I suggest for one to make hard copy of the Colman Compound articles as this links tend to vanish from internet
original article with pictures is at:
http://www.overunity.com/7679/selfrunning-free-energy-devices-up-to-5-kw-from-tariel-kapanadze/msg417566/#msg417566Just some information about Colman and others:
and
formula for Colman Compound 3Ca(Po3)2+10C
where
How
how much of each one of components
how it might be made
==============================================================================================[/size]
el:Hi Wesley, I have seen all the videos, and
I must say that the your work done by is amazing,
so a part that i understood how the device it work ,
it's very hard for me to figure out how to build .
el:I also not understand if the device emits radiation or not.
el:Friday, during our conversation you told me… leave out the spirituality, but from your videos,
el: i saw a great sensitivity and values for your family and also for this this planet.
el:Spirituality or not this shows that you have a big heart and
el:it shows all the research that you did.i have the ability to industrialize this device ,
el: not only for money but really to share something useful with people.
el:I'm open to any your proposal, and in the meantime I say thank you for you time.
=================
One can make use of the results I have got.
The chemical formula is 100% known.The design is known. the principals of operation of Colman Device is known.
So what is left. If One wants to check the results of my scientific investigation
One must get the chemicals put them together and make test in presence at best of 100W
Radio frequency amplifier driven by regular signal generator.
The cost of Amplifier was $100 the cost of generator can be between $100 to $500
there is a need for lead box from big old car battery that can be open from the top.
If there is any radiation than it will likely go up ( fallowing straight lines).
Lead gives attenuation to X-rays and Gammas So the person is not directly affected if not in line of sight(that is:
Electromagnetic transmission includes light emissions traveling in a straight line.
The rays or waves may be diffracted, refracted, reflected, or absorbed
by atmosphere and obstructions with material and generally
cannot travel behind obstacles).
There is need for Gamma radiation detectors= cheap are $150 or less.
There is need for Gamma radiation detectors= cheap are $150 or less.
But Ortec makes program called Scintivision that cost about $4000- and that works with NaI(Tl) scintillator detector.
There is another program by Ortec called Maestro 32 that is sufficient for the task around $1300
If purchased on Ebay the system can be very inexpensive
http://www.ebay.com/itm/NaI-Tl-30-70mm-Scintillation-gamma-spectrometer-AtomSpectra-2-Resolution-7-3-/221448985380?pt=BI_Security_Fire_Protection&hash=item338f635b24 link and free Gamma program is listed at the bottom of the ebay offer.
Quote:"
Freeware PRA program is recommended for work with the detector assembly. It can be downloaded from author's web page at
http://www.physics.usyd.edu.au/~marek/pra/index.html .
FritzPeaks and Theremino MCA also works well.
Switching OFF of absolutely all sound effects for USB sound input device is strictly required.
Some Windows (especially Windows 7) drivers sets ADC gain to maximum possible at first start.
It strongly reduces actual dynamic range of the detector.
If it happened you need to set input signal gain to 5-7% instead of 100%,
high voltage adjustment is not required. Initial setup and calibration is the same as for 63*63mm detector,
you can see it (in Russian, with English subtitles) here. Optimum settings for your equipment depends
on computer and operating system and may be different."
Even simple Ludlum detector will give the presence of radiation but will not give
To the experimenter information what is exactly going on
http://www.ebay.com/itm/Ludlum-3-w-44-9-GM-Pancake-Probe-Geiger-Radiation-Survey-Meter-Alpha-Beta-Gamma-/251638765494?pt=BI_Security_Fire_Protection&hash=item3a96d6d7b6
====
[el: Thank you,
===
- this one is under $300 Victoreen 660 660-1 gamma radiation and x-ray measuring rate detector
-
http://www.ebay.com/itm/Victoreen-660-660-1-gamma-radiation-and-x-ray-measuring-rate-detector-/131297127128?hash=item1e91eb2ad8
- I have one( different type) but
I do not make much use of it as I really want to know what is going on there.
