Language: 
To browser these website, it's necessary to store cookies on your computer.
The cookies contain no personal information, they are required for program control.
  the storage of cookies while browsing this website, on Login and Register.

GDPR and DSGVO law

Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding.
Amazon Warehouse Deals ! Now even more Deep Discounts ! Check out these great prices on slightly used or just opened once only items.I always buy my gadgets via these great Warehouse deals ! Highly recommended ! Many thanks for supporting OverUnity.com this way.

User Menu

Tesla Paper

Free Energy Book

Get paid

Donations

Please Donate for the Forum.
Many thanks.
Regards, Stefan.(Admin)

A-Ads

Powerbox

Smartbox

3D Solar

3D Solar Panels

DC2DC converter

Micro JouleThief

FireMatch

FireMatch

CCKnife

CCKnife

CCTool

CCTool

Magpi Magazine

Magpi Magazine Free Rasberry Pi Magazine

Battery Recondition

Battery Recondition

Arduino

Ultracaps

YT Subscribe

Gravity Machines

Tesla-Ebook

Magnet Secrets

Lindemann Video

Navigation

Products

Products

WaterMotor kit

Statistics


  • *Total Posts: 897180
  • *Total Topics: 15807
  • *Online Today: 44
  • *Most Online: 103
(December 19, 2006, 11:27:19 PM)
  • *Users: 2
  • *Guests: 12
  • *Total: 14

Author Topic: Rosemary Ainslie COP>17 Circuit / A First Application on a Hot Water Cylinder  (Read 266557 times)

Offline nievesoliveras

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1996
I was busy doing some community work.

Jesus

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy


Offline Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
many thanks indeed Jesus.  You're so well named.   ;D  I was hoping you'd be around. 

Kindest regards,
Rosie

Offline Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Hi Guys,

I'm doing a lot of work off forum and some of it needs record.  This is just a conceptual explanation of current flow and only for those that may be interested.

Dear ******

Here's how I see current flow.

For now, I assume that matter forms and accretes from nebulae - and I propose that the nebulae themselves are 'broken strings of zipons that have manifested out of the 'universal field' through some disruption to their balanced string formation to become chaotic truants.  Then the simple particles form from out of those truants  become the photons, and the electrons.  Then the 'accretion' of that matter progresses and they form the proton and with it the first hydrogen atom.  Here's the thing.  For every atom that gradually forms in that nebulae - with it comes a 'necklace' or a one dimensional 'string' of zipons.  This belongs to that atom.  I don't know the ratio of these fields - these 'necklaces'  to atoms.  By which I mean that I don't know if there are 10 zipons per string or 10 000 per string.  But I need these fields.  That way, when two or more hydrogen atoms (the most simple atom) share the same space, so to speak,  then, albeit that they're mutually repulsive - they are bound by these hidden fields that can adjust their orbit to balance the opposing charge in those hydrogen atoms.   So.  In the very beginning - when matter first manifests as atoms, then we get these subtle fields.  They resist the bigger universal field - which means that they're 'self supporting'.  And yet they belong to the material of the atom without ever becoming a part of the atom.  Like a hidden police force that keeps order in the neighbourhood. If they were not there then the structure of a sun would not be able to 'hold together'.  The sun is possibly not the best example of these fields as - at a critical mass, the most of them move to a  chaotic distribution of truants.  But in even in this chaotic state they remain 'localised' looking for some boundary interaction where they can peel away from the structure as radiant energy.

The proposal is that these fields remain with the atom - even as some of the atoms develop into more complex structures.  It's proposed that the complexity in the growth of the atom is at the expense of the zipons in the atoms' energy levels.  But those 'binding fields' stay with that atom - but outside that atom however complex or simple is that atom.   Therefore at whatever stage of development - of those developing atoms - and provided only that there are two or more such atoms - then those hidden 'necklaces' stay within that structure and bind it into a three dimensional object.  That's where they started. And, forever after, when planets are formed from those parts of the original sun that maybe escaped or exploded away from the sun - they stay with those atoms and - forever - organise them and sort out their crystalline structures - and hold them together in a condition of 'best balance'.  They are NOT a part of the atoms' energy levels.  But they are still just magnetic fields - exactly as I propose are the atoms' energy levels.  The difference is that the atom's energy levels are 2 dimensional whereas these little fields are 1 dimensional.

