he will do something similar to what he tried to do to mr. kaku. that is to say, attempt to undermine credibility with logical fallacy...
Hi Wilby.  I will be entirely embarrassed by that communication from Omnibus as it will imply that I've been making public announcement of academic accreditation when I've gone to some considerable efforts to state the exact opposite.  And there is nothing can be done to correct this general impression unless Omnibus is man enough to apologise to Professor Gaunt and redress the focus of his question.  My concern is that this much character is lacking - precisely in as much as he impetuously demands verification as he has explained.  Fortunately - right now - Professor Gaunt is probably asleep.  And I will certainly be able to reach him to warn him of this letter and route him to this thread.  But it's been a salutary reminder to me to treat members with much more circumspection.  Omnibus has here shown himself to be irresponsible and entirely unreliable.  I at least know more of the nature of the beast - so to speak.

Kindest regards,
Rosemary

Offline WilbyInebriated

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3143
Hi Wilby.  I will be entirely embarrassed by that communication from Omnibus as it will imply that I've been making public announcement of academic accreditation when I've gone to some considerable efforts to state the exact opposite.  And there is nothing can be done to correct this general impression unless Omnibus is man enough to apologise to Professor Gaunt and redress the focus of his question.  My concern is that this much character is lacking - precisely in as much as he impetuously demands verification as he has explained.  Fortunately - right now - Professor Gaunt is probably asleep.  And I will certainly be able to reach him to warn him of this letter and route him to this thread.  But it's been a salutary reminder to me to treat members with much more circumspection.  Omnibus has here shown himself to be irresponsible and entirely unreliable.  I at least know more of the nature of the beast - so to speak.

Kindest regards,
Rosemary
indeed. my apologies for sussing out the links.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Sponsored links:




Offline Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
indeed. my apologies for sussing out the links.

LOL  It's not a problem.  I have easy access to him and can get this matter resolved.  But I see now that I may also have to warn Tapsen.  I'll simply suggest that they ignore the email unless Ominibus sends a follow up with the appropriate questions. 

In any event, unless Omnibus has disclosed his actual name then they will ignore the emails as 'noise'.  They're well used to such.  It's also more than likely that the university will filter out the email entirely unless he's got a full signature there.

Take care of yourself Wilby. 
Kindest regards,
Rosie

EDITED. And frankly I think that it's highly unlikely that our learned and revered will answer an email addressed to koooyyy@hotmail.com.  It seems somewhat irreverend.  LOL.  Omnibus advises us widely that he's an academic.  I'd quite like to see his credentials - quite frankly.

Offline Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968

P.S. My e-mail address is koooyyy@hotmail.com
Send me an email to my address with your name attached to that email and I may yet take the trouble to forward you the pdf.  I would also first require you to correct that mishmash of misinformation you managed to convey to Professor Gaunt and also, possibly to Professor Tapsen.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Sponsored links:




Offline Omnibus

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5330
No, no. I'm not asking him whether he attended a demonstration or not. Neither did I ask him as to whether he approved of protocols, whatever that means. I'm asking him if he did confirm independently the claims for the energy disbalance. That's the only thing I'm interested in -- independent confirmation of the discussed energy disbalance. Nothing short of it.

Offline Omnibus

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5330
Send me an email to my address with your name attached to that email and I may yet take the trouble to forward you the pdf.  I would also first require you to correct that mishmash of misinformation you managed to convey to Professor Gaunt and also, possibly to Professor Tapsen.

What mishmash that might be?

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy


Offline WilbyInebriated

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3143
No, no. I'm not asking him whether he attended a demonstration or not. Neither did I ask him as to whether he approved of protocols, whatever that means. I'm asking him if he did confirm independently the claims for the energy disbalance. That's the only thing I'm interested in -- independent confirmation of the discussed energy disbalance. Nothing short of it.
holy tu stultus es batman!
rosemary has previously indicated neither gault nor tapson confirmed any claim. see below.
This is a different issue.  If I based my measurements of proof on transients then I would not have sufficient proof.  Our measurements were empirical and the protocols stipulated by experts in the art.  The problem was that those same experts would NOT attend a demonstration - lest they were then required to accredit those results.  I really don't AGAIN want to detail that protocol.  It's all clearly defined in two papers.  This is EXHAUSTING me Omnibus.  Have pity.

Regards,
Rosemary

i bolded the relevant parts for you so they don't elude you again omni. ::)

Offline Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
No, no. I'm not asking him whether he attended a demonstration or not. Neither did I ask him as to whether he approved of protocols, whatever that means. I'm asking him if he did confirm independently the claims for the energy disbalance. That's the only thing I'm interested in -- independent confirmation of the discussed energy disbalance. Nothing short of it.
Omnibus - am I dreaming.  Didn't you advise us that you're widely connected to academics - all over the place?  How then, with that much education - can you refer to energy disbalance?  It's termed 'imbalance'.  Unless of course English is not your natural tongue.  In which case I can understand it.  And how does ANYONE independently confirm energy IMbalance without reference to an experiment?  In order to see that evidence requires that there is some apparatus that is able to demonstrate this.  And I have NEVER discussed energy imbalance - nor have I experimented with any concepts related to ENERGY IMBALANCE.  Now you have entirely lost me.  I think what you need to do here in the interests of transparency - is actually disclose your email right here - on open source.  Because, right now the semantics that you are trying to use to disguise the damage you've done is actually patently obvious.  And I need re-assurance that the damage is NOT too extreme.  Right now you are stating to two learned and respected Professors that I have claimed that they accredited my results.  THIS IS FALSE.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy


Offline Omnibus

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5330
The e-mail to prof. Tapson is also sent. Thanks @WilbyInebrated for the help. You're good at it.

Before reading the manuscript I'd like to hear what these two colleagues have to say regarding the experiment.

Offline WilbyInebriated

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3143
The e-mail to prof. Tapson is also sent. Thanks @WilbyInebrated for the help. You're good at it.

Before reading the manuscript I'd like to hear what these two colleagues have to say regarding the experiment.
tu stultus es... qed.

Offline Omnibus

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5330
Energy disbalance is what's of the primary interest in this forum, that is, the dibalance between the energy input compared to the output energy, in favor of the latter. Here in this forum it is agreed that the said disbalance be called "overunity" and therefore in the future in this exchange the disbalance in question may be referred to simply as "overunity" or OU.

Offline Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
The e-mail to prof. Tapson is also sent. Thanks @WilbyInebrated for the help. You're good at it.

Before reading the manuscript I'd like to hear what these two colleagues have to say regarding the experiment.
And I intend finding out - from them - your actual name and a little bit more about that 'colleague' status.  LOL  Until this last intervention I rather gave you the benefit of the doubt. 

 

OneLink