Before experimenter buys something he must read on line manual to see it that
what is listed on ebay is accurate , Most of the sellers are just uneducated people in this area.
Gamma Spectroscopy Kit
Nuclear Gamma Spectrometry with your
PC is everything that is needed for the task however
in can be purchased for much less at the right time just by hunting for it on Ebay.
I never buy new it does not pay for me. And yes detector and computer program is the must to have.
Even if it is not calibrated and just simply switched on it will show more than just radiation detector
Ludlum. As Ludlum only show that somethin is happening there. It is good to have it however as this can show not only
Gammas but Beta and Alpha radiation.
http://www.ebay.com/itm/Gamma-Spectroscopy-Kit-/181201783326?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_0&hash=item2a3077ca1e
Most of gamma computer based systems will show
to the experimenter X-rays as well along with Gamma. X-ray are located af very left of the computer screen.
X-ray have the smallest amount of energy. But whenever you have gamma you must of have x-ray.
www.gammaspectacular.comSydney Australia has different and more advanced kits .
All lf them do the same. It is just " how easy it is to work with them."
For experimenter it is just easy high school level play with Colman system but one must take time .
I do 0.1% of experiments and %99.99 of research and education.
However if experimenter goes with %50/%50 he could of make it done at no time . English phrase no time - means very short time.
So why is taking so much time for me?
Easy answer. I got couple times very bad side effects that made me aware of at first understanding what is going on.
But I have used no lead shield, no lead apron, and I was at very close contact with "specimen"
Could I finish the job a week from now.?
Yes possibly I could but I do not care about money and even my life to much.
However I do care about my ability to finish the job I started. So for that I need health and knowledge.
If I was doing the experiment with just the lead box I would probably not have any "of the problems " at all
At the minimum the cost for being able to play with Colman is $1500
I invested a lot but it is addition to my lab so I would spend that anyhow.
That has nothing to do with original price of new equipment. I would never spend that money for it.
Again USED USED USED equipment is the best for the task as it is cheap.and still very good.
list of equipment of help:
1 generator from 0 to 1GHz but if it is from 50MHz to 600MHz is ok too.
1 Amplifier from 100MHZ to 700MHz to at best 100W power output.
! lead box from old heavy truck bat. (no top is important)
1 oscilloscope 500MHz Can be analog but digital is is just easier to operate.
http://www.ebay.com/itm/Tektronix-TDS2012-100MHz-2ch-1Gs-s-Digital-Storage-Oscilloscope-With-2-Probes-/181402918755?pt=BI_Oscilloscopes&hash=item2a3c74df63
the one from above is Ok but much beter is 500MHz and 1Gs/s or more.
==
el: And the the magical dust?................................................hehe
==
this one is excellent but it show acquisition problem that might be due to just simple
calibration procedure and it is a risk of money for someone,
http://www.ebay.com/itm/Tektronix-TDS820-Digital-Oscilloscope-6GHz-50-KS-s-2Ch-w-GPIB-/221372465267?pt=BI_Oscilloscopes&hash=item338ad3c073
this one is recommendend !!!!!
http://www.ebay.com/itm/LECROY-9310M-DUAL-CHANNEL-300MHZ-OSCILLOSCOPE-Great-Condition-/251053816312?pt=BI_Oscilloscopes&hash=item3a73f939f8
LeCroy is one of the best even old one.
However the price is little to much and it is only 100Ms/s not so great.
For that price you can get Tektronics of much better performance.
so do not buy it.
this one goes to 4Gs/s however it is only 150MHz. It will work !!! for the task
http://www.ebay.com/itm/LECROY-9410A-DUAL-CHANNEL-150-MHz-DIGITAL-OSCILLOSCOPE-100-Ms-s-4-Gs-s-WARRANTY-/231098337079?pt=BI_Oscilloscopes&hash=item35ce88c737
and one can bargain the price say offer $200 for it.