So.  This means - that on every level, whether we're looking at a TV screen or a computer or an electric kettle or anything at all that is a visible representation of multiple atoms - then what we do not see are these little fields that bind those atoms into that amalgam.

Now this holds for liquids and solids and it holds for suns.  But it does not apply to all gases.  However, anything with a 3 dimensional structure - then these strings determine their shape and the distribution of the atoms within that shape.  And they always move to a condition of balance or 'best balance'.  They obit at 2C and are thereby too small and too fast for even light to find them.   And they only interact with the atoms' energy levels, NOT with the particles in those energy levels.  Break those strings - introduce chaos - prevent that orbit - then the field of zipons becomes the hot, slow visible state where it is otherwise the cold, fast invisible state.

A battery mix is either alkaline or acid.  It has an innate imbalance.  The fields that bind the material in that mix - offer an alternate charge to the atoms in the mix.  But if the net charge of the atoms and therefore the molecules in that mix is predominantly negative then these binding fields would spin to present a positive charge - and vice versa.  If these binding fields were all therefore predominantly positive - then these fields themselves would be mutually repulsive.  Therefore the mix would be inherently 'chaotic' lacking the balance that is required to allow the fields their best 'rest' position.   It's just the other face of the same coin.  Given a critical imbalance then these binding fields would also 'catch fire'  in the same way that the sun 'catches fire'.

Now the one thing that magnets can't do is change their justification.  If a north of one magnet is presented to another north - then they repel.  Left to their own devices and within a required proximity the one magnet may readjust it's alignment by physically moving in space and then through space to attach the appropriate pole to the juxtaposed magnet.  These binding magnetic fields have that same problem inside that battery mix.  They can't just realign their spins to get that balance.  Somehow the 'charge' of the atoms and molecules determines their own charge.  And that's inviolate.  However.  Just as a permanent magnet can present an alternate pole it if can first adjust through space, so can these zipons adjust their polar property if they can move through space to alter that 'spin'.  This 'chance' or opportunity is offered by the conductive property in the material of circuit components.  Effectively if they leave the mix as a north - then they can re-enter the mix as a south.  They then present the required charge to enable an alternate spin.  When this is managed then they can re-align the atoms into different molecular structures until that elusive 'balance' is obtained.  It's subtle *****.  Its the difference between exiting the north pole - say, of our earth and re-entering the south pole.  The re-entry is the absolute opposite charge to the exit.  From that point of the orbit - back to the north pole from inside the earth - there is an entirely different and opposite charge of that field.  The same with the re-entry of these fields through the negative or positive terminal.  It's the precise opposite of the previous charge. Effectively they've managed to change the presentation of that spin to achieve that required charge balance inside that mix in the same way that permanent magnets can present the required charge when it aligns with another magnet.  The visible evidence is the re-arrangement of the molecules in that mix.  They systematically 'lose' that imbalanced molecular charged condition to become neutral.  A quiet best balance 'rest' position.   But the proposal is that this rearrangement was managed by these binding zipons - not by the atoms themselves as is proposed by mainstream.

Now.  Back to that movement through the circuit components as current flow.  Here's the thing.  With copper - we know that it has balanced valence electrons in their outer energy levels.  This means that those binding fields are really comfortable.  Perfect symmetry.  Pauli's exclusion principle determines that no two electrons can have the same path.  Remember that the proposal is that electrons are 'trapped' between energy levels.  Therefore two outer energy levels would clearly be presenting two alternate spins. Two alternate charges.  The one energy level would be clockwise say, while the other would be anti clockwise.  Perfect symmetry.  Therefore we may assume that this balanced condition would also somehow be reflected in their binding zipon fields.  The proposal is that zipons only interact with other zipons.  Therefore it is proposed that they're interacting only with those two energy levels.   Which also means that for every north binding field there would be a south binding field to accommodate both 'exterior' justifications of those energy levels.  Not exactly two binding fields - just one binding field describing a figure '8' perhaps,  to accommodate both charge properties in those energy levels.

Then from 'left field' so to speak that copper structure is exposed to a magnetic force that is coming from the discharge of current flow - the discharge of magnetic fields - from the supply source.  It has a justification.  Let's call it a North.  Therefore it repels ALL the norths in its path.  This means that one half of all those binding fields in the copper - are 'repelled'.  They literally move outside the structure and 'hang around' orbiting and waiting for a chance to get back in - go home - so to speak.  And their position is replaced by the north from the current flow.  A graduated series of interactions within that structure as they move at 2C through that structure.  In effect, the balance in that wire allows the easy passage of that current flow because the north field was already there.  It takes the place of the repelled field.  No resistance.  In a way the wire has simply 'opened it's throat' to allow the flow of this Northward bound zipon field.  And - in doing so, it's forced out the north field that it previously held those atoms bound.

