OMG, already someone has contacted me in private saying I should read another of his posts. Thanks to that person. I'll read Pirate88179 post tomorrow. I would not be surprised if Pirate88179 blocks me from posting here in my own thread to prevent me from showing what a liar he is, once again. If that happens, then I'll post my reply here tomorrow -->

http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=8608.new;topicseen#new

Good grief, poor guy.

@Pirate88179

Bill,

I have been reading this forum quite a while, so I kind of know you a little. Never once have I known you to lie or stretch the truth. I just hope you can just let this go because it doesn't take you anywhere. PL has pissed off a few others on this forum before. He doesn't seem to get that the way he presents himself is offensive to some. If he really wants to make things better, and if he had the intellectual maturity to be able to understand, then he would be worthy of debating or discussing issues and would stop posting things that are non-productive.

You don't have to defend yourself.

Good luck to you and your efforts.

Brad

@Pirate88179

Bill,

I have been reading this forum quite a while, so I kind of know you a little. Never once have I known you to lie or stretch the truth. I just hope you can just let this go because it doesn't take you anywhere. PL has pissed off a few others on this forum before. He doesn't seem to get that the way he presents himself is offensive to some. If he really wants to make things better, and if he had the intellectual maturity to be able to understand, then he would be worthy of debating or discussing issues and would stop posting things that are non-productive.

You don't have to defend yourself.

Good luck to you and your efforts.

Brad

Thank you sir, I really do appreciate that.  You are 100% correct.  I will take your advice.

Thanks again.

Bill

Pirate88179 wrote:

Also, to correct you yet again, Gadget NEVER said the JT is OU.

We may as well get this out of the way a few hours early. There are numerous quotes, here are some. See the red highlights in particular -->


Posted in "Second Stage Joule Thief Circuits" thread:

your Welcome  BUT  as said in previous post there is MUCH room for improvemenst to this OU effect and As a condition i asked Stephan   and in all fairness  I discovered it and build it first and its My concepts therefor No prize entrant or entries shall  use My concept  to enter for the prize including using an ultracapacitor or a joule thief as per MY concept . Simply put you can enter using any charging Method with an ultracap as the output source nor use the circiut ground loop had designed and i am ironing out . You can however replicate improve  the design for the benifit  for all but no entery for prize .
Its ou .

Posted in "Second Stage Joule Thief Circuits" thread:

Also the unit will certainty will show a selfrunning light at the very least  . whether it pulls it from the bcap or not its the first OU toy every made that is public and usefull. Build one and you will at the very least had a self runner .

I have demonstrated over the unity of a primary source in the Jule thief thread . from an aa battery 2500mah i have charged an ultracapacitor to full capacity with only a few microvolts of loss from the battery 1.4 volt battery .

Gadgetmall said it was a joule thief, and that it's OU.

May I suggest You Pirate and Gadget just perform those measurments and silence-disproof Paul.

Paul is just irate , because he tough he could make money with it , but now feel he wasted his time .

Sorry we could not make you rich .

Why tell a lie about me when I've already clarified? Again, you buddy copied a *portion* of a *sentence* from my public statement at my website, gave it a deceitful twist about how I was going to sell other peoples devices, and didn't even provide a link so people could see how he clearly lied. But hey, you would rather lie to help your buddy, huh.

My websites public statement -->

http://globalfreeenergy.info/public-statement/

And proof that I did not edit my public statement like Pirate88179 tries to get people to think -->

http://74.125.155.132/search?q=cache:KouVPJ5ntb0J:globalfreeenergy.info/public-statement/+%22I+start+a+company+to+market+and+SELL+such+machines+to+people+and+companies+who+are%22+site:http://globalfreeenergy.info/&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us&client=firefox-a

The above link is a google server where google caches web pages. Take note at the top of the web page of googles time stamp of Dec 6, 2009 01:56:57 GMT. Thank the Universe for google who saved me from Pirate88179's Libelous acts.

They can't stand the fact that I tested their claims, which in every case showed less than 100% efficiency. I'm a huge fan of excess energy research, but not false claims to damage this community.

your tests, were they peer reviewed? are you suggesting one non peer reviewed test is a scientific conclusion? where can the full data set from your 'test' be reviewed at?

did poynt vet it for you? because if he or milehigh or tk didn't do the vetting... well, need i say more?