Nothing is off the table...we haven't a clue how far advanced their technology is.

I've already listened to 2 apparently independent sources who reported time traveling and teleportation in the early 60's...so who really knows where the limit is.

Regards...

They just place 4 or 5 red herring witnesses into the mix and bob's yer uncle.

Regards...

Yes cloxxi,
that would be a good test to simulate a crash with an old airliner.
That would surely convince a lot of people that aluminum airplanes can not go right through concrete, or steel-reinforced walls.
One just has to watch videos of the twin towers where the planes' wings slip right through the walls that are made up of steel columns, and then ask himself "Is this possible?"

One thing you need to remember is that it is illegal to film the pentagon in almost any capacity.  this includes from a distance, not sure how they know you are filming ..or what have you, but it's fairly common to be warned about it if you are staying in nearby hotels.

I was told passively about this when I was younger (13 or so) and staying in the area.

I remember seeing a computer generated scenario of the supposed events surrounding the 911 attack only a day after it occurred.  Later I though I had actually seen it; now I remember it being CG.

Very strange how this works no?

I believe he meant 'computer graphic'.

Regards...

Nothing is off the table...we haven't a clue how far advanced their technology is.

I've already listened to 2 apparently independent sources who reported time traveling and teleportation in the early 60's...so who really knows where the limit is.

Regards...

We can take an educated guess, and suggest that it's far beyond what the public  is currently aware of, and certainly well beyond present accepted scientific knowledge. We know that the hole in the pentagon was too small to admit the supposed plane. Since the FBI have a strong tendency to confiscate video footage of these events, especially footage which contradicts the official story, we don't know if the 'wreckage' photographed is genuine or planted. We don't know whether the 'witnesses' are bona fide, have been 'approached', threatened, bribed, 'got at' in some way, or are in fact entirely fake intelligence 'plants'.
       The so-called '911 Commission' conclusion is now being admitted as incorrect, false, and coerced in every way, by the same people that were responsible for telling us the 'official whitewash'.
       In the case of the pentagon, my feeling is a missile was involved, or a specialised military vehicle, not a standard plane. I don't think this event was a hologram - nor do I think that the 911 planes were holograms, or that the trade center buildings were zapped by a 'beam'. This is cointelpro nonsense designed to discredit the evidence that a) modifite thermite (thermate) was utilised. b) In no way did the alleged terrorists have the skills to guide those planes, with the sharp twists involved, into the trade center buildings, given their atrocious record at the CIA funded flight schools where they received their so-called 'education'. These are aerodynamic 'miracles' - another word for 'remote control' - so real experts question why bumbling idiots like Islamic terrorist patsies, who foresake their Korans for heavy drinking, bungle their CIA-funded flight classes, attend strip clubs, snort cocaine, threaten to microwave-oven their girlfriend's kittens, etc., could have been capable of such expertise.
       The fact is they weren't capable, and were simply the usual cretinous dupes used by the real terrorists who prefer to remain behind the scenes - as they invariably do. That is why a good percentage of those 'terrorists' on the WTC planes are still alive and walking around today -
but funnily enough, their complaints never seem to get aired in the mainstream media.
       One more thing, I don't think enough attention has been paid to the  background radiation count at the WTC. Check out Ed Ward - he has some good information. There is no reason why micro-nukes should not have been utilised given the evidence, to combine a massive core flash in the basement (supported by witnesses, by the way)  with support beam thermate demolition cutting at angles, so that the beams fell on themselves. You have building seven falling into its own footprint at demolition speed, without having even even been hit by a plane - this is impossible, according to all accounts. These steel chassis-type buildings have NEVER fallen by fire alone - so once again, we're being massively lied to on every count. What's 'news'? only what we uncritically accept.
    Interestingly enough, Marvin Bush was in charge of security. I guess he must have been napping while the support beams were cored out with thermate demolition packs, by smartly-uniformed 'team members'.
       When are we going to get up off our knees, educate ourselves, stand up to this nonsense, recognise where it's all heading and refuse to cooperate before the totalitarian global fascist state, cashless society, microchips and all the rest of it, arrives on our doormat in a nicely-printed, official envelope??
       Count me out. And, by the way, if you live in the UK, or anywhere else, for that matter, love your dogs and pets, and don't want them to die of microchip-induced cancer - just say no. Remember - You're next.