Author Topic: TWM Technology Claims to have closed the loop (Read 10674 times)

0c · « **Reply #15 on:** October 15, 2009, 05:58:07 PM »

Quote from: spoondini on October 15, 2009, 04:48:05 PM

... the key to achieving OU is the fact they are using both sides of the magnetic field. All electromags are on, and they switch polarity at exactly the right moment when the permanent mag is facing the electro mag. Therefore the permananent mags are being both repelled and attracted at the same time by the electro mags in the stators. ...

That's the core idea in WhipMag, except I was attempting to do it using only permanent magnets (I'm still working on it).

Using electromagnets provides more flexibility. But it also requires a source of energy to power the electromagnets. If the energy gains are great enough to power the electromagnets and circuitry, then they might have something. I wish them well.

YeahRight · « **Reply #16 on:** October 15, 2009, 08:09:53 PM »

Quote from: spoondini on October 15, 2009, 04:48:05 PM

He basically said the key to achieving OU is the fact they are using both sides of the magnetic field.

This tech is already used in many of todays electric motors and has nothing to do with overunity.

hoptoad · « **Reply #17 on:** October 15, 2009, 11:04:02 PM »

Quote from: LarryC on October 15, 2009, 02:59:39 PM

Found it with drawings using Wheeler; Kenny L. under Google Patents or http://www.google.com/patents/about?id=zQ-rAAAAEBAJ

Regards Larry

Thanks Larry
Cheers

allcanadian · « **Reply #18 on:** October 16, 2009, 02:37:48 AM »

@yeahright
Quote:
"When investigating the patent it's obvious this is not an OU capable machine.
The patent describes rotation by regular interaction between magnets and electromagnets.
When using electromagnets as used here, there is always a counter induced voltage from
the passing rotor magnets and this keeps the motor from being overunity.
This voltage is responsible for increasing motor voltage at increased speeds.
And the efficiency is simply kept below OU due to the losses of such an machine.
The losses is this case would be:
Induced voltage times currents when loaded.
Bearing and windage losses.
Eddy current and hysteresis losses.te:"

Obviously the normal/conventional or otherwise obsolete losses you speak of have been rectified in a better design hence the patent, which obviously implies the motor is new or unique---the main criteria for a patent. Didn't your wife explain to you it's not the size or configuration that matters--it's how you use it, LOL.
AC

hartiberlin · « **Reply #19 on:** October 16, 2009, 03:31:26 AM »

Hi,
I have added the videos over here:

http://www.free-energy.tv/browse-TWM_Technology-videos-1-date.html

Regards, Stefan.

P.S: Will be analysing them, when I am back at home next week and
will have faster Internet access again.

Xaverius · « **Reply #20 on:** October 16, 2009, 05:56:42 AM »

Quote from: LarryC on October 15, 2009, 02:59:39 PM

Found it with drawings using Wheeler; Kenny L. under Google Patents or http://www.google.com/patents/about?id=zQ-rAAAAEBAJ

Regards Larry

Thanx, that helps much.

News:

User Menu

Author Topic: TWM Technology Claims to have closed the loop (Read 10674 times)

0c

Re: TWM Technology Claims to have closed the loop

YeahRight

Re: TWM Technology Claims to have closed the loop

hoptoad

Re: TWM Technology Claims to have closed the loop

allcanadian

Re: TWM Technology Claims to have closed the loop

hartiberlin

Re: TWM Technology Claims to have closed the loop

Xaverius

Re: TWM Technology Claims to have closed the loop