Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Mostly Permanent Magnet Motor with minimal Input Power  (Read 252444 times)

synchro1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4720
Re: Mostly Permanent Magnet Motor with minimal Input Power
« Reply #450 on: May 13, 2019, 09:30:37 PM »
Quote from Gotoluc:

"So to please everyone I did tests to see if the super build could have OU potential even though I knew it would not since the design also suffers of the generator effect as the coil moves in the permanent magnet field. Since it can only move at a certain speed because the coil generates power as it moves, it fights the input power which is coming in the same direction, so we cannot beat the laws of physics here".

Everyone can see from Luc's final conclusions that his (MMM) failed to benefit from any propulsive "Delayed Lenz effect". Removing the latching relay in his motor circuit would allow it to Oscillate in Adam's resonance; Doubling it's power by dovetailing the inductive back kick instead of fighting out of phase like Luc describes it doing.

synchro1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4720
Re: Mostly Permanent Magnet Motor with minimal Input Power
« Reply #451 on: May 14, 2019, 04:07:58 PM »
Gotoluc's trellised stators add magnetic force, but the geometry needs to be compressed for the oscillator. The design comes down to positioning vibration transducers inside a compact version with the interval of Lenz reversal the length of throw.

Increasing the coil size would delay the interval and add force to the impact by lengthening the throw.

synchro1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4720
Re: Mostly Permanent Magnet Motor with minimal Input Power
« Reply #452 on: May 15, 2019, 03:28:06 AM »
The charging time and sudden-discharging time almost increase proportionally with the increase of inductance of the coil. These high inductance flat coils would increase the Lenz Delay, lenghten the throw and solidify the reinforced impact.

synchro1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4720
Re: Mostly Permanent Magnet Motor with minimal Input Power
« Reply #453 on: May 15, 2019, 03:44:40 PM »
The Adam's resonance throw range is a function of inductance. A coil with a 1" throw and 1 Henry of inductance would travel 2" with 2 Henries of inductance. This is the limit of the kickback propulsion distance.

synchro1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4720
Re: Mostly Permanent Magnet Motor with minimal Input Power
« Reply #454 on: May 16, 2019, 04:05:43 PM »
Joe Newman's "Big Eureka" stator coil had miles of copper wire and an inductance of high enough Henries to delay the inductive kickback sufficiently to propel his magnet rotor.

A coil that size would deliver an oscillation throw equal to the "Big Eureka" rotor arc. The advantage of the MMM over Newman's motor is the lack of confinement of the magnet rotor to the core dimension of the coil. The MMM geometry of trellised stators and external magnets allows Luc's design to ultimately out perform Newman's.

synchro1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4720
Re: Mostly Permanent Magnet Motor with minimal Input Power
« Reply #455 on: May 16, 2019, 11:01:01 PM »
These rotating contacts are at 180 degrees and one on each side of the wheel, thus, when the brushes touch these contacts, the circuit will close. The polarity of the current is reversed in the coil for each half turn. We can wire the oscillator and the SPDT switches to two batteries and the coil in series and substitute it for the "H" bridge:

This circuit is basically identical to Gotoluc's with the latching controlled by the commutator shape.
« Last Edit: May 17, 2019, 08:59:33 AM by synchro1 »

synchro1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4720
Re: Mostly Permanent Magnet Motor with minimal Input Power
« Reply #456 on: May 17, 2019, 09:08:45 AM »
Newman's commutator is designed to pulse the coil when the north south rotor magnet is at an angle to the coil axis to propel it from the lenz reversal at TDC. The rotor will attract to the opposite coil poles at 45 degrees and repel from field reversal at 90.

The oscillator self times it's own kickback, and has no need for a Newman commutator.

















synchro1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4720
Re: Mostly Permanent Magnet Motor with minimal Input Power
« Reply #457 on: May 17, 2019, 03:17:25 PM »
The piezo transducers are at the end of the power stroke only: This is an overunity design.

synchro1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4720

synchro1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4720
Re: Mostly Permanent Magnet Motor with minimal Input Power
« Reply #459 on: May 19, 2019, 10:30:17 PM »

This 10 pound skein of 22 gauge magnet wire would carry nearly 5 Henries of inductance. This would deliver around 1 meter of Adam's resonance throw. Joe Newman ties 9 volt batteries together in series to reach voltages sufficient to overcome the large resistance.

synchro1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4720
Re: Mostly Permanent Magnet Motor with minimal Input Power
« Reply #460 on: May 20, 2019, 07:46:03 PM »
Look at the spacing of these two Adam's rotor N facing magnets. They're attracted to the steel core of the relay coil, the reed switch masks the attraction with a coil pulse, then the Lenz reverse kicks the second magnet with a repulsive force:

The coil inductance would determine the distance between these two magnets. The same ratio applies to the MMM Adam's throw:

synchro1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4720
Re: Mostly Permanent Magnet Motor with minimal Input Power
« Reply #461 on: May 20, 2019, 11:39:00 PM »
The space between the 10 O'clock magnet and the center of the secondary U core is a function of the primary coil inductance and would equal the Adam's resonance throw if the coil were part of Luc's MMM.

A ratio of that segment of the arc factored by the coil inductance can calculate the travel of a 10 pound coil.

synchro1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4720
Re: Mostly Permanent Magnet Motor with minimal Input Power
« Reply #462 on: May 21, 2019, 05:26:49 PM »
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The 4 Kilogram coil is levitating:


Here's a video of lateral Mendocino Adam's resonance


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2VhQq_utlQg

synchro1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4720
Re: Mostly Permanent Magnet Motor with minimal Input Power
« Reply #463 on: May 21, 2019, 11:16:01 PM »
Running the base magnets positioned monopole and joining the stators across the top while leaving room for a 4Kg coil.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EkXSvNzoCbs

synchro1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4720
Re: Mostly Permanent Magnet Motor with minimal Input Power
« Reply #464 on: May 23, 2019, 03:09:55 PM »
Core saturation

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The levitator magnets at the ends of the ferrite core would saturate it and the weightless coil and core would have the same inductance as they would if the coil were traveling on a fixed core.

Look how Kundel generares rotary motion with a small linear oscillation:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eNgd1ZVZtsY

An Adam's resonance Mostly Magnet Mendacino linear oscillator with Kundel rotary motor would be Ideal to replace a Diesel motor and ballast in a sail boat. 750% approximate efficiency after conversion losses. Silent and vibrationless.

The throw is in Adam's resonance range for the kickback; The width of a ring magnet on the rail:
« Last Edit: May 23, 2019, 07:29:21 PM by synchro1 »