Language: 
To browser these website, it's necessary to store cookies on your computer.
The cookies contain no personal information, they are required for program control.
  the storage of cookies while browsing this website, on Login and Register.

GDPR and DSGVO law

Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding.
Amazon Warehouse Deals ! Now even more Deep Discounts ! Check out these great prices on slightly used or just opened once only items.I always buy my gadgets via these great Warehouse deals ! Highly recommended ! Many thanks for supporting OverUnity.com this way.

User Menu

A-Ads

MN LiveCoach

Masternodes Live Coaching

Powerbox

Smartbox

3D Solar

3D Solar Panels

DC2DC converter

Micro JouleThief

FireMatch

FireMatch

CCKnife

CCKnife

CCTool

CCTool

Magpi Magazine

Magpi Magazine Free Rasberry Pi Magazine

Battery Recondition

Battery Recondition

Arduino

Ultracaps

YT Subscribe

Gravity Machines

Tesla-Ebook

Magnet Secrets

Lindemann Video

Navigation

Products

Products

WaterMotor kit

Statistics


  • *Total Posts: 513375
  • *Total Topics: 15278
  • *Online Today: 44
  • *Most Online: 103
(December 19, 2006, 11:27:19 PM)
  • *Users: 7
  • *Guests: 16
  • *Total: 23

Author Topic: New Steven Mark video released April 2006 !  (Read 39597 times)

Offline Freedomfuel

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 105
Re: New Steven Mark video released April 2006 !
« Reply #45 on: April 21, 2006, 08:08:53 PM »
But the earth magnet field is a steady "DC" field.
No "AC" field....so how should it then oscillate ?

Well, actually you may be wrong.  That is what I thought untill I read this article from the University Of Oulu in Finland

ULF waves (geomagnetic pulsations)
http://www.oulu.fi/~spaceweb/textbook/ulf.html

I don't know what to make of this but it could be worth further investigation.  How the geomagnetic field could exhibit these ultra low frequency pulsations is not clear.  Maybe the magnetosphere is being modulated by the solar wind or there could be some kind of cavity mode resonance going on beneath the ionosphere.  Whatever it is, it is going on high above the surface of the Earth so the Mark device would have to be acting as an antenna beaming a signal into space rather like radar, (it is not called 'space energy' for nothing). Once we understand the natural phenomenon that it exploits we can also understand how the Mark coil acts as an antenna.  This would be more useful than trying to fathom out it's function from blurry videos.

The thing to bear in mind is this:  there is a LOT of energy in the sky.  My previous post quotes the Encyclopedia Brittanica as claiming 'billions of magajoules' in the phenomenon of reconnection alone and that is just part of it.  There is also the awesome phenomenon of 'sprites' and 'blue jets' also known as 'mega-lightning' in the mesosphere and the lower ionosphere, not to mention the mother of all WMDs.

Check out Magnetospheric Electric Field
http://www.oulu.fi/~spaceweb/textbook/efields.html

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy


Offline Mannix

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 562
Re: New Steven Mark video released April 2006 !
« Reply #46 on: April 23, 2006, 02:45:24 AM »
Thanks
 Freedomfuel,

The rellevant bits of discovery that Steven has revealed are
Multiple frequencies combining in a space around a collector
Kicks combining to form bigger kicks
Deliberately creating noise
a rotational field that posseses inertia once created
Remember in the large coil demo he says when the "slap" frequencies come together.
Interactions between out of phase xformers
There is no Iron core
They behave as variable tuning devices
They have a natural tendency to run with gain  ( positive feedback)

Like Freedomfuel has stated getting a few cap values may not help. Getting kicks to combine is the first step however you do it.
Steven kindly revealed his discovery process so we should really go back to these basics and try to get a result as he did.

Teslas "standing waves" do seem relevant here . It is a jigsaw puzzle and we do not have all the pieces but we do have a few. The question is are we capable of putting them into practice?

The one thing that Steven has revealed is that his process is certainly not conventional and what I like about it most is that it challenges us to understand..not copy ..for this, I for one am gratefull to him . Many others are completely frustrated by it and may be tempted to give up.
My approach at present is wire on wire with circuits like the TEP project .Perhaps several transformers in one circular space creating out of phase interactions.

Lets enjoy the puzzle


Lindsay Mannix 

Offline Earl

  • TPU-Elite
  • Sr. Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 448
New Steven Mark video released April 2006 !
« Reply #47 on: April 23, 2006, 12:15:12 PM »
Hi Freedomfuel,

>I think that everyone is getting too hung up on details of hardware based on some fuzzy videos and stills. 
>For instance Earl wants to know what kind of capacitors are used in the 1.5kW coil

I never expressed any interest in knowing what kind of capacitors are being used.  What they have
for dielectric doesn't interest me.

Fuzzy videos or not, it is still important to know if these L/C components are oscillator tanks or line fiter.

For example, people have said look at the juicy spark of the big unit, it shows that RF is present.
But if the output goes through a low-pass filter, then there are no RF components on the output.