When it comes to a resistive element we have a problem.  Here there is no balanced valence condition.  Too many atoms with a like charge - bound by too many zipon fields with a like charge.  Effectively the crystalline structure of that resistive wire has been chaotically managed to get to the required rest state.  Just too many norths or too many souths - and the structure verges on chaotic.  But here's what's proposed.  By a random distribution of those repulsive fields throughout the structure then the best balance - albeit tenuous - is managed.  If, for instance, one arranged a series of inherently repulsive atoms into a circle - then - in the mind's eye one can see that an artificial 'balance' could be maintained the one half of that circle presenting the polar opposite of the other.  The quantum result would be an arrangement of those atoms and molecules that are positioned such that there are as many norths as souths.  Many such circles would still remain chaotic.  The crystalline structure would still be random. But their their quantum value would present an apparent 'rest condition' with an apparent 'balance' in that charge distribution.

Now.  This material is also presented with a flow of moving zipons that are still Northward bound.  Then those fields of  zipons holding the atoms in their 'northerly' justification are all expelled - exactly as they were in the copper.  And these expelled fields still extrude the structure itself and orbit - also waiting for their 'chance' to re-enter their 'abode'.   But this time there's a problem.  By 'kicking out' those binding fields has imbalanced that tenuous positioning of charge distribution of those fields remaining inside that material of the resistor.  This imbalances the remaining zipons.  And they all start unravelling.  As they unravel they change from their previous cold fast hidden condition to a hot slow visible condition.  In effect it is like a spark that grows into a fire but it's held bound within the material of the resistor itself.  A graduated process.

I think I must stop here.  There's more to explain regarding the quantity of expelled zipons that enable that 'resonance'.  But for now, I think this is enough.  I've only used pictures here *****.  But I need to explain where the quantity of the expelled zipons as a result of this 'flow of charge' actually enables the benefit that we require.  Effectively 'thin' wire does not allow sufficient 'expelled' zipons.  And we need sufficiency to ensure a high enough voltage.  I'm glad you called for this exercise.  It was long overdue.

Kindest regards,
Rosemary.


Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Sponsored links:




Offline Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Guys, these emails I hope are self explanatory.  And Glen - if you post here again - just know I'll delete it.

Dear Bob.

Hi again.  If you don't mind I'll be posting the whole of this series emails on the thread.  It will vindicate the comments and show justification for my intention to delete any further posts from TheCell AKA FuzzyTomCat AKA Glen Lettenmaier.  I'll alert Stefan to this but he's away for a few weeks.  It seems that this is an example of while the mouse is away the cat plays.  LOL.

Kindest regards,
Rosemary

Begin forwarded message:

From: Rosemary Ainslie <ainslie@mweb.co.za>
Date: 08 August 2010 9:17:27 AM
To: Bob Potchen <bob@TheCell.com>
Subject: Your message

Dear Bob,

Was surprised that I can still be reached on the message system through EF.Com.  They disabled this long before they actually banned me.

Also delighted to lean that this is not you.  I realise now that it's Glen - exactly as he always writes - and I should have realised as much.  Where has Farrah gone?  Miss her posts very much.

Kindest regards,
Rosie
This is a message from TheCell at Energetic Forum ( http://www.energeticforum.com/ ). The Energetic Forum owners cannot accept any responsibility for the contents of the email.

To email TheCell, you can use this online form:
http://www.energeticforum.com/sendmessage.php?do=mailmember&u=72235

OR, by email:
mailto:bob@TheCell.com

This is the message:

Dear Rosemary,

Thank you for identifying the differences in writing style between the Overunity THECELL (no space) and myself.....If you are able, can that name be withdrawn or required to be changed....

All my best,

Bob Potchen


Offline Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Hi guys, in the face of this latest intervention by Glen - I'm now utterly disgusted and rather determined to 'fight' for my rights and for open source best interests.  What's happening now on EF.com is nothing short of fraud - conducted under the full knowledge and co-operation of their admin.  To which end I've written to them - and - as required - will implement action againt the owners of the forum if required. 

