Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Bedini motor, debunked by MythBusters.  (Read 101534 times)

Pipebomb

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 1
Re: Bedini motor, debunked by MythBusters.
« Reply #75 on: August 22, 2009, 12:11:16 AM »
The MythBusters did it again...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q3I9RUCrjoQ


In my honest oppinion.... The Mythbusters duo are a couple of bellends. They even busted the "Spud up the exhaust trick", they did that with a big engine. I actually know that it does work on a 1.4 Renault engine. Coz I spudded a teacher's exhaust pipe when I was at school, I hid and watched as he tried to crank the engine, and it did not start  ;D. And yet, those two prats said that it was a myth.

They sure do look like oil bandits to me  :P.
I've been trying to find this mythbusters episode on the internet with no success.  I then found this website and the link says "This video is no longer available due to a copyright claim by Energetic Productions LLC."  What's this mean?  Were the Mythbusters wrong after all?

YeahRight

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 29
Re: Bedini motor, debunked by MythBusters.
« Reply #76 on: October 07, 2009, 02:26:35 PM »
Energetic Productions LLC is a crackpot video production company pushing vacuum energy as true facts.
http://www.energyfromthevacuum.com/

jibbguy

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 352
Re: Bedini motor, debunked by MythBusters.
« Reply #77 on: October 07, 2009, 04:41:08 PM »
Back for another lesson?

Prove them wrong then. No one here gives a flying fart about completely unsubstantiated opinions based on ignorance and bias... I CAN say this, because obviously in our last episode, you were blissfully unaware of the shear magnitude of the body of work on LENR. 

In fact, i suspect your "colleagues" aren't too happy about you either. Some of them have been facing a "credibility crisis" lately (its been a rough year for them, and it ain't getting any better, lol), and you're efforts are not helping matters ;)

You think just logging in with a generic "it's all crap" on every thread is somehow meaningful to anyone, that it would change any minds? Lol please explain how that is.

And judging from your efforts do "disprove" LENR a few days ago (apparently you were  one of those naysayers who were left swinging in the breeze last March, and that humiliating experience has stuck in your craw)....

... It appears from what you've shown us so far, you couldn't properly debunk "Leprechauns", let alone something that dozens of mainstream Physicists and academics who violently opposed LENR in the past have decided to keep silent on now; because they understand there is no chance of success in denying it anymore, and doing so would only make them look absurdly bitter, mentally petrified, and intransigent.

And now, once again, your mouth has written a check you can't cash: Let's see your argument against Col. Beardon's work then.

But i will say this.. You must not be a "Paid Shill": Otherwise you would have starved to death by now ;) 

... So i will adjust my opinion, and say there is hope for you yet! Do the study and you may, if you allow yourself to do the analysis objectively, be surprised with what you find... Again.

If you are serious about having any impact at all in your attempts to "save us from ourselves", lol... Here is how to do this (..a little free advice for you and others):

Do the background reading. Choose a specific question that the opponent will find difficult to answer. Don't attempt to denigrate anything or anyone, and don't come off with an attitude that proves your negative bias from the get-go. Then you have a chance to do something ;)

YeahRight

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 29
Re: Bedini motor, debunked by MythBusters.
« Reply #78 on: October 07, 2009, 11:26:32 PM »
YeahRight!!!
If you're so sure of Vacuum Energy being for real then it's up to you to prove your claims.
It's certainly not me. I'm the sceptic. Disprove my scepticism by showing me Vacuum Energy.

Regarding Cold Fusion. There is work being performed but nothing is yet acknowledged as CF.
There is just some reaction they can't measure correctly or explain yet. But there is no 100%
proof of CF. Just the reaction itself and this is not proof of anything than just a reaction.

alan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 716
Re: Bedini motor, debunked by MythBusters.
« Reply #79 on: October 10, 2009, 02:16:22 PM »
how do you want your proof to be served?

YeahRight

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 29
Re: Bedini motor, debunked by MythBusters.
« Reply #80 on: October 10, 2009, 03:58:52 PM »
how do you want your proof to be served?
Indisputable!

YeahRight

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 29