USB RF Spectrum Analyzer 4.15 GHz - TSA4G1 by Triarchy Technologies
Spectrum analyzer is really good to have but Experimenter does not need to have it.
http://www.ebay.com/itm/USB-RF-Spectrum-Analyzer-4-15-GHz-TSA4G1-by-Triarchy-Technologies-/151218540507?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_0&hash=item233553cfdbthere are less expensive than this as well.
some connectors,some cables with BNC connectors
glass tube fron quartz glass ( important only for temperature)
powder as in Colman patent
===
el: and about , how many grams of powder of copper, sync,and the black one?
===
Everything is in Colman patent
or in my videos
===
el: yours video….i think that somebody cut some parts
===
there are many videos of the series Revolution has begun
===
el: i saw the draft, but the extra power where will go?
It will be present on the ends of the Colman Tube as DC. Tube might get hot under the load.
el: is just to check the radioactivity…
==
no The ends of the Colman tube are
made from cooper and that is where voltage is present if It works,
It should give voltage even one hour after generator and amplifier is switched off
===
el: i many kw you had with one tube?
===
1.1Kw
or if diameter is 2x5mm it should give around 10kW
====
el: by logic….much bigger is the tube, much more is the power? or not?
===
the volume of powder
===
el: did you had radioactivity?
square root of power
el: honestly ok?
===
Can not answer this question !! understand?
el: yes
Experimenter must be careful
el: but i read your heart
However at the end of it it is safer than lead acid bat from your car
it is no waste if damaged
nothing can go out of lead shield of right thickness
==
el: ok
==
for Experiment top of the box is not important if person is on the side of the box and box is on the level of his chest
if there is any radiation he he he that it goes on the straight lines [size=78%] [/size]from the tube
So box is taking care of vottom and sides and top can be with no cover
let "IT" go up. what is the problem?
none
===
el: Wesley, thn
el: thank you very much, really. tomorrow morning i will start this project. i don’t know how
to say really thank you.
el: if there are something that i can do for you , please just tell me. i know that the trust is
very difficult to find but…again thank you
===
look at picture below;
===
el: the tube is connected with what?
el: colman tube. because in the file is not connected
el: you say that the end is made by copper , but in the patent, is write: one end in copper and one and zinc.
===
No powder is one end cooper one end zinc but that what you use to close the tube so the
powder does not go out are made from cooper or brass look at my videos
they must be cap at the ends
===
el: better copper or brass?
===
does not make any difference
===
el: and without any kind of glue?
===
no glue. when you use lathe to make diameter you will found, that inside the glass tube that tube is not perfectly circle rounded.
Than you turn the fitting left or right and it will lack itself but do not force it as glass might brake.
it is not difficult to make tolerances between fitting( plug- end) and lass tube 1 micrometer and that is even more that is required
that can be done on cheap lathe
In Italy you might not even need to do it as everything is metric.
I have got plumbing gas fittings imperial standard and I got metric glass tubes
in my videos it is model number and place I have got fittings from
Home Depot
===
el: and the glass tube?
el: Do you are using your device at your home?
===
glass tube I do not know I got if from my friend scientist " from very far away "
I got everything I need I did not pay for it at all
He value mu brain more than his money
I do not charge for my advice. my brain is free of charge to anyone
el:i still can’t belive
===
that is ok
===
el: i still can’t believe that you are helping me.its 6 years that i am searching
====
Filip value of my lab is quite few (x ....es) I did not pay for it to much,
as at the certain level people just do not want to sale something to you,
but to give it to you not charging yiu, or at worse they take just as much as it is to transport of it.
At certain level that is not important,
People wants to !!!!screw the system !!!!!
got it?
===
el:what you mean with screw the system?
===
think!!!
===
el: ok but why you trust me?
===
I do not know you
===
el: but are you helping me. so why?