Dear Jillian,

I'm calling on you to advise you that the MOSFET heating circuit thread bears no reference to my own work in this subject as the initiator.  Added to which, now that Aaron has got rid of that the top 20 list - he's also managed to bury my own work - obviously this in close co-operation with yourselves.

I must insist that you either lose that MOSFET heating circuit thread or re-instate my own COP 17 Thread back in that top 20 list and then give it front page prominence - as it was previously referenced. Else, I must conclude that you are co-operating with your members to 'lose' reference to my being the 'discoverer' and the 'initiator' of this circuit technology.  I believe that this is fraud and as such is actionable and I will explore my rights accordingly.

Regards,
Rosemary Ainslie

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Sponsored links:




Offline TheCell

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 285
@Rosemary Ainslie

Myself TheCell is located in Germany and has nothing to do with
FuzzyTomCat / Glen Lettenmaier. I switched my attendance mode from believing to critic observer lately , because of being fooled again (Kapagen).
The purpose of this thread is now clear to me. I know offensive Thread's and persons (specially in German automobile forums ) who argue with everyone, that do not share their opinion. Compared to them it was a little critic level that I have chosen, with the attempt to get the desired information in a short efficient way.
This attempt has failed. Nevertheless there is no need to apologize.

Greetings BK

Offline Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
@Rosemary Ainslie

Myself TheCell is located in Germany and has nothing to do with
FuzzyTomCat / Glen Lettenmaier. I switched my attendance mode from believing to critic observer lately , because of being fooled again (Kapagen).
The purpose of this thread is now clear to me. I know offensive Thread's and persons (specially in German automobile forums ) who argue with everyone, that do not share their opinion. Compared to them it was a little critic level that I have chosen, with the attempt to get the desired information in a short efficient way.
This attempt has failed. Nevertheless there is no need to apologize.

Greetings BK
Greetings BK.  I indeed do need to apologise.  My immediate assumption was that Glen Lettenmaier was that poster - so abject apologies to Glen.  It seems that I was entirely wrong and too quick to jump to conclusions.

I need to ask you to reconsider your 'name' as TheCell as it is already used and rather widely.  I wonder if you could - perhaps - think of a variation.  TheCell is a chemist who has worked extensively on HHO and his work is immediately identifiable with some considerable history associated with it.  It would be considered an enormous favour.  If you look at the email you'll understand this better.  I believe that neither of you would want to be confused the one with the other and TheCell's work has an extensive history going back some many years.

It would be very much appreciated.

Meanwhile I'm delighted to hear from you and the more so as it seems you've retracted those rather harsh criticisms.  There is much scope for improvement in our work.  But we're doing our best and certainly we have absolutely resolved the experiment to proof of concept.  As I say.  Every bit helps.

Kindest regards,
Rosemary

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Sponsored links:




Offline Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Hi guys,

Just a final post before I sign off for the night.  This is a follow up on the previous correspondence related to current flow.  Again.  It's only for those who are interested in the thesis. 

'...Regarding the extra energy.  You see ***** - the potential difference is the sum of the 'charge imbalance' from the source.  But in transferring that energy from one terminal to another that charge imbalance is 'transferred' to the copper wire - and then to the resistive wire.  The copper wire does not 'mind' that imbalance - as it does not dislodge those binding fields.  The north's 'say' are extruded from the copper wire.  But the 'norths' from the battery supply source simply take over their function.  In moving through the circuit wire it simply maintains that bound condition which remains 'mostly' satisfied. But in the resistive wire there is no required balance available to that material structure. We're here dealing with imbalanced fields.  Imbalanced valence electrons.  This, in turn, indicates imbalanced energy levels.   Here the binding fields, those 'string's, are actually BROKEN when the 'north' current flows through it.  This unravels the atoms that they WERE holding together.  And that bound condition becomes compromised.  It results in a gradual and continual weakening of the resistive structure as these binding zipons systematically leave the structure in the form of radiant energy.  The break in the light filament.  The gradual weakening of your toaster wires.  The slower but ultimate 'break' in the wire in your heating elements.  And so on.  The atoms have NOT changed.  Nor has their number changed.  All that's CHANGED is the condition or integrity of their BOUND state.  They've lost their bonding - their glue - because the binding fields have systematically 'left the building' so to speak.