One can theorize hundereds of years about what esoteric principles may or may not be in play, and refer
to this Web page or that, but we have very little luxury left.  In some days, weeks, possiblly months,
all oil supplies from the Middel East may be cut off from one day to the next.  News filtering out from GIs
in Iraq say Bush has given an ultimatum to Iran that runs out on April 28.

I personally see the output falling to zero when inverted as proof that the energy source has nothing to
do with magnetic field of any kind, neither Earth's nor Sun's.  It is quite obvious that the device is tapping
into an aether flow, perhaps the same one that is pushing all objects to the surface of the Earth.  Some
people call this gravity.

I had a lot of questions for Steven in another thread, but no answers unti now.  Therefore without any
facts, I have no basis for theorizing about anything.  The only thing I presently have are fuzzy videos.
I will be drawing some block diagrams concerning multiple frequencies, as soon as time permits.

--------------------
Hi Lindsay,

Has Steven *explicitly* said that the unit uses no magnetic cores / discs / plates ?
Steven has said that his experiments used transformers, and transformers have magnet cores, so at least
his past experiments used magnetic cores even if the Ring of Power does not..
The two toroids definitely use magnetic cores, but my present opinion is they play no role in the concept;
but only RF filtering.

Regards, Earl

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

New Steven Mark video released April 2006 !
« Reply #47 on: April 23, 2006, 12:15:12 PM »
Sponsored links:




Offline Earl

  • TPU-Elite
  • Sr. Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 448
Re: New Steven Mark video released April 2006 !
« Reply #48 on: April 23, 2006, 11:34:30 PM »
Harti> But the earth magnet field is a steady "DC" field.
Harti> No "AC" field....so how should it then oscillate ?

Freedomfuel> Well, actually you may be wrong.

Dear Freedomfuel,

You also could be absolutely, completely wrong about Steven's device
having any connection to Solar energy, the Earth's magnetic field, the
ionosphere, the magnetosphere, ULF waves, geomagnetic pulsations, etc.

It is also possible that such hypothesized relations deserve no
further study whatsoever. Having designed antennas for over 40 years,
I do not believe the Steven's device is acting as an antenna for
energy high above the Earth.

In my opinion, it is much simpler. Aether is everywhere. The presence
of Earth's mass causes a distortion of aether flow. This aether flux
is what causes all objects to be pushed to the Earth (not pulled by
gravity). His device captures this flux in the form of a rotating
aether vortex. An invisible hurricane. Imagine a ring slightly larger
than a hurricane's vortex and trying to move this ring. Would you feel
resistance to movement?

Your fixed idea that Steven's device ***MUST* be connected to Solar/Earth
interactions could led you down a false path so that you never understand
the phenomena behind its operation.

In my opinion, we should should act like a detective at a crime scene,
pay attention to the facts as presented by Steven and not be led
astray by what we think MUST be. This means the only way to advance
is:

1) to study blurry videos until your eyes turn red
2) ask Steven questions
3) Steven must answer reasonable, non-silly questions on a timely basis
4) forget Steven's device, develop your own theories, built it, change
your theories, rebuilt it, until it works.  Your device may have nothing
to do with Steven's and may still work.  This approach might even be
faster if the above 3 points are not realized.

At the moment, we don't even know if Steven's device operates on a cause/response
relation, such as putting energy in the form of two frequencies into a "tickler"
monophase coil/multi-phase coils.  This tickle than causes an avalanche of energy
into another coil, which might have an orthogonal relation to the tickler coil.
The tickler coil might be monophase, while the collector coil might be multi-
phase.  Or vice-versa.  Or both could be multi-phase, etc.

Going back to some basic comments by Steven, I have drawn up some images and would
like Steven's comments on them.  Since adding two frequencies also gives the sum
and difference, I have isolated the difference frequency with a series capacitor
since it might be a very low frequency causing problems with excessive current due
to insufficient winding inductance.  This line of thinking assumes that energy
is being sent to a tickler winding.

I see no way to take a multi-frequency signal and generate, for example, a 3-phase
signal in order to excite 3 windings at 120 degrees physical spacing.
I do see a way to do this, but it would take two sets of independent windings,
in other words 6 windings altogether.
Correction, using B or C might work with only 3 windings, but not sure
about this.

Best regards, Earl

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy


Offline Elvis Oswald

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 256
    • ONI
Re: New Steven Mark video released April 2006 !
« Reply #49 on: April 24, 2006, 12:36:47 AM »
It's been nine years (at least) since Steven began showing off his device.  While you're doing detective work, you might want to dust that 900 pound gorilla for fingerprints. hahaha

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: New Steven Mark video released April 2006 !
« Reply #49 on: April 24, 2006, 12:36:47 AM »
Sponsored links:




Offline Mannix

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 562
Re: New Steven Mark video released April 2006 !
« Reply #50 on: April 24, 2006, 01:14:59 AM »
Fantastic!

Constructive and objective input is what really sends us hurtling down the path of discovery and all this time it was fingerprints from a gorrila that we needed ...damm we are so stupid. Nobody could see it. It would be funny if it wasn't so sad.
I hope you got what you were looking for.

