Storing Cookies (See : http://ec.europa.eu/ipg/basics/legal/cookies/index_en.htm ) help us to bring you our services at overunity.com . If you use this website and our services you declare yourself okay with using cookies .More Infos here:
https://overunity.com/5553/privacy-policy/
If you do not agree with storing cookies, please LEAVE this website now. From the 25th of May 2018, every existing user has to accept the GDPR agreement at first login. If a user is unwilling to accept the GDPR, he should email us and request to erase his account. Many thanks for your understanding

User Menu

Custom Search

Author Topic: Back to Basics  (Read 151385 times)

Grumpy

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 2247
Re: Back to Basics
« Reply #15 on: August 11, 2009, 03:34:47 PM »
Taught - didn't believe. You apply 480 to a 480/240 transformer and it puts out 240. Put 240 to the secondary and the primary outputs 480.

Charge applied to a wire creates a magnetic field. The magnetic field creates 'conventional' current flow. The magnetic field leads current flow by 45 degrees. The charge leads the magnetic field by 45 degrees.

If you want to produce 'conventional' current flow in a wire you can produce the same magnetic field around the wire that would have been produced if charge was applied to the wire - at the same speed, direction and rotation around the wire.

The hard part is knowing the correct way a magnetic field is produced by current flow.
It isn't a tube-shaped field around the wire. It is a more like a spring but it rotates with the wire at the center.

Sorry.... Been a bit busy...

BEP, I remember you stating once that your training including and additional field.  I thought that it might have also included how the magnetic field is created that drives the electrons/ions to create conventional current.

turbo

  • Guest
Re: Back to Basics
« Reply #16 on: August 11, 2009, 04:25:11 PM »
Why don't you fake the TPU again, maybe you will learn something next time.

Losers like you can only bash others to make up for your own shortcomings. You are right up there with all the other trolls, and your buddy IST.

Keep hiding behind your empty words. 

You'll never "get it", but you sure will pretend that you have it...ROFLMFAO!!!

Your so right.....again.
Thats 3 in a row keep up the good work.


BEP

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 1289
Re: Back to Basics
« Reply #17 on: August 11, 2009, 04:56:22 PM »
BEP, I remember you stating once that your training including and additional field.  I thought that it might have also included how the magnetic field is created that drives the electrons/ions to create conventional current.

Yes. I think you also know I don't usually bring it up as it can start fires  :)

There is no doubt there is a third field (I still doubt 'field' is a proper description as 'field' is only a measurement of something, not that 'something' itself).

Folks always speak in terms of straight line movement. There is no such thing. When I mentioned 'charge' above I'm speaking of two things. Charge is normally thought of as a difference in potential. It is but it is also the spin of that potential. I think this is why a static charge can move a compass needle.

There will be no magnetic field unless charge has movement. Movement cannot happen without time.

If we want to create a usable current flow in a conductor we need to really understand things like induction. I don't believe the common book description is correct as the base theory uses itself to prove itself.

An EM wave is shown as two fields perpendicular to one another, magnetic and electric. Both are depicted and thought of as sinusoidal lines.  This wave isn't the lines. It is what is between the lines. If you can think of it this way you can see an EM sine wave is - at its base - a series of compressions and decompressions. When you have two perpendicular fields you will have angular momentum. It is well known in radio propagation that a transmitted signal always rotates.

So does current flow in a wire and the magnetic field around that wire.

There would be no rotation without a third field. Call it what you want.

There are three basic fields in nature, which manifest mathematically as gradient, divergence and curl, or; tempic, electric and magnetic.

When you understand this you should have a real understanding of why the speed of light can be varied just by the mass it travels. Lately, to the point of taking several minutes to transverse a few feet of crystal. The speed of light is constant. The overall tempic is not constant to the traveler. Only the local tempic is constant to the traveler.

We also need to understand the difference between particle velocity and group velocity. After all, the group velocity of a charge or magnetic field change can do the same as change of velocity of a charge or magnetic field.

Then you get into so-called 'left-handed' actions. This is nothing more than the group velocity being the reverse of particle or wave velocity. You have seen it when watching a fan turn. At some point the blades appear to run backwards. That is negative group velocity. Group velocity can also be far more than velocity of a particle or wave.

So there you have it. Drift current is incredibly slow. It can be mm per second while the force can be seen almost instantaneously at the other end of the wire. This is line charge.
You also have surface charge (skin-effect) and spatial charge (dielectric charge). Of the three the latter is the biggest speed demon. It will not be deterred by a magnetic field as easily as the other two.

This leads into the 'cancellation' thoughts. Total cancellation of a magnetic field is not possible, or is it? If it is then the total absence of a magnetic field means that space must be filled with spatial charge. Parametric pump perhaps?

So, yes. We need to go back to basics. But we must understand what those are.

My comments are not derailments of thought. To me it is just the way it is. The interaction of fields is the ultimate answer.

We also need to stop thinking in linear terms. A toroid is not a straight line. Circumference requires the use of pi in the math. If you want pulses on the control coils to meet those on the collectors you must use pi or they will never meet.

Sorry about the big wind. Must be the coffee  ;D

P.S.

