Language: 
To browser these website, it's necessary to store cookies on your computer.
The cookies contain no personal information, they are required for program control.
  the storage of cookies while browsing this website, on Login and Register.

GDPR and DSGVO law

Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding.
Amazon Warehouse Deals ! Now even more Deep Discounts ! Check out these great prices on slightly used or just opened once only items.I always buy my gadgets via these great Warehouse deals ! Highly recommended ! Many thanks for supporting OverUnity.com this way.

User Menu

A-Ads

Powerbox

Smartbox

3D Solar

3D Solar Panels

DC2DC converter

Micro JouleThief

FireMatch

FireMatch

CCKnife

CCKnife

CCTool

CCTool

Magpi Magazine

Magpi Magazine Free Rasberry Pi Magazine

Battery Recondition

Battery Recondition

Arduino

Ultracaps

YT Subscribe

Gravity Machines

Tesla-Ebook

Magnet Secrets

Lindemann Video

Navigation

Products

Products

WaterMotor kit

Statistics

  • *Total Members: 83569
  • *Latest: jank

  • *Total Posts: 515062
  • *Total Topics: 15320
  • *Online Today: 44
  • *Most Online: 103
(December 19, 2006, 11:27:19 PM)
  • *Users: 2
  • *Guests: 18
  • *Total: 20

Author Topic: New Breakthrough in Over Unity Theory  (Read 14806 times)

Offline Merg

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 360
New Breakthrough in Over Unity Theory
« on: June 11, 2010, 02:52:09 AM »
After the research and analytical work a new theory has been developed and now Jovan Marjanovic and academician Veljko Milkovic are presenting the theory which says that acting force against moving body will not only accelerate the mass of the body, but also its initial kinetic energy too. The product of initial velocity and additional velocity times the mass would be measurement of extra energy or over-unity energy...
 
Jovan Marjanovic & Veljko Milkovic - Kinetic Energy and Over Unity

The goal of this work is to point out some important facts in formulas for kinetic energy and momentum (quantity of the movement) for moving bodies.
It will be shown that over unity behavior is inherent in movement itself.

In this work the authors will discuss:

- origin of the formulas for linear momentum and kinetic energy,

- principle of adding energy to a moving body as the key for over unity,

- initial velocity in gravitation field,

- the best way of adding energy to the pendulum,

- validity of relativity of classic mechanics inside an inertial frame.

Key words: velocity, kinetic energy, momentum, over-unity, pendulum.

The complete paper can be read on the next link (PDF - 155KB):
http://www.veljkomilkovic.com/Docs/Jovan_Marjanovic_Veljko_Milkovic_Kinetic_Energy_and_Overunity.pdf
 

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy


Offline e2matrix

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1869
Re: New Breakthrough in Over Unity Theory
« Reply #1 on: June 11, 2010, 04:39:47 AM »
Haven't read the paper yet but what you are saying sounds a lot like Tseung's 'lead out' info.  He's got a long thread on this forum that is still being updated.

Offline exnihiloest

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 716
Re: New Breakthrough in Over Unity Theory
« Reply #2 on: June 11, 2010, 02:02:42 PM »
...
The complete paper can be read on the next link (PDF - 155KB):
http://www.veljkomilkovic.com/Docs/Jovan_Marjanovic_Veljko_Milkovic_Kinetic_Energy_and_Overunity.pdf

As proof of OU, it is stated that:
- when you push a ball with a certain work and a force F, it acquires a velocity v, and a kinetic energy 1/2*m*v²
- now the ball is rolling, and you repeat the first operation: you push again the ball with same work and same force F, it acquires a velocity 2*v, and a kinetic energy 1/2*m*2²*v²
It is concluded that:
we have only doubled the work and obtained four times the kinetic energy!

This is total nonsense. Speed is relative to a reference frame, and so is the kinetic energy.
Energy is frame dependant.

In order to suppose that the work to accelerate the ball from 0 to v is the same as to accelerate it from v to 2*v, we have to suppose that in the second case, we accelerate the ball from 0 to v in a reference frame already at speed v relative to the first one. Thus we calculated two works of same value but relative to two different frames of reference. To add them is meaningless.
From the initial reference frame, we accelerated the ball from 0 to 2*v, therefore the work we expended is of course 1/2*m*2²*v².

The way Marjanovic does physics math is an absurdity not only from relativity viewpoint but also in Newton's mechanics.



Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: New Breakthrough in Over Unity Theory
« Reply #2 on: June 11, 2010, 02:02:42 PM »
Sponsored links:




Offline Omnibus

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5330
Re: New Breakthrough in Over Unity Theory
« Reply #3 on: June 11, 2010, 02:08:22 PM »
Quote
Energy is frame dependant.