Offline Elvis Oswald

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 256
    • ONI
Re: New Steven Mark video released April 2006 !
« Reply #51 on: April 24, 2006, 06:26:08 AM »
Actually, I was being polite.  :)  But since you insist on insulting anyone who dares to challenge the validity of this 'device' I'll be a little more blunt.

Your posts that ramble on and on about how wonderful things will be with free energy... and how 'lucky' we are to be graced with these fuzzy videos and repeated mile long posts about kicks, kicks, KICKS... are have lost their luster for me.

The question remains - why has it been 9 years since the device was invented (at least) and there is not ONE working unit in service anywhere?  The plain and simple fact is that it works or it doesn't.  If it works - then free energy is here and we can all go home.
So where's it at?

 


Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: New Steven Mark video released April 2006 !
« Reply #51 on: April 24, 2006, 06:26:08 AM »
Sponsored links:




Offline Superman

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 6
Re: New Steven Mark video released April 2006 !
« Reply #52 on: April 24, 2006, 07:33:37 AM »
Actually, I was being polite.  :)  But since you insist on insulting anyone who dares to challenge the validity of this 'device' I'll be a little more blunt.

Your posts that ramble on and on about how wonderful things will be with free energy... and how 'lucky' we are to be graced with these fuzzy videos and repeated mile long posts about kicks, kicks, KICKS... are have lost their luster for me.

The question remains - why has it been 9 years since the device was invented (at least) and there is not ONE working unit in service anywhere?  The plain and simple fact is that it works or it doesn't.  If it works - then free energy is here and we can all go home.
So where's it at?

Do you truly think governments and corporations are simply going to say "Yes, we've found free energy. Now everyone use it and destroy the energy sector that is making trillions of dollars."

As for this technology, it's not that hard to understand the concept behind it. The pupose, as Stephen Marks and Mannix have mentioned is to let people learn and understand this technology instead of just build it without a clue. Although, clearly many people just want to build something and watch it work...

Offline Tink

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 222
Re: New Steven Mark video released April 2006 !
« Reply #53 on: April 24, 2006, 08:53:43 AM »
Only nine years ago?
Nope 19 years ago allready.
Why not simply telling us a patent number Steven?

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: New Steven Mark video released April 2006 !
« Reply #53 on: April 24, 2006, 08:53:43 AM »
3D Solar Panels

Offline Mannix

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 562
Re: New Steven Mark video released April 2006 !
« Reply #54 on: April 24, 2006, 12:16:57 PM »
Hi all,
I think that a bit of perspective is needed here.
For all those who,after reading all the reports by qualified people who have names and are mostly still alive just cant get it , I suggest that you either re-read the reports and comment on them or just watch and read.

The "Yapping terriers of ignorance" will not encourage anything here.
Of course people dont have to believe but..there are videos there are reports so be really objective by all means.

What has a skeptik ever created ?
What has a skeptic ever achieved?
What has a skeptik ever constructed?

Objectivity is quite  another thing and some people simply cannot grasp the fact that they have missed something in school.
For my part I will desist from responding to the Yapping dogs it gets nobody any where
Demonstrating your incapacity to grasp a new concept doesnt even serve you.

Lindsay Mannix
 

Offline Tink

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 222
Re: New Steven Mark video released April 2006 !
« Reply #55 on: April 24, 2006, 06:40:47 PM »
Dear Mr. Mannix,

Please don't get me wrong, I do believe the Stevens' device works.
It just makes me feel sad that after 19 years it is still not on the market.
So many (oil)wars are not needed if only we could buy this device.
With this device we can get free electricity and heat and via a waterpump and electric distillation clean drinkingwater.
Also can we light and heat greenhouses to grow our own food.
This device means freedom.
Maybe that is the reason this device is not found on the market and even patents are not been found.
I am not in it for the money because a patent would stop that anyway and it has never been my goal.
I have had a dream so to say (as a child) just like many others here and that is to build a free energy device because I am so **** sure it is possible to do so.
I have been tinkering myself with mechanical devices but with the birth of the internet I found out that I was reinventing the wheel.
Steven must know how frustrated we are because we can't grasp it yet how his device works.
I for one am frustrated to be honest.
I think I speak for most of us when I say that we are afraid that his device will never get on the market so we must try to get it out of the claws of the powers that be and get it out in the open.
Please do not give up on us.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: New Steven Mark video released April 2006 !
« Reply #55 on: April 24, 2006, 06:40:47 PM »
3D Solar Panels

Offline Mannix

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 562
Re: New Steven Mark video released April 2006 !
« Reply #56 on: April 24, 2006, 10:53:39 PM »
Tink and all,
I take your point about why is it not out there so I will attempt to explain something that I have had to reluctantly accept as well.

If we look at various bits of technology over the years and study their history we will find the same disturbing picture but because we are looking in hindsight we are do not feel the isolation of discovery. This is what prompted me in the first instance to investigate the issue. The inventor that is Steven, has an agreement with UEC that prevents him from going into too much detail.It is a fine line for him . There is a concerted effort to bring this into use. Consider the info here not as a relevation of a free energy device but as a place where we may be able to get a few clues and perhaps some practical understanding of the process. This has already happened in many ways... not enough for some ,but enough for those who are prepared to do some hard work to follow in his footsteps.

