Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Rosemary Ainslie COP>17 Circuit / A First Application on a Hot Water Cylinder  (Read 317004 times)

Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
This are the pictures of Rosi  ;D

many thanks for this rensseak.  Seems like it's been duplicated.  But I'll leave it as is.  A tribute to Donovan Martin's design skills. 

 ;D 

rensseak

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 330
Hello Rosemary

1. click on search (for me "Durchsuchen") a new window opens where you can select the file.
2. click on "more attachments" and a new line appears and then go to 1.

Norbert

Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Hello Rosemary

1. click on search (for me "Durchsuchen") a new window opens where you can select the file.
2. click on "more attachments" and a new line appears and then go to 1.

Norbert

 ;D GOT IT.  Many thanks indeed Norbert.  Much obliged.

Kindest regards,
Rosie

nievesoliveras

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1996
About the photo posting

What I usually do is to click the link and when it shows the picture I save it on my harddisk, then I can post it from there.

Just hit reply on the thread page and after writing what you want to say, look for the word "attach" on the reply page, press browse and look for the saved picture and press ok to upload it to the attach box.

Then just press post as normal and you got the picture posted.

If you want to post more than one, look at the attach box and hit more attachments and repeat the more attachments with each picture you want posted.

Jesus

PS
If Links like this wont work: (http://i758.photobucket.com/albums/xx223/aetherevarising/DSC00032.jpg)
They work like this: http://i758.photobucket.com/albums/xx223/aetherevarising/DSC00032.jpg
Eliminate the ()s

Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Nope - thanks anyway - but it absolutely does not work for me.  Could be that it's because I'm using an Apple.  I'll try it on my standard computer later on tonight.  AAAAAAh.  I'm the ultimate dinosaur on these computers. >:(

But thanks for all the advices - Jesus et al.  I'll get there eventually.  For now I'd be very grateful if someone could just post this final picture of the finished product.  I need to post some direct copies of the paper as well and some waveforms.  But I'll see what I can do later this evening.

(http://i758.photobucket.com/albums/xx223/aetherevarising/DSC00083-1.jpg)

Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Guys,  I just need to interrupt the 'topic' marginally to explain something that MUST remain OPEN SOURCE.

Here it is.  We're restricted in 'scaling up' on this system because of restrictions to the transistor.  The MOSFET system is ideal because it has an internal body diode that can channel a path for the current flow during the 'off period' of the duty cycle.  But MOSFETs are NOT built to take the kind of wattage that's required for a realistic application.  We're hoping to get around this by varying the component parts of the resistor to reduce the Ohm's value - yet somehow keep the actual current flow to a level it can withstand.  Tricky.

HOWEVER.  I've been thinking of varying the arrangement while still using the 'concepts' that are forged through our thesis.  If indeed current flow comprises, let us for these purposes call it 'charge' rather than the 'flow of electrons' then theoretically we should be able to use a lead acid battery 'in the loop' with an alkaline battery.  The discharge of the one would recharge the other and vice versa.  For those chemists reading here - remember that the anode of the alkaline is the negative terminal. 

This 'principle' has been variously endorsed by sundry chemists whom I've spoken to but still requires a detailed analysis of the chemistry involved.  And the actual problem is to find an alkaline with the same capacity as a lead acid. 

This may assist us in increasing the actual wattage delivered without necessarily routing it through the MOSFET.  But we're working on the required circuits.  And I'm only posting this to ensure that this development is IN THE PUBLIC DOMAIN - lest anyone try and patent it!!!

In any event.  We need to explore this option more thoroughly and will incorporate these tests as well.  For anyone - any chemists - who see the significance - feel free to test this.  But know that I have not done so myself and cannot therefore assure you that you won't be wasting your time.  It is however, theoretically seductive - as it points to a possible 'closed system'.  We need this.  We really do need this.  LOL.  But the details of that required circuit - I'll have to work on it.  I did post this on EF.com - but it was really too sketchy.  It'll be my weekend homework.

