Free Energy | searching for free energy and discussing free energy

Solid States Devices => solid state devices => Topic started by: Eighthman on January 14, 2010, 12:31:55 AM

Title: An Attempt At A Summary: The Mark Device
Post by: Eighthman on January 14, 2010, 12:31:55 AM
The problem with this device is that the volume of posts has become extreme. I tried to read as many as I could, so please forgive me for any redundancies.  I will try to summarize what I have observed:

1) If the Mark device is real, then it is likely that various people have stumbled upon it in much the same empirical way he did. His device seems to be the accidental product of his 3-D audio attempts.  The Sweet , Hendershot and Markovich devices probably operate the same way.  In particular, the Markovich device information spoke similarily about designing delays in the coil assembly to create the energy flow, as well as being 'quasi- electic' or 'quasi-magnetic'.

2) Given the above, theory about its operation is fuzzy, to say the least.  Drawing energy from the earth's diffuse magnetic field makes little sense ( contrary to Hendershot as well).  Reading the accounts about near disaster with this and the Sweet device,  it seems most likely that you are creating a sort of "macro quantum object",  rather like a giant atom.  Think of it like this - lots of people ramble on about "zero point energy" but no one seems to explain how to use this energy because YOU NEED TO CREATE A SINK for it to work.  Thus,  water runs down hill,  heat moves to cold and so on.  There is enormous pressure at the bottom of the ocean but you can't generate power down there unless you have an area of reduced pressure.
 
I think by creating this macro vortex object,  he stumbled upon a real energy sink that gets Casimir/ether pressure to fold on itself into a spherical standing wave.  You're getting energy sucked in, condensing into a sort of matter.  It's just related to E=mc2. 

3) The area to investigate involves shapes.  In recent years, scientists have discovered a surprizing world of cluster chemistry - in which smaller atoms of various elements can be clustered into larger shapes that imitate other elements in form.  Once this is done,  these cluster shapes will act chemically like their new found cluster element shape rather than the smaller parent.  This is a clue.

I have been skeptical about people playing with pyramids, etc and getting odd voltages.  I may have been wrong....

The key is to find some seed or clue empirically, as various inventors have and expand on it.  Unfortunately,  what I see here often looks like simple blocking oscillator action as magnetic fields collapse.

As I said above, I apologize for redundancies or missing things already said due to post volume.

Is there anybody here who has isolated a real anomaly?  Real DC wattage out?  Could you add anything concrete to my (very modest) summary?

Thank you.
Title: Re: An Attempt At A Summary: The Mark Device
Post by: otto on January 14, 2010, 06:31:39 AM
Hello all,

@Eighthman

  110 - 120V DC on my A measured with the cheapest digital A.

No comments on the anomalies!

My feeling says me that this is your first and last post. A good post.

Edit:

Keyword: cluster

Otto
Title: Re: An Attempt At A Summary: The Mark Device
Post by: FatBird on January 14, 2010, 03:31:56 PM
If you watch SM's videos, he definitely has a rotating field that gives HUGE overunity.  The problem so far is that none of us have been able to duplicate his inventions.  If the watch the video below when SM takes it back from the man, SM says it has a gyroscopic effect because the field is spinning.  The problem is that none of us knows how he made the field spin.  That is the MILLION DOLLAR question!!!  LOL


http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=167210479374903373#



.
Title: Re: An Attempt At A Summary: The Mark Device
Post by: Eighthman on January 15, 2010, 12:57:58 AM
Here's another point about atoms that may fit the observations of the Mark device.  Spherics discussed the NMR of Iron.  Ordinarily, nuclear magnetic resonance is associated with MHZ frequencies - however, in the weak earth's magnetic field, such resonance is well within the audio range.
see:  http://www.search.com/reference/Magnetometer

So,  Mark could have been experimenting in the audio range, he could have used the weak earth field to trigger the device by accident, and jumped to the conclusion that it was powered by earth's magnetic field (in actuality, triggered, NOT powered!).  It might have had some trouble working if turned sideways (maybe that fits some orientation observations).

Two questions:  are the pictures you show of an actual demonstrated Mark device or an attempt at a reproduction?

More importantly,  does anyone have a high resolution picture of the Mark coil that was cut into a cross section?  This might be very helpful.
Title: Re: An Attempt At A Summary: The Mark Device
Post by: otto on January 15, 2010, 06:23:55 AM
Hello all,

@Eighthman

I have the same trouble: if I turn my setup sideways the kicks are gone and there is no light. Of course the particles are stopped.
If I flip my setup upside down I can see the kicks but they are different and of course the particles are stopped and there is no light.

So, every time when I build a new coil I have to test this coil in both positions to see if it works.

I can only say hmmmmm.....Im not so good educated to explain why this happens.

Of course there are more questions that needs an answer but....not how to build a TPU but more .... just a little one:

why works a 22 turns collector and a 21 or 23 turns collector doesnt work?

In my setup is the difference only around 5 cm in the lenght of the cable.

5 cm = 2". The degrees?

Not to forget:

I failed a little bit the audio frequencies. Im using around 30 - 35kHz.

Otto
Title: Re: An Attempt At A Summary: The Mark Device
Post by: innovation_station on April 23, 2010, 06:21:24 PM
Here's another point about atoms that may fit the observations of the Mark device.  Spherics discussed the NMR of Iron.  Ordinarily, nuclear magnetic resonance is associated with MHZ frequencies - however, in the weak earth's magnetic field, such resonance is well within the audio range.
see:  http://www.search.com/reference/Magnetometer

So,  Mark could have been experimenting in the audio range, he could have used the weak earth field to trigger the device by accident, and jumped to the conclusion that it was powered by earth's magnetic field (in actuality, triggered, NOT powered!).  It might have had some trouble working if turned sideways (maybe that fits some orientation observations).

Two questions:  are the pictures you show of an actual demonstrated Mark device or an attempt at a reproduction?

More importantly,  does anyone have a high resolution picture of the Mark coil that was cut into a cross section?  This might be very helpful.

i see where you want to go .. 

need a video ....  : )

i did it and posted it .. 

you refer to heterodyneing  a class A audio tube amp triggered by a SINGLE TESLA KICK ... 

ONLY THING I DID IT WITH 1 FREQ NOT 3 .. 

it feeds back and amps its self to resonant rize then hetero dynes ... 

drop the speeker put a 4 ohm coil around a damm cord and pump it !

: )

ist

here is the demo video ... 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9xl0XhKuSV0

all i did was tune it ...  and flick the switch .. 
you make the kick and it amps its self till the amp kicks in then the resonant rize ..
happins then it wobbles : )