Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Stan Meyer Mystery Finally Solved  (Read 12643 times)

ramset

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8073
Re: Stan Meyer Mystery Finally Solved
« Reply #15 on: February 21, 2010, 04:45:57 PM »
W.O.
said

The cell will fall out of “resonance” which will require constant correction.

----------

Thats a "biggy"[screams "solid state required to proceed"]

Chet

WilbyInebriated

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3141
Re: Stan Meyer Mystery Finally Solved
« Reply #16 on: February 21, 2010, 10:05:15 PM »
@ Wilby

That’s like saying you can not figure out alternating current that Tesla invented until you have built a working AC generator!  Or, you don’t know how your car’s engine works until you’ve built a working engine first.  What kind of happy horse shist is that?  I actually liked you better as a drunk.  At least then you had a viable excuse to sound like an idiot.
why do you keep avoiding the question with logical fallacies? it's a simple yes or no question...

ramset

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8073
Re: Stan Meyer Mystery Finally Solved
« Reply #17 on: February 21, 2010, 11:50:57 PM »
Wilby
Your a smart fellow but you take too much pleasure in pissin on peeps.

Get some manners Bud!

The Man said he found a Frequency that the power to drive "Dropped" and the Volume of gas "Erupted" ala The 8 foot flame Meyer Demo's,

But then she falls from "resonance"

a big pain in the pants problem!

Get some couth  Bud !!

Chet

sfandbv

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 1
Re: Stan Meyer Mystery Finally Solved
« Reply #18 on: April 18, 2010, 07:37:33 PM »
@ WorldOrder,

Is your 3 phase system the same as Kevin West uses at waterforfuel.com? He also uses a few additional capacitors, a resistor, and a bifilar choke. Do you need these as well or is it just a rectified 3-phase output straight into a tubular cell array?




sparks

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2528
Re: Stan Meyer Mystery Finally Solved
« Reply #19 on: April 18, 2010, 09:38:04 PM »
  Lets say myers was doing exactly what he said.  He was inputting into an rlc tank using the cell capacitance as the c in the rlc.  This would without a doubt be the most efficient way of introducing voltage across the cell with minimization of input current.    He has two chokes one adjustable one not attached to each side of capacitor.  He says he is actively adjusting one to bring the circuit to resonance.  Resonance can store electrical energy input from a dc or ac scource.  After a while the resonant currents and voltages can far exceed the input current and voltage.  Energy will be lost from the system due to resistance and radiation and the power factor will be hideous but we are not looking for power throughput in the circuit we are looking for energy retention.  Each ring of the rlc imposes a voltage across the tap water electrolyte.  There is no current going through the cell.  There is only current going through the external circuit from one side of the cap to the other.  There is however a repolarization of the electric field permeating the cell.
This repolarization of the electrolytic field does not dampen the rlc.  It is an integral part of the rlc.  Is a currentless electric field change enough to split water.  I dont know.