your picture shows what i was referring to

because your system is top heavy, the only work you need to put into it is the difference in weight until it goes past 90* and falls,

what you have neglected to think about is that if it does go all the way to the floor, your input has now increased because you now have to move the lever from the floor all the way back up to the magnet array, which is a lot more distance than the magnets who move it only like 30*


why not just put a couple gears on it, and use the torque to spin your magnet, or build two so they can power each other

you can't claim proof until you have a runner....

i don't understand why you modified your original design

i have only been talking about your most recent video, your old design doesn't behave in the same manner as this one, its the opposite,

"neglected that the YOG has a pendulum in it’s design. The counter weight returns the cycle back to the array."

what counterweight? your video does not have a pendulum, and a pendulum implies your design is now bottom heavy, which would not behave in the same manner as your current set up, thats irrelevant because that would change the input


if you show this same thing happening with a bottom heavy set up, or with a perfectly balanced lever then you could easily prove a gain (and your older videos seem to support this)

hello, i give you credit for going with big diameter and weak mags. balance the wheel and show it, if it takes longer than 10 minutes, compress vid, use vegas pro

hello, i give you credit for going with big diameter and weak mags. balance the wheel and show it, if it takes longer than 10 minutes, compress vid, use vegas pro

X00013,
They are not weak magnets and compressing the video will not shorten the time. It will decrease the video quality.

i dont understand what time restrictions have to do with anything, a balanced lever would conclusively show a gain, and if you chose not to use a balanced lever because it didn't work, then it isn't a gain

Bojangles,
I replied this to you. Please take the time to read. When you become a builder and place your videos on YouTube you will notice YouTube does not allow a recording time of over 10 minutes per video.

The reason why I made it slightly top heavy is because of the 10min time limit on YouTube videos. I don’t have all day waiting for the lever to stop floating around (weight less) every time I touch it or wait for it to pick a side and slowly rest before I can take a measurement.

This is a clear as I can reply. If you still don’t get it. Just read it again or sleep on it. You will eventually see what I’m talking about. 

Howard

that way you can show there is basically no input and whatever output you got could be considered gain

Bojangles,
I’m not even worried about the slight imperfection of the weight. For the reasons I have pointed out to you. I’m working on figuring out the best way to measure the Output. If I don’t get a positive gain IN vs OUT I still have the YU Effect to fall back on.

If you still have concerns. Be patience for my next video.

Howard
Video: The Yu Effect – Kinetic energy gain from magnets
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iBtl0OTSccs

I am sorry to say that this design does not produce any free energy. The calculations are all wrong. Lift a rock up with your meter and then drop the rock on it. You will find the same results if not better.
 Another way would be to do away with the magnets and drop the arm from the 11:59 position and take the reading. I bet you get the same reading if not better.
 You will never produce enough energy to take the arm back to the starting point and or past. At least not with the design you are now showing.
  I am not trying to burst your bubble but I do suggest that you think about it more before making such false claims.

 

"@Nightlife,
Your repeating the same points that was already addressed. I don’t see the point of repeating myself over and over. Please read again and stop guessing. Your welcome to do your own test."

 LOL, I had already tested this a couple of years ago and I am telling you that you are not taking into account of the calculations needed. You can not just say the force of the hit is more then the force of the start. You have to calculate the distance in the mix.
 Add the distance from the bottom to the exit and divide it by the drop force and then compare your findings to the start force or add the distance from the bottom to the the start and multiply it by the start force and compare that to the drop force. You have yet to show those figures which you must take into consideration. I did these things already and I am telling you that you are not even close to perpetual motion not to mention your false claims of over unity.

Howard, there was no reason for me to have recorded my test because  there was  no gain to record. I will however give this next link to a u shaped array that I posted to prove to another member that I could pass thru a u shaped curve. The array you are about to see is one I have used many times in many different experiments because it is the best one I have been able to create for this type of use. I refer to this array as the nightlife array.

http://www.youtube.com/user/bcnightlife

 I have since created jigs for making the array. This array has been used to do what you are doing as well as many different ways. The one I am now working on has three arms and four different arrays. I do not record my results unless they are what I hoped for.
 I have started one array at 7 o'clock and ending at 1 o'clock. I would start the draw at 10 o'clock and it would pass over 12 and pass thru the gate at  1 o'clock but it would not go far enough around to be picked back up by the draw at 10 o'clock. I did however find that the arm traveled further around when I started the array at 7 o'clock then it did starting it at 10:00. I also found that the arm went further around starting at 12:01 without magnets then it did with the array starting at 10:00 and ending at 1:00.

Nightlife,
You claim you tested this a couple of years ago? Ok then, lets see it! Where’s your video?  I’m calling you out! I’m telling you can’t get 1.3 pounds from dropping 0.3 pounds from 10 feet. Isn’t the real fact is you’re the one making false claims.

 I doubt you accounted for the weight of the arm which must be factored in.

 You don't want to get into a pissing match with me. I am only trying to help you save some time. I am not book smart but common sense is one of my fortes.