Oopps! Sorry it tripples my image... How can I delete the first two? By the way as you can see I add one magnet in the stator to double the magnetic field. I think this is much more efficient than Lindemann design...

Wow your right it very similar except theirs is a coil in the static rotor.

Wow your right it very similar except theirs is a coil in the static rotor.

@Neo-X

Yes, the difference is in the lack of a moving rotor and your design has a mechanical torque output and the Asaoka design has electric power output.
Unfortunately Asaoka did not mention the effect of Lenz law when a decent load is connected to his output coil. Nevertheless, he deals with the possibility of getting more output wrt the input. What he found with the 40 times less input power need for getting the same flux densitiy sounds very good indeed but in itself it does not guarantie a COP>1, does it.

In your design I think the size of the air gap between the stator and rotor is also very important just like in Lindemann's setup and he recommended less than 0.1mm gap, this calls for high precision machining and very good ball bearing for sure.  Lenz law can also manifest in your design when you load the shaft but I guess it is surely less than in a normal electric motor.

@Skywatcher123

Well if you study the permeability values of the paramagnetic materials mentioned in the patent, then you would find a value of 0.9999...  so just under the value of 1, i.e. that of the air.  This means that the air gap in itself could serve too, no need for any paramagnetic material BUT probably there is another point of view: paramagnetic metals may have a certain role in small eddy current induction hence small counter flux production in the gap, this may be beneficial if not excessive? Tests can tell the answer.

rgds, Gyula

Hi Neo-X,

Maybe you are right, I wish you were...

I am not fully convinced that using pulses in setups like you refer to (smartpack, pod, MEG) involves overunity. Lenz law does not differentiate between pulses and sinewaves unfortunately. Somehow the setup itself should be designed to trick Lenz law. I have not seen such setup in practice, only in paper. Have you?

rgds, Gyula

Very good you attempt testings!

You think of NE555 based pulse generator and a MOSFET switch? If you need help in such circuit, ask.

rgds, Gyula

@gyulasun

Thanks for help... I dont know how to use an IC and I have no money to buy.. Im thinking to use a two transistor to make flipflop circuit and my other problem is the magnet. I have no rectangular magnet...

@frii143

All I know is theirs no energy you can get in a centripetal force. Centripetal force can only transform and store the energy.. For example in a skater, if you use your feet to rotate your body while your arms are extending outward, the energy is stored in the mass of your arms and when drop down your arms an energy is released increasing your rotation and then stopped by friction.. Similar to a flywheel when a force is applied to rotate it, the energy is stored in its mass and when the applied force is stopped it continue to rotate because of its stored energy until it stopped by friction.. This means the greater the mass, the greater the energy can be stored.. A planet doesnt stop because theirs no friction.. If you are wondering why other device gets overunity thats because they know how to extract power in magnetism and gravity.. Energy can be extracted in magnetism and gravity thats why almost all overunity devices uses magnet and gravity. But it doesnt mean that magnet create energy, you cant create energy from nothing thats the laws of physics. Their is enormous wave energy in around us even in empty space. It is the ether wave that can pass through in any material except for magnet. The magnet acts only like a diode or a valve rectifying the wave energy in space in only one direction. Thats why a magnets have a repelling and attraction forces similar to an electric fan facing together...

@ gyulasun

Okay thanks I will try to study that circuit it is slight complicated...