Is it possible that this, that is this forum  is a part of the process of acceptance. You see that some people cannot accept that there is a world outside the one where thay are completely subservient to ideas that were not theirs in the frist place.

Perhaps a circuit will appear here that encompasses everything that Steven has revealed.  The problem is that Unless we can grasp the process it would be like handing petrol and matches to a child.

There is much more support out there for those who say "impossible"

I will include the engineers reports in this thread for those who have not had the time to go thru the other one




 29 September 1997
Michael Fennell  (Consulting Engineer)
8348 Menkar Road
San Diego, CA. 92126
 
To whom it may concern:
 
I have been hired by Mr. Green to evaluate the performance of the Toroidal Power Unit or TPU as has been described to me as a proprietary invention of Steven Mark who was until 1995 President and Chief engineer of Spheric Laboratories, a public corporation.
 
I have been instructed to compare the performance of the TPU with that of any known batteries and other storage systems.
 
As understood the device is universally observed to have the following characteristics:
 
 Outside Diameter:  6"
 Inside Diameter:  5"
 Height:    1 - 3/4"
 Weight:   12 ounces
 Output Power:   250 Watts
 Output Voltage:  160 Volts
 Voltage Frequency:  5000 Hz.
 Duration of Performance: 30 Minutes
 
To compare the TPU with commercially available and developed batteries I described its performance in terms of -Specific Energy-.
 
The power delivered by a battery or motor is the amount of energy delivered per unit time.
A 250 Watt device delivers 250 Joules per second. The total energy delivered is the power times the amount of time that the device is on. A 250 Watt power supply that is on for 1 second delivers 250 Joules. Since the TPU was on for a half an hour, it delivered (250W) x (0.5 Hours) = 125 Watt Hour of energy. In Joules that is (250 W) x (1800 s) = 450,000 J.
 
A convenient way of comparing two energy sources is to compare their specific energies.
The specific energy of a battery is the total power it delivers divided by its weight. For the TPU that would be 125 W-Hour / 0.34 Kg or 367 W-Hour / Kg.
Specific energy is a useful number for comparing power supplies for vehicles and portable electronics, because a battery may deliver a large amount of power, but weigh too much to be useful. If the batteries constitute a large fraction of the vehicle mass, much of the power they supply is used just to move their own mass.
 
I have included a table comparing the specific energy of the TPU with that of other batteries. Generally, batteries are defined as self-contained electrochemical cells: they burn no fuel and require no outside chemicals.
 BATTERY    SPECIFIC ENERGY   COMPANY
             W-Hr / Kg   REFERENCE
 
TPU      367    As Observed
Lithium-iron Disulfide    130    (2)
Lithium     125    Battery Engineer(3)
Sodium Sulfur     100    (2)
Nickel-metal Hydride      75     Energy Conversion Devices.(3)
Zink-Bromide       70    Electro Energy(1)
Nickel Cadmium      56    (2)
Lead-Acid(Experimental)     50    (1)
Lead-Acid(Conventional)     35    (1)
 
(1) ?Electric-Vehicle Batteries,? H. Oman and Gross Feb. 1995
(2) ?Solar Dome,? Robert Q. Riley
(3)   Phone conversation.  See text.
______________________________________________________________________________
 
For electric vehicle applications, the most promising near term successor to conventional lead acid batteries are Nickel-Metal-Hydride (NiMH) batteries. These are currently used in laptop computers.
Energy Conversion Devices (ECD) has a large number of patents on NiMH technology, and has licensed the technology to GM in the U.S. and other manufacturers in Europe and South East Asia. To obtain more information on these batteries contact Greg Fritz at ECD (248-363-1750) or John Dunbar at Gold Peak (619-674-5620). Gold Peak Inc. Makes NiMH batteries and is a licensee of ECD. Greg Fritz says that ECD may be able to produce batteries with a specific energy of up to 150 W-Hour / Kg within several years.
 
Lithium polymer batteries are another promising battery technology. Battery Engineering is bringing out a 125 W-Hour / Kg battery this summer, according to Sal Piazza (619-830-5820), a battery engineer and spokesman.
 
Capacitors can also be used as energy storage devices. Maxwell Technologies produces a line of ultracapacitors that can achieve extremely high energy storage densities. Their ultracapacitors are used in electric vehicles to capture energy from regenerative brakes and store it for subsequent accelerations.
However, according to Ed Blank at Maxwell (619-279-5100) their capacitors can not possibly match the performance characteristics of the TPU
He said that if their capacitors could match the TPU then he would not be at work; he?d be at the beach.
 
