Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Flynn's Parallel Path  (Read 70665 times)

JackH

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 250
Re: Flynn's Parallel Path
« Reply #90 on: June 29, 2006, 02:46:51 AM »
Hello penguin hood,

""Switching a magnetic flux from permanent magnets beetween two closed magnetic paths using coils. When the electric pulse is OFF, the magnetic field return to initial state (same flux on both magnetic paths) or remains on the magnetic path where was confined when the pulse was ON?""

Your statement is only true if there is no air gap between the field poles.  If an air gap is present the magnetic field will return to what it was before the pulse DC.    Magnetic flux lines will always return to the least resistance path.
You need to understand that if this Flynn device was used in a motor, there would be an air gap between the rotor and the magnet poles.

Later,,,,JackH

penguin hood

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 25
Re: Flynn's Parallel Path
« Reply #91 on: June 29, 2006, 04:02:33 PM »
Many thanks JackH, I appreciate much your pretty answer

hartiberlin

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8154
    • free energy research OverUnity.com
Re: Flynn's Parallel Path
« Reply #92 on: July 18, 2006, 06:08:01 AM »
I just saw, that Flynn has a new rotary motor design at thsi page:

http://www.flynnresearch.net/technology/PPMT%20Technology.htm

Look into the PDF file at the buttom of the page.

http://www.flynnresearch.net/technology/PPMT%20technology%20white%20paper.pdf

There it is stated, that this motor has a very much reduced drag effect,
with other words the Lentz law does not apply to it or is much reduced !
Looks very interesting !

FredWalter

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 124
Re: Flynn's Parallel Path
« Reply #93 on: July 28, 2006, 03:19:06 PM »
Can this technology be used to move magnetic flux so it cuts through a coil and generates electricity, similar to what is done in http://www.magneticpowerinc.com/mpi-patentapplication.pdf

They claim overunity, in a device that has no moving parts.

longwolf

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 11
Re: Flynn's Parallel Path
« Reply #94 on: July 30, 2006, 07:26:23 PM »
Can this technology be used to move magnetic flux so it cuts through a coil and generates electricity, similar to what is done in http://www.magneticpowerinc.com/mpi-patentapplication.pdf

They claim overunity, in a device that has no moving parts.

If you're talking about making a perm magnet boosted transformer, the problem is that the secondary, output coils, create a magnetic field that opposes the control coils so that the flux from the perm magnets stops being forced into the secondaries.  :'(

LarryC

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 911
« Last Edit: October 27, 2009, 11:21:49 PM by LarryC »

capthook

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 469
Re: Flynn's Parallel Path
« Reply #96 on: October 30, 2009, 08:23:36 AM »
Hey Larry -

Thanks for the update on Flynn.  And for the WIPO patent links.
At 71 pages, I look foward to finding the time to dive in.
It's great to see his work being further developed and apparently being brought to the market place.

Was/has Flynn ever stopped by here (or any other forum) to discuss his stuff?
I'm surprised at the relative apparent lack of interest on this forum towards his work.

His previous US patent#: 6,342,746 was some good stuff offering many variations on his idea(s) and offered a surprising amount of details.

A primary question in the past was magnet strength.
Ceramic magnets were normally recommended to prevent core saturation, and the effect was presented by the (very) few tests I've seen as having a narrow 'window' - small voltage/amps ranges and magnet/core ranges.

However, Jan Vink's replication ( http://peswiki.com/index.php/Directory:FPPP:Replication:Jan_Vink ) uses N42 neos and 15 watts.  He reports N35 neos as using .88 watts (although magnet dimensions aren't given. I would suppose they are a bit smaller given the results??)
Larger/stronger magnets would provide more useful power.

It would appear from the latest Flynn info that large neos are being used and the 'window' has been enlarged.

I've considered how to implement his design(s) into a piston-style motor and how well it might work, maybe someday....

Would love to hear more discussion, updates, thoughts, links (anything!) etc. on Flynn's work!!

Earthrise

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 30
Re: Flynn's Parallel Path
« Reply #97 on: October 13, 2013, 07:45:12 PM »
With a  four years lapse on this subject, I have to ask. Is anyone on this forum trying to duplicate the motor and generator designs of Joeseph Flynn? I have seen replications of his motor on YouTube. I can't find anyone doing a duplication of his version of a motionless generator. A look at his site shows it hasn't been updated for some time and his research has been absorbed by DARPA. This means that it is a real, working technology. Otherwise, they wouldn't be involved.

Going to the site http://www.flynnresearch.net/products/PPMT%20Products.htm shows that:
"Our PPMT-T2 high power density generator designs are currently proprietary and restricted, and not for public release at this time."

What this means is that the generator works too well to ever be released into the public domain.
In the United States, it is not illegal to reproduce for your own use something that is patented. It would become illegal if you tried to sell what you made. However, if you made an improvement or altered the object in some way, you can file your own patent application or release your altered design into the public domain.


lancaIV

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5233
Re: Flynn's Parallel Path
« Reply #98 on: October 13, 2013, 11:24:48 PM »
With a  four years lapse on this subject, I have to ask. Is anyone on this forum trying to duplicate the motor and generator designs of Joeseph Flynn? I have seen replications of his motor on YouTube. I can't find anyone doing a duplication of his version of a motionless generator. A look at his site shows it hasn't been updated for some time and his research has been absorbed by DARPA. This means that it is a real, working technology. Otherwise, they wouldn't be involved.

Going to the site http://www.flynnresearch.net/products/PPMT%20Products.htm shows that:
"Our PPMT-T2 high power density generator designs are currently proprietary and restricted, and not for public release at this time."

What this means is that the generator works too well to ever be released into the public domain.
In the United States, it is not illegal to reproduce for your own use something that is patented. It would become illegal if you tried to sell what you made. However, if you made an improvement or altered the object in some way, you can file your own patent application or release your altered design into the public domain.


Flynnresearch wrote 2006 about a great power density and in the pdf we see an
400Hz example !
High power density -up to 1/10 comparing with conventional DC motors also to find here:  [size=78%]http://www.electrifyingtimes.com/brush.html[/size]