But in transferring that voltage  - when the north (say) current runs through the wire - then it extrudes ALL the norths or, depending on the direction of current flow - ALL the souths in all the wires.  Two norths just cannot share any kind of immediate proximity.  The current flowing through the wire  does not discriminate in terms of quantity.  Therefore - provided more norths are extruded than are replaced by current flow - then the voltage across the resistor will be greater.  It may therefore result in MORE fields extruded than supplied by current flow depending on the quantity of material available - or to put in simply - it depends on the thickness  or the mass of the wire.   The force of voltage times amperage in the returning cycle can then equal or EXCEED the energy that was first applied.  The transferred imbalance first allows the material to become a potential supply source for current flow because it's innate balance has been disturbed (as in the battery) but the amount of that imbalance can equal or exceed the energy first delivered - provided only that there's enough mass.  The excess is slight.  But it's enough.  My own prediction is that - subject to a better organisation of the switching cycle - to better control - we should be able to retain the voltage level at the supply to precisely it's pre-discharge value.  But we are nowhere near that yet as the default oscillation is still rather costly to each cycle.

In effect E still = MC^2.  But the mass of resistor itself now also comes into the equation.  But the mass relates to the measure of its newly acquired voltage potential.  Effectively the resistor itself becomes an energy supply source.  This has been discounted by mainstream.  Indeed - when I first presented the circuit design I was WIDELY advised both on forum and by our academics - that it is IMPOSSIBLE to generate enough energy away from the supply to recharge the supply.  Our experimental evidence has put paid to that assumption.  And I see now that this concept of recharging a discharging battery is more readily accepted - especially amongst us OU enthusiasts.

I am SO looking forward to you understanding these things *****.  They're simple.  Really, really simple.  But like all maps - one must first get familiar with the geography.

Kindest regards,
Rosemary

Offline Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Hi guys,  I debated whether or not to include this email - but have decided to do so in the interests of full record.  At least it will keep those interested in step with developments.

Dear *****,

There are only about 10 people who fully understand the concepts in the thesis.  I find it SO simple.  But that's because I'm seeing in in the mind's eye and I'm obviously not communicating clearly.  I am entirely satisfied that this can be explained in simple 3d representation of concept.  Really it will not be difficult.  It would make the 10 dimensional aspect so immediately clear. In this I'm speaking exactly the same language as the string theorists.   I've been working on the 'script' and provided these can be shown as I envisage it then it will make much more sense when it's represented pictorially or visually. Indeed we can reference the impossibility of electron current flow.  I'd love to do that.  Perhaps 3 to 5 minutes of brief reference.  But that production depends on our chat tomorrow afternoon.  I've been doing a bit of homework here and it's coming together - at least enough to find out what *****'s constraints are in what he'll need to do.

Regarding the extra energy.  You see ***** - the potential difference is the sum of the 'charge imbalance' from the source.  But in transferring that energy from one terminal to another that charge imbalance is 'transferred' to the copper wire - and then to the resistive wire.  The copper wire does not 'mind' that imbalance - as it does not dislodge those binding fields.  The north's 'say' are extruded from the copper wire.  But the 'norths' from the battery supply source simply take over their function.  In moving through the circuit wire it simply maintains that bound condition which remains 'mostly' satisfied. But in the resistive wire there is no required balance available to that material structure. We're here dealing with imbalanced fields.  Imbalanced valence electrons.  This, in turn, indicates imbalanced energy levels.   Here the binding fields, those 'string's, are actually BROKEN when the 'north' current flows through it.  This unravels the atoms that they WERE holding together.  And that bound condition becomes compromised.  It results in a gradual and continual weakening of the resistive structure as these binding zipons systematically leave the structure in the form of radiant energy.  The break in the light filament.  The gradual weakening of your toaster wires.  The slower but ultimate 'break' in the wire in your heating elements.  And so on.  The atoms have NOT changed.  Nor has their number changed.  All that's CHANGED is the condition or integrity of their BOUND state.  They've lost their bonding - their glue - because the binding fields have systematically 'left the building' so to speak.

But in transferring that voltage  - when the north (say) current runs through the wire - then it extrudes ALL the norths or, depending on the direction of current flow - ALL the souths in all the wires.  Two norths just cannot share any kind of immediate proximity.  The current flowing through the wire  does not discriminate in terms of quantity.  Therefore - provided more norths are extruded than are replaced by current flow - then the voltage across the resistor will be greater.  It may therefore result in MORE fields extruded than supplied by current flow depending on the quantity of material available - or to put in simply - it depends on the thickness  or the mass of the wire.   The force of voltage times amperage in the returning cycle can then equal or EXCEED the energy that was first applied.  The transferred imbalance first allows the material to become a potential supply source for current flow because it's innate balance has been disturbed (as in the battery) but the amount of that imbalance can equal or exceed the energy first delivered - provided only that there's enough mass.  The excess is slight.  But it's enough.  My own prediction is that - subject to a better organisation of the switching cycle - to better control - we should be able to retain the voltage level at the supply to precisely it's pre-discharge value.  But we are nowhere near that yet as the default oscillation is still rather costly to each cycle.

