Fausto;
People involved with Bedini Fan SGS's need to really study these
Plengo topic posts carefully because he seems to be presenting
the "missing link" between Bedini motors and overunity energy
production! IMHO.
I have a 12V Bedini fan which doesn't create enough BEMF...
see below. So I can not confirm what Fausto is showing here,
yet. But Fausto should be proud of what he has done so far.
I distinctly hope Fausto has microcontroller development
capabilities.
@ Plengo
I have four 12Volt 2Ah batteries lying around and enough parts so i dicided
to build the circuit (with a 12Volt 200mA fan), just to test the sw1 and the battery behavior.
I found that battery 1 (run battery) is being discharged at very slow rate, battery 2 (run battery) is being slowly charged and battery 3 is slowly being charged.
However, battery 3 won't go over 11.02 Volt!!!
I have tried the 12Volt Fans with the Bedini circuit but these fans
do not create enough Bemf back EMF pulse voltage to overcome
the silicon diode voltage drop plus the battery voltage for the
Charge Battery .
So Simply: "~YOU MUST USE A CONVERTED ~ 48VDC FAN!",
not a 12Volt fan. These 48V fans are surprisingly inexpensive. The
reason is that the 48VDC Fan has more inductance in it's field coils
so it creates a much larger voltage spike. This is an Inhoptep circuit
problem.
By the way what I did was to cut and paste all the text that
plengo has posted on this topic and put it into a text editor and
edited it...I think this is very good evidence of the scientific method.
So the strong points of Plengo's methods;
a) He uses a 48 volt Fan
b) He seems to have found a method to produce
power using the 'balanced" and "unbalanced" state
situation.
---
Weak points;
a) The Bedini motor does not self start, so a method of
self starting is required that uses battery power to do it.
(Else you have a potential for a "hand magnet" too).
b) While I think that max(Voltage batA + Voltage batB + Voltage batC)
is a probably valid way to measure the system state of charge, it is
not a technical proof of the the total energy state of charge
in the system. Just don't get too disappointed if the above is true.
c) damp-out shorting switch arcing with a small value capacitor.
No MHD magnetohydro dynamic energy generation please.
d) A valid microcontroller for this will not be able to watch
7 decimal digit volt meters to detect a voltage change,
this would be too expensive to do in a final system.
But I would like to suggest you look at the following;
You mentioned that the RPM of the fan increases from the
"unbalanced" to the "balanced" state situation. My suggestion is
that you use Fan RPM to designate the system state of charge.
A microcontroller could easily find relative Fan RPM by interfacing to
the field drive signal. The microcontroller would watch relative
Fan RPM and as it maximises it would then go though the system
"unbalancing" sequence. If the sequence is short enough then
it could swap batteries via relays. The microcontroller can still watch
the battery voltage but would not need 7 digits accuracy to do it.
e) Battery swapping takes a largish number of reed relays.
f) radiant energy = static electricity. Static electricity needs
to be isolated from microcontroller hardware.
---
The final goal should be to create a system that can continually
fully runs itself while power a small known load. When the system
runs itself for longer then the batteries could power the load directly
then that is proof of overunity.
:S:MarkSCoffman