Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Agentgates´s TPU setup with strange wavehill hump  (Read 344332 times)

minde4000

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 268
Re: Agentgates´s TPU setup with strange wavehill hump
« Reply #150 on: January 07, 2010, 07:29:23 PM »
@mflynn44

Thanks for ideas. I tought about this myself - I figured it might start sparking and destroy my toy before I had a chance to play with it.
The lowest spark gap voltage I could feed is 2500V .. I recon thats an overkill..

I need a pulse driver...

M

neptune

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1127
Re: Agentgates´s TPU setup with strange wavehill hump
« Reply #151 on: January 07, 2010, 07:35:31 PM »
Just my take on what is meant by 3 channels. What is proposed as I understand it , is to have 3 primary windings and one secondary winding on the coil . Each primary is pulsed in turn , by its own semiconductor device . these are driven by a suitable pulse circuit , pulsing each in turn . I hope this is correct and helps.

PaulLowrance

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2483
    • Global Free Energy
Re: Agentgates´s TPU setup with strange wavehill hump
« Reply #152 on: January 07, 2010, 07:39:07 PM »
Stefan,

This post was moved into the OverUnity Prize folder for a reason because he was going to mail you the device. Is there a planned date that will happen? It's a little strange how people right from the start were encouraging others to send agent gates money.

I think people are beggining to see what's happening to the "free energy" community. Now I'll go back to Steorn replication research.

Magluvin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5884
Re: Agentgates´s TPU setup with strange wavehill hump
« Reply #153 on: January 07, 2010, 07:43:29 PM »
This is what maybe he is doing.  Making a complete circuit that doesnt require signal generators or any other expensive equip and make it a nice lil radioshack parts build with a battery and a light bulb. home recipe.
555 pie  4017 cookies  and an energy shake!   =]

Mags

FatBird

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1178
Re: Agentgates´s TPU setup with strange wavehill hump
« Reply #154 on: January 07, 2010, 07:56:03 PM »
To make it as symetrical as possible, I think he wants to Fire FET 1 from the 4017 3 Output, FET 2 from the 6 Output, & Fire FET 3 with the 9 Output.

Here is the URL for the CD4093 Schmitt Trigger:

http://www.national.com/ds/CD/CD4093BC.pdf

.
« Last Edit: January 07, 2010, 09:03:24 PM by FatBird »

gadgetmall

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1733
    • Alternative Energy
Re: Agentgates´s TPU setup with strange wavehill hump
« Reply #155 on: January 07, 2010, 08:09:29 PM »
There is no circuit just a coil configuration and how it is wound.

Input low voltage low amps (mA) he is using 31vdc @ .09A (90mA) and getting over 1KW out

Current issue is the BEMF (or ???) to the input drivers which causes failure due to over voltage/curent. Read the thread for more on this.
ISNT 0.09v      9 100ths of an amp ? if  1.00= 1amp . and 1.10 is 1amp and 10 ma then 1.01 is one amp and 1 microamp not milli  ,correct ?
gadget

Magluvin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5884
Re: Agentgates´s TPU setup with strange wavehill hump
« Reply #156 on: January 07, 2010, 08:11:08 PM »
So the decade counter can drive the mosfets no? It mus be at supply voltage levels on those outputs.

And probably a descent dvm with hz setting isnt that expensive. And a pc scope. simple and wont break the bank for most.

Mags

ketone

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 43
Re: Agentgates´s TPU setup with strange wavehill hump
« Reply #157 on: January 07, 2010, 08:19:51 PM »
@Gadgetmall

                  1 amp = 1.00
                  1/10 amp = .1
                   1/100 amp = .01
                    1 milliamp = .001


                 

Spider

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 190
Re: Agentgates´s TPU setup with strange wavehill hump
« Reply #158 on: January 07, 2010, 08:24:13 PM »
Way back I uploaded this video:
http://www.overunity.com/index.php?action=downloads;sa=downfile&id=149

Maybe I should fire that through the coil....4000V 200Watt.....but i am afraid my house will blow up LOL

I have 3 of those, so maybe in phase.. 1 2 3

Back for more

Spider

Groundloop

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 1736
Re: Agentgates´s TPU setup with strange wavehill hump
« Reply #159 on: January 07, 2010, 08:33:00 PM »
Tony,

Attached is my proposed 4017 circuit.

The Eagle CAD design files are attached as a compressed rar file.
(Eagle CAD can be downloaded for free at www.Cadsoft.de )

Edit: There was a small error in the PCB so I uploaded the new files.
EDIT: New changes based on recommendations from Tony.

Regards,
Alex.
« Last Edit: January 08, 2010, 01:19:26 AM by Groundloop »

broli

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2245
Re: Agentgates´s TPU setup with strange wavehill hump
« Reply #160 on: January 07, 2010, 08:35:13 PM »
Looks like GL-man heard the cry of help...silent, fast, deadly. Good job man, you're as reliable as ever this is why I like this forum.

Groundloop

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 1736
Re: Agentgates´s TPU setup with strange wavehill hump
« Reply #161 on: January 07, 2010, 08:48:46 PM »
@broli,

LOL

Alex.

MrMag

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 754
Re: Agentgates´s TPU setup with strange wavehill hump
« Reply #162 on: January 07, 2010, 08:49:19 PM »
Hahaha, you can tell Groundloop has done this before. :) Another great job.

I do have a question. If you plan on firing these 3 coils in sequence, why no just hook them in series??

Mk1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2068
Re: Agentgates´s TPU setup with strange wavehill hump
« Reply #163 on: January 07, 2010, 08:53:52 PM »
@all

Why not a simple joule thief circuit , 2 primary ...

Mark

Groundloop

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 1736
Re: Agentgates´s TPU setup with strange wavehill hump
« Reply #164 on: January 07, 2010, 08:59:23 PM »
@MrMag,

I think this circuit is what Tony asked for.

Firing the three coils one after each other.
You can't do that with a one transistor JT.
And you can't do that with the coils in series.

Alex.