I see we are back to basics  :D Insults, name calling, etc. It is good to see things are going back to normal  ::)

Grumpy

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 2247
Re: Back to Basics
« Reply #18 on: August 11, 2009, 05:53:22 PM »
Thanks, BEP.  Great post.

innovation_station

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5134
Re: Back to Basics
« Reply #19 on: August 11, 2009, 06:07:17 PM »
bep

you rock bro

marco and grumpy get along ......  >:(

grumpy ... when i get moved youll eat your words ... sir!!  :D

 ;D ;D

im not gonna start anything ...

right now ...  my hands have been tied for some time

NOW IM A CUT SOME RUG ....  ;)

you all know how my stuff works ... lol

you can complacate the whole thing with all the big words ...  but it all comes back to the kick ...

 ;D

here is an idea for YOU ALL

if i pulse 1 pulse per min....  and it is say 1 amp at 12 vdc for simplisity i use thease numbers ...

now i cut the pulse ..  i have say 15 v returned at 1.5a ....this is hypoticatlly speeking ...

ok

now do it 10 000 times a second .......  :o :o :o :o :o :o :o  duh ...   how hard was that ... 

so lets say i get an extra 10 watts ... in 1 pulse ....  what will the result be if i do it faster .....  ;D ;)

in ordor to do it faster ... fast release times on the material is important ...  to avoid extra heating and stress on the core material ... and coils ...  feroite works well as does aircore ...

i can go on and on ....  if you like but my words fall on blind eyes .... and def ears ...

ist!

i guess its my fault ...  8)



BEP

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 1289
Re: Back to Basics
« Reply #20 on: August 11, 2009, 06:18:08 PM »
i can go on and on ....  if you like but my words fall on blind eyes .... and def ears ...

Not at all Bro! Some of your posts yank a knot in my tail. I keep thinking I'll get your former location by a news report about a black hole appearing somewhere in the burbs  :D

innovation_station

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5134
Re: Back to Basics
« Reply #21 on: August 11, 2009, 06:32:11 PM »
 ;D ;D

i guess it depends upon dirrection of spinn no ?

 :D

yes i do know ...  if you make an eather spinner in the wrong way ... sure you will open a hole that will burn more than just your tpu ... but if it was done in the other dirrection would it not enfoce the earths feild ....   potencially solveing the uv thing the ozone layer sealing up the holes the in the ionphsere

and keeping the real bad ones out ...  sheeh ... it might even put the plannet back where it should be .... no ?

just rambles and babbles for now ...  ;) :D ;D 8)

me!  ;)

forest

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4076
Re: Back to Basics
« Reply #22 on: August 12, 2009, 12:33:58 AM »
I remember that SM said that TPU is nothing like all other claimed OU devices except maybe Hendershot device. Is that correct ? That would be of great help if I can find if that was really said...

rotaryfcg

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 19
Re: Back to Basics
« Reply #23 on: August 12, 2009, 09:36:49 AM »
Yes. I think you also know I don't usually bring it up as it can start fires  :)

There is no doubt there is a third field (I still doubt 'field' is a proper description as 'field' is only a measurement of something, not that 'something' itself).

Folks always speak in terms of straight line movement. There is no such thing. When I mentioned 'charge' above I'm speaking of two things. Charge is normally thought of as a difference in potential. It is but it is also the spin of that potential. I think this is why a static charge can move a compass needle.

There will be no magnetic field unless charge has movement. Movement cannot happen without time.

If we want to create a usable current flow in a conductor we need to really understand things like induction. I don't believe the common book description is correct as the base theory uses itself to prove itself.

An EM wave is shown as two fields perpendicular to one another, magnetic and electric. Both are depicted and thought of as sinusoidal lines.  This wave isn't the lines. It is what is between the lines. If you can think of it this way you can see an EM sine wave is - at its base - a series of compressions and decompressions. When you have two perpendicular fields you will have angular momentum. It is well known in radio propagation that a transmitted signal always rotates.

So does current flow in a wire and the magnetic field around that wire.

There would be no rotation without a third field. Call it what you want.

There are three basic fields in nature, which manifest mathematically as gradient, divergence and curl, or; tempic, electric and magnetic.

When you understand this you should have a real understanding of why the speed of light can be varied just by the mass it travels. Lately, to the point of taking several minutes to transverse a few feet of crystal. The speed of light is constant. The overall tempic is not constant to the traveler. Only the local tempic is constant to the traveler.

We also need to understand the difference between particle velocity and group velocity. After all, the group velocity of a charge or magnetic field change can do the same as change of velocity of a charge or magnetic field.

Then you get into so-called 'left-handed' actions. This is nothing more than the group velocity being the reverse of particle or wave velocity. You have seen it when watching a fan turn. At some point the blades appear to run backwards. That is negative group velocity. Group velocity can also be far more than velocity of a particle or wave.

So there you have it. Drift current is incredibly slow. It can be mm per second while the force can be seen almost instantaneously at the other end of the wire. This is line charge.
You also have surface charge (skin-effect) and spatial charge (dielectric charge). Of the three the latter is the biggest speed demon. It will not be deterred by a magnetic field as easily as the other two.