A small Maxwell capacitive energy storage device system is about 18'x18"x6". It can deliver about 42 W-Hr. The unit described by Ed Blank is designed to deliver 5000 W For 30 seconds at 56 volts. I do not have the weight of the device, but the specific energy should be much lower because the box has 108 times the volume of the TPU.
Two characteristics differentiate the performance of the TPU from batteries. First, it has a 5000Hz AC output. Batteries are strictly DC devices.
Second, its output voltage is very high compared to typical batteries. Batteries are constructed from electrochemical cells with a small fixed voltage; a typical value is 1.5 volts. Higher voltages are achieved by stacking these small cells together in series. Typically the largest stacks are 12 volts.
These higher voltages can not be made arbitrarily large.
Battery cells have internal resistance; if a large number of cells are stacked in a series, each cell in the series will pass all the current delivered by the stack. Consider the concept of the weakest link in a chain.
For example, if ten 1.5 volt cells rated at 1 amp each are stacked together, the stack can only be operated at 1 amp at 15 volts.
Drawing higher current would result in each cell in the stack passing more then its rated 1 amp. This would cause internal changes in the cells which can lead to a cessation of the electrochemical energy producing activity or a buildup of gas with possible explosion.
To use many batteries to create the current and high voltage associated with the TPU would be out of the question.
 
AC voltages can be obtained from battery based power supplies using converters or actually inverters. However, inverters are built using capacitors and inductors that tend to be bulky. This means that it would be extremely difficult if not impossible to build a 160 volt 5000 Hz power source by linking together a large number of low voltage batteries and the additional inverter electronics in a package with the small size and mass of the TPU.
 
In Summary:
No known form of battery or capacitor comes close to the performance specifications of the TPU as described. Even the best available lithium batteries would require almost triple the weight to deliver an equivalent amount of energy.
Whatever this device is, it does not seem to be a battery in the conventional sense of a self contained electrochemical cell that burns no fuel and requires no outside chemicals.
Another point to consider is; from what I understand 30 minutes may not be the limit of this device?s performance. If that is the case, it will be proportionally better in performance. For example, if the device is capable of operating at the same power for 60 minutes, this would equate to about six times its weight in the best available lithium batteries that would be required to deliver the equivalent amount of energy.
 
      Sincerely,
 
      Michael Fennell
      B.A. Physics, Swarthmore College1983
      M.S. Applied Physics, UCSD, 1988
       
I have worked on projects for NASA.
I have been a project engineer for ENERGY SCIENCE LABORATORIES, a senior technical associate with AT&T BELL LABORATORIES and have been a technical Writer for the HARVARD UNIVERSITY COMMITTEE ON PATENTS AND COPYRIGHTS.
 

 
THE ?TPU? POWER SOURCE
 
 I have been asked to prepare this document to address some criticism, which may exist in relation to the ?TPU? power source as developed by Steven Mark. I have seen the various videotapes and have attended live demonstrations of the device in operation. I have also received the feedback and comments of various engineers and experts in electronics and electrical power generation who have also seen the tapes and witnessed live demonstrations.
 
 First of all, there has been some considerable speculation as to the origins of the ?TPU? technology and who actually owns it. It was conceived and developed by Steven Mark and is owned by Universal Energy Corporation and has been legally owned by that company since 1992. I have personally seen the various contracts and summary evidence myself to conclude that the ?TPU? technology is owned by Universal Energy Corporation. I have heard that someone named Brian Collins in Australia has claimed that he invented the technology and has used some of the videotapes to gather sums of money from would be investors. This activity is criminal and Brian Collins did not invent the technology and does not own it or have the right to sell any part of it in any way. Additionally, there have been others that have found a way to ?Cash In? by using the videotapes and claiming they own or represent the technology in some way. This is all very unfortunate because the ?TPU? is a real power source and deserves to be developed by legitimate means. These people in Australia and other places have taken advantage of, and grievously injured the inventor (Steven Mark) and legal owners (UEC) of the ?TPU?.
 
 The second point of criticism is that the ?TPU? is a fake and doesn?t really work. I have received the input of a variety of engineers and technical people. Most relevant is the feedback from two highly qualified individuals. The first of these is Chris Campbell, an experienced Radio Engineer from California, and the second is Roland Shinzinger, a well known authority on power systems, and a Professor Emeritus of Engineering, (UCI).
Mr. Campbell was selected by myself because of his well known expertise in radio and microwave transmission devises. Mr. Campbell was asked to be as skeptical and critical as possible regarding potential ways that these effects might be faked. Dr. Schinzinger was hired by an outside firm and presumably given similar instructions to examine the device for possible fraud or trickery.
 
 Mr. Campbell made it very clear that it was virtually impossible to transmit the necessary energy via radio or electromagnetic means of a magnitude necessary to light all the light bulbs seen lit in the demonstrations. This is especially true because of the inventor?s willingness to drive around town and perform the demonstration anyplace desired.
 
Neither Campbell nor Dr. Schinzinger, nor any of the other technical personal have been able to find any evidence of fraud or trickery. Nor have they been able to offer a plausible explanation of how the device actually functions.
 
