Most of the worlds most revolutionary discoveries are usually very simple, but hard to understand. This is why it takes so long to discover them.

Examples: Electricity, Fire, Engines... ect..

@otto

Thank you for the correction. I also know that lower frequencies consume more juice even at 5kHz so this is why I am puzzled how that engineer could see this in the TPU and not see the higher frequencies also.

@All

Parallel to what I am trying out in this thread, there is this question that has been bugging me for quite some time now as to how to go about making a circuit that can receive a continuous and infinite supply of 1 volt at .01 amps. This is about the minimum anyone can catch just by putting a single wire outside their home, connecting it to a radiant energy circuit that outputs two wires. But what the hell can anyone do with this energy?

I don't think inductors will be useful because they will produce both losses and emit other energies. So my only thinking is to use capacitors. It is very difficult for me to explain what I am thinking such a circuit would required so I have vulgarized this into the below diagram. I wanted to make it in animation but lack of time these days make this hard to do. I will eventually do it though.

I call this potential circuit a "Voltage Grabber Circuit" or VGC for short. There is nothing on Google using this naming so I think it is pretty safe to use to identify this specific circuit.

With all humility and humble respect for everyone here, if you ask me, all the main EE guys that are here to design circuits are just wasting their god given talents. The only real circuit the OU endeavor needs is an open source VGC. Make me one of those and the OU question will become history. The VGC is the one tool we are missing in our arsenal of toys to play with. Think of it like a smart capacitor.

Just consider that a suitable 1 wire input has the potential to supply an infinite quantity of 1 volts at .01 amps on two wires. You can grab 1 per second, or 1 million per second or 100 million per second. Either way, the energy will always be there available to the circuit. Now take that 1 volt and accumulate it until you get 10 volts. Bingo, the job is done. OK not so easy. I know.

The problem is that storage methods are not designed or available that can work in an additive fashion. If I send this power into a capacitor for 1 hour, I will still only have that same first power, nothing more because capacitor will only absorb the highest voltage put into it and not accumulate voltage.

So what do you do. Well I think this has to be solved in various stages.

As a STAGE 1 (small orange boxes are small capacitors) you can feed capacitor #1 with 1 volt then put it offline, then feed capacitor #2 with 1 volt then put that one offline also, then cap #3, up to cap #10 or up to how many you want. Then you put all the caps in series with the main ends still disconnected then you discharge them into a bigger holding capacitor (longer orange boxes are bigger capacitors) that is STAGE 2. Now either the stage 1 caps are charged individually or they can possible be charged all at the same time if all connected in parallel at charge state.

Once the second stage is charged up, they also go into series and discharge into the largest capacitor. Remember those two big yellow caps in the LPTU. Hmmmmmmmmmmmm. Possible dual VGC.

SM mentioned once that the control circuit was patented. What if it was just a VGC that worked with only 2 caps in first stage and 1 cap as a last stage. The diagram below is just to show the idea, the principle of how to accumulate larger energy from a small energy source. I do not think there is any other way.

Yes we are working on other ways, but in the interim, I think this type of circuit will prove to be extremely useful.

Anyways, if anyone knows how to really design such a circuit, please let me know. Image a 120 cap 1st stage, 10 cap 2nd stage, and if you want 3rd and 4th stages. All from an initial low power source. The source is there. That is simple. But what to do with it is the question I am asking. My basic solution is if it is there, grab it while you can, store it, group it and put it aside. Hmmmmmm. 3-6-9 would be a good staging for this also.

wattsup

@wings

That patent is for picking up from preenergized cable. Not directly relative but it is still very interesting. Thank you.

similar ?

http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=3696.0

MIT experiment one transmitter many receivers....more efficiency - posted by Broli at Energetic forum

"Although predicted by theory, the increase in efficiency when powering two devices at the same time had not been previously demonstrated in experiments. The team that carried out the recent work — Kurs, Moffat and Soljačić — found that when powering two devices at once, which individually could achieve less than 20 percent efficiency in power transfer, the combined efficiency climbed to more than 30 percent. The two receiving coils resonate with each other as well as with the transmitting coil, and help to reinforce the strength of the magnetic field. Kurs says that the efficiency should continue to rise as more devices are added, climbing toward a theoretical limit of 100 percent. The research has been funded by the NSF, the Army Research Office, DARPA, and a grant from 3M."

http://web.mit.edu/newsoffice/2010/wireless-power-0409.html

Those center toriods are mounted on a base that have two male bayonet tangs. One is slim and one is wide. Just like car audio speaker connections. The odd thing is he never connects to them. As far as Litz go you can use the ezflow Audio cable. I believe he wrapped 90 degrees on that also.

Like Marco showed: voice coils.

Put a 10meg resisitor across the cap and disconnect it from the circuit then measure the voltage. It should disappear as in ghost voltage or short it separately(you won't see a spark). Seen this many times.

The leds are lit from 27milliwatts.

Use a 555 board to pulse it. This is similar to the oscilator in the stun gun on a nine volt battery.

The large loops could be a hoax. After all he never damaged the center units. This would be a good ploy to focus attention on the centers. Another misnomer. Marco and Grumpy advertised the center toroid too as a being very important. They mentioned it as a magamp. In my view that was a purposeful NDA misnomer.

I will fire a stun gun into my bucker. I can put a second layer on it also. I will also try my iron ring.

What if SM fired two stun gun circuits into the outer loops also. My thinking has always been that he took a stun gun and altered the last stage into a bigger loop. He told me not to fire the stun gun into a 15 foot diameter audio cable loop in the yard. The FAA would see it.
If you look at the last stage of a stun gun there is a big cap and ignition type coil there.
Then the emmissions from the outer loop would smack the center toroids.

Sm told me 'No big loop'.
Moab said 'I dont need  To use a stun gun'.
Grumpy posted a Tesla picture showing multiple spark gap stages.
Grumpy posted 'No NDA. Just end up in jail'

What if I invert what SM and Moab said and take that as a 'Yes' to what I tried?
That would make what Grumpy said as peritinent.

There was and has been so many things to try that was and is easy to just take what people said at face value. I was just the new guy then. But now after all the attempts, papers, patents, inventors have all shown the same event in different ways. Jack up the Bloch wall. This is an electrostatic process.

Si, Kemosabe?

@GK

Nice one man. I see it is in @gotoluc's bucking mode.

Youz gonna have sum fun wit dat. lol

Also, noticed you have a good number of secondary turns which makes it a perfect candidate to also try the Tesla Coil method.

Send pulse into one Pri, then send that Pri to either the Sec under it or opposing it, in either direction. Like a cannon. I think your build will be better then mine when I test it that way this weekend.

Then consider from there either open ended system or closed via a capacitor and load.

Have fun. Will be back soon. lol

 Two bucking magnetic fields create consequent poles.  This creates more torsion at the expense of angular velocity.
t