This leads into the 'cancellation' thoughts. Total cancellation of a magnetic field is not possible, or is it? If it is then the total absence of a magnetic field means that space must be filled with spatial charge. Parametric pump perhaps?

So, yes. We need to go back to basics. But we must understand what those are.

My comments are not derailments of thought. To me it is just the way it is. The interaction of fields is the ultimate answer.

We also need to stop thinking in linear terms. A toroid is not a straight line. Circumference requires the use of pi in the math. If you want pulses on the control coils to meet those on the collectors you must use pi or they will never meet.

Sorry about the big wind. Must be the coffee  ;D

P.S.

I see we are back to basics  :D Insults, name calling, etc. It is good to see things are going back to normal  ::)

one of the most valuable posts here.

forest

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4076
Re: Back to Basics
« Reply #24 on: August 12, 2009, 04:24:31 PM »
"This leads into the 'cancellation' thoughts. Total cancellation of a magnetic field is not possible, or is it? If it is then the total absence of a magnetic field means that space must be filled with spatial charge. Parametric pump perhaps?"

GIVE ME AN ANSWER PLEASE! How to cancel magnetic field ?
Can two magnetic field coexists in the same space or they interact each other pushing or attracting ? This IS the key to Free Energy

giantkiller

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 2791
    • http://www.planetary-engineering.com
Re: Back to Basics
« Reply #25 on: August 12, 2009, 06:00:36 PM »
The Kunel patent shows a way to accomplish this. Then the reconnect.

"This leads into the 'cancellation' thoughts. Total cancellation of a magnetic field is not possible, or is it? If it is then the total absence of a magnetic field means that space must be filled with spatial charge. Parametric pump perhaps?"

GIVE ME AN ANSWER PLEASE! How to cancel magnetic field ?
Can two magnetic field coexists in the same space or they interact each other pushing or attracting ? This IS the key to Free Energy

otto

  • elite_member
  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1215
Re: Back to Basics
« Reply #26 on: August 12, 2009, 06:49:56 PM »
Hello all,

@forest

a total cancellation IS possible. I have 2 compasses inside my 1 ring TPU and a magnetic needle hanging over my TPU and the needles dont move. No magnetic field!!

Im only pulsating my copper core. Copper is not magnetic.

@ to a honoured member of this forum who has sent me a PM

1. its clear that we need 3 collectors. But Im talking about TUNED collectors.
So, as I saw, the collectors are only a few turns for each frequency. As they are not so long, they are not heavy.

2. yesterday I wrote about a core. Who said to use an iron core in a TPU???
I WAS TALKING ABOUT A  COPPER CORE!! And I have one. Weight of my core??

1 ring of my copper core = 2 POUNDS!!! = around 17 turns for my 15" TPU.

3. Buddy, its your work and I dont want to prove you right or wrong.

@All

DAMN IT, would somebody tell us all why a 4" TPU has the weight of 1 POUND??? Maybe there are really bananas inside??

NO dont say its the copper from the collectors or controls!!! I dont want to read such a crap about loooooooong coils. A very long time I saw that a TPU has only short coils.

So, again, what is sooooo heavy in a TPU??

Otto

PS: a time ago I have bought sixty (60) pounds of thin copper. Guess why??

BEP

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 1289
Re: Back to Basics
« Reply #27 on: August 12, 2009, 06:56:55 PM »
"This leads into the 'cancellation' thoughts. Total cancellation of a magnetic field is not possible, or is it? If it is then the total absence of a magnetic field means that space must be filled with spatial charge. Parametric pump perhaps?"

GIVE ME AN ANSWER PLEASE! How to cancel magnetic field ?
Can two magnetic field coexists in the same space or they interact each other pushing or attracting ? This IS the key to Free Energy

Understand that the post of mine you reference is my opinion.

Think of magnetic flux as a body of water. You can make many different disturbances, ripples, focal points in that one body of water. Call each one of those a field.

If you draw magnetic field lines of any magnet then continue to extend those lines they will be part of the next largest or local magnet.

You can't have two or more magnetic fields in the same place and time because they are all part of the same whole. The best you can do is deflect, bend, twist and most difficult, break the connection.

Key to free energy? Maybe.

It takes a great deal of force to break a field line. The amount of charge released during the reconnection is supposed to be great. Will it be more than the force needed to break the connection? Some scientists seem to think so.

One thing is clear to me. You can create a small area of extremely low magnetic flux. When you do that the same area becomes highly positively charged.

If you wish to experiment with this you should do your own research. I don't see a point in it here as I can't say it has a great deal to do with a TPU.

Grumpy

  • TPU-Elite
  • Hero Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 2247
Re: Back to Basics
« Reply #28 on: August 12, 2009, 10:27:30 PM »
Is the magnetic field around a current carrying wire circular or radial?


I know that eveyone is told that it is circular, but is it?

forest

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4076
Re: Back to Basics
« Reply #29 on: August 12, 2009, 11:42:28 PM »
Ed Leedscalnin said it is whirl in spiral propagating straight  and I tend to agree