===
because what I was given, I should give out. It is not important WHO but how many will try it and how many will
make progress that is the part of screwing a system
===
el: smart
el: and because I was recommended (to help me)?
el: you are very smart guy. and i really appreciate all of this. is the first time in my life
===
Li- is one who I trust I know him personally
I do not know you nor I trust you . My investigation in science is for free to any one
el: People wants to screw the system And the system will be screw badly
with me or without me
===
el: Yes,but not so many people are doing like you are doing
===
If I die my files will fly out all of them that makes it even faster
===
el: So Friday - why did you told me that the system is good?
===
I have no control what people are doing and after they got it working what the people are doing as well.
Most of them keeps it and sit on it, thinking how to cash it out .
Like always there is a greed.
Someone is on the top of big humongous money and he does not want to others to have it for free,
That is human nature.
So they will be on it, never seeing money .
Because once first device is sold to the buyer than he will make copy of it for sure, and for free.
Bot paying to the inventor nor investor.
====
el: That one will not pay to anyone.
===
And to make patent is now to late. Colman patent is now free for anyone it was given in 1956
and patent is good only for 20 years got it?
the system is good. I do not care about money
I'm not for money
nor I ask for any money
I'm not for sale
===
el: Yes. If it work. And is safe
It works and is safer than car battery as it does not have acid
The radioactivity if there is any :)hehehe last's only for one hour
===
el: Also i am not for money. But i need it to buy all the stuff
hee
every hour there is a need to reactivate the compound with 5 to 15 seconds impulse
that impulse gets power from the device and Colman tube should work for 70 years
60 colman tube might give ( or one bigger one) enough to power small vehicle "for ever" or just the one tube that is thicker than in the patent.
el: And the base is the electrical energy. Do you think that my idea is bad?
===
Well it is green no waste no danger to environment when properly shielded .
Take acid from car battery and is dangerous and pouting
===
el: If we have to live in this planet i would like to do it in the best way and in harmony with everything
===
It is in harmony no pollutants,
Radioactive phenomenon of decay is natural. Your granite counter top. of your table is radioactive and yet you might have granite floor
Your salt is radioactive and you use it in the kitchen
===
el: I will send you the video of my work in progress. If is not problem for you.
===
I can not talk you to do anything it is your life and your decision .
I have nothing to do with it, that is my legal statement
The form I use is: Experimenter,
that might be anyone or just one who was approved by special authorities
The form of my interaction with you is not the advice you
and not by any form of implementation.
I share my information with you only
and based on law of USA I have rights to share science
el: Hehehehe
===
heeeee
Your motivation is gain and big money, nothing wrong
my motivation is very much already said
That is why some of Arabs might hate me as well as Venezuela
but there is much to many , who does not like me or might hate me, anywhere "in the world of money"
===
el: Big money. ...what is money. .is just a illusion. ..they are like the magical powder.
The problem is that for the people money means power.
Because the money are not easily taxable
and buyer for cash is every man on the planet earth
===
el: And this power Is ego.
===
Everyone who is passing next to your window
Even child can ask his dad, why this man is not using gasoline?
===
el: And you are not afraid?
====
no
after 9/11 I do not care about life any longer. I was scheduled to die. I was lucky I was nit in the building of
WTC1 at that time. All I care is to make it happened
===
el: I am thinking that you have a good friends
===
when you see people hanging from windows and jumping to their death
===
el: Which is the true?
===
after you see that yelling crowd that is dying
after you look at faces of people in the air about tall down
===
el: Just to control the people with anti terrorism system?
===
After that you change , and I have changed.
===
el: I believe Free Energy is energy free of charge and there is no wars for domination
nobody needs oil and natural gas Nobody needs dead animals fuel
el: Trust me that the East Europe have Big potential .
===
there is 3 ways for Free Energy
1 electrostatic Tariel Kapanadze
2 magnetic
3 nuclear
===
el: Ok
===
all of them are progressing
I do not care who will be first
===
el: Colman is one of nuclear. ..
