Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Agentgates´s TPU setup with strange wavehill hump  (Read 340127 times)

mrd10

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 327
Re: Agentgates´s TPU setup with strange wavehill hump
« Reply #885 on: June 23, 2010, 06:24:11 PM »
continued, i just used .3mm enameled copper wire, see the yellow tape, it says 6, which means 6 windings, that is the feedback coil, it doesnt have to be many windings, I made another small toroid with 10 segments instead of 3 as the ones shown, cause somewhere down the track i will hook 8 secondaries to bifilar twisted segments on larger tpu..
so you can see where im going with this........if you can visualize it...

mrd10

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 327
Re: Agentgates´s TPU setup with strange wavehill hump
« Reply #886 on: June 23, 2010, 06:34:43 PM »
Hey giankiller, nice cct, thanks for that, hmm I could modify small toroid using your cct. but building yours and testing it first, cool

wattsup

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2606
    • Spin Conveyance Theory - For a New Perspective...
Re: Agentgates´s TPU setup with strange wavehill hump
« Reply #887 on: June 23, 2010, 06:42:22 PM »
@mrd10

Good work there. I will be very interested to see what type of coupling will occur with your epoxy/ferrite coated toroid.

mrd10

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 327
Re: Agentgates´s TPU setup with strange wavehill hump
« Reply #888 on: June 23, 2010, 06:53:04 PM »
@wattsup

yeh me too, cause i just started again, i just allocate 3 to 4 hours aweek for this, so give me time, no rush on my part.
just to let you all know ill be absent for few weeks, so if it goes quite from me you know why.

it could work just as well without epoxy, but cause i made few nylon rings, i thought id coat some, and test that first.
any ideas we can share amongst each other might make all the difference.

e2matrix

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1956
Re: Agentgates´s TPU setup with strange wavehill hump
« Reply #889 on: June 24, 2010, 06:45:34 AM »
Yep, yep, yup!
Just change the output coil.

So stun guns have an internal spark gap before it goes to the final coil for the external (shocker pins)?  Change the output coil?  in the stun gun?  to the TPU control coil ?  one for each?  Lost... I know but I remember you said something about using stun gun circuits before regarding the TPU. 

giantkiller

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 2791
    • http://www.planetary-engineering.com
Re: Agentgates´s TPU setup with strange wavehill hump
« Reply #890 on: June 24, 2010, 07:13:55 AM »
In the SM video with the tv and drill SM brings to 2 output leads spaced apart are we see huge white sparks.
That was my enlightening moment.
There are many ways to achieve that internal spark gap producing shockwaves of great intensity without producing 'visible' sparks. When these hit a coil the impedance is infinite for a moment before the conduction starts. This is a huge clue and falls in line with electrostatic charge.

So stun guns have an internal spark gap before it goes to the final coil for the external (shocker pins)?  Change the output coil?  in the stun gun?  to the TPU control coil ?  one for each?  Lost... I know but I remember you said something about using stun gun circuits before regarding the TPU.

TEKTRON

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 300
Re: Agentgates´s TPU setup with strange wavehill hump
« Reply #891 on: December 12, 2010, 10:48:16 AM »
Hello all. hope im in the correct place. and i don' have time to read up,(i'm like 20 pgs. back) so I don't know where we are at. I just had a thought.... Gates coil design -VS- VHS tape. Why do we use a slanted tape head? silence....Because the info to reproduce TV wont fit on the tape. slanted head can record or play more info on more length of tape. 45 deg is waaaaay too steep. I don't have time or resources to experiment. lets try winding primary at 5 degrees or some other deg to complete at least one thread screw like fashion around the circumference of the coil. I think it would interact more with the secondarys. ..... something just came to mind...thinking of a bolt thread.. the finer the thread the more torque can be applied. because you have more "LEVERAGE"

FatBird

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1178
Re: Agentgates´s TPU setup with strange wavehill hump
« Reply #892 on: December 12, 2010, 01:23:48 PM »
I know what you mean.  This thread just kind of died out.

pauldude000

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 614
    • My electronics/programming website
Re: Agentgates´s TPU setup with strange wavehill hump
« Reply #893 on: December 13, 2010, 02:13:04 PM »
I know what you mean.  This thread just kind of died out.

This thread died out because Agent Gates decided to start his own little forum for a personal mini think tank.

I was initially a member from the start for a grand total of about a week, until he posted his 'manifesto'. Cute little document that in essence gave him legal ownership of any and all ideas generated in the forum....

I can smell a scam a mile away.

He may well have had a limitedly working device, but he probably did not even know how or why it really worked. His open claims were initially for public disclosure and free sharing of information, but his little 'notice' described otherwise.

Reminded me far too much of Edison.

Not the brilliance mind you, but the 'business' side of the equation, where every one of Edison's employees were relieved of any new ideas while under his employ, as said ideas belonged to 'the company'.

Paul Andrulis

Sprocket

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 410
Re: Agentgates´s TPU setup with strange wavehill hump
« Reply #894 on: December 13, 2010, 02:34:29 PM »
This thread died out because Agent Gates decided to start his own little forum for a personal mini think tank.

I was initially a member from the start for a grand total of about a week, until he posted his 'manifesto'. Cute little document that in essence gave him legal ownership of any and all ideas generated in the forum....

I can smell a scam a mile away.

He may well have had a limitedly working device, but he probably did not even know how or why it really worked. His open claims were initially for public disclosure and free sharing of information, but his little 'notice' described otherwise.

Reminded me far too much of Edison.

Not the brilliance mind you, but the 'business' side of the equation, where every one of Edison's employees were relieved of any new ideas while under his employ, as said ideas belonged to 'the company'.

Paul Andrulis

Thanks for the heads-up.  I always wondered why this promising thread died.  Greed seems to be the main reason we still have access to only cave-man technology, relatively speaking. 

Your last paragraph about Edison is generally the rule rather than the exception nowadays though - most companies insist that any invention made while a company's employee, automatically belong to said company.  At least that's my understanding.

ramset

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8073
Re: Agentgates´s TPU setup with strange wavehill hump
« Reply #895 on: February 22, 2011, 02:32:50 PM »
Tony,
We havent heard from you in a while?.I miss you Buddy
Hope all is well!
Chetkremens@gmail.com