Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Agentgates´s TPU setup with strange wavehill hump  (Read 343994 times)

gadgetmall

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1733
    • Alternative Energy
Re: Agentgates´s TPU setup with strange wavehill hump
« Reply #165 on: January 07, 2010, 09:04:13 PM »
@Gadgetmall

                  1 amp = 1.00
                  1/10 amp = .1
                   1/100 amp = .01
                    1 milliamp = .001


                 
hehe . right . where am i ? Ok so .09 is  9 ma correct ? IF 1.000 scale

 NICE boards Alex ! Another Project!! .

Albert

victore

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 16
Re: Agentgates´s TPU setup with strange wavehill hump
« Reply #166 on: January 07, 2010, 09:11:27 PM »
@Gadget
I am not sure if you are joking or serious, but:

0.009A = 9 mA
0.09A = 90 mA   ;)

Groundloop

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 1736
Re: Agentgates´s TPU setup with strange wavehill hump
« Reply #167 on: January 07, 2010, 09:15:19 PM »
Albert,

If two other people at this forum can confirm over unity in this system,
then I will make PCBs for this, else not. I guess I will wait for confirmation
of ou before spending money and time on this. I can add that my first
coil test gave me 14 Watt out with 38 Watt input. So there IS an effect
going on but if it is ou remains to see.

Alex.

gadgetmall

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1733
    • Alternative Energy
Re: Agentgates´s TPU setup with strange wavehill hump
« Reply #168 on: January 07, 2010, 09:16:20 PM »
@Gadget
I am not sure if you are joking or serious, but:

0.009A = 9 mA
0.09A = 90 mA   ;)
:) forgot the 0 :) Look 35 years of electronics  at least 100 shocks from 110 and 20 from 220 mains and a brain stroke 4 years ago . I'm bound to lose it  sooner  than later .  ;D

thanks

Albert

MrMag

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 754
Re: Agentgates´s TPU setup with strange wavehill hump
« Reply #169 on: January 07, 2010, 09:16:51 PM »
@MrMag,

I think this circuit is what Tony asked for.

Firing the three coils one after each other.
You can't do that with a one transistor JT.
And you can't do that with the coils in series.

Alex.

Thanx Alex,

I didn't mention jt? I think it was someone else.
So, he wants to fire them sequentially, timed, not necessarily in series. gotcha.

darkspeed

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 189
Re: Agentgates´s TPU setup with strange wavehill hump
« Reply #170 on: January 07, 2010, 09:18:37 PM »
Quote from: Groundloop link=topic=8586.msg220357#msg220357 =1262895319
Albert,

If two other people at this forum can confirm over unity in this system,
then I will make PCBs for this, else not. I guess I will wait for confirmation
of ou before spending money and time on this. I can add that my first
coil test gave me 14 Watt out with 38 Watt input. So there IS an effect
going on but if it is ou remains to see.

Alex.

Alex, what was your amps / volts for the 14 and 38 watts??

Thanks!

gadgetmall

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1733
    • Alternative Energy
Re: Agentgates´s TPU setup with strange wavehill hump
« Reply #171 on: January 07, 2010, 09:19:41 PM »
I'm in . give me a bit of time to cut some pvc . I got plenty of wire in yesterday . This looks promising does it not ! . But i really wanted to use My pulse generator with a powersupply first to see if i can smoke some fet's  :) Its tubes so i'm not worried about smoking it .

Albert

Groundloop

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 1736
Re: Agentgates´s TPU setup with strange wavehill hump
« Reply #172 on: January 07, 2010, 09:28:38 PM »
@darkspeed,

Input was 12 volt 3 Ampere from lead acid battery via my RA switch.
The Ampere was measured over a non inductive 0,25 Ohm 20 Watt resistor.
The output load was a 15 Watt 230VAC light bulb. Did measure 12VAC
and 1,67 Ampere. The Ampere was measured via the same type resistor
and then used Oms law to calculate current.

Alex.

broli

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2245
Re: Agentgates´s TPU setup with strange wavehill hump
« Reply #173 on: January 07, 2010, 09:41:29 PM »
It's good to see more people are starting to become aware of this thread. If this is the real deal we might have the first replication before the end of the week. And kits very soon after, got to love the speed of the still "free" internet.

minde4000

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 268
Re: Agentgates´s TPU setup with strange wavehill hump
« Reply #174 on: January 07, 2010, 10:32:10 PM »
I tried to feed 2500V pulsed DC into primary w/ spark gap then w/o spark gap w/ earth ground then w/o... 40W 120VAC bulb as a load stayed cold..

I would really like to see one in "action" on video with proper measurement techniques... (wich is struggling to materialize? makes me wonder why...) and not an LED screen of DC supply with is under inductive load... I hope I am wrong.
I will put it aside for now till someone else will have any luck with this.

Minde



 

Magluvin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5884
Re: Agentgates´s TPU setup with strange wavehill hump
« Reply #175 on: January 07, 2010, 10:34:56 PM »
Awesome Groundloop

Question, is there any time off with the decade counter? Or is there always going to be a primary on?
To further complicate things, lol I dont want to, but each output of the decade counter can have a 555 1 shot that the time ON can be adjusted. Just something to think about in case its necessary.

I made 1 test tool with 8 thin wires stretched on a long thin plexi, and the other one will be done in a bit. I want to try to understand what is happening at different angles. All the wires will be in parallel and a res in series so the input power is known and to lower the current draw. Just have a need know whats going on.

Mags

Edited for spelling and missng word.  mags

Groundloop

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 1736
Re: Agentgates´s TPU setup with strange wavehill hump
« Reply #176 on: January 07, 2010, 10:44:09 PM »
@Magluvin,

No there is no pause between the firings. If you want a pause then use
Q0, Q2, Q4 on the 4017 to control the transistors on/off and tie Q6 to RES.
That way you get a one clock pulse pause between each firing.

It is no problem to use a one shot 555 at each output but then it will be
less expensive to just use one PIC micro controller.

Alex.

hartiberlin

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8154
    • free energy research OverUnity.com
Re: Agentgates´s TPU setup with strange wavehill hump
« Reply #177 on: January 07, 2010, 10:50:18 PM »
Hi Groundloop,
how did you drive your setup  with your bulb ?
Just pulsed ONE input  coil and compared output at the
output coil versus input power ?

Or did you already used 3 input coils with sequential switching ?

As I got mails telling me, that AgentGates claimed
to have a running device and does not show it,
from the start on,  I am thinking about moving this thread back into the
TPU area, until AgentGates comes forward and shows his real stuff ?

What do you all think about this ?

Regards, Stefan.

Magluvin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5884
Re: Agentgates´s TPU setup with strange wavehill hump
« Reply #178 on: January 07, 2010, 10:51:02 PM »
Tru dat G

Thanks. Never played with the 4017   but alternating the outputs is good.  =]
Just tinkin


Mags

broli

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2245
Re: Agentgates´s TPU setup with strange wavehill hump
« Reply #179 on: January 07, 2010, 10:57:34 PM »
As I got mails telling me, that AgentGates claimed
to have a running device and does not show it,

Lol. It has been only two days now and he already gave the secret sauce. And even its own development is in an early stage. Those people pming you should learn to have patience, the truth comes with time. If I'm not mistaken he's trying to put together instructions, videos, theory, the prize unit and a setup that doesn't burn in minutes. Give the guy a break and time.