=================================
think ...... it possible that that attack could be done, taking 4 planes by group of people with wooden knifes and box cutters?..... think
Think.....................................
===
el: No possible
===
el: And the radar?
the man with power at that time Mr B. was oil man
that man had problem with competition in Iraq
Every city have big radar to check the City. Because are not flight zone.
el: And fukushima?
===
fukushima is natural phenomenon of earth quick , that made it happened most likely,
but we do not know who had insurance policy in hands.
Who must be paid. What was in insurance agreement
was that agreement including natural disaster?
if yes than someone got big bux
Money do not care about anything at all
=====================================================================
el:
i can’t find what is 3Ca(Po3)2 + 10 C
el: could be a normal calcium phosphate?
====
I believe so but I'm not sure I was not the one who made the compound. That was chemistry scientist who made it for me.
Here is some other material to be sorted by you:
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/sci.chem/7G8tBn7xn6csci.chem ›
3Ca(Po3)2+10C
16 posts by 8 authors
Attila Veres
7/8/03
3Ca(Po3)2+10C
I would like to know the correct name of this Calcium Phosphate, and what is
the 2+10C at the end?
Your help would be greatly appreciated.
dlzc@aol.com \(formerly\)
7/8/03
Dear Attila Veres:
"Attila Veres" <f...@accessv.com> wrote in message
news:QqIOa.2148$Fy1.98135@localhost...
- show quoted text -
Po is Polonium
URL:http://www.webelements.com/webelements/elements/text/Po/key.html
3Ca(PO3)2 is the fomula for calcium phospate. The final "2" indicates the
number of phosphate "groupings" (the PO3) attached to the calcium.
I suspect the 10C, depending on context, is ten atoms of carbon.
David A. Smith
Attila Veres
7/8/03
3Ca(PO3)2+10C
"dl...@aol.com (formerly)" <dlzc1.cox@net> wrote in message
news:OIIOa.123499$MJ5.41244@fed1read03...
- show quoted text -
Thank you David,
It should be phosphate. PO
In the J.T. Baker catalogue I found only
Monobasic: Ca(H2PO4)2.H2O
Diabasic: CaHPO4
Tribasic: Ca5(OH)(PO4)3
but I couldn't find 3Ca(PO3)2+10C
I did Internet search and I got here,
http://www.thirdclassroom.net/htmlib/400941027994287.html cannot read it, could be Chinese, and found this:
Ca3(PO4)2+2H2SO4 == Ca(H2PO4)2+2CaSO4
Ca(H2PO4)2 == Ca(PO3)2+2H2O
3Ca(PO3)2+10C == Ca3(PO4)2+4P+10CO
still not much help to me.
Attila
Steve Turner
7/8/03
"Attila Veres" <f...@accessv.com> wrote:
- show quoted text -
What is the context?
As written, the formula above is nonsensical.
Calcium phosphate is Ca3(PO4)2. There are other entities which may be
called "calcium phosphate" which contain varying amounts of hydrogen
ion, e.g. CaHPO4. There is also a calcium phosphite, CaHPO3, but it
is much less common.
The "10C" means nothing as written. Either this is some sort of a
misprint, or it's taken from an equation. Are you trying to make
phosphorus?
Steve Turner
Real address contains worldnet instead of spamnet
Bruce Sinclair
7/8/03
- show quoted text -
Agreed ... but could it be some kind of ore as written ? (with bits of the
formula missing)
Bruce
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Oook !
Eric Lucas
7/9/03
"dl...@aol.com (formerly)" <dlzc1.cox@net> wrote in message
news:OIIOa.123499$MJ5.41244@fed1read03...
- show quoted text -
PO3 is phosphite, not phosphate. Not sure if that's a typo, but it's not
clear what the OP is trying to communicate with that formula--I can't tell
what's supposed to be subscripted, what might be superscripted, and which
numbers are on the line. If we had that info, and were sure there are no
typos, it would be infinitely easier to parse the formula.
