Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Which device has the best chance for overunity success???  (Read 12827 times)

FatChance!!!

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 197
Which device has the best chance for overunity success???
« on: October 27, 2009, 02:07:01 PM »
I just keep wondering about different self-sustaining OU approaches and finally I had to ask the question.
Which device do you think have the best chance for Overunity if properly designed? And why, if I may ask.

1. The Hilden-Brand motor.
2. The Bedini Circuit.
3. The Magnetic Wankel motor, aka Sprains type.
4. The MEG.
5. Overunity Electrolysis (Electricity generated from the hydrogen will run the Electrolysis in closed loop).
6. The Steorn solution (Whatever this turns out to be).
7. The TPU of Steven Mark.
8. Cold_Fusion, Self Sustained.
9. The Flynn motor.
10. Paul Lowrance diode claims.
11. Or maybe some other device not being in this list.

If any of these tech mentioned is considered being Crackpot technology, then please point it out.
« Last Edit: October 27, 2009, 03:30:04 PM by FatChance!!! »

FreeEnergy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2014
    • The Freedom Cell Network

onthecuttingedge2005

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1336
Re: Which device has the best chance for overunity success???
« Reply #2 on: October 28, 2009, 06:09:25 AM »
currently, only nuclear holds the record. fusion detonation, 30,000 times more energy than what it took to make the reaction and materials. beat that.

FatChance!!!

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 197

FreeEnergy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2014
    • The Freedom Cell Network
Re: Which device has the best chance for overunity success???
« Reply #4 on: October 28, 2009, 08:32:56 AM »
When will the update on your progress come?

this is not my work.
just a video which i think has a chance to achieve over unity.
enjoy!

p.s.
this is also not my work but is interesting: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cq5r08eqgsk from thread http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=8051.0
this also shows potential.

Cloxxki

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1083
Re: Which device has the best chance for overunity success???
« Reply #5 on: October 28, 2009, 09:49:11 AM »
I was going to throw in the Yu oscillator as well. Its either a confirmation/rework of Howard Johnson's work, or a sad fraud. But, I trust Yu. The limitation, his lead magnet needing to be flipped each half cycle, seems to lend credit to its working.
Long term, and engine will need to be made to work on perhaps a his magnet array, or Roney's iron/magnet hybrid stators. Short term, we need to get HHO electrolysis loops sorted. Too bad that governments only invest billions in project with great promise of saving 5% of fussil fuel usage, declaring the rest as chanceless.

Xaero_Vincent

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 90
Re: Which device has the best chance for overunity success???
« Reply #6 on: October 28, 2009, 10:25:33 AM »
If Yu can make his magnet pendulum rotate the magnet on its own energy (without a battery) while still gaining speed then overunity can be claimed.

Here's a video I came across:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V-MQvzOCNSI

Not sure if its fake or not.

FatChance!!!

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 197
Re: Which device has the best chance for overunity success???
« Reply #7 on: October 28, 2009, 11:01:32 AM »
Of course this is a fake. Why would he otherwise sell plans on how to build your own.

Youtube quote:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
For the complete plans and details to make your own working power generator,
for questions and answers contact me at yannickvd11@yahoo.fr
------------------------------------------------------------------------

If this guy really had anything going he would become richer beyond his wildest dreams
by letting any university verify his claims and present him to the right connections
for massproduction or buyers of the tech.
Selling plans on youtube is such a simple scam alert. Always avoid plan selling scoundrels.

TechStuf

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1280
    • Biblical Record Proves True
Re: Which device has the best chance for overunity success???
« Reply #8 on: October 28, 2009, 11:08:20 AM »

Quote
Which device has the best chance for overunity success???


That's an easy one.  A combination wind turbine/stirling engine strategically placed at Capitol Hill.


TS

Xaero_Vincent

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 90
Re: Which device has the best chance for overunity success???
« Reply #9 on: October 28, 2009, 11:21:23 AM »
Of course this is a fake. Why would he otherwise sell plans on how to build your own.

Youtube quote:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
For the complete plans and details to make your own working power generator,
for questions and answers contact me at yannickvd11@yahoo.fr
------------------------------------------------------------------------

If this guy really had anything going he would become richer beyond his wildest dreams
by letting any university verify his claims and present him to the right connections
for massproduction or buyers of the tech.
Selling plans on youtube is such a simple scam alert. Always avoid plan selling scoundrels.



Could be a fake but you don't need the plans to replicate it and see if its all bull. The video is self-explanatory and gives all the information needed. This image I found fills any gaps left over.

spoondini

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 121
Re: Which device has the best chance for overunity success???
« Reply #10 on: October 28, 2009, 02:20:12 PM »
Right now the yu oscillating generator is promising.  My jury is still out.

Also what I've coined the 'paul lowrence effect' can currently generate very small amounts of energy, seemingly pulled from nowhere.

Realistically, nuclear is proven and has the capability to satisfy all power need, but on the flip side blow the world to pieces. 

The perfect form of ou would generate enough power to perform useful work, but not enough to perform useful destruction.

FatChance!!!

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 197
Re: Which device has the best chance for overunity success???
« Reply #11 on: October 28, 2009, 04:22:59 PM »
The perfect form of ou would generate enough power to perform useful work, but not enough to perform useful destruction.

That's right, but I'd like to contribute this to the statement.
"The perfect form of ou must also be possible for anyone to build for home use, when having the necessary skills,
at reasonable cost to become economical viable within 5 years compared to domestic energy pricing"


Enough of this, back to the list of OU devices.
Is there any tech in this list you prefer or simply believe in.
Myself I'm a sucker for the Magnetic Wankel motor. I've read it's the efficiency of the electromagnet that makes this work.
The problem is how to design such an electromagnet? Sprain supposedly managed this by several design optimizations.
It's his best guarded secret. Without this knowledge it doesn't work, according to released information.

dankie

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 463
Re: Which device has the best chance for overunity success???
« Reply #12 on: October 28, 2009, 05:12:51 PM »
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=adqtuj_kGC8

By far Geet , very doable and adaptable . It can even run  on  100% water or saltwater as told  by Pantone  in this video .

Xogen technology has also been  proven and is now goverment funded for water water treatment plant in wealthy suburb in Ontario .

TPU and ether related devices will just fade away to superior technology .



dankie

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 463
Re: Which device has the best chance for overunity success???
« Reply #14 on: October 29, 2009, 12:40:50 AM »
NAH  , that thing doesnt exist  , it was  a hoax and a hype job that I know nothing about and probably you couldnt make it work .

GEET has  the best chance @ overunity success . And it has alot of other benefits besides overunity .

Listen to the man himself , see the proof on youtube of regular Joe's making it work .

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=adqtuj_kGC8