Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Floyd Sweet VTA Replication Project  (Read 60071 times)

luishan

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 74
Re: Floyd Sweet VTA Replication Project
« Reply #15 on: March 23, 2012, 05:03:00 PM »
Dear Chris


    Very good experienced comments. I will keep in mind.
    Please keep on going your experiment and share your experience.
    Thank you.






luishan

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 74
Re: Floyd Sweet VTA Replication Project
« Reply #16 on: March 23, 2012, 06:35:34 PM »
Check it out below video. He use magnetic flux energy.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qrMaAO10XSs




hyiq

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 207
Re: Floyd Sweet VTA Replication Project
« Reply #17 on: March 23, 2012, 10:04:03 PM »
Hi Luishan,

This looks like a very good experiment to try. I will say a lot can be learned by experimenting on this type of device.
This is however a totally different concept than Flux Cutting. This is Induction through Flux Linking (Transformer Induction). Its important to keep this in mind when experimenting.

Lots of turns on a small coil and you can get a very good result from this type of arrangement but its a lot different from the VTA. My experiments on the Flux Gate Magnetometer are very similar. You can see in my early experiments, I use a large input, on my later experiments I use much less, because I used an input with more turns on it. In this case, you might need more Input Voltage, but Input Current goes way down. Its Ohms Law.
 
All the best

  Chris
 

mx1000

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 40

MenofFather

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 943
Re: Floyd Sweet VTA Replication Project
« Reply #19 on: March 21, 2014, 09:04:01 PM »
In one video Floyd ajusting frenquency and found, that resonant frenquency of magnet is 11 herc. Did that mean, that if we put 11 herc, then we get energy amplification and then not need prepare magnets?

MenofFather

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 943
Re: Floyd Sweet VTA Replication Project
« Reply #20 on: March 22, 2014, 08:20:04 AM »
Here I corect show? In inputs coils he put 10 volts and 32 mikroams curent, sine of 60 herc. On output coils he have 500 W 120 volts 60 Hz. Magnets in atraction mode.

For conditionig, Sweet use sixteen hundred mikrofarad capasitor 220 volts and paralel  acros it is 220 volts, probarly, lamp, to see voltage across capasitor.

Or maybe one output coil?

MenofFather

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 943
Re: Floyd Sweet VTA Replication Project
« Reply #21 on: March 22, 2014, 08:53:56 AM »
Here is Sweet conditioning coil, wound maybe 0,5 mm wire, maybe 500-250 turns. Then it put into this coil two magnet with space (box between them) in atraction mode and dischare capasitor in pulsing system with 60 herc frenquency on this coil. Then change polarity and again dischare some time capasitor with 60 herc to this coil.

But he say, that tha size magnet have self frenquency about 11 herc, so what this mean, that if we use 11 herc to input coils, then not need prepare magnets?
 

MenofFather

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 943

dieter

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 938
Re: Floyd Sweet VTA Replication Project
« Reply #23 on: March 27, 2014, 09:25:59 PM »
I wish I knew the answer. One thing that made me keep on searching elsewhere is, in the VTA  descriptions they always say "it's very easy", but then later I read "oh yes , you have to condition the magnets, with a secret procedure and 20'000 volts". And now you say 220V. It's this inconsistency that made me pass by.


Of course, it would be great to get energy from permanent magnets. And I have a feeling that it is possible.


Regards

MenofFather

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 943
Re: Floyd Sweet VTA Replication Project
« Reply #24 on: March 27, 2014, 09:56:25 PM »
I wish I knew the answer. One thing that made me keep on searching elsewhere is, in the VTA  descriptions they always say "it's very easy", but then later I read "oh yes , you have to condition the magnets, with a secret procedure and 20'000 volts". And now you say 220V. It's this inconsistency that made me pass by.



Regards
Floyd use 250 volts capasitor. From were you get information, that need 20 000 volts?

dieter

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 938
Re: Floyd Sweet VTA Replication Project
« Reply #25 on: March 28, 2014, 12:47:35 AM »
Hi,


Quote
...In fact, Don Watson said the magnet to be programmed was to be excited between two plates that were charged with at least 20KV (DC or AC). This would cause a 'ringing' in the barium which would last for upwards of 15 minutes.