Eric Lucas
dlzc@aol.com \(formerly\)
7/9/03
Dear Eric Lucas:
"Eric Lucas" <eal...@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
news:dKNOa.45857$3o3.3095825@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
- show quoted text -
Yes, I made a hasty conclusion. You are correct about phosphite, in case I
had confused anyone other than myself.
The OP had responded, and somehow usenet had resequenced it, with a
"complete" set of three formulae. So you don't have to find his post, I
will quote the relevant portion here:
<QUOTE>
I did Internet search and I got here,
http://www.thirdclassroom.net/htmlib/400941027994287.html cannot read it, could be Chinese, and found this:
Ca3(PO4)2+2H2SO4 == Ca(H2PO4)2+2CaSO4
Ca(H2PO4)2 == Ca(PO3)2+2H2O
3Ca(PO3)2+10C == Ca3(PO4)2+4P+10CO
still not much help to me.
<END QUOTE>
David A. Smith
Steve Turner
7/9/03
bruce.sinclair@NOSPAMagresearch.NOTco.NOTnz (Bruce Sinclair) wrote:
In article <61smgvgg9gu62j0tcus3mkaqp29faeiial@4ax.com>, Steve Turner <srtu...@spamnet.att.net> wrote:
"Attila Veres" <f...@accessv.com> wrote:
3Ca(Po3)2+10C
The "10C" means nothing as written. Either this is some sort of a
>>misprint, or it's taken from an equation. Are you trying to make
>>phosphorus?
>
>Agreed ... but could it be some kind of ore as written ? (with bits of the
>formula missing)
Calcium phosphite in graphite or something? Possible, I suppose; I'm
not a minerologist. But the formula:
3Ca(PO3)2
is still problematic. At the very least, calcium phosphite should be
written Ca3(PO3)2, and I'm not even sure if this form of calcium
phosphite exists.
Again, it would be helpful to know the context of the original.
Steve Turner
Real address contains worldnet instead of spamnet
Eric Lucas
7/9/03
"dl...@aol.com (formerly)" <dlzc1.cox@net> wrote in message
news:fIUOa.95507$Pc5.22142@fed1read01...
> The OP had responded, and somehow usenet had resequenced it, with a
> "complete" set of three formulae. So you don't have to find his post, I
> will quote the relevant portion here:
>
> <QUOTE>
> I did Internet search and I got here,
>
http://www.thirdclassroom.net/htmlib/400941027994287.html> cannot read it, could be Chinese, and found this:
> Ca3(PO4)2+2H2SO4 == Ca(H2PO4)2+2CaSO4
> Ca(H2PO4)2 == Ca(PO3)2+2H2O
> 3Ca(PO3)2+10C == Ca3(PO4)2+4P+10CO
> still not much help to me.
> <END QUOTE>
Ah, all is now clear. I jumped to a wrong conclusion, PO3 is *not* a
phosphite (i.e., P(+3)), but rather PO3(-1), some sort of pyrophosphate,
still formally P(+5). I call it a pyrophosphate because the second reaction
almost certainly involves heat to drive off water. To the OP, the last line
says that 3 molecules of this calcium pyrophosphate reacts with 10 carbon
atoms to give calcium phosphate, 10 molecules of carbon monoxide and 4 atoms
of some allotrope of elemental phosphorus.
Eric Lucas
Steve Turner
7/9/03
"Eric Lucas" <eal...@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
>Ah, all is now clear. I jumped to a wrong conclusion, PO3 is *not* a
>phosphite (i.e., P(+3)), but rather PO3(-1), some sort of pyrophosphate,
>still formally P(+5).
I'll be durned. I've never heard of such a beast, but the Lewis
structure is actually pretty trivial to draw. (Whether or not it's
real is another issue.) Does this really exist as such (i.e., singly
charged monomer)? Pyrophosphates are usually dimeric or trimeric,
IIRC.
