this is a free forum... you obviously have no idea of what hosting bandwidth costs.

Actually, you can get quite a lot of bandwidth for $150-200/mo.

We are talking about your own dedicated Xeon server and 2-4,000GB/mo transfer which is pretty much a standard nowadays in server offerings.

So what's the problem then? This site has to be making easily $200/mo, unless Stefan expects a salary for himself, in which case the site is run from some cheapish hoster with lousy specs. Oh wait, but it is on a shitty server with shitty features.

CompuTutor, this should help lift up your spirits.

 You are rather new here and most likely missed my topic about using both poles of a electromagnetic coil. Bedini has only used one in all of his designs which waste the other pole. I brought this up over a year ago and to date I have only seen one other utilize both poles. That was Johnybrovo who used one pole to spin one disc and the other to spin another disc. He found that my theory was correct. What I would like to see is both poles being used to spin one disc. This would double the torque which would provide more power to over come more resistance which would supply more energy.
 Something that most have over looked is the fact that a coil has two poles and both are equal and you can not have one without the other. When you use one, the other is there and is capable of producing equal work as the other with out requiring any additional input power.
 I was going to build what I have in mind but my focus was steered away to another experiment that is proving to be much better and much easier for people to build that would provide free energy without the need for a outside power source to start it.

 I do hope this helps lift up your spirits again and I wish all the the best of luck to you and all.

...BTW, using colorful language does not diminish our intelligence.
Tropes

Yeah, but coming home from a funeral
and downing over half of a 1.75L of rum
then Wilby-Bashing was uncalled for...

I already messaged Stefan to delete all
that "Colorful language" in interest of those
that it can offend (Noted NightLife, Etc.).



I do agree,
and a smaller disc spinning the opposite direction
in some vid I saw somewhere did come to mind when I read that.

But when I watched the EFTV vid with John,
it seemed to be explained as two norths pressed together
forming a "Sharp North" which loaded (Saturated) the coil's core
and hence windings, but the "Scaler South" that returned
between the magnet pairs that swamped the coils during
the field collapse was giving the magnetic field's collapse
the added (OU) push that is claimed to be there?

I'll dig out my copy and watch it later more carefully.

But I remember something about the spacing of the magnets,
and the timing of the open/close circuits
utilized the "South" of them somehow.

I started this thread to get to the bottom of
the "Sharp North" thing first,
then play with coils & cores after I had that established.

Cart before the horse I ask?



OK, I came back to add a bit more...
I have this hair-brained idea
that will turn up in "half Baked" sometime.

I wanted to understand the N><N thing,
to combine it with parallel path theory.

The 4X available with parallel path setups,
mixed with (What I though was a) novel idea
by also using that N><N concept too.

To get both get the magnetism in,
and then back out of a core/coil assembly
seemed like a match made in heaven.
(Pun intended...)

Anyway, I can't wait,
I've gone to re-watch that vid again.

CompuTutor, this should help lift up your spirits.

 You are rather new here and most likely missed my topic about using both poles of a electromagnetic coil.

With 61 pages of posts I am at a slight loss without a hint.

This one perhaps ?
"new magnetic motor goes 2000 rpm without load 1000 rpm with load"

I'll gladly read/learn/ponder,
if you would be so kind as to
throw me a clue about which thread.

Thanks