 During that time, the magnet could be subjected to a sharp pulse at roughly 260 degrees of a 60 cps sinewave. He said this was based on his own experiments and seemed to get the best results....

see:


 www.linux-host.org/energy/svta.htm

MenofFather

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 943
Re: Floyd Sweet VTA Replication Project
« Reply #26 on: March 28, 2014, 07:24:31 AM »
Hi,


see:


 www.linux-host.org/energy/svta.htm
Maybe with 20000 volts he better get results, but Floyd use 250 volts DC capasitor. So maximum voltage  Floyd use is 250 volts. Floyd all explain how condiotion and here no secrets. Who for you is authoritity, Floyd or Watson?

marathonman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 860
Re: Floyd Sweet VTA Replication Project
« Reply #27 on: March 28, 2014, 09:51:02 PM »
According to HYIQ.ORG people around Sparky are lying about the magnet conditioning and someone should be able to replicate it.
i personally believe they are lying. i don't trust none of those sorry people involved like Lindemann and Tom Bearden.
all they are is coat riders making money off other people fame or ideas.
don't forget these....



dieter

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 938
Re: Floyd Sweet VTA Replication Project
« Reply #28 on: March 29, 2014, 12:38:12 AM »
In fact, even several Replicators said, sparky did not only disclose parts of the operation principle, but even misleaded people by fake information. From my point of view some of the replicators have given much more valuable infos than sparky himself.


That said, one must love this 80 years old guy, when you hear his wife like "is everything alright with you?" and he like "yeah we're fine, get back into the kitchen, it's something electric"... she obviously had no idea that historical things happened right there...if they happened. Well, it's whittnessed.


I would neighter rely on the infos by the don smith replication, for other reasons. A guy named Neil Weber had some good infos and offers the original magnets, that are rare to find and of which he had to buy a few dozens. See youtube.


A COP  of 1.5 Mio is pretty cool, shure. Feels a bit like a cities power supply in your pocket. 1 Watt in, 1.5 Megawatt out. Megawatt , mmmh!  8)


But this whole conditioning business... I'm not getting it. I have seen the "bubble" they are talking about. Basicly it's just a reversed polarity on the barium ferrite magnets center, so along the edges it's NS, but in the center SN, with a bloch wall surrounding the center. But then they say you need to "program" the magnet with a eg. 60Hz signal while the bubble is made... program? Ok, but then it is also said, the conditioning does not only consist magnetical treatment, but also pulses of HV in the magnet material (that is nonconductive...)...


All very confusing. Nonetheless, my contribution: I once put a neodym against a barium ferrite magnet, N to N. Then I watched it with the green magnet vision film. The BF had a reversed polarity area of the size of the Neodym! So this way, with the film in place (5$, wondermagnets.com), you could remagnetize the BF magnet manually (and visually) with a neodym and achieve the same bubble. If there is also a flat coil on it, providing the 60hz signal, that might work too. At least something to experiment with.
.As Floyd Sparky Sweet said, it HAS to be Barium ferrite.
As far as I see, the donut magnets inside a microwave oven are also barium ferrrite. Tho, the hole in the middle may be a problem. Also, these magnets are magnetized so perfectly, not shure if I would want to mess with them.
.Regards


Jimboot

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1407
Re: Floyd Sweet VTA Replication Project
« Reply #29 on: March 29, 2014, 01:35:56 AM »
In fact, even several Replicators said, sparky did not only disclose parts of the operation principle, but even misleaded people by fake information. From my point of view some of the replicators have given much more valuable infos than sparky himself.


That said, one must love this 80 years old guy, when you hear his wife like "is everything alright with you?" and he like "yeah we're fine, get back into the kitchen, it's something electric"... she obviously had no idea that historical things happened right there...if they happened. Well, it's whittnessed.


I would neighter rely on the infos by the don smith replication, for other reasons. A guy named Neil Weber had some good infos and offers the original magnets, that are rare to find and of which he had to buy a few dozens. See youtube.


A COP  of 1.5 Mio is pretty cool, shure. Feels a bit like a cities power supply in your pocket. 1 Watt in, 1.5 Megawatt out. Megawatt , mmmh!  8)


But this whole conditioning business... I'm not getting it. I have seen the "bubble" they are talking about. Basicly it's just a reversed polarity on the barium ferrite magnets center, so along the edges it's NS, but in the center SN, with a bloch wall surrounding the center. But then they say you need to "program" the magnet with a eg. 60Hz signal while the bubble is made... program? Ok, but then it is also said, the conditioning does not only consist magnetical treatment, but also pulses of HV in the magnet material (that is nonconductive...)...


All very confusing. Nonetheless, my contribution: I once put a neodym against a barium ferrite magnet, N to N. Then I watched it with the green magnet vision film. The BF had a reversed polarity area of the size of the Neodym! So this way, with the film in place (5$, wondermagnets.com), you could remagnetize the BF magnet manually (and visually) with a neodym and achieve the same bubble. If there is also a flat coil on it, providing the 60hz signal, that might work too. At least something to experiment with.
.As Floyd Sparky Sweet said, it HAS to be Barium ferrite.
As far as I see, the donut magnets inside a microwave oven are also barium ferrrite. Tho, the hole in the middle may be a problem. Also, these magnets are magnetized so perfectly, not shure if I would want to mess with them.
.Regards


Or we could just buy one of these . I got delivery of some of there mags the other day and their polar patterns are crazy. Strong as hell when they lock together too. http://www.correlatedmagnetics.com/minimagprinter/