I'm still trying to find electric field around spinning magnet
APOLOGIES - I ACCIDENTALLY TYPED 'MAGNETIC-FIELD', INSTEAD OF 'ELECTRIC-FIELD', WHEN I FIRST POSTED 'THIS POST'.
You probably already know that apparently if you freeze a permanent-magnet, it's 'Electric-Field' becomes permanently visible in the ice, but I can't find this mentioned on wikipedia or on any credible-scientific-website.
However, I have never heard of this being tried with a spinning-magnet, that could be done in a hollow part in the ice, or outside the ice.
You can see a photo of the frozen 'Electric-Field' on the webpage in the quoted-text below, from a post I made on another thread
- The proof that a permanent-magnet( an unpowered-magnet ) has an electric-field can be viewed when a magnet is frozen solid in water, the Electric-Field then becomes clearly visible
In the webpage below, find the text - "Notice the angle of the electric field thats perpendicular to the magnet" - , to see the photo of the frozen magnetic-field of a permanent-magnet
http://www.energeticforum.com/renewable-energy/9680-tube-driven-tpus-construction-zone-5.html
However, I wonder if when you freeze a permanent-magnet, it may become closer to being a super-conductor, which is actually different to a room-temperature permanent-magnet, but obviously a frozen permanent-magnet is not as cold as a super-conductor( a much lower temperature, frozen permanent-magnet )
___________
The Following Relates To Energy-Amplification Via Geometrical-Means, For Example, A Motor With A Large-Wheel On It's Axle, And That Large-Wheel Turns A Small-Wheel Which Is On The Axle Of A Generator.
It Relates To This Thread, Because Of A Detail In The Last Paragraph.
Faraday's First Motors, And Generators, Seem To Have No Points Of Electromagnetic-Friction, So, I'm Thinking If They Would be Ideal To Test Out The Theories Of 'Energy-Amplification' Via Geometrical-Means/'Purely-Mechanical/Electrical'( Geometrical-Means, see above) Designs, Which Are Usually Discredited Due To Torque.
However, I assume that faraday's initial generators( and all subsequent others) did in fact have problems with the electromagnetic-eddies( lenz's law ) that they created.
- The question was asked on this thread, that if when the speed of faraday's-homopolar-generator is increased, whether or not it generates more voltage, I think the only answer provided, was that faraday's-homopolar-generator needs a very high rpm to generate any power.