That's sheer nonsense.

Offline Omnibus

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5330
Re: New Breakthrough in Over Unity Theory
« Reply #4 on: June 11, 2010, 02:42:43 PM »
I don't know what that fellow is claiming neither do I have the time right now to get into the details but one thing is clear--when one says a body of mass m has velocity v that in no way implies the body can be observed from a different frame with the intention to prove that its velocity isn't v. That's such a dishonest twisting of someone's claim that I have no words for it. When someone says a body has velocity v he means it. That is, he is at rest with the laboratory frame and is observing the body moving at velocity v. Period. Further, when he says the body has a velocity of 2v he also means it and that velocity is also seen from the laboratory frame.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: New Breakthrough in Over Unity Theory
« Reply #4 on: June 11, 2010, 02:42:43 PM »
Sponsored links:




Offline Cloxxki

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 825
Re: New Breakthrough in Over Unity Theory
« Reply #5 on: June 11, 2010, 04:04:57 PM »
The pathways at the airport seem to be a relevant comparison here?

You push a ball with 1 unit of force, witch makes it attain v. It smoothly transitions onto the pathway, which happens to move at v itself. we'll have to disregard spin here, because the ball would roll forward on the pathway when braking down the spin.
Anyway, we hop on the pathway where the ball is laying still. We again push it with 1 unit of force, and sure enough, we get 2*v as an actual speed. That is, if we did not slow down the pathway. But, we did! Pathway delivered the difference between dV and dV².
If we step off the pathway and attempt to make the same push from the side rjust as the ball passes us, CAN we make it reach 2*V? we could use a lever to double our pushing speed, but that also reduces torque. The push is "weaker".

It all comes doen to this. Raise a weight to twice the height, and the speed it will fall to the ground to, will be MUCH less than twice the original. Distance*time is the bugger everytime.

Offline exnihiloest

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 716
Re: New Breakthrough in Over Unity Theory
« Reply #6 on: June 12, 2010, 10:44:53 AM »
Quote from: Exnihiloest
energy is frame dependant

That's sheer nonsense.

Omnibus, you should learn physics instead of spreading lies and ignorance.

"The kinetic energy of a single object is completely frame-dependent"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kinetic_energy


Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: New Breakthrough in Over Unity Theory
« Reply #6 on: June 12, 2010, 10:44:53 AM »
Sponsored links:




Offline Omnibus

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5330
Re: New Breakthrough in Over Unity Theory
« Reply #7 on: June 12, 2010, 02:27:49 PM »
Omnibus, you should learn physics instead of spreading lies and ignorance.

"The kinetic energy of a single object is completely frame-dependent"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kinetic_energy

You should stop quoting Wikipedia when the discussion is about serious things. Your dishonesty has no limits and you're trying to find support in the most unlikely source for true science.

Offline Cloxxki

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 825
Re: New Breakthrough in Over Unity Theory
« Reply #8 on: June 12, 2010, 07:27:30 PM »
Quote
You should stop quoting Wikipedia when the discussion is about serious things. Your dishonesty has no  and you're trying to find support in the most unlikely source for true science.
Wikipedia is a better source than repeating one self in 100% surely establishing that OU was reached, each new hint of an idea.

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: New Breakthrough in Over Unity Theory
« Reply #8 on: June 12, 2010, 07:27:30 PM »
3D Solar Panels

Offline exnihiloest

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 716
Re: New Breakthrough in Over Unity Theory
« Reply #9 on: June 14, 2010, 09:43:05 AM »
You should stop quoting Wikipedia when the discussion is about serious things. Your dishonesty has no limits and you're trying to find support in the most unlikely source for true science.

What a joke! It is your own dishonesty that you project.
Wikipedia can't educate ignorant people who want to remain in their ignorance. It is just a start point for intelligent people able to go beyond.

Kinetic energy being 1/2*m*v² and v being frame dependant, it is obvious that kinetic energy is frame dependant.
But according to intuitive omnibus knowledge, Wikipedia is wrong and energy is independant of the frame of reference, therefore even when v=0, there is a kinetic energy!...    ::) ::) ::)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kinetic_energy


Offline Merg

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 360
Re: New Breakthrough in Over Unity Theory
« Reply #10 on: June 14, 2010, 05:52:18 PM »
The latest update from the authors:


Dear Friends,

Several people already expressed great concern about possibility if the force acting against the ball could pass the same energy to the ball after the ball started to move.
The problem was that the force should pass extra path in order to catch and push the ball.

We already explained that the force must be fast enough in order to catch and to push the ball.
However, we forget to mention that acting force should be an Impulse, without passing extra path.
Imagine turning the wheel by the hand. The hand would pass the same path every time, but probably somewhat faster next time. Magnetic force would be the best to use. If acted on the wheel it would act against nearest magnet on the wheel and pass the same path every time.