Regards,
Rosemary
http://www.scribd.com/aetherevarising

otto

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1215
Hello all,

@Rosemary

show us, if possible, the waves you get from your system. Dont say you have only square waves!!

Otto

ramset

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8073
Rosemary
Just for the record,
Otto is a very good guy that shares much at this forum!
Any info you can give him will benefit all!

Chet

Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Hello all,

@Rosemary

show us, if possible, the waves you get from your system. Dont say you have only square waves!!

Otto

@Otto
Check out the waveforms on the paper. 
http://www.scribd.com/doc/26240411/PROVING-OVER-UNITY-THE-HARD-WORK-OF-MANY-DEDICATED-OPEN-SOURCE-MEMBERS


Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Rosemary
Just for the record,
Otto is a very good guy that shares much at this forum!
Any info you can give him will benefit all!

Chet
It's perhaps an unfortunate that you ever make a recommendation Chet - with respect.  I remember how you advanced TK's contributions which a parade of exaggerated praise that proceded or preceded his every post.  TK is NOT intending to promote this or any OU technology.  Had I and others not resisted those interventions I'm satisfied this technology would be thoroughly buried by now.  In fact - if my memory serves - Wilby managed a rather skilfull dialectic that finally silenced him. 

My hope is that unlike TK - Otto is earnestly attempting to advance Over Unity type technologies. 

nievesoliveras

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1996
Nope - thanks anyway - but it absolutely does not work for me.  Could be that it's because I'm using an Apple.  I'll try it on my standard computer later on tonight.  AAAAAAh.  I'm the ultimate dinosaur on these computers. >:(

But thanks for all the advices - Jesus et al.  I'll get there eventually.  For now I'd be very grateful if someone could just post this final picture of the finished product.  I need to post some direct copies of the paper as well and some waveforms.  But I'll see what I can do later this evening.

(http://i758.photobucket.com/albums/xx223/aetherevarising/DSC00083-1.jpg)

Again for the link you posted to work you should not put () on it.

Jesus

ramset

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8073
Rosemary
I originally brought /invited TK to your thread with the best of intentions!

I believe he is sincere in the pursuit of OU

I do not fancy him an MIB

I did remove myself from the thread when things got out of hand.[very nasty]

A lesson learned!!

You are a very sincere woman with a most definite goal,I apologize for any stress
caused by TK or myself, my original intentions where good [still are].


Chet


PS
While we may all be experts in our fields,
which I believe TK to be at the top of his field,
no one can lay claim to this field [opensource OU]
You are a pioneer  and your zeal is infectious
Hopefully these moments will be historic
Thankyou for all you do

And yes "Wilby" never left your side!
« Last Edit: July 24, 2010, 12:06:59 AM by ramset »

Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Again for the link you posted to work you should not put () on it.

Jesus

Thank you Jesus.  I did remove brackets.  THEY JUST KEEP COMING BACK.  LOL.  I need to get off the Apple - I think is the problem.  But thanks again.  Much appreciated.

Rosemary Ainslie

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Rosemary
I originally brought /invited TK to your thread with the best of intentions!

I believe he is sincere in the pursuit of OU

I do not fancy him an MIB
I would happily fall in with this gross misconception if I EVER saw any evidence of this.  I only see him anxiously disproving whatever he can with rather less authority than he pretends.  And his SKILL at power analysis is clearly wanting.  One woud expect some expertise here before presuming to comment on the experimental evidence.  But having said that - he gave me some much needed training in Open Source 'dangers' and it was as well to learn this.  A necessary but unhappy requirement. 

But thank you for the kind wishes.  For now I'll take them at face value and pretend to forget the continual endorsements you provided so gratuitously that so mitigated against the best interest of this and - indeed - all OU technology. 

And I need to disabuse you of something.  THIS IS NOT A FIRST.  It is only that we are able to substantiate our claim which is more difficult with motors and other technologies.  So we are not making history except in so far as we're working off campus.  That indeed may very well be a first.  Hopefully it'll be a precursor to more such.  Never hurts to hope. 

So Chet.  For now we'll bury the hatchet.   :D

rensseak

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 330