Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: PWM circuit 555  (Read 52880 times)

Paul-R

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2086
Re: PWM circuit 555
« Reply #30 on: April 12, 2010, 04:35:02 PM »
what is the 42,8kHz supposed to do to the water molecule?
In some sort of way, it shakes it to pieces, probably due to resonance.

John Worrell Keely is said to have done this using sound and others, principally
Bob Boyce, using electrical effects.

(Rather like the opera singer breaking the champagne glass by singing at it its
resonant frequency).

bille

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 11
Re: PWM circuit 555
« Reply #31 on: April 14, 2010, 01:10:30 AM »
In microwaves you have waveguides and cavities. everything is tuned.
Do you think the size and shape of the hho resivoir will change the frequency?
What do you think?
BE

Paul-R

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2086
Re: PWM circuit 555
« Reply #32 on: April 14, 2010, 11:03:49 AM »
In microwaves you have waveguides and cavities. everything is tuned.
Do you think the size and shape of the hho reservoir will change the frequency?
What do you think?
BE
I doubt it. In the case of Bob Boyce, it is the separation of the plates and the electrical frequencies put out. There is a standing wave going across the 101 plates, and the plates must be at a null position. Te gases are given off, as with Stan Meyer, in the space between the plates and not on the surface of the plates. It is thought that it is the static voltage which does the stuff, rather than the current.

viz
http://www.free-energy-info.co.uk/Chapter10.pdf

ultimavoid

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 4
Re: PWM circuit 555
« Reply #33 on: May 04, 2011, 09:20:46 PM »
Has anyone looked in to the efficiency of the process related to the Duty Cycle of the signal? Do the molecules need any "down time" for maximum efficiency?