Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Selfrunning waterhose water perpetual motion experiment by Tony Hughes  (Read 22014 times)

truth

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 54
Re: Selfrunning waterhose water perpetual motion experiment by Tony Hughes
« Reply #30 on: August 08, 2009, 06:03:03 AM »
Hello everyone,

Sadly I read this whole thread and nobody mentioned it.

That is right, it........  the water hose level...... the one that uses two clear ends on a water hose.... the one where no matter what shape the hose is in the water is at the same level at both ends....  great in building level buildings in ancient times. Only exception is the entire hose (the middle) needs to be lower than the ends being measured.
Now what if the hose was thirty miles long would it drop even one inch?

No, it would give the same distance from the CENTER of the Earth at both ends.  There would be a straight level line that would need to go below ground level in order to be both straight and level with the center of the earth. The water hose would need to have the ends elevated by like ten feet plus in order to measure the water level because of the height at the center.


Water leaves the pool that is too long in the center because the center of that straight line is closer to the center of the Earth than the ends, and that makes it lower.

Think ocean. Does the water's surface curve?

Simple but deceptive,
Truth    ;D

Thaelin

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 1093
Re: Selfrunning waterhose water perpetual motion experiment by Tony Hughes
« Reply #31 on: October 18, 2009, 12:46:41 AM »
   Work or not work, have no idea. What I wanted to bring to light is that Buba
miss quoted the facts a bit. Not two inches out of the bucket but two "feet". A
big difference there. For what its worth..

thay

Bubba1

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 80
Re: Selfrunning waterhose water perpetual motion experiment by Tony Hughes
« Reply #32 on: October 18, 2009, 04:27:01 AM »
   Work or not work, have no idea. What I wanted to bring to light is that Buba
miss quoted the facts a bit. Not two inches out of the bucket but two "feet". A
big difference there. For what its worth..
thay

What I was referring to was "what i came up with was about 2inches difference(ABOVE WATER INTAKE)." in the first post, with the emphasis on "ABOVE WATER INTAKE".  Was the end of the hose 2 inches above the water intake (other end of the hose, understandable), or 2 inches above the water level (new physics)?

FreeEnergy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2014
    • The Freedom Cell Network
Re: Selfrunning waterhose water perpetual motion experiment by Tony Hughes
« Reply #33 on: October 18, 2009, 10:02:08 AM »
deleted
« Last Edit: October 18, 2009, 11:14:35 AM by FreeEnergy »

FreeEnergy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2014
    • The Freedom Cell Network
Re: Selfrunning waterhose water perpetual motion experiment by Tony Hughes
« Reply #34 on: October 18, 2009, 10:14:26 AM »
deleted
« Last Edit: October 18, 2009, 11:14:22 AM by FreeEnergy »

Thaelin

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 1093
Re: Selfrunning waterhose water perpetual motion experiment by Tony Hughes
« Reply #35 on: October 18, 2009, 09:01:34 PM »
   Check. My booble. sorry.