Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: A validation of the UP-SIDE-DOWN phenomena  (Read 73657 times)

stprue

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1025
Re: A validation of the UP-SIDE-DOWN phenomena
« Reply #150 on: December 01, 2009, 11:45:50 PM »
  Iron sure will respond to a lower frequency.  Guess that is why they have it in low frequency generators.  I always wondered why a piece of steel lost it's magnetic field when you smacked it.  Or sent a compressional wave through the material.
e
I'm not seeing a picture Sparks

giantkiller

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 2791
    • http://www.planetary-engineering.com
Re: A validation of the UP-SIDE-DOWN phenomena
« Reply #151 on: December 02, 2009, 12:14:01 AM »
@Stprue,
It is an exclamation point...
















-------------------------------------------
@Sparks,
I think is was EVGray or Hubbard at age 12 that hung a steel loop off of the open hood of an automotive vehicle on a piece of string. In the middle of that he hung a paper clip(steel) on a string. He started the vehicle. He then took a hammer and struck the steel ring. The paper clip became invisible. After some time he hit the ring again and the clip reappeared. He did this over and over and with witnesses and this started his career in overunity.

sparks

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2528
Re: A validation of the UP-SIDE-DOWN phenomena
« Reply #152 on: December 02, 2009, 12:40:03 AM »
    sptrue

  Most transformers or antennaes have to get rid of the internal magnetic field produced by the atomic magnetic dipole moment alignment with the induced field.  If they don't then each successive input saturates the metal atomic lattice until it runs out of atoms.  Ac circuits will reset the metals dipole moment wheras ripple dc does not.  The ambient magnetic field may and this is just a hunch reset the transformer core for you and give you an additional magnetic field change within the core material. Set reset.  If the setting power is reclaimed as much as possible by reflection then the reseting power puts you into gain.  The shockwave doesnt really do this.  It readily ionizes the atoms as the electrons respond to an accelerating force while the more massive neucleus doesnt even know what just happened.  It doesnt respond because its intrinsic angular momentum is many orders over that of the electron.  Plus it takes up space so it has alot of other issues to contend with.  The electron acceleration will produce an emwave of its own that is imposed on the ionized cores.  This sometimes leads to an electron cascade and a current that is many orders over what one would expect from the input spike.
« Last Edit: December 02, 2009, 01:05:12 AM by sparks »

hartiberlin

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8154
    • free energy research OverUnity.com
Re: A validation of the UP-SIDE-DOWN phenomena
« Reply #153 on: January 09, 2010, 10:16:30 PM »
Hi EM and Marco,
any news on your devices ?


EM, did you sell your invention to RCA ?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IMMbihbeIls

Have a look at their airenergy pickup device !

stprue

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1025
Re: A validation of the UP-SIDE-DOWN phenomena
« Reply #154 on: January 10, 2010, 12:11:41 AM »
Nice find...very cool!  I wonder what the range is!

EMdevices

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 1146
Re: A validation of the UP-SIDE-DOWN phenomena
« Reply #155 on: January 20, 2010, 07:36:09 AM »
My device uses low frequency, but RCA's device is very practical and neat.  I wonder if it messes up the Wifi protocol in any way?

I finally fixed my computer and now here's some videos I was going to put up on you-tube months ago.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J-3-ZHOqt6Y
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tH6M-Gx8RyQ
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KtPQnib5Hck
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lZ9k_2L1dwU
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v4G1wonjpN8

Enjoy,

EM

turbo

  • Guest
Re: A validation of the UP-SIDE-DOWN phenomena
« Reply #156 on: January 21, 2010, 01:04:11 AM »

Hi EM and Marco,
any news on your devices ?


Hi Stefan  :)

Here is a pic of my latest test:
But it ain't a TPU!!!!

Your file is too large. The maximum attachment size allowed is 300 KB.

wings

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 750
Re: A validation of the UP-SIDE-DOWN phenomena
« Reply #157 on: January 21, 2010, 08:44:06 AM »
Hi Stefan  :)

Here is a pic of my latest test:
But it ain't a TPU!!!!

Your file is too large. The maximum attachment size allowed is 300 KB.
if you use windows:
Image Resizer
This PowerToy enables you to resize one or many image files with a right-click.

http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/Downloads/powertoys/Xppowertoys.mspx

hartiberlin

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8154
    • free energy research OverUnity.com
Re: A validation of the UP-SIDE-DOWN phenomena
« Reply #158 on: January 21, 2010, 11:04:37 AM »
Hi Stefan  :)

Here is a pic of my latest test:
But it ain't a TPU!!!!

Your file is too large. The maximum attachment size allowed is 300 KB.

If the picture is bigger than 300 KB,
please upload to Google picasa hosting or any other simular image hosting sites
and post the link.
Any JPEG picture in 1024x768 could compressed down to less than 300 KB,
so it would be a waste of bandwidth and storage space, if you want to post
bigger pictures and many users don´t have such big monitor sizes...
Many thanks.

hartiberlin

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8154
    • free energy research OverUnity.com
Re: A validation of the UP-SIDE-DOWN phenomena
« Reply #159 on: January 21, 2010, 11:10:29 AM »
My device uses low frequency, but RCA's device is very practical and neat.  I wonder if it messes up the Wifi protocol in any way?

I finally fixed my computer and now here's some videos I was going to put up on you-tube months ago.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J-3-ZHOqt6Y
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tH6M-Gx8RyQ
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KtPQnib5Hck
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lZ9k_2L1dwU
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v4G1wonjpN8

Enjoy,

EM

Hi EM,
not bad lighting a few low power LEDs, but these are just tuning to different resonnace frequency effects and
here:
http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=8245.msg209191#msg209191
you already showed a much bigger light and wattage output !

Will you also show this on video ?

What power did the transmitter draw for this output power level ?

Many thanks.

Regards, Stefan.

EMdevices

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 1146
Re: A validation of the UP-SIDE-DOWN phenomena
« Reply #160 on: January 22, 2010, 03:35:47 AM »
Stefan, that was a short lived experiment that burned out my "magnifier" circuit. I did not have a chance to take a video, the videos I posted are old ones I had taken prior.  But not to worry, I'm re-engineering the system.  So while I don't know the amount of power it draws, I know for a fact that the more power I draw the more I load the transmitter side of the system. 

EM   

P.S.   @all,  forget about this technology, it's not that useful for long distances, better use RCA's Wifi, or other directional energy schemes. 

EMdevices

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 1146
Re: A validation of the UP-SIDE-DOWN phenomena
« Reply #161 on: February 08, 2010, 04:44:14 AM »
This next experiment is different then what I previously showed, so don't get confused.

I'm now using a small oscillator to power one of the loops and I'm trying to see how efficient I can get.

I'm about 99% efficient right now.  I'm thinking to add another tuned loop maybe I can push it over the top.

Once again, this is different then what previously demonstrated and there are no ambient magnetic fields, I made sure of that.

enjoy

EM