By using the pendulum all this issues would become invalid because the pendulum comes to stop on each side and there is no any extra path passed by the force if the force was used in highest positions.

To illustrate impact of extra velocity (this time it was angular velocity) to the space module Explorer I, please read the document on the internet:

„Von Braun’s 50-year-old Secret“ on the site:
http://www.enterprisemission.com/Von_Braun.htm

Sincerely,

Jovan Marjanovic and Veljko Milkovic

Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Re: New Breakthrough in Over Unity Theory
« Reply #10 on: June 14, 2010, 05:52:18 PM »
3D Solar Panels

Offline Cloxxki

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 825
Re: New Breakthrough in Over Unity Theory
« Reply #11 on: June 14, 2010, 06:29:37 PM »
I  there's a little formula stating that if you inrease speed of actuator, you lose force by an equal amount...
You can't get both, full force AND distance. (Im)pulses are popupar, but don't help here.

Offline X00013

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 679
Re: New Breakthrough in Over Unity Theory
« Reply #12 on: June 15, 2010, 02:23:24 AM »
I'm waiting for wikipedia to tell me what gravity is, according to wikipedia I will be a better person if I masturbate daily, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=id1Po8ryJrU&playnext_from=TL&videos=vdgB163TTTw

Phuccwikipedia 

Offline Omnibus

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5330
Re: New Breakthrough in Over Unity Theory
« Reply #13 on: June 15, 2010, 12:12:23 PM »
What a joke! It is your own dishonesty that you project.
Wikipedia can't educate ignorant people who want to remain in their ignorance. It is just a start point for intelligent people able to go beyond.

Kinetic energy being 1/2*m*v² and v being frame dependant, it is obvious that kinetic energy is frame dependant.
But according to intuitive omnibus knowledge, Wikipedia is wrong and energy is independant of the frame of reference, therefore even when v=0, there is a kinetic energy!...    ::) ::) ::)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kinetic_energy

Inadequate quoting is dishonesty. It is dishonest to give quotes about frame dependence with the intent to debunk someone's claims when that someone explicitly talks only about events occurring in one only frame.

Offline Rosphere

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 485
Re: New Breakthrough in Over Unity Theory
« Reply #14 on: June 15, 2010, 01:15:59 PM »
As proof of OU, it is stated that:
- when you push a ball with a certain work and a force F, it acquires a velocity v, and a kinetic energy 1/2*m*v²
- now the ball is rolling, and you repeat the first operation: you push again the ball with same work and same force F, it acquires a velocity 2*v, and a kinetic energy 1/2*m*2²*v²
It is concluded that:
we have only doubled the work and obtained four times the kinetic energy!

This is total nonsense. Speed is relative to a reference frame, and so is the kinetic energy.
Energy is frame dependant.
...

I don't know what that fellow is claiming neither do I have the time right now to get into the details but one thing is clear--when one says a body of mass m has velocity v that in no way implies the body can be observed from a different frame with the intention to prove that its velocity isn't v. That's such a dishonest twisting of someone's claim that I have no words for it. When someone says a body has velocity v he means it. That is, he is at rest with the laboratory frame and is observing the body moving at velocity v. Period. Further, when he says the body has a velocity of 2v he also means it and that velocity is also seen from the laboratory frame.

From the top:

You stand in your "laboratory frame" reference frame and kick a ball with impulse force F to make it roll with forward velocity v (and rotation w) towards your lab partner standing in your same "laboratory frame."

Your lab partner in your same reference frame intends to provide the second kick to make the 2v (2*v) velocity; to make the ball go twice as fast as it is rolling now.

The impact force of the foot on the ball depends upon the velocity the foot relative to the ball; if you kick it fast it goes fast, tap it slow it goes slow.

Without any math or physics "lies" about such things, we can easily infer through our childhood playground experience that the lab partner will need to kick way faster than you did to double the ball speed.  If his body mass is about the same as yours and he kicks with the same foot speed that you did, we can all easily imagine that that ball will go no faster than v as his foot barely makes contact with the ball.  (It's rolling right by him.)

He will need to kick twice as fast as you, (with the equivalent leg mass.)  Unless he is riding on a scooter, (a different reference frame,) traveling along side the ball with the same velocity v.  Then, in this scooter frame he can kick the rolling ball with your same effort.

So, either you lab partner provides a harder kick from the lab frame, (more energy than you from the lab frame,) or the same effort kick from the scooter frame, (but extra lab frame energy is required to move the scooter.)

Now I am out of time.  Off to work now. 

 

 

OneLink