Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: orgone energy ignitable?  (Read 9091 times)

jikwan

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 206
orgone energy ignitable?
« on: May 08, 2010, 02:51:18 PM »
uncertain which catagory to put this

over the years ive come across data/vids showing ICEngines
could be run on orgone. could be. some reports state engines
definitely have run on the stuff. no video proof yet.

seems that its ignitable and rather than exploding---it implodes
must set timing at bottom dead centre

this blows my mind, i cannot grasp the concept

is there someone that could give a concise explanation and
maybe point me to some useful data/vids?

i have an idea how to generate orgone
not quite sure of what kind of size it has to be to
provide enough power

also there may be a good chance to wreck the engine
if the timing is not absolutely perfect

sztudynt

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 5
Re: orgone energy ignitable?
« Reply #1 on: August 06, 2010, 07:37:51 PM »

is there someone that could give a concise explanation and
maybe point me to some useful data/vids?


A few days ago i found this:

Quote

Joseph H. Cater has produced a most impressive body of information in his books “The Awesome Life Force” and “The Ultimate Reality”. These books are expensive and as they are copyright 1984 publications, I am not allowed to provide you with a copy. Google books have a partial copy of the “Awesome Life Force” here and “the Ultimate Reality” here

I have not constructed and tested the following device, nor do I know anyone who has. As the following information is not widely known, that is understandable. If you do build this device and find it to perform as described, would you please let me know as feedback of that kind is most useful.

Mr Cater describes this invention as: “a simple device which can be easily and cheaply constructed by any back yard handyman without the need for any special tools. This device can put free-energy within the grasp of everyone”. Mr Cater says that this device will let any internal combustion engine run without fuel, and no changes to the engine are needed. The engine can be installed in a vehicle or used for driving an electrical generator. Mr Cater describes two different versions of this device. With either version, the larger the number of layers, the more effective the device becomes and forty layers are suggested as being a practical number. A box of sufficient size is covered with forty alternate layers of aluminium foil and paper. Two thicknesses of newspaper for each layer of aluminium foil should work well, the outermost layer being non-metallic and held in place with a generous amount of masking tape.

Version 1: The box has an air inlet and an air outlet, with non-metallic baffles between them to make the air circulate through the whole of the inside of the box. The box should have a volume of about 1.5 cubic feet (42.5 litres) and a one-inch (25 mm) flexible pipe can be used to connect the box to the air intake of the vehicle. As a box of this size will not fit in the engine compartment it can be located anywhere in the vehicle and the flexible pipe run through to the engine. Copper foil can be used instead of aluminium foil. The actual construction suggested is for a box size 12” x 12” x 18” (300 x 300 x 450 mm) constructed from acrylic and containing forty baffles.

For either version, the box needs to be robust as it has to withstand the stresses caused by the partial vacuum created by the engineÂ’s intake strokes. With metric construction using 10 mm thick acrylic, this would require two pieces 450 x 300 mm to form the top and bottom, and two pieces 450 x 280 mm for the sides, and two end pieces 280 x 280 mm. Mr Cater suggests the use of epoxy resin to join the pieces together, but the supplier of the acrylic can supply a specialist bonding liquid which makes two pieces of acrylic merge together so that there is no actual joint as such, just a continuous piece of acrylic with a right-angle bend in it. The construction is like this:




and the outlet pipe is connected directly to the carburettor if there is one, or to the air intake if there is not, so that all of the incoming air has to pass through the box. Mr Cater specifies 40 baffles inside the box and his diagram shows them running along the length of the box instead of across the width as shown above. Given the dimensions stated and lengthwise baffles, that would leave just 7 mm for an air passage plus a baffle, with 3 mm baffles that leaves only 4 mm for the air passage and while that represents an air-flow area of 1,120 sq. mm. as opposed to 500 sq. mm. for the outlet pipe, the air-flow passage length is 18 metres long and has forty hairpin bends in it and that is going to cause some constriction to the air flow. Whether or not some constriction is desirable is not at all clear.

Placing the baffles across the width, and still using 3 mm thick baffles, gives an air-passage width of 7.5 mm and a passageway area of 2,100 sq. mm. which is a substantial increase over the original 1,120 sq. mm. It reduces the flow path to 11 metres and that may not be desirable. If you decide to construct one of these devices, then the choice of baffle direction is yours. When securing the layers of aluminium foil and newspaper around the whole surface of the box (except for the air intake hole and the air outlet pipe) Mr Cater suggests using spots of ordinary glue and then wrapping the outside in masking tape.




In order to show how the box pieces fit together, the diagram above does not show the layers of aluminium and newspaper surrounding the box on each of the six sides. The joint between the flexible pipe and the air filter can be sealed with duct tape.

