An hour plus lecture deserves of an elaborate response, and multiple questions.

I have never witnessed a greater amount of chest-knocking as an introduction. It quite put me off, to be honest with you. Experience, consultant, research, vision, cutting edge, etc, etc. Just show your stuff, don't start telling how great you are. Good thing the fortune teller was in agreement with you, I'll pay extra attention now.
You may well be the most educated and enlightened person on earth since Tesla. But then, there is no real need to tell people you are. Modesty is an easy vitue to excel at. Simply keep it a little secret from your audience how great you really are.

With this first impression I'll now try to get through the full introduction, and then the actual lecture.

(I made it through, shaking my head many a time)

I was bracing myself to hear something really great now (like the Marko Rodin lecture, make sure you see that all the way through before you ever use the word research to refer to your hobby), and held off posting my honest first impression.

All I got to see was you jumping to conclusions, based off other experimenters' (guess)work, and presenting it as your discoveries and "research" and "things that cannot be made up". Research in the historic sense is reading a lot on a topic or occurance. Not sure this also goes in free energy and anti-gravity research.

Perhaps you were talking to gullable children there, forced to keep it simple. I'm not educated at all, but I'd like to hear, in your words, the "good stuff".

Looking forward to seeing that bell device though. Looked like something that someone of you statue should be able to put together in a couple of spare hours. It's hardly cutting edge in terms of components or constructions, although if it works, surely the components add up to more than their sum. I do expect there to be an effect actually, as you're not the first to come with this. Much more advanced designs have been shown, like a 3-axis gyro rather than your one-axis counterrotating one.

I'd like to hear an explanation for the reverse saucer outside ring of the supposed German pictures. Purely aerodynamic?

Also I'd be interested to see the mass those stuck together magnets offer show on a scale and wooden balance, compared to all components seperately. An object falling at 30mph through air isn't all that conclusive when it makes up a 1% height advantage over another. Air drag is not a factor out of the equasion.

An hour and a half which I'll never get back. Glad this is my leave day from work, just to recharge my batteries. I propose you to not lecture, and certainly not list your full credentials again before you come up with something NEW. All people are equal, and additional respect is earned by other people discovering you, not from you educating them on you.

That prototype bell really can't be hard to make from your own drawings. Breakthrough...maybe when it works. Now, you've got a drawing based off other people's ideas.
I'm unimpressed, but honestly hope to be. I really do want the good stuff.