Steve Turner
Real address contains worldnet instead of spamnet
Eric Lucas
7/9/03
"Steve Turner" <srtu...@spamnet.att.net> wrote in message
news:qlnpgvgpvh4c43ltnqhl6gdao9mjh9psev@4ax.com...
> "Eric Lucas" <eal...@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
>
> >Ah, all is now clear. I jumped to a wrong conclusion, PO3 is *not* a
> >phosphite (i.e., P(+3)), but rather PO3(-1), some sort of pyrophosphate,
> >still formally P(+5).
>
> I'll be durned. I've never heard of such a beast, but the Lewis
> structure is actually pretty trivial to draw. (Whether or not it's
> real is another issue.) Does this really exist as such (i.e., singly
> charged monomer)? Pyrophosphates are usually dimeric or trimeric,
> IIRC.
I agree, I've never seen such a beast personally. Ca(PO3)2 may just be a
fictional simplification for didactic purposes. Maybe in reality some
partially hydrated dimeric anion like CaH2P2O7, or something like that. On
the other hand, it may be real, with the unstable PO3- anion stabilized by
the Ca ions and lattice energy. My copies of Cotton & Wilkinson and
Greenwood & Earnshaw are at work..
http://www.overunity.com/844/amazing-nuclear-power-converter-via-oscillating-tank-circuits/15/#.VBm_WfldXngel: this i found also me, but i don’t understand if i can buy…or i have to make by myself
nyway, the colman/seddon-gillespie patent (original document here:
http://v3.espacenet.com/origdoc?DB=EPODOC&IDX=GB763062&F=0&QPN=GB763062) looks interesting, but those
chemicals are hard to get...
3Ca (Po3)2 + 10C is a mixture of calcium metaphosphate (?) and coal as if it would react... it was discussed here (french):
http://forums.futura-sciences.com/thread190462.htmlor english translation for people like me who can't speak french
http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=fr&u=http://forums.futura-sciences.com/thread190462.html&sa=X&oi=translate&resnum=1&ct=result&prev=/search%3Fq%3Dhttp://forums.futura-sciences.com/thread190462.html%26hl%3Den The Colman / Seddon-Gillespie GB patent 763,062 for a 1 KW power, 70-year life,
el:possible for me...
el: but for sure you have…i saw in your video...
this is translattion into English:
http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=fr&tl=en&u=http%3A%2F%2Fforums.futura-sciences.com%2Fchimie%2F190462-formule-3ca-po3-2-10c.html&sandbox=1
this is original probably more accurate!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=fr&tl=en&u=http%3A%2F%2Fforums.futura-sciences.com%2Fchimie%2F190462-formule-3ca-po3-2-10c.html&anno=2&sandbox=1el: ten parts of carbon?
http://sci.chem.narkive.com/zxKR7Qhf/3ca-po3-2-10c I'n my tube I have multiplied everything by 50 but one can multiplyt it by 100
it is the same as original but it is easier to make correct weight in mg
http://www.energeticforum.com/renewable-energy/13901-colman-beta-decay-new-energy-source.html http://www.science-bbs.com/46-chem/c3cb823c7babd437.htm http://sci.tech-archive.net/Archive/sci.chem/2013-11/msg00024.html this one from above is little different
this is the reason because is black….