In effect E still = MC^2.  But the mass of resistor itself now also comes into the equation.  But the mass relates to the measure of its newly acquired voltage potential.  Effectively the resistor itself becomes an energy supply source.  This has been discounted by mainstream.  Indeed - when I first presented the circuit design I was WIDELY advised both on forum and by our academics - that it is IMPOSSIBLE to generate enough energy away from the supply to recharge the supply.  Our experimental evidence has put paid to that assumption.  And I see now that this concept of recharging a discharging battery is more readily accepted - especially amongst us OU enthusiasts.

I am SO looking forward to you understanding these things *****.  They're simple.  Really, really simple.  But like all maps - one must first get familiar with the geography.

Kindest regards,
Rosemary

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy


Offline Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Sorry - just btw.  This thread dropped off the front page and I could not find it.  Had to go back to a previous link.  How does one find the other pages on the forum?  Can someone help me here?

Kindest regards,
Rosemary

Offline Pirate88179

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 8366
Rosemary:

Just look on the top of the page next to your avatar, select the second one down that says "show replies to your posts" and it will show every topic you posted in and take you to the last post you have viewed in that topic.

I hope this helps.

Bill           

PS IF you do not see that selection, then you need to open the header by clicking on the + sign on the top right hand side of the page. (Just to the right of the date and time) It will drop down the header so you can see your avatar and the choices on the left I mentioned above.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy


Offline Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Rosemary:

Just look on the top of the page next to your avatar, select the second one down that says "show replies to your posts" and it will show every topic you posted in and take you to the last post you have viewed in that topic.

I hope this helps.

Thanks Bill - very much. 
Kindest regards,
Rosie

BTW it seems complicated.  Can't Stefan modify this to give us a page number access?  I'll ask  him when he gets back. 

Offline Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Hi guys,

Finally I'm getting a time line.  I had a long conversation with the guys on campus today.  The switches will be designed and built and ready for testing by this time next week.  It's been REALLY slow on campus - but I think this is now about to change.

I'll post those switching circuit designs as soon as I have receipt of them, hopefully before the weekend.

Regards,
Rosemary
http://www.scribd.com/aetherevarising

Offline Bubba1

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 80
...Then, if indeed the plug replenished the electrons then the question is do electrons replenish the supply to produce light, motorised energy, heat from our stoves, our appliances, and on and on?  Clearly if your average utility supply grid had to supply all those electrons then there are simply not enough electrons from the source to enable that very big demand.  It would be quantifiably impossible for any average generator regardless of whether it's a nuclear or coal burning source to supply whole cities with that many electrons....
 

Do you mean to say that it is your understanding of conventional theory that a battery or a power company supplies electrons to a light bulb through one wire, without getting any in return through the other wire?

Offline Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Do you mean to say that it is your understanding of conventional theory that a battery or a power company supplies electrons to a light bulb through one wire, without getting any in return through the other wire?
Hello Bubba.  NO is the short answer.  What I'm pointing to is the logical fallacies of assuming electron flow in any context of current flow at all.  If you take a supply grid applying current to recharge a battery - then the current is first rectified to DC and the circuit is then connected to the battery.  We understand that the current first flows to the battery as it's in series with the plug switch.  Then - having flowed to the battery it then flows through the battery back to the plug.  The point is this.  The battery never sees an extra electron - EVER.  So what is it that flowed from the one point of the plug back to the other point of the plug?  Electrons?  Then if so - did the electrons somehow skip past the battery and forge a path through what?  The air - to return to their own plug source terminal?  Given always that the battery is directly in the path of that current flow. 

The only thing that is measured across the battery is a voltage potential.  And the only thing measured across the plug point is a voltage potential.  The assumption is made that electrons are flowing from the plug through the battery and back to the plug.  This have NEVER been quantifiably proven.  It has only been assumed.

I use this example as there is a need here for a continual path of current flow through the battery as this is now in the path of the grid supply. 


 

OneLink