Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Testatika, TPU, MEG, etc. amplification principle theory  (Read 16539 times)

f_dyne

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 59
Re: Testatika, TPU, MEG, etc. amplification principle theory
« Reply #15 on: July 28, 2009, 08:35:34 PM »
Yes, but the problem is that they counter each other and they're even exclusive. In a lot of situations, it all depends on some interpretation of experimental data. That interpretation can be done so it will comply with many different theories.

Take for example Heisenberg Matrices and Schrodinger equation...
They mean the same thing but the mathematics is different.

F_dyne

the_big_m_in_ok

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2087
Re: Testatika, TPU, MEG, etc. amplification principle theory
« Reply #16 on: November 08, 2009, 07:26:27 AM »
f_dyne said:
Quote
here there is a theory of TPU, Testatika, MEG, etc. EM overunity based on mainstream physics:
http://utenti.lycos.it/fischerconsulting/testatpu.html
@all
I stumbled onto this patent that (sort of) combines a Testatika---better yet---a Wimshurst machine, with a radio receiver:

#1,471,165
http://www.google.com/patents?id=SZleAAAAEBAJ&pg=PA1&dq=loop+aerial&as_drrb_ap=q&as_minm_ap=0&as_miny_ap=&as_maxm_ap=0&as_maxy_ap=&as_drrb_is=q&as_minm_is=0&as_miny_is=&as_maxm_is=0&as_maxy_is=&num=100&source=gbs_selected_pages&cad=2#v=onepage&q=&f=false

I know 'F' in the patent drawing rotates with "condensers" on the ends of the spokes, but whether of not the prototype---if there was one---worked, is unknown by now.

I give you the reference number and Google address to look at even on the patent 'web sites if you like.  You might find it interesting or useful.

--Lee
« Last Edit: November 08, 2009, 02:24:54 PM by the_big_m_in_ok »

sparks

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2528
Re: Testatika, TPU, MEG, etc. amplification principle theory
« Reply #17 on: November 08, 2009, 02:10:55 PM »
    The ability of different forms of matter to absorb electromagnetic waves and incorporate them into their intrinsic at rest potential energy content is Universally demonstrated.  On the surface of the Earth the most common demonstration of this is the absorption of infrared wavelengths by water molecules.  Lots of infrared around lots of water molecules lots of heat.  How do we convert the photon energy gained by a watermolecule into electrical potential?

f_dyne

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 59
Re: Testatika, TPU, MEG, etc. amplification principle theory
« Reply #18 on: February 17, 2010, 11:16:42 PM »
@the_big_m_in_ok :

thank you I'm going to read the patent.

@sparks :

I explained a possible method here :
http://xoomer.virgilio.it/fischerconsulting/TEI.txt
in this site :
http://xoomer.virgilio.it/fischerconsulting/edgeresearch.htm
the idea is that ions can be "seen" from the external plasma surface as RF photons, and they are slowed down from counter EMF using an external antenna load.
I'm building test prototypes, I'll need more time.

F_dyne

mscoffman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1377
Re: Testatika, TPU, MEG, etc. amplification principle theory
« Reply #19 on: February 18, 2010, 06:25:29 PM »
f_dyne said:@all
I stumbled onto this patent that (sort of) combines a Testatika---better yet---a Wimshurst machine, with a radio receiver:

#1,471,165
http://www.google.com/patents?id=SZleAAAAEBAJ&pg=PA1&dq=loop+aerial&as_drrb_ap=q&as_minm_ap=0&as_miny_ap=&as_maxm_ap=0&as_maxy_ap=&as_drrb_is=q&as_minm_is=0&as_miny_is=&as_maxm_is=0&as_maxy_is=&num=100&source=gbs_selected_pages&cad=2#v=onepage&q=&f=false

I know 'F' in the patent drawing rotates with "condensers" on the ends of the spokes, but whether of not the prototype---if there was one---worked, is unknown by now.

I give you the reference number and Google address to look at even on the patent 'web sites if you like.  You might find it interesting or useful.

--Lee

@the_big_m_in_ok

You are looking at the diagram but not reading the text of this patent
correctly. The static shield has nothing to do with static electricity,
but is used to shield voltage coupling. So this has nothing to do
with wimshurst generators. The Testatika uses an RF *transmitter*
type mechanism to step down static voltage power, called an RF
oscillator with air core transformers rather then iron core.

In the patent the capacitors are operated manually as a noise reduction mechanism
to detune *one* of two identical antennas. I don't know the exact radio
effect he is referring to...Maybe the broadband characteristic of natural radio
noise versus the narrowband effect of manmade radio signals. Then
he puts them into an subtraction mechanism before receiving them.

:S:MarkSCoffman
« Last Edit: February 18, 2010, 07:54:59 PM by mscoffman »

the_big_m_in_ok

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2087
Re: Testatika, TPU, MEG, etc. amplification principle theory
« Reply #20 on: February 18, 2010, 07:21:31 PM »
@the_big_m_in_ok

You are looking at the diagram but not reading the text of this patent
correctly. The static shield has nothing too do with wimshurst generators,
but is used to shield voltage coupling. So this has nothing to do
with wimshurst generators. ... The capacitors are operated manually as a noise reduction mechanism to detune *one* two identical antennas.
@mscoffman
I didn't have a lot of time to look at the patent thoroughly.  However, I do see that drawing numbers 22, 23, 24 are "condensers" that interact with each other, and, like you, I didn't understand the radio principle the inventor was referring to.

I'll download the patent later and study it closer.

--Lee