http://books.google.com/books?id=JAkPAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA120&lpg=PA120&dq=3Ca(Po3)2+%2B+10+C&source=bl&ots=o6eeWfRhNy&sig=Gk6DMiqAsLY9ybXjaSKmHMR7fbY&hl=en&sa=X&ei=7sAZVKTSKs3ZoASDsoKADw&ved=0CG4Q6AEwCA#
v=onepage&q=3Ca(Po3)2%20%2B%2010%20C&f=false
http://books.google.com/books?id=LF8XAQAAMAAJ&pg=PA147&lpg=PA147&dq=3Ca(Po3)2+%2B+10+C&source=bl&ots=d3nrUpOQBO&sig=iF31Fz1r0lImT629jrDWHsavAGE&hl=en&sa=X&ei=7sAZVKTSKs3ZoASDsoKADw&ved=0CHEQ6AEwCQ#v=onepage&q=3Ca(Po3)2%20%2B%2010%20C&f=falsehttp://www.overunityresearch.com/index.php?topic=2058.15;wap2http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F978-3-642-92778-2_12 Zusammenfassung
Zur Darstellung von elementarem Phosphor wurde früher Tri-kalziumphosphat mit
Schwefelsäure behandelt, die Lösung von primärem Kalziumphosphat nach Abtrennen
des Kalziumsulfats eingedampft und mit Holzkohle oder Koks vermischt. Das beim
Trocknen entstehende Kalziummetaphosphat lieferte beim Erhitzen in feuerfesten Retorten Phosphor nach der Gleichung:
3Ca(PO3)2+10C=P4+Ca3(PO4)2+10CO.
http://cubaenergy.com/2014/05/20/revolution-has-begun-free-energy-exposed-part1/ !!!!!!!
http://www.sciencemadness.org/talk/viewthread.php?tid=65&page=15 !!!!!
http://www.jiskha.com/display.cgi?id=1278986808 http://profchimie.wikispaces.com/file/view/FosfOr%EF%81%8C.ppt http://www.pirotek.info/forum/~thread__mid=838423623&thread__start=11.html http://profchimie.wikispaces.com/file/view/FosfOr%EF%81%8C.ppt for easiness to understand what is happening to inventors dealing with Energy
devices that might create problems to industry I give you another man another company and
another story ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, and what happened to them!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
that happened because they ask for money
that means that catch is do not ask for money [size=78%]: [/size] all one can do for inventor is just to kill him
not so bad after all heeeeeeeeeeee
:
http://www.astralpublishing.org/sitebuildercontent/sitebuilderfiles/telsasymposium1990paperbypaulbrown.pdf http://peswiki.com/index.php/Directory:Resonant_Nuclear_Reactor Paul Brown's Resonant Nuclear Battery
Paul Brown: Resonant Nuclear Battery - The Alpha-Beta Voltaic Effect NuCell (RexResearch)
Page Excerpts:
A radioisotope electric power system developed by inventor Paul Brown is a scientific breakthrough in nuclear power.
The battery utilizes the energy given off by decaying radioactive material, converting it directly
into a continuous AC electrical current. Unlike conventional nuclear generating devices, the power
cell does not rely on a nuclear reaction or chemical process and does not produce radioactive waste products.
Abstract
Nucell, Inc., a subsidiary of Peripheral Systems, Inc., is developing alternative energy technologies for
generating electrical power by employing radioisotopes as the prime power source. A phenomenon known as the
"Beta Voltaic Effect" is used to directly convert radioactive decay energy into electricity without going through a thermal cycle.
The great attraction of isotopic power supplies is that radioactive decay energy is several orders of magnitude greater than chemical energy.
do not even attempt to open this one it will not open
http://www.astralpublishing.org/sitebuildercontent/sitebuilderfiles/paper_presented_ans1989_meeting_paulbrown.pdf did not open in US
but I found another one that opens
http://www.astralpublishing.org/sitebuildercontent/sitebuilderfiles/telsasymposium1990paperbypaulbrown.pdf: So what happened to him? ?
that is what happened:
http://www.sec.gov/news/digest/1992/dig100292.pdf :
http://www.rexresearch.com/nucell/nucell.htm: that man is another one who got his hands on nuclear bat.
http://www.paradigmphysics.com/Beta_Nuclear_Energy.pdfel: Thank you
here is some more:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5ezwSvpX8VYhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s811V2KPexIthat is page with all but you must sort it
ttps://www.youtube.com/channel/UCvAQu78R5eJ7cJMQpFGb5Hw
Wesley