Version 2: Is supposed to be easier to construct and more effective in operation. In this arrangement the box is made in the same way and to the same dimensions, but the baffles are replaced by well-packed fibreglass wool sandwiched between two boards, each of which have been drilled with 300 holes 1/16” (1.5 mm) evenly spaced over the area of the board:




The perforated boards are kept clear of the top and bottom of the box by 6 mm spacers run around the edge of the box and completely sealed along all of their edges. In the diagram above, the 40 layers of aluminium foil and newspaper are not shown. The fibreglass wool is packed tightly around the edges of the box so that the air is forced to flow through it and canÂ’t bypass the fibreglass by flowing around the edges of the packing. The main body of the fibreglass wool is arranged to be loose enough for the air to flow through it.

What is shown as a “choke” on the air intake is there to allow the incoming air to be shut off completely in order to deal with a situation where the engine doesn’t stop even when the ignition is switched off.

Mr Cater says: “In the above construction, it must be emphasised that the proper packing of the fibreglass wool is of major importance. It must be packed to the extent that the passage of air begins to be seriously restricted. Up to this point, the tighter it is packed the better. The more fibreglass wool, the greater the exposure of the air as it flows through and the greater the dispersion of the air which is a vital factor. If this is not followed, failure will more than likely result. The box should be constructed so that the top can be removed easily.” Mr Cater does not say why the top of the box needs to be removable, but presumably it is to allow for the packing density to be altered until the devices is working well.


Patrick Kelly
engpjk@yahoo.co.uk
http://www.free-energy-info.co.uk

Quote above comes from end of this chapter:


This device look very simple and it's cheap to assemble. I'm preparing to make a replication of this device, but first i need to spare some money. At this moment i don't have a job and all my money goes to buy food.

I wish you all good luck :)


z.monkey

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1660
    • Scientilosopher's Domain
Re: orgone energy ignitable?
« Reply #2 on: August 06, 2010, 08:23:52 PM »
Howdy Jikwan,

I spent years toying with orgone, bions, chi, manna, bio energy, whatever you call it.
I have read all of Joseph Cater's books, and still have a couple.  Health Research
carries his books and have contact with him directly, and you can get the books
there.  Here is a link to Health Research...

http://www.healthresearchbooks.com/pages/books_list.php?origin=author&author=Cater,%20Joseph%20H.

Yes it is theoretically possible to burn concentrated accumulations of orgone.  In
"The Awesome Life Force" there is a there is a device which is a box of decaying
organic matter (leaves, I think) then the output air is piped to a internal combustion
engine.  I have never tried this experiment, so I can't say it works.  It would be
neat to try.  Like say if I took a heap of decaying organic matter out of my composter,
and put it in a sealed container with a valve on the top.  Let it sit for a few days
and see if it develops pressure.  Then open the valve, and hold a lighter close
to any gas that escapes, and see if it burns.

The authority on orgone is Wilhelm Reich, and he is very controversial.  If you can
find his books you are very fortunate.  I have only read about him and his work
through other writers, and have never seen his work.

Through all of my experimenting I have found that orgone energy is most compatible
with living things, plants, and animals.  I have done multitudinous experiments with
my garden where I bury a plate accumulator in the ground, under the plant's roots.
It seems to make a little difference, but I have no empirical evidence.

In one of Reich's experiments he constructed a orgone accumulator to be like an
electrical capacitor and they could watch the capacitor charge up and then
discharge as the voltage became high enough to jump the gap between the
terminal block electrodes.  So maybe that is a way you could effectively utilize
orgone energy...

cletushowell

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 571
Re: orgone energy ignitable?
« Reply #3 on: August 07, 2010, 06:05:33 AM »
well this operates in the last loop of gravity so its was the final unsolved link but its really simple it has to do with the energy in newtons apple getting so charged with energy in space it attracts water the water eventualy neutralizes the radiation adds weight to the apple and it falls where the water is removed be decomposing material so im not shure how your trying to apply it but first you need the energy source to remove the water chlorphy from so essentily your not using the enrgy but removing the unified feilds that hold the energy and then add it again some how creating suction in the process let me explain it in my hot air ballon it seems to be the best parable we charge the hot air ballon but it
does not lift its on the bottom of the ocean beacuse we filled the basket with rock but if i remove a rock then the atomic energy matches the water and its no longer a rock energy but a unified water energy but we made suction on the way up then I remove another rock we are now unified in air then space
so then we must neutralize the energy to drop we do this with water because hydrogen we add oxygen and drop the ballon again by neutralizing the hydrogen energy. so were unified with each state of matter in energy not in mass. hope this helps understanding the cycle you should be able to create it in any force or feild.