Looks like we need a ' We can't live without "humor" ' forum on this site.

Regards...

So it's probably a focused beam high-gain transmitter and receiver.

What does everybody think of this true or false



posted by power technology  September 11, 2008, 01:52:31 PM on elemental rod thread


Hi,

I am new to the group. The reason that I joined is because someone
 told me that this is the best alternative and free-energy group on the net.
 My partner and I are always on the lookout for the elusive Free-Energy Device
 that really works. I was really surprised to see Dr. Schwartz's ERR
Technology being discussed in the group. My company is very familiar with his research.     
I first met Dr. Schwartz back in Jan. of 1998 when my wife and I went to the Philippines
 to visit her parents. While we were there her father asked if I would like to go with
 him to a lecture at the University of the Philippines. The lecture was about alternative
 energy given by Dr. J. B. Schwartz from the Noahs Ark Research Foundation. The
lecture started at 8 am and ended at 12 noon. During the whole four hour lecture
 Dr. Schwartz powered his public address system, an old 17 in. black and white
television and two 100-watt
 light bulbs. He spoke about many different kinds of alternative energy but the
one that I was most impressed with was has Electromagnetic Radiation Receiver that
 he was powering all his equipment with. At first I was skeptical about his ERR as
he called it because it looked too small and light to be used to run all his equipment.

His ERR device consisted of two rods which I believed to be nano-tubes, two copper
 coils on two very strong magnets about an inch or more apart, a complicated looking
circuit board, a small DC volt meter and some three prong electrical outlets all
 mounted on a thin piece of plywood. At the beginning of his lecture I noticed that
the reading on the voltmeter was reading 15.4 to 16.6 DC volts and after four hours
later it was still reading the same.

I asked him if the ERR could be moved from the table to another part of the room and
still produce power. He agreed and unplugged his pa system and allowed three people
from the audience to carry the ERR, the television and the inverter to different parts
 of the room and it didn't seem to affect its power output at all. We were also
allowed to examine the table and it proved to be a light-folding table. I found no
source of power other than the ERR itself. The only thing that I found to be strange
was when I used his metal ruler to test the magnets; I accidentally put the ruler
 across both magnets and the power shut down. Dr. Schwartz seemed to be a little
 upset because of the difficulty pulling the metal ruler off the magnets. After
the ruler was removed the power came back on. When I asked him why the power went
off he said that I shouldn't short the magnets because it could damage the
 unit. He seemed irritated with me so I didn't persist any farther.
         
After his lecture I asked him if he could meet with my company to talk about
possible investment in his ERR technology but he didn't seem too interested
in taking to investors.

Soon after returning to the US I was able to convince my partner that it would be
 worth it if we donated $100,000 to the Noah's Ark Research Foundation.
 About a month later the money was returned to our bank. After many emails
 Dr. Schwartz replied, I don't except money from investors.
I figured that he was pissed at me because I shorted his unit. I later found out
 from a source in Arizona that hes financially well off plus hes
 a save the world freak and a very difficult person to work with.

My partner thinks that he must have been transmitting the power from outside the
 room and picking it up with his ERR but I don't think so. He also thought
that he made bank interest on our money before he sent it back so I checked with
 Dr. Schwartz's bank and they said that no interest was made on our money.
 They said that they had instructions from Dr. Schwartz to return the money to the
 sender and that he didn't give any reason.
 
For several years I hadn't heard much about Dr. Schwartz's ERR until
 2003 when I went to Japan to see a device at the University of Tokushima. After
 seeing both Dr. Schwartz's ERR back in 1998 and the one at the University
 of Tokushima in 2003 I'm now convinced that both are using the same
 basic technology.

I'm surprised nobody mentioned the properties of bismuth and that it is diamagnetic. 
Here's a link to levitating magnets using bismuth.

http://www.fieldlines.com/other/diamag1.html

This EER device, could very well be simular to a generator I saw a few years ago.  Due to the diamagnetic material, a coil will begin to self resonate.  He does say he uses a transmiter (to stimulate the plates)

Interesting device, I hope it's not galvanic action
EM

Yeah I guess a sligthly less probable alternative would be that it's one of those old radiant Tesla ideas coupled with some metamaterial focusing.

@markdansie,
you have to look beyond what you see to get an idea
whats real or phony.Example in the ERR video the doctor says about connecting with the earth,
well immediately you think hes using the con mans book"How to fool people for proft",ha ha.
 He starts the device it begins counting then it locks,then the doctor makes a comment,
funny stuff.
People here react to this in a very nasty way,con man,fraud.You have to look beyond this,
the doctor said that
a special pulse at a frequency has to be applied to get a voltage output,so first step you
 sweep across different frequencies to get an idea the range needed to generate voltage,
very easy thing just move the unit around,
when it moves it must have a different locking frequency,next
you make a program using a programable frequency generator.You sample the output voltage
you start at the  beginning of the range of frequencies that gives you the effect,you sample
the voltage, no voltage ,increment frequency
you sample and increment untill a votage appears,then you stop thats the lock.
As for the doctors intention I think that he hopes that he can perfect
the technology and then,open source part of it and sell part of it or lease it.However that
can't happen heres why,He like the tpu's inventor doesn't know how it works,so can't perfect it
thats why its flaky ,only if you know how exactly it works can you perfect it
and limit the bad effects.The right hand ,left hand materials is silly,it takes energy to move electrons
because a material is left hand makes no difference it still takes energy to move electrons.This device
and the tpu are energy converters
they convert an unknown energy source into a different form this is allowed under conventional physics,
they are not free energy devices,
the tpu people on
 this site have tried to figure out what it is for years and haven't yet,steven mark the inventor of the
 tpu didn't have a clue what the energy source is and  only that it works and said so recently.

Looks like we need a ' We can't live without "humor" ' forum on this site.

Regards...

http://www.iwise.com/3Wog4

 

@harvey
I agree with you that I feel the rods and the ERR are not connected. I believe the rods worked but were too costly and eventually ran down. if you like an expensive battery. I fear there may have been other issues like radiation or just plain dangerous materials in them. However I only am guessing.
The ERR is a new kettle of fish. I must admit I am curious to see how it is powered. Has me baffled at the moment.I guess the reason I remain open is the field of left handed materials is still a mystery.
Here is a radio interview. This might give some insights into the man more than the technology.
 
http://www.achieveradio.com/archplayer.php?showname=The%20%20Progressive%20Technology%20Hour%20with%20William%20Alek&ShowURL=http://audio.achieveradio.com/vortex-net-tech/Dec-13-2008-at-11-00AM---Vortex-Net-Technology.mp3