 The ?TPU? units apparently heat up to a potentially dangerous level after a considerable period of time, and must be shut off at that point. This makes some people suspicious of a battery that is being depleted and which must be recharged after a few minutes. However, after having cooled down, the inventor has always managed to start the unit up again and light the lamps again for the same amount of time as before, until the unit heats up again, without removing the device from the observers sight to be ?recharged?. This can apparently be done any number of times, such as the cumulative ?ON? time can be extended to at least 30 or 40 minutes. This is several times longer then the theoretical limit of any kind of concealed battery pack that I, the battery experts or electrical engineers have yet been able to discover. I have personally seen this demonstration at least fifty times.
 
In point of fact, there is in existence a video tape showing a ?TPU? putting out over 1,000 Volts and lighting ten 100 Watt/ 120 volt light bulbs in series for ten minutes. (I have seen this demonstration in person several times). In order to light ten 120 Volt, 100 Watt bulbs for even five minutes, the size and weight of the batteries necessary would need to be quite large.  I have discussed this issue with a number of battery experts who have assured me that such a power supply made of batteries would need to weigh somewhere between 25 and 70 pounds or more.  When I asked if there is not some way, perhaps using Nickel-Cadmium or Lithium batteries or some other kind of exotic or extremely expensive batteries, to make such a unit that would weigh less than 20 pounds, they have frequently laughed at the absurdity of the suggestion, insisting that I am asking the impossible.  One battery expert told me that by using some kind of extraordinarily expensive new military spec Lithium batteries that he has heard of (but never seen), it might be possible to get closer to a figure of 20 pounds, but that he knew of no battery in existence that would actually power ten 120 volt, 100 watt bulbs for even five minutes that could possibly weigh under 20 pounds.  Since the total weight of the larger ?TPU? unit in the demonstration is only about 6 lbs., it seems impossible to do this even if the entire weight of the device consisted only of batteries.  The bottom line is; the ?TPU? ain?t a battery.
 
 I understand that an Engineer, Michael Fennell, has written a paper comparing the small ?TPU? in W-Hr / Kg to all the various battery types currently available. In this paper the ?TPU? has an energy storage advantage over the best (Lithium-iron Disulfide) battery of almost three to one!
So, even if the ?TPU? were nothing more then a battery, it must be some new kind of fantastic battery. Therefore, in itself very valuable, regardless.
 
 As a final word, I must say that ?I saw what I saw?. As unbelievable to me as it is. From all I can see, and from all the things the various Engineers and technical experts that have witnessed in the video tapes and live demonstrations, so far the device appears to be most genuine.
David Doleshal PhD.
800-920-4292
PO BOX 5165
Balboa Island, CA.
92662
THE ?TPU? POWER SOURCE
 
 I have been asked to prepare this document to address some criticism, which may exist in relation to the ?TPU? power source as developed by Steven Mark. I have seen the various videotapes and have attended live demonstrations of the device in operation. I have also received the feedback and comments of various engineers and experts in electronics and electrical power generation who have also seen the tapes and witnessed live demonstrations.
 
 First of all, there has been some considerable speculation as to the origins of the ?TPU? technology and who actually owns it. It was conceived and developed by Steven Mark and is owned by Universal Energy Corporation and has been legally owned by that company since 1992. I have personally seen the various contracts and summary evidence myself to conclude that the ?TPU? technology is owned by Universal Energy Corporation. I have heard that someone named Brian Collins in Australia has claimed that he invented the technology and has used some of the videotapes to gather sums of money from would be investors. This activity is criminal and Brian Collins did not invent the technology and does not own it or have the right to sell any part of it in any way. Additionally, there have been others that have found a way to ?Cash In? by using the videotapes and claiming they own or represent the technology in some way. This is all very unfortunate because the ?TPU? is a real power source and deserves to be developed by legitimate means. These people in Australia and other places have taken advantage of, and grievously injured the inventor (Steven Mark) and legal owners (UEC) of the ?TPU?.
 
 The second point of criticism is that the ?TPU? is a fake and doesn?t really work. I have received the input of a variety of engineers and technical people. Most relevant is the feedback from two highly qualified individuals. The first of these is Chris Campbell, an experienced Radio Engineer from California, and the second is Roland Shinzinger, a well known authority on power systems, and a Professor Emeritus of Engineering, (UCI).
Mr. Campbell was selected by myself because of his well known expertise in radio and microwave transmission devises. Mr. Campbell was asked to be as skeptical and critical as possible regarding potential ways that these effects might be faked. Dr. Schinzinger was hired by an outside firm and presumably given similar instructions to examine the device for possible fraud or trickery.
 
 Mr. Campbell made it very clear that it was virtually impossible to transmit the necessary energy via radio or electromagnetic means of a magnitude necessary to light all the light bulbs seen lit in the demonstrations. This is especially true because of the inventor?s willingness to drive around town and perform the demonstration anyplace desired.
 
Neither Campbell nor Dr. Schinzinger, nor any of the other technical personal have been able to find any evidence of fraud or trickery. Nor have they been able to offer a plausible explanation of how the device actually functions.
 
