Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: what is the diffrence between the X rotor and the shortest path rotor  (Read 5092 times)

shimondoodkin

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 72
what is the difference between the X rotor and the shortest path rotor

lindman attraction rotor presented with s like rotor but it suffers from bending
as solution was presented to use an "X" like rotor.

which  is better? why? or which is the difference between them

Nabo00o

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 310
    • Naboo's homepage
Re: what is the diffrence between the X rotor and the shortest path rotor
« Reply #1 on: September 09, 2009, 02:50:05 AM »
Isn't this the Ecklin motor?

Nabo00o

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 310
    • Naboo's homepage
Re: what is the diffrence between the X rotor and the shortest path rotor
« Reply #2 on: October 07, 2009, 02:31:47 PM »
Ops Sorry. Seems there is some history between Ecklin and Lindemann, and that Brown was only stealing their idea to make money  :-\

Neo-X

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 379
I think they are all the same in operation differing slightly in power and efficiency..

Nabo00o

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 310
    • Naboo's homepage
Yeah I guess you're right.

Hmm, some crazy thought tells me that the Ecklin motor/generator could be made to self-run and generate electricity at the same time..... Controlling the phase with diodes could be the way to do it.

Neo-X

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 379
I have an idea on how to improve this invention Im sure it is much more efficient than this 4 concept..