Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

A
  ...or a possible real understanding,to realize a gravity powered device (so long discredited "perpetuum mobile"...) ,in my opinion has no cryptic significance.

    More ,this two words denomination is the whole deal,come to terms.

    Let's open a single book,the latin dictionary...and play a simple puzzle-word.

    The word  "perpetuum" ,between many others meanings is pointed out as..."uninterrupted".

    The word  "mobile",among others connotations ,is accounted for..."flowing freely".

    The gravity phenomenon,can be explained easy,as an "uninterrupted free flow",if we have in mind the rain or a free falling mass.

     For a common approach,to imagine  a PM device,we can make use of the same suggestive equivalence :"uninterrupted fall".

     The key word is "uninterrupted".   

     If you take a look at  "Wheel vs. lever..." "A simplified MT13t..." topics,there is a proposal,so that PM can be "rediscovered" as simple as possible,not as an unbalanced wheel,but as an unbalanced lever.

     Less is more:perpetuum mobile,as an ingenious definition,can illustrate in the same time,a phenomenon and a minimum word-picture-design.

     Words,as is well known,sometimes are great friends,sometimes are great foes of reality:it depends how we take use of them!

          All the best! / Alex

        Hi Infringer !
 
  In Europe,the history of PM ,takes birth long time before Bessler (1712),with Villard de Honnecourt(1235).

  Take a look at his design (a rim with 7 hammers),something different than Bashkara's unbalanced wheel with mercury.

  You can see the evolution of the same basic unbalanced wheel idea(Taccola,Leonardo da Vinci,Bessler and others).

  Bessler (see MT13/Maschinen Traktate ) minimized the short arm-long arm switch time/space from 180*(Villard,Taccola,da Vinci) to 90*.

 As you know,the only problem of PM is this self-switching from short arm into the long arm.

 The most important matter in gravity is the fall time(and space),as a modality to get power ,due to the nonlinear(ever increasing) characteristic of this phenomenon.

 A wheel concept (many spokes) allows a limited fall (step by step ),so we can't "open the gate" for gravity power.

 A lever concept (two spokes only),gives the go-ahead for a maximum vertical fall (180*).

 With a small apparent "trick",we can get even more :an incredible ~360* equivalent fall,so even a greater "harvested " power for a single fall sequence.

  If you run your eye over the history of PM (now as a "technical folklore"...),after you take a look at my topics at this forum (and   www.besslerwheel.com   ...),you can understand easy,that the single problem of a possible PM ,is to look on his evolution and to simplify an old idea:simple hinged gravity wheel into a simple hinged gravity lever.

 The last design is a whipping lever (a lever with a single hinged arm...in the old tradition of PM),as a self-oscillating body ,in a gravity flow.

 Sure,the real last step,is a simple test.

     All the best! / Alex

.....if we take a look at :
     https://images.app.goo.gl/eDa6wVzAASLHaavA6
.....but with a different starting position ( inverted pendulum...) ?!
     Al_ex