 The ?TPU? units apparently heat up to a potentially dangerous level after a considerable period of time, and must be shut off at that point. This makes some people suspicious of a battery that is being depleted and which must be recharged after a few minutes. However, after having cooled down, the inventor has always managed to start the unit up again and light the lamps again for the same amount of time as before, until the unit heats up again, without removing the device from the observers sight to be ?recharged?. This can apparently be done any number of times, such as the cumulative ?ON? time can be extended to at least 30 or 40 minutes. This is several times longer then the theoretical limit of any kind of concealed battery pack that I, the battery experts or electrical engineers have yet been able to discover. I have personally seen this demonstration at least fifty times.
 
In point of fact, there is in existence a video tape showing a ?TPU? putting out over 1,000 Volts and lighting ten 100 Watt/ 120 volt light bulbs in series for ten minutes. (I have seen this demonstration in person several times). In order to light ten 120 Volt, 100 Watt bulbs for even five minutes, the size and weight of the batteries necessary would need to be quite large.  I have discussed this issue with a number of battery experts who have assured me that such a power supply made of batteries would need to weigh somewhere between 25 and 70 pounds or more.  When I asked if there is not some way, perhaps using Nickel-Cadmium or Lithium batteries or some other kind of exotic or extremely expensive batteries, to make such a unit that would weigh less than 20 pounds, they have frequently laughed at the absurdity of the suggestion, insisting that I am asking the impossible.  One battery expert told me that by using some kind of extraordinarily expensive new military spec Lithium batteries that he has heard of (but never seen), it might be possible to get closer to a figure of 20 pounds, but that he knew of no battery in existence that would actually power ten 120 volt, 100 watt bulbs for even five minutes that could possibly weigh under 20 pounds.  Since the total weight of the larger ?TPU? unit in the demonstration is only about 6 lbs., it seems impossible to do this even if the entire weight of the device consisted only of batteries.  The bottom line is; the ?TPU? ain?t a battery.
 
 I understand that an Engineer, Michael Fennell, has written a paper comparing the small ?TPU? in W-Hr / Kg to all the various battery types currently available. In this paper the ?TPU? has an energy storage advantage over the best (Lithium-iron Disulfide) battery of almost three to one!
So, even if the ?TPU? were nothing more then a battery, it must be some new kind of fantastic battery. Therefore, in itself very valuable, regardless.
 
 As a final word, I must say that ?I saw what I saw?. As unbelievable to me as it is. From all I can see, and from all the things the various Engineers and technical experts that have witnessed in the video tapes and live demonstrations, so far the device appears to be most genuine.
David Doleshal PhD.
800-920-4292
PO BOX 5165
Balboa Island, CA.
92662
 
 
Roland Schinzinger
Ph.D.
29 Gilman St. Irvine, CA 92715-2703, Phone & FAX: (714) 786-7691
 
Dear Stephen,
 
Thank you for your kind words of sympathy regarding my loss. We both share similar feelings.
 
In your letter you asked my opinion:  I think it is a miracle that your device works. Exactly how it converts energy is elusive to both of us at this time. That does not mean we shouldn't apply ourselves to know for sure. My offer to work with you still stands. I understand your difficulties with the gentlemen you work for and I will not take your decision personally. I will be glad to talk to you and help you all I can. My offer to work on the project was made with the greatest respect and not as some kind of justification to the Foremost Corporation. I told them that from what I could see of your units they did supply substantial amounts of both voltage and current. I told them I could not give any indication of the value of the discovery without knowing more about it. I did recommend that they invest necessary funds to continue working on the discovery and that I was interested in working with you. That is about all I said to them on the subject. Anything you may have heard to the contrary is not true.
 
To further our discussion, the reason you can not use small transformers within or at close proximity to your unit is because of the leakage fields of magnetic flux. They induce currents into nearby circuitry and most likely cause frequency changes in the operating point of the control unit. Remember when you inject even a small frequency component into sensitive frequency dependant equipment you can have a disaster. That is exactly what I believe is occurring when you try to use a transformer close to your units.  There will be all kinds of harmonics present within this field extending past the radio frequency range. If I were to compare the two I would say that toroidal transformers would be more susceptible. This may be contrary to common thought. Toroidal transformers have all their flux aligned with the grain of the steel used in them. This is the reason for their reduced size as compared with E I cores. When operated at higher flux density you can permit a smaller core. Toroids will always saturate quickly, however, E I transformers ramp up to saturation levels slowly. If anything, I would suggest you work with E I rather then Toroids. In either case I believe you will find that you will have to place the inverter well outside the collector coils.
 
You may also leave a message for me at my office at the University of California Irvine.
 
Sincerely,
 
Roland
 
RESUME   ROLAND SCHINZINGER

Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering  (UCI)
Professor Emeritus of Electrical Engineering  (UCI)
PhD, Univ. California, Berkeley    1966
MS,   ?      1954
BS,   ?      1953
Westinghouse Design School / U. of Pittsburgh  1955
Apprenticeship (Technikum), Bosch Co.   1947
High School (Doitsu Gakuin, Tokyo, Abitur)  1945

Academic Appointments:

(UCI) Associate Dean 1979-83, 1985-86
(UCB)Teaching Fellow 1963-65
Robert College Istanbul Turkey:
Associate Professor 1962-63
Associate Professor 1958-62

University of California, energ. & Mgt. (Grad Program) 1991-92
California State Polytechnic University    1978-80
University of Santa Maria, Brazil     1993
University of Kariruhe, Germany-
Power and High Voltage Institute     1986
University of Manchester Inst. Of Science and Tech.-
And Imperial College, London:     1972-73

Honors:

Fellow, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Eng.,(IEEE)
Fellow, Institute for the Advancement of Engineering
Award for Contributions to Professionalism (IEEE)
1983 Centennial Medal (IEEE)
Science Faculty Fellow (Natl. Sc. Foundation)   1964-65
Sangamo Prize Fellowship (Sangamo Electric)   1953
Honor Societies HKN, TBN, Sigma xi
Listed in ?Who?s Who, Am. Men & Women in Science and Engineering

Publications:

Over 70 technical papers, plus numerous reports and commentaries.
Also four books: Ethics in Engineering   McGraw-Hill
   Conformal Mapping   P.A.Laura
   Emergencies in Water Delivery Davis Pub.
   Electrical Laboratory   SIMA Ltd.






This does not satisfy everybody ..there are times when I tear my remaining hair out ...but the are time of clarity and i urge you to discover this part of yourself .. It is  important to you for many things and vital for this.   

Offline lancaIV

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 2862
Re: New Steven Mark video released April 2006 !
« Reply #57 on: April 25, 2006, 01:40:20 AM »
Recitation:(Keelynet) Room Temp Superconductor/Negative Resistor ?

From.DMBOSS1021
Date:Mon,31 Jul 2000

Hi Folks:
Found this patent claiming a process for fabricating a room temperature
superconductor,that also seems to become a negative resistor,gaining
or collecting energy in one mode of it`s use !

http://www.patents.ibm.com/details? &pn=US04325795__

"Process for forming ambient temperature superconducting filaments "
"Bourgoin,Ronald C."

"Abstract:
This invention is a process for forming electrical conductors in the form
of filaments which exhibit properties of electrical superconductivity at ambient
or normal room temperature.The process includes the preparation of a molten
mixture of conducting and insulator materials,the introduction of the nearly
homogeneous mixture between electrodes across which a voltage is applied causing fine filaments to be formed having a diameter within the range of
10 to 1.000 A.The filaments thus formed give almost no resistance to the passage of the electricity therethrough at room temperature thus effectively
forming an ambient temperature superconductor."

This patent describes the theory,and investigative journey that led to this
discovery,from others work. And also describes how the material is made,
and the subsequent tests.

It is using an anomalous property of Bismuth,when formed in a very thin
filament,and being formed in a molten state,under the influence of a high
electric field applied to the ends of the filaments as it cools/crystalizes.

It describes a simple apparatus to do this.and to make an array of these
filaments,encased in an insulating matrix so that the overall power of the
composite superconducting "cable" is quite high.

Apparently in tests,it was found that the overall circuit resistance of a sample
of the filament array,connected to normal leads,was actually less than
the resistance of the leads by themselves,demonstrating a negative resistance-
or extra energy input by the filament structure !

......
Sincerely,
            DMBoss1021

-Recitation end.!

Probably a little more "light" !

Sincerly
          de Lanca

Offline Liberty

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 525
    • DynamaticMotors
Re: New Steven Mark video released April 2006 !
« Reply #58 on: April 25, 2006, 02:11:31 AM »
...The inventor that is Steven, has an agreement with UEC that prevents him from going into too much detail.It is a fine line for him .
 
 ...First of all, there has been some considerable speculation as to the origins of the ?TPU? technology and who actually owns it. It was conceived and developed by Steven Mark and is owned by Universal Energy Corporation and has been legally owned by that company since 1992. I have personally seen the various contracts and summary evidence myself to conclude that the ?TPU? technology is owned by Universal Energy Corporation.


I have written to UEC to ask them for the patent number and when they will bring the device forward.
I will make another post when (or if) I get an answer.  Here is the content of the questions:

I understand that your company has the TPU (Toroidal Power Unit) invented by Steven Marks.  Are you going to release patent information on this device and introduce it for market soon?

Liberty

Offline Elvis Oswald

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 256
    • ONI
Re: New Steven Mark video released April 2006 !
« Reply #59 on: April 25, 2006, 02:49:21 AM »
Mannix - it is your attitude, and your name-calling that wastes time.

Considering the time that this has been floating around... it's perfectly acceptable, logical, and polite to question the reality of the situation.  Why do you have to react like I called Steven or his device a fraud?

Assuming the letter posted from Michael Fennell (in 1997) is 100% accurate - then there is (or was) a working device.  But that still doesn't take away from the validity of my complaint.  The implications of such a device are greater than patents and NDAs... especially after this amount of time.

The letter from Roland Schinzinger (above) iindicates that Steven has no idea how the device works.  Maybe that is the problem.  If that is the case, it *might* indicate the true motive for involving others while closely guarding the actual cricuit design.
It's my opinion that this is too damned important for anyone